Four Less-Reported Pieces of Hugely Good News

by: David Sirota

Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 07:00


OK, it's Monday, so let's slough off our national case of the Sundays and kick the week off with three pieces of less-reported but nonetheless significantly awesome headlines - and requisite kudos to President Obama:
David Sirota :: Four Less-Reported Pieces of Hugely Good News
1. "Defense Official: Obama Calling for Defense Budget Cuts": Fox News is reporting that "a senior U.S. defense official" is saying that the Obama administration "has asked the military's Joint Chiefs of Staff to cut the Pentagon's budget request for the fiscal year 2010 by more than 10 percent -- about $55 billion." Fox News may be trying to use this story to whip up the "weak on national security" offensive against Obama, but if public opinion data is any indication, it won't work. What you rarely hear from a Pentagon-worshiping media is that the American people believe we spend way too much on defense right now. According to a 2007 Gallup poll, "the public's view that the federal government is spending too much on the military has increased substantially this year, to its highest level in more than 15 years." The poll found a plurality - more than 4 in 10 Americans - now saying the government is spending too much for national defense and the military. Likewise a 2005 PIPA poll shows that, if given the chance, Americans would make deep cuts to the bloated defense budget and redirect most of the savings into domestic programs like health care. Big kudos to President Obama for starting to take on the long-overdue process of reducing defense spending.

2. "Obama's Order Is Likely to Tighten Auto Standards": In a move mixing progressive federalism with sound environmental policy, the New York Times reported last week that President Obama ordered his administration to approve applications from states that wish to raise their auto fuel efficiency standards. Again, this is long-overdue - and Obama gets big kudos.

3. "Main Street Reviles Wall Street Bonuses": The Washington post reports that the Obama administration has - finally - subscribed to the idea that "companies on the federal dole should be forced to radically cut their dividends." Progressives have been pushing for this since the bailout debate began - there's absolutely no reason why taxpayer money should subsidize bank dividends.

4. "Obama Signs Pro-Labor Executive Orders": Dow Jones reports on Obama signing a package of executive orders repealing those by Bush that effectively allowed all sorts of anti-union behavior by federal contractors. These aren't hugely significant in terms of their economy-wide impact, and they are absolutely no substitute for priorities like the Employee Free Choice Act, but they certainly do set down markers about the constructive relationship this White House wants to build with organized labor.

I'd say the significance of these three pieces of news are in the proper order in terms of importance. They are certainly all significant, but if Obama is really serious about getting the defense budget under control, that would be monumentally huge, because it would provide the federal government the additional revenues needed to fund almost every other major priority in front of our country.

Good on ya, Barack - more like this please.

UPDATE: Chris points out that the defense spending news is a smokescreen, and that actually Pentagon spending will increase by 8% this year. D'oh. Well, three pieces of good news is still good, right?


Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
looking left (4.00 / 2)
these moves by 44 are i hope an indication that pres obama is at least looking left and sees a constituency there, not to mention that this is sound policy and good for america, whats not to like, unless of course you are a right wing gas bag and hate american ideals.  

it ain't 'left', it is what most of the (4.00 / 1)
population would support if the chickenshit sold out Dem party wasn't committed to shitty messaging and incompetent politics.

of course, since we the peeee-ons have been voting for sell outs or political incompetents since I was 20 in 1980, uh, we get sell outs and incompetents!

HOPEFULLY barack will be something new ...

rmm.  

It is too full o' the milk of human kindness To catch the nearest way


[ Parent ]
Arithmetic? (0.00 / 0)
First David Sirota repeats a rumor that maybe Obama wants to cut the Defense budget by 10% for a grand total of $55 billion (Okay, hurrah for Obama or whatever!), and then...

Somehow this $55 billion "would provide the federal government the additional revenues needed to fund almost every other major priority in front of our country."

What?

Is this just a typo, where "the additional revenues" sounds like it's all we really need, like "Here the money you need to buy a house" instead of "Here's a little money to help with rent for next month."

Only today the American Society of Civil Engineers is reporting that the tab for repairing infrastructure is $2.2 tillion!

