The Rantings of Legislative Terrorists

by: David Sirota

Thu Jan 29, 2009 at 13:16


How do you know House Republicans aren't negotiating in good faith and are acting as legislative terrorists? Because their rantings are verifiably crazy (h/t Steve Benen):

Representative Virginia Foxx, Republican of North Carolina, said that former President George Bush's signature tax cuts in 2001 had created years of growth but that the nation's problems started when Democrats regained majorities in Congress in the 2006 elections.

Again, only legislative terrorists desperate to sabotage the economy would make such deliberately insane statements. Only legislative terrorists would insist that the economy was Teh Awesome under George W. Bush. Only legislative terrorists would ignore the basic facts that most Americans innately know, and that were perfectly summarized by Washington Post:

President Bush has presided over the weakest eight-year span for the U.S. economy in decades, according to an analysis of key data, and economists across the ideological spectrum increasingly view his two terms as a time of little progress on the nation's thorniest fiscal challenges.

The number of jobs in the nation increased by about 2 percent during Bush's tenure, the most tepid growth over any eight-year span since data collection began seven decades ago. Gross domestic product, a broad measure of economic output, grew at the slowest pace for a period of that length since the Truman administration. And Americans' incomes grew more slowly than in any presidency since the 1960s, other than that of Bush's father.

And only legislative terrorists would keep repeating lies that claim - despite overwhelming data to the contrary - that Bush-style tax cuts are a better way to create jobs and boost GDP than infrastructure spending.

As I said before, America doesn't negotiate with international terrorists because if we did, we would validate and empower the most destructive people and ideologies. Likewise, Democrats shouldn't negotiate with legislative terrorists in the Republican Party, not only because Republicans have almost no legislative power, but because negotiating with legislative terrorists validates and empowers them to sabotage the economy.

David Sirota :: The Rantings of Legislative Terrorists

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Kerry Opposes tax cuts in bill (4.00 / 3)
kerry agrees-he wants tax cuts removed and a better stim bill
http://www.politico.com/news/s...

tax cuts may go (4.00 / 1)
HUFFPO-dems may yan tax cuts
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

[ Parent ]
They better ... (4.00 / 2)
and Kerry is right for once .. f--k the Republicans!! .. they aren't going to vote for it anyway .. cram it full of stuff that has a good chance of working .. and cut Republican states out of it too .. and see how they howl then .. the bastards

[ Parent ]
It's funny you make this comparison (0.00 / 0)
Since I think that Obama's willingness to talk to Republicans and his expressed willingness to talk to Iran (without preconditions) come from the same place.

Is this an argument against Obama's foreign policy as well?

Things You Don't Talk About in Polite Company: Religion, Politics, the Occasional Intersection of Both


No (4.00 / 1)
There's a difference between talking to a legitimately elected government like Iran's (a government which I of course find objectionable) and talking to, say, Al Qaeda (which Obama has never said he would).

[ Parent ]
I believe fearmongers (0.00 / 0)
is the proper word for them.

again, can I place my vote against the term "legislative terrorists"? (4.00 / 1)
I agree with the points you raise. But the term "legislative terrorists" just seems like the output of a random slur generator - like when people called Obama a socialist radical. I mean, what is it supposed to mean - that Respublicans seek to use the legislative process to... kill civilians and instill fear in the populace? But it seems, according to you, they're terrorists because they don't have the country's best interests at heart. And they lie. But if that's the case, it seems like calling them liars and legislative soboteurs would suffice.

I mean, I just think the term "terrorists" makes it easier to deligitimize your argument, which is otherwise a powerful one that needs to get more media exposure. But whatever, you're the writer. Just my two cents.


Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search