Today's Journalism: Stimulus, Investigating Bush, and Wall Street Bailout

by: Chris Bowers

Thu Jan 15, 2009 at 13:11


Today, I placed calls into several congressional offices, looking into the stimulus package, investigations of the Bush administration, and the second phase of the Wall Street bailout. Here is what I found:

1. Foreclosure relief and bankruptcy reform not in the stimulus: With a draft outline of the stimulus package currently circulating, I contacted a congressional aide who confirmed to me that the provisions of HR 225 and S 61, allowing bankruptcy judges to re-write mortgages according to current home values, did not appear to be included and was overall unlikely to be included. Given our efforts on this front earlier in the week, this is unfortunate. However, the aide expressed optimism that this aspect of foreclosure relief and bankruptcy reform would be attached to a near-future, omnibus Foreclosure Relief bill that House Finance Chair Frank will be moving forward later in the session (aka, later this year).

2. How will Senator Whitehouse investigate the Bush administration? Pursuant to Senator Sheldon Whitehouse's comments on NPR two days ago, that he intended to investigate the outgoing Bush administration:

One Democratic senator who sits on both the Judiciary and Intelligence committees said Congress does need to see the secret legal opinions drafted for Vice President Dick Cheney by the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel. Rhode Island's Sheldon Whitehouse considers those opinions a blot on the Justice Department.

"I think that there's a lot that remains to look at, and I appreciate that President Obama doesn't want to make it his purpose as a new president, with America in real distress in many directions, to go back and look at all this, but I think we in Congress have an independent responsibility, and I fully intend to discharge that responsibility," Whitehouse said.

I called Senator Whitehouse's press office to see if the Senator intended to introduce mirror legislation to HR 104, a bill by House Judiciary Chair Conyers to create an independent commission to investigate Bush-era crimes. The press office did not know at this time, but they would get back to me in a day or two once they have the answer.

3. Will there be new conditions, transparency and oversight on bailout funding? Finally, pursuant to a Politico article that Senate Banking Chairman Dodd might not introduce mirror legislation to House Finance Chair Frank's HR 384, which places tough conditions, transparency and oversight on the use of TARP money:

Obama's team will draft a letter laying out some assurances on how it would spend the money, and Dodd says it should be broadened beyond the financial sector to include commitments to help stave off home foreclosures, more accountability and tighter requirements on executive compensation for private companies that receive TARP funds.

Dodd said he's prepared to draft legislation, mirroring a bill proposed by Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass) last week, to call for a broadening of the TARP program and for more oversight, but he said that a letter from Obama's team - instead of additional legislation - could be sufficient to alleviate concerns in Congress.

I called Senator Dodd's office and asked if Senator Dodd intended to introduce mirror legislation to HR 384 (which is currently being debated in the House). No response has been received at this time. I will have to keep trying.

****

These are three of the stories I am following right now. We have entered a new moment where not only are Democrats actually passing a huge amount of legislation, but where they are willing to talk to progressive media about it. As such, if you want me to look into other aspects of these stories, or into other congressional stories altogether, I can do so. Let me know what you want to see in the comments. The doors really are open right now. Let's take advantage of this.

Update: As per the comments, I have added broadband and high-speed rail funding as the next issues I will make inquiries about. And, keep in mind that I started asking Dodd's office about mirror legislation because of commenter debcoop, too. I really will take your concerns to the Hill. Just let me know.

Chris Bowers :: Today's Journalism: Stimulus, Investigating Bush, and Wall Street Bailout

Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
High speed rail (4.00 / 5)
According to the latest reports, only $10 billion of the $825 billion stimulus is allotted towards rail and mass transit.

In addition, I know that Senators Kerry & Specter have been working on a standalone bill to dedicate $23 billion towards rail projects.

Finally, there has been word that the next omnibus transportation bill will dedicate a higher percentage towards mass transit (fingers crossed).

Perhaps you could call Senator Kerry's office and ask whether there is an effort to increase the amount of stimulus money going towards rail projects, why the current amount is so low (especially since Obama was talking in December about the biggest infrastructure investments since the National Highway Program), and whether the money will go only towards "shovel-ready" projects or whether some of the funds will go towards engineering and planning for future projects.


Very good (4.00 / 1)
I will do that. More money for high-speed rail!

[ Parent ]
also (0.00 / 0)
You could perhaps call the office of Joe "Amtrak" Biden to see where he stands on this. I think he is still a senator until a bit later today.

[ Parent ]
If I have time (4.00 / 1)
Working on some broadband stuff right now. High-speed rail will probably have to wait until either later in the afternoon, or tomorrow morning.

Great suggestion though.


[ Parent ]
excellent (4.00 / 1)
Just what I was going to suggest. By the way, if you're wondering what a large and powerful nation actually investing in the future looks like:

In an amazing move towards converting their entire country towards sustainability, China is underway rebuilding its entire transportation system from the ground up.  They now realize that cars and oil have no future.  China is building an amazing 5,000 miles of brand new high speed trains comparable to the French TGV (200+ mph), all of which will be open for business in just 2 short years!  In addition, China is building 36 brand new, full size metro systems - each to cover an entire city.  The new Shanghai metro system will be the largest in the world when complete - larger than London's extensive system.  China's massive, fast track green transportation construction project is unprecedented in the history of the world, and will completely transform China towards sustainability by drastically reducing their need for oil and cars.