$55 bill is 1/40th of that cost, and not exactly the money we apparently need, and infrastructure is only the beginning of "every major priority."



[ Parent ]
Okay, that was crude! (0.00 / 0)
My previous comment looks crude and uncouth, and worse yet, full of typos, but... holy dumping donuts, Batman!

David Sirota's celebration of Obama was the first thing I read this morning, no caffeine has yet percolated into my brain, and all I could think was...

$275 billion in honking tax-cuts to buy zero Republican votes!


[ Parent ]
Really bad arithmetic! (4.00 / 1)
Here's the really bad arithmetic for you:

I'd say the significance of these three pieces of news

But he listed four items!  :)

Just wondering, have any of the head honchos at Open Left considered using an editor to look over the main articles (or whatever the posts are called on the left side of the screen)?  Not picking on David, he's a professional writer and this is about the first time I've seen a typo from him.  But I see them all the time from some of the other regular posters, especially bad spelling.  It may seem like a trivial thing.  But it seems to me that if you are sloppy with your posts, you may also be sloppy with your research and maybe your facts too.

If you don't want to have someone else spot check your articles first, at least run a spell check before posting!  That won't catch everything, but it will catch a lot.


[ Parent ]
As you say... (0.00 / 0)
a 10% military cut is pretty small (just $55 billion), but what Sirota says is "if Obama is really serious about getting the defense budget under control" which probably means much bigger cuts. The military budget was half its current size (only $300 billion) just 8 years ago. So, if the military budget was cut by $300 billion and was kept to this level for a decade it would add up to $3 trillion, enough to pay for much of the infrastructure improvements, healthcare, etc. that represent "every major priority."

Please give Sirota a little slack on these things and look closely at what he actually wrote. His writing is sometimes a bit hyperbolic, but the essence is usually solid.


[ Parent ]
Good Grief! (4.00 / 2)
It's been over a WEEK since President Obama was sworn in, and he hasn't taken ONE DAY of vacation or cleared ONE STICK of BRUSH! And he calls himself a President...

David shows his influence on front page (0.00 / 0)
Stories I see by cursorily scanning them:

Welfare System Failing To Grow as Economy Lags
Risks Are Vast in Revaluation of Bad Assets
A State with A Wish List for Stimulus Spending
In Daschle's Tax Woes, A Peek Into How Washington Works
Border Proves No Obstacle for Mexican Cartels

I suspect that the front page from yesterday was shaped by the NYT editors thinking that it was Super Bowl Sunday and fewer people were actually reading it.

(Post-Dispatch covered the one-year anniversary of the Kirkwood City Hall shooting as their lead story)  

Darkness has a hunger that's insatiable, and lightness has a call that's hard to hear.  


Dept. of David Shamed Me Into Looking It Up (0.00 / 0)
Jay Nixon will need $800 million in stimulus money for his budget to work out,  especially for Medicaid.  

Darkness has a hunger that's insatiable, and lightness has a call that's hard to hear.  

[ Parent ]
Thanks for the tip about the Kirkwood shootings article (0.00 / 0)
A tragic event.  Here's a link to the story if anyone is interested:

http://www.stltoday.com/stltod...


[ Parent ]
The bonus issue really is about competence (4.00 / 1)
I can understand the temptation to get all riled up about the $18.4 billion in bonuses, but to focus on that seems to accept a compromise when there really isn't a reason to negotiate in the first place. The real issue is that the government now essentially owns a majority stake in these companies, but the management that got us into this mess is still calling the shots. Making a big push to get back the $18.4 billion in bonuses is like demanding that someone who just drove a backhoe into your living room pay to refinish the floor.

Paying bonuses and dividends last year is one of the smallest of the bad decisions these executives have made. The government owns these companies now - why shouldn't we be demanding new management?


here's why I'm nervous about that military story (0.00 / 0)
It says the Pentagon was asked to slash its "request" by 10%.  But didn't I read here on the frontpage that the Pentagon asked for some huge increase in spending?  A 10% "cut" of a "request" may still be an increaes.

New Jersey politics at Blue Jersey.

Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search