Monday Night Congressional Happenings

by: Chris Bowers

Mon Jan 26, 2009 at 22:30


Some items of note happening in Congress:

  1. "Cram-down" bankruptcy and mortgage reform being marked up in House Judiciary committee: Just yesterday came the final word that "cram-down" bankruptcy mortgage reform was not going to be in the stimulus package. However, the House is not wasting any time pushing it through as separate legislation, and it is already being marked up in the House Judiciary committee. No word on the chances of this legislation passing the Senate just yet, but the rapid turnaround in the fortunes of this legislation is welcome.

  2. Broadband grants pass with Net Neutrality intact: There was a lot of worry in the media reform community that the new grants for broadband would happen only with a gutting of regulations on network neutrality. Fortunately, from what I have heard, this aspect of the stimulus appears to have passed through the committee markups in the House and Senate with the Net Neutrality regulations intact. There is still worry that the $6 billion for broadband in the stimulus will turn into corporate welfare, though. Tim Karr has more on this at the Huffington Post.

  3. Timothy Geithner is confirmed as Treasury Secretary. By a vote of 60-34 in the Senate, Timothy Geithner has been confirmed as Treasury Secretary. Four members of the Democratic Senate caucus voted no: Robert Byrd, Russ Feingold, Tom Harkin and Bernie Sanders. Feingold's no vote is surprising, as he rarely votes against Presidential appointees. Ten Republicans voted in favor of confirming Geithner. While I would have been fine with him being defeated, this is really a "meh."

  4. John Conyers continues investigation of Bush administration. While discussion of investigation the Bush administration has often been couched in hypothetical terms, House Judiciary Chair John Conyers today showed that such investigations are currently ongoing. A few hours ago, Conyers subpoenaed Karl Rove, as part of an ongoing investigation of Karl Rove, former Attorney General Michael Mukaksey, former White House consul and Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers and former White House Cheif of Staff Josh Bolton that was actually written into the judiciary rules package. So much for hypotheticals, or for looking forward rather than back. Let the investigations continue!

  5. In advance of tomorrow's action to try and push the DeFazio amendment to increase high-speed rail funding in the stimulus package, I was wondering if anyone had a list of legislative directors for Democratic members of the House Rules committee. For that matter, a complete list of House legislative directors would be extremely useful. The reason for this is that, as I am coming to understand it, citizen lobbying is far more effective if it is aimed at legislative directors rather than simply leaving comments with the front desks of congressional offices. It is worth noting that the Rules committee also appears to contain many progressives, and should be fertile ground for our action.
Lots of action in Capitol Hill, and also in the White House. Isn't it great to actually be governing? :)

Update: DeFazio ammendment withdrawn:

We received word this afternoon that Rep. DeFazio's amendment that would have provided $2 billion in assistance to transit agencies was required to be withdrawn. We'll post more as we learn it, but had something to do with parliamentary issues.

If you called Rep. Slaughter on the Rules Committee today, we thank you very much for your support and effort to get that crucial funding included in the economic recovery package. (And we point out that calls to her should no longer be made.)

Frak. I didn't act fast enough on this one. Still learning about how these things work.

Chris Bowers :: Monday Night Congressional Happenings

Tags: , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Not a good comment from leadership in the House (4.00 / 2)
From the Hill.

Pelosi should have a better indication of how many caucus fires she needs to put out after the results of a preliminary whip count on Tuesday afternoon, a veteran Democratic aide said.

"Right now it seems throughout the caucus like nobody's happy with this," the aide said. "Maybe that's the sign of a good bill - that nobody's happy with it. But there are problems with the Blue Dogs, the New Dems, the liberals, even all of the freshmen who voted to disapprove of the bailout.

"And the real problem comes after Wednesday when it comes back from the Senate and it's even bigger," the aide said.

Uh...Or maybe the bill needs a lot more improvement anonymous veteran Democratic aide.

If I were Oberstar or DeFazio, I'd be working to Blue Dogs to get them to support more direct infrastructure spending since projects in a member's home district seem to melt away all concerns about a budget deficit (unless you're Jim Cooper).  