[ Parent ]
wow (0.00 / 0)
I wish we had that kind of dedication to mass transit in our government. Hopefully we don't have to wait until our population density matches China to actually do it.

[ Parent ]
Would be different (0.00 / 0)
I know this is often a conservative talking point against doing anything, but it is true that in the U.S. environmental and labor concerns as well as a higher cost of labor would simply not make something on that scale, in that time frame, very feasible.

Now, could we do the same thing in a little bit longer? Yes. Should we? Yes.

I support John McCain because children are too healthy anyway.


[ Parent ]
we should be pushing to expand the stimulus on a progressive front (0.00 / 0)
There's $30 billion in the stimulus outline for roads/bridges type stuff, and only $10 billion for mass transit.  Energy efficiency and education are also sorely lacking, and even though the stimulus outline estimates that each dollar put into broadband expansion yields a ten-fold increase in the economy, only $6 billion is being put into it.  And I certainly wouldn't mind having less in tax cuts and more funding to keep state/local governments afloat.

John McCain <3 lobbyists

since the GOP is jumping off (4.00 / 1)
there is no reason to keep so many tax cuts in the bill.

ON MSNBC right now, I've heard that House Republicans and even Senate Republicans are not happy with the spending in the bill. It's obvious that Obama's hope of getting 80 votes in the Senate is a pipe dream. He should cut away all of those business tax cuts and put the money towards infrastructure.

Trust me, even Republican voters are in favor of infrastructure spending. The GOP probably won't vote for this bill anyway, so we should at least make sure it works.


[ Parent ]
Other braodband issues (4.00 / 2)
I am also looking into concerns that the $6 billion will go direct to telecos that haven't done anything with subsidies they have received in the past. There are also concerns about noncompetition regulation being gutted to go with the $6 billion.

Broadband is #1 on my radar right now. High speed rail #2. I'll have more on both either later today, or tomorrow morning.


[ Parent ]
mass transit in the stimulus (4.00 / 1)
definitely could use a boost -- I think goal to aim for would be parity with highway and other non-rail transportation spending.

However, there is already a lot of money for energy efficiency in there -- based on the detailed summary posted at TPM, I count almost $25 billion in funding to directly improve energy efficiency, another $20 billion in grants for school modernization (at least some of which will go to improving efficiency), another several billion in grants for research into more efficient technologies, and $19 billion for improving the electric grid and boosting use of renewable energy technology. Compared to only $2.4 billion for carbon sequenstration, it seems that the stimulus package actually has priorities in the right place as far as energy is concerned (lots of funding for efficiency and proven renewables, little funding for speculative, unproven technology).

All this notwithstanding, I think the entire spending component of the stimulus plan could increase by a factor of 2.  


[ Parent ]
Green Jobs, energy efficiency, renewables, ecological restoration, mass transit - GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE, period. (4.00 / 1)
Hi Chris,

Thanks for doing this.  You have a greater level of access to policymakers than most in the progressive blogosphere, and opening up the floor in this way is a generous and laudable use of your resources.

Above in the comments, several folks spoke up about mass transit allocations as part of the infrastructure portion of the stimulus (which David Sirota points out may be a pitifully small $85 billion in the post before yours).



I'd like to broaden that inquiry to the larger question of infrastructure spending.

The first issue is size - I believe it should be a priority for the Netroots to advocate for more spending on infrastructure relative to that spent on tax cuts (even on tax cuts for the poor and middle class).  

An even greater issue is one of priority - what's at stake is whether we blow our wad of cash on short-term or long-term progressive interests.  We don't get to do deficit spending every day, and we don't get this kind of an opportunity even every decade.  I believe the vast bulk of our spending in the stimulus should be on what might broadly be termed green infrastructure, for the creation of green jobs.



This means a lot more than mass transit.  We're talking energy efficiency and renewable energy projects, urban and minority population job retraining, and ecological restoration of national parks and other public lands (strangely left off many wish lists).  

Who's pushing these priorities?  How can we help them?  I posted about some of the interesting green legislation in the comments on the Progressive Legislation Monitoring project, but no currently-proposed legislation directly fills all these goals.  The stimulus could be the "silver buckshot" we need to solve the climate crisis.

Can you find out our status in this critical area?  


I don't know about the rest of you (0.00 / 0)
but I am feeling very angry over the bailouts.

If you or I overextend ourselves they tell us to fuck ourselves and we'd lose everything.

They overextend themselves - often criminally - and we get told "we need to prop them up with taxpayer money"

If corporations want equal protection as per People of the State of California vs Central Pacific Railroad Co/Southern Pacific Railroad Co then the slack/debt forgiveness etc needs to go both ways.

This whole economic meltdown and the resulting response should no doubt illustrate to everyone here how much of a plutocracy the United States has become.  


Thanks for your responsiveness, Chris (0.00 / 0)
This blog just entered a brave new world.

Infrastructure Bank? (4.00 / 2)
Thanks Chris for this hard work. What ever happened to the idea (from Dodd?) about funding an infrastructure bank? Is that on anyone's radar? That seems an obvious way to force infrastructure funding on to a multi-year footing.

Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search