Going Nuclear In Response To House Republicans

by: Chris Bowers

Fri Jan 30, 2009 at 14:45


Despite the massive Democratic trifecta in the House, Senate and White House, three very positive things are happening right now for House Republicans:
  1. Perceived Public Support: In congressional offices throughout Capitol Hill, phone calls are running nearly 100% against the stimulus. Much of this is that people do not understand the difference between the poorly named stimulus and equally poorly named bailout, but the calls are still running against further government spending. Even though polls show the majority of the country in favor of the plan, these calls make a big difference in perceived popular support on Capitol Hill.

  2. Pride in Unity: Republicans in the House feel pretty good about themselves for voting unanimously against the stimulus package in the House. They are playing "Eye of the Tiger" at their caucus meetings, making gleeful proclamations on how this will help them in 2010, and stating, intentionally loud enough for Democrats working on the Hill to hear, about how happy they are that Republicans are united again and how they can't remember a time with this much unity. They feel good about themselves again, and want to rub it in Democratic faces.

  3. Media Coverage: As reported in multiple locations, even though they have lost power across the board, Republicans are still getting twice as much press than Democrats. Their opposition to the stimulus is a hit with the political media. Let's face it, even I am covering it right now, and I rarely write about Republicans.
Right now, Republicans are feeling the love from the political media, from constituents calling into their office, and from each other. In short, they feel pretty damn good. As such, we can expect their purely contrarian ways to continue, unless a disincentive to this behavior appears. In order to show congressional Republicans who really is in charge right now, we need to respond to these developments with a disproportionate, nuclear strike that goes far in excess of what they have done. In the extended entry, I provide the outlines of just such a nuclear response, much of which is already in the works.
Chris Bowers :: Going Nuclear In Response To House Republicans
Each of the three pillars of Republican support need to be hit:

  1. Use the Obama email list to generate positive calls for the stimulus: As I argued 36 hours ago, the Obama administration needs to retaliate against the first pillar of Republican support--calls to congressional offices--by using its still operable campaign email list that is still funded by an operable campaign committee to generate 100 times more calls in favor of the stimulus than our coming in opposed. All that is needed to do this legally is to walk over to DNC HQ a few blocks from the Capitol, draft an action alert to the campaign email list, and then send it out. Pound the first pillar of Republican opposition into dust. It also fulfills a regular campaign theme from President Obama, when he said that his supporters would be needed to help pass his legislation even after he took office.

    It is worth noting that the Obama email list is still active, as shown by today's call to host house parties about the stimulus. It is good to see the email list active, and I have no problem with house parties. However, it is very important that these house parties contain an action about contacting Congress, rather than just becoming an internal discussion among supporters.

  2. Put Judd Gregg in Commerce--after he votes for the stimulus: Next, destroy their unity. While I opposed putting Republicans in cabinet positions during November and December, moving Republican Judd Gregg from New Hampshire to the Commerce Department would be a perfect response right now. This would severely undercut Republican power by getting Democrats to 60 votes, while also giving the appearance of being bi-partisan. In a true Machiavellian move, it reaches out to Republicans and undercuts them. It would also pretty much guarantee the passage of the Employee Free Choice Act, as both Arlen Specter and one Democrat would have to withdraw their support, thus further causing Republican heads to explode. Again, this is a disproportionate response to Republican opposition, as it would remove the last remaining pillar of actual Republican power on Capitol Hill in response to their purely symbolic show of power two days ago in the U.S. House.

    The only qaulifiers are, first, that Gregg first must vote for the stimulus package in the Senate. This will show Republicans that we didn't actually need another Democrat to pass that bill, but we are adding one anyway in retaliation to the House GOP. Also, it will show that Gregg will fall in line with Obama's policies while in the Cabinet--appropriate fealty before joining the team. Second, Governor Lynch in New Hampshire needs to make it clear that he will appoint a Democrat to replace Gregg, and that no deals with Republicans are on the table.

  3. Support the Americans United For Change paid media campaign on the stimulus bill. It is also necessary to take out the third pillar of Republican support in their current pride fest: free media. Since we can't undo the free media Republicans have received from the political media on this one, we need a disproportionate response from paid media. Just such a campaign is currently being organized by Americans United For Change, which is an alliance of MoveOn.org and several large unions. Support it here, and help go nuclear on congressional Republicans.
Together, these three actions would be an excellent response to what Stephan Colbert called the House Republican "audacity of nope." It would put Democrats and the Obama administration in an even stronger position than after the November 4th elections.

If Republicans want to keep getting drunk and urinating on the country, let's make sure there is a fire in every toilet they can find.


Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Obama's numbers up today... (4.00 / 6)
Fox had a poll that ended Wednesday and congressional approval jumped 20 points in two weeks, while Republicans still at 25% approval 63% disapproval and reverse numbers for Democrats (can't remember the number off hand but very good approval for congressional dems).... and that's after all their BS about contraceptive funding and all the media storm against us...

That's good news...

The unanimity thing really has really gotten those bastards fired up and now it's spreading to the Senate as well...  The Obama team either screwed up or planned this by giving them reassurances that the bill will be changed, so some of the wavering members said they felt OK voting no... whether they stay unanimous is a question mark, but I'm guessing they will... it "feels" like being a winner again, and they are all assholes, so it won't be surprising at all...  Lesson learned for the Obama camp... don't negotiate with terrorists...

The stimulus will squeak through the Senate and the conference bill will probably suck, but the republicans are digging in their heels... expect more of this in the future for other bills... surprised that SCHIP passed with such good numbers, yesterday....