Also.... (4.00 / 1)
it doesn't seem to be the smartest strategy at this point that they're obviously concerned mostly about the size of the package (i.e. "...the real problem comes....when it comes back...and it's even bigger"). Perhaps they should be most concerned about getting a package that's large enough to actually get us out of a huge recession. Not one that stays below some arbitrary number. Sigh....time to start looking for jobs on the hill.  

[ Parent ]
we can in this (0.00 / 0)
on maddow sirota was saying he thinks the bill is going to be out there for another few weeks at least an that will be better for progressives-gives more time to push like hell for a btter bill. or it will be so watered down it will be in jeopardy in congress as many dems may so no go. we have a good chance to win this.

[ Parent ]
I think you're right (0.00 / 0)
the most important word there is "we". The house and senate leadership really need to know that there is a groundswell of support for more direct spending and less business tax cuts and more support for rail and public transit in particular. If DeFazio's amendment gets ruled in order, then all we have is another 5 billion to get back to Oberstar's original number.  

[ Parent ]
Why is it a surprise Feingold voted against Geithner? .. (0.00 / 0)
Geithner has proven himself not exactly the most adept at handling the current crisis .. just like "B-52" Ben sat besides Greenspan and said nothing .. so did Geithner sit by and do nothing while the economy collapsed .. does any commenter here have any confidence in Geithner? .. my guess is  .. probably not .. the obvious problem is .. Krugman doesn't want the job .. and probably neither does Stiglitz .. and probably no one asked Roubini .. and I am sure Obama asked Warren Buffett ..  but Buffett said no .. so who else is there?

Did Feingold (0.00 / 0)
vote against any Bush admin. appointees?

[ Parent ]
Didn't he vote against Alito? .. (0.00 / 0)
I know he voted for Roberts .. but I am pretty sure he voted against Alito .. and I am pretty sure he voted against Gonzo as AG as well

[ Parent ]
yeah (4.00 / 1)
He voted against Gonzo, too - that's another one.

[ Parent ]
Interesting how he voted for Roberts, but not Obama (0.00 / 0)
Obama really surprised me on that one, given his centrist and accomodationist tendencies. Perhaps he hadn't decided to run for president yet.

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton

[ Parent ]
yes (0.00 / 0)
He voted against the Mukasey nomination. And he also voted against Alito, who's supreme court, not cabinet, but a major appointment nonetheless.

Not sure if there were others or not.


[ Parent ]
Isn't there a congressional "facebook"? (0.00 / 0)
Not the Internet 2.0 web site Facebook, but an actual book that contains the names of every member of congress, with photos (and thus the name), and salient info, including their top staff, which would presumably include their legislative directors.

I've never seen one myself, never having worked in politics, but--don't laugh--I heard about it while watching the West Wing, which was written by people who've done this for a living, so I assume that they didn't just make it up. Nor do I know where and how to get one. But surely there are ones compiled by special interest groups that would need to know such things, like corporate lobbyists, major labor unions, AARP, ACLU, etc.

Also, not to harp on it, but I find that watching the West Wing is an excellent primer into the technical nuts and bolts of how politics works. It's getting to be a bit dated with each passing year, its context being a fairly liberal Democratic president working with a GOP-controlled congress that's dominated by its far-right wing. I.e. a more liberal version of Clinton in the Gingrich and DeLay 90's. But the technical stuff and dialogue is incredible, and I often have to rewind just to get all the nuances. Hugely recommended.

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton


I think there is .. (0.00 / 0)
I am not sure whether it is available just to Congressional staffs(and even if it is .. I am sure plenty of lobbyists have them)

[ Parent ]
I'm guessing that there's more than one (0.00 / 0)
I wonder if someone who knows how to put such things together could put up a Wiki-like web site specifically for such a purpose, to be edited and added to as needed by authorized people, but readable for anyone with web access? Once the technical stuff is assembled, the content could probably be fully fleshed out by a small army of authorized users within weeks. And it's not like we lack such people by now. Since none of this would be confidential or privileged info, even congressional staffers could contribute, with their boss's permission.