This could be part of Obama's original plan, but I doubt it... I think that he felt with his high approval numbers he could lean on these guys more like Bush did with us.  He'll still be able to use their recalcitrance as an advantage, as Clinton did with Republicans in the 90's, but I think he would have rather had some cooperation...  He may be trying to wear them down now... since he insisted on "bipartisanship" at least he's not going to let them off the hook for this and is leaning on them even harder now with an ad campaign and Obama personal appearances... The Rush Limbaugh thing may prove to be the most brilliant move of the Obama presidency.... Forcing republicans to pick between the public or their rabid base... They will, of course, choose the latter, but, the GOP will be punished for doing so...

I think the Judd Greg thing is either a shot across the bow to Senate Republicans or a realization that Republicans simply won't play ball no matter what and a new strategy will be needed....

I wish I lived in a republican district so I could give these guys hell... I do have one republican senator that I will lean on heavily... but, it's hard to get through... his office staff sucks...

Let's hope we can get a smattering of house republicans onboard to break their little unanimous obstruction party...

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


Voinovich (0.00 / 0)
Voinovich is voting against this thing no matter what, but calling into his office can't hurt.  

[ Parent ]
Against? Why? (4.00 / 2)
He was a leader on getting the auto bailout going, that would be inconsistent with his typical behavior.  Now that he's free of Republican pressure, he can channel his inner liberal... if there's money going to Ohio, I don't think the goes against it... he owes the GOP nothing... they've treated him like garbage over the years...

Do you have any inside info, or is it just a hunch on your part?  My hunch says he votes with us, but I certainly could be wrong...

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


[ Parent ]
Hunch (4.00 / 1)
Voinovich is such a staunch defecit hawk, I just don't see him going for this. The auto bailout was one thing because Ohio was going to be hurt the 2nd most if it didn't pass, but he could revert back to his fiscal conservative principles for this one.

That said, I'd like to see him surprise me, but when moderate House Republicans like Mark Kirk, Joseph Cao and Stephen LaTourette voted against it, I don't have any faith that their Senate counterparts will be any more reasonable.  


[ Parent ]
Have you ever seen him in a committee hearing? (4.00 / 1)
There ain't no inner liberal in there. He can be a mean SOB. Yes he was for the auto bailout because he was still not sure about running again and it would have been political suicide to oppose it. But I think now that he doesn't have to run, you'd be just as likely to see him go more conservative as go more liberal.  

[ Parent ]
Who cares if the House GOP feels good? (0.00 / 0)
I think it's pretty darn irrelevant that the House GOP is feeling proud right now, or that their constituents support them.  These guys represent a sliver of the country, and naturally reflect the viewpoints of their districts.  Elsewhere in the country, their performance isn't going over so well, despite the media attention. In fact, I think the attention they get is a positive thing, since it mostly paints them in an unflattering light.

I like the idea of public pressure via email, but not because of anything going on in the House; rather, it's good to bring pressure against the GOP senators, particularly the few so-called moderates.


Yes (4.00 / 2)
If they feel great about unanimously and impotently opposing something that a majority of the public supports, then they are stupid and they can suck an egg.

In any case, they will not be re-elected or defeated based on this bill, but rather on the state of the economy when they begin to run for re-election in earnest in 2010.

I personally think this little episode was good for House Dems.  It removes any incentive to give a flying fuck what their Republican colleagues think, which opens an avenue for us to influence them.


[ Parent ]
Actually the fact that it frees up the Democrats to vote without regard for Republicans (0.00 / 0)
[ Parent ]
Even Gerlach voted against the bailout .. (0.00 / 0)
so it seems he's gonna run for Gov. of PA instead .. Obama won his district handily I believe

[ Parent ]
republicans (0.00 / 0)
I think that the republicans bargain in bad faith; and have so for the last 15 to 30 years.

BAD FAITH - Dishonesty or fraud in a transaction, such as entering into an agreement with no intention of ever living up to its terms, or knowingly misrepresenting the quality of something that is being bought or sold.
Intent to deceive. A person who intentionally tries to deceive or mislead another in order to gain some advantage.
Bad faith (Latin: mala fides) is a legal concept in which a malicious motive on the part of a party in a lawsuit undermines their case. It has an effect on the ability to maintain causes of action and obtain legal remedies.
Generally speaking, courts will not just look at the legal rights of parties in pursuing a transaction or a lawsuit, but will look behind the activity at the motives of the persons attempting to obtain the assistance of the court.
If a court feels that the reasons behind the transaction or lawsuit have the effect of abusing the power of the law,or the court,it will generally deny a party the ability to rely on a legal remedy that they will otherwise be entitled to.It is related to the equitable powers of common law courts to look beyond the law.


fighting fire with fire (0.00 / 0)
>>They are playing "Eye of the Tiger" at their caucus meetings, making gleeful proclamations

I suggest we respond with the Godfather of Soul:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...


Will Judd Gregg accept Secretary of Commerce? (0.00 / 0)
I can't answer this.   I don't know Gregg well enough.   Obama cannot offer it to him unless he knows that he will accept and that he will be ratified.  

Gregg is up for re-election on 2010 and he is very much at risk of not being re-elected.  Perhaps he takes Secretary of Commerce to avoid the re-election challenge.    


house repubs (0.00 / 0)
mom would of called them the peanut gallery. breid

strengthen the bill so it really helps us all fast -- that's what'll defeat them -- (0.00 / 0)
they don't matter anyway, and the bill is what counts.

actually creating tons of good jobs is what's needed -- not simply throwing money around without regulations in hopes it "works".

it's already too weak and the GOP is counting on that -- and they're getting more and more concessions that weaken it even  further every day.

real healthcare for all (not "reform") defeats them too -- passing Medicaid for All no matter what they scream will help too -- help us all.

Principles and good strong liberal programs -- that's all that's needed.


Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search