I don't mean a subsection of Facebook and such, but a separate, standalone site, with an exhaustive list of every member of congress and their staff and bio and contact info, and perhaps every department and agency head and their top assistants and deputies and their info, updated and expanded as needed and possible. Among other things, it would really help with action alerts and putting together strategies for influencing legislation.

Another feature could be past, in-process and possible future legislation, with the full text, markups, amendments, roll calls, links to relevant information, etc. I've got to believe that such a collaborative tool already exists, but if one doesn't, we sure could use one.

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton


[ Parent ]
Yes (4.00 / 1)
There are print publications that come out quarterly, the Congressional Yellow Book for example. However, these tend to be ridiculously expensive. They eventually float down to the larger libraries (Like College Libraries), but generally not until the following quarter.

Similarly, Legistorm provides staff listings (and their salaries), but the info tends to be couple months old.

Congress.org has senior staff information, and some of the interest groups or media organizations (The Nation has one) sometimes have information on staffers, but, once again, there are so many staffers that its difficult to keep track of comings and goings.  


[ Parent ]
As I proposed above (0.00 / 0)
A free Wiki-like web site could be put together, and with enough qualified people contributing to and maintaining it, could become a very useful up to the minute, detailed, relevant and accurate resource for political activists, and beyond. In fact, I'd guess that it could become self-supporting with ads fairly quickly, given the likely usage if it proved to be properly done. I mean, the technology isn't exactly rocket science these days, and it's not like any of this is privileged information. Who works for whom doing what where isn't a big secret. You just have to be an insider to know it. With enough people contributing and maintained properly, the overlap would likely quickly fill in all needed details, and then some.

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton

[ Parent ]
Obama Admin Concedes Family Planning Expansion in Bill (0.00 / 0)
obama admin concedes expansion of family planning after gop criticsm of it. oy
http://www.latimes.com/news/na...

There's going to be give and take on nearly every bill (0.00 / 0)
Especially the huge ones, so I wouldn't necessarily read too much into his or the Dems being willing to concede or not fight too strongly for this or that provision. This may well find its way into an upcoming bill. Plus, anything to do with family planning or "social" issues is going to slow things down, or at least cost political capital, and they're not going to spend it on anything that isn't seen at top priority right now.

I'm going to wait a while to assess the overall thrust of his and Dems' negotiating stance, to see how much overall they concede, or fight for. Only then will we be able to tell how committed they are to a progressive agenda, both principally and politically. But the priorities right now are the economy, Iraq, foreign policy, national security, infrastucture, restoring the constitution, etc., and these sorts of thing, however important, are going to get less priority.

Of course if, after 6 or more months, he doesn't start addressing these other issues, or concedes point after point, then we'll have cause to worry. But I wouldn't necessarily be upset if this or that item gets punted right now. They can't do it all right away, there are priorities and constraints, and they're still figuring out how you do things when you're in charge.

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton


[ Parent ]
Yes, there is a directory (0.00 / 0)
It is maintained by the Friends Committee on National Legislation.  the peace movement relies on it.

http://capwiz.com/fconl/direct...

you can click on the Rules Committee and find every member of the committee.  Then click on each member, click staff, and find the legislative directors.  It does not give direct extensions for the individual staff members, and it does not have pictures of the staff.  But it is a great resource for citizen lobbyists.


Seriously. . . (0.00 / 0)
I wish the US would take public ownership of the telecom/internet infrastructure already instead of leaving it to the foot-dragging corporate world. We lag so far behind the rest of the world it's pathetic and embarrassing.

Telephone, cable & internet are as much national infrastructure now as roads and bridges. And removing the delivery backbone from corporate hands would finally mean real competition between broadband, television and other telecom/internet providers. And public expansion to cover the entire country would be serious economic stimulus.


Arggghhhh!!!!! (0.00 / 0)
I guess it's time to move onto the senate.

One question though, I keep hearing mumblings how this bill is supposed to grow in size as it moves forward. But everyone seems to be sticking to the 825 bn number. Are the CBO numbers keeping people from adding to the stimulus bill? Do we have to wait for conference to get rail and public transit added back in?

Where's the best place in the legislative process to lobby to get these additional funds added? Senate Approp.? Senate Floor? Or Conference Committee?


Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search