From Little ACORNs Grow

by: ZP Heller

Wed Feb 04, 2009 at 08:59


A note of introduction: I am the editorial director of Brave New Films, and I'll be blogging about all things related to the economic meltdown, foreclosure crisis, and the war in Afghanistan, as those issues represent our biggest campaigns right now.

The GOP and Fox News have been ganging up on the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) like a couple of bullies picking on the scrawniest kid in the schoolyard--and they can only push that kid so far until he gives them a well-deserved bloody nose.  Last week, House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) unjustly accused ACORN of receiving a $4.19 billion bailout from President Obama's economic stimulus package.  His false claims were echoed by Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) on Fox, who claimed this money was a "payoff" for ACORN's activism in the last election.  That was all it took for bloviators Rush Limbaugh and Michelle Malkin to resuscitate allegations of ACORN's voter fraud.  They even blamed the low- and moderate-income advocacy group for the subprime meltdown, rather than discuss the banks actually caused this mess and have subsequently received tens of billions in bailout funds they continue to squander.

These cries amount to nothing more than fearmongering in the name of obstructionism, what ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis called "a complete fabrication of overheated partisan fever dreams."  As Congress Matters noted, the $4.19 billion was actually set aside for "neighborhood stabilization activities related to emergency assistance for the redevelopment of abandoned and foreclosed homes."  In other words, any non-profit housing developer could bid on this money.

Here comes the bloody nose.  On Monday, the organization sent a letter to Boehner's office and media in Ohio shooting down each and every accusation and attacking Boehner on his home turf, a district where more than 4,800 families faced foreclosure in 2008 alone.  They also went after Boehner's record of voting against the Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008 and the Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act.  Simultaneously, they're asking everyone to contact their Senators and tell them to support the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, a version of which passed in the House last week despite the GOP's partisan rancor.

ZP Heller :: From Little ACORNs Grow
Indeed, the GOP and Fox seem determined to distract us from the true causes of the mortgage meltdown as they cling to a dying ideology at all costs.  Why else would they pick on one of the only groups actively working to end the foreclosure crisis?  ACORN has been protesting and disrupting sales of foreclosed homes in 25 cities around the country; going door-to-door in communities particularly affected by the crisis; counseling families facing foreclosure; and collecting petition signatures to request a 90-day foreclosure moratorium (which Obama has said he would support), enabling homeowners to renegotiate the terms of their loans.  And that was just in the month of January!

In the coming weeks, ACORN will launch its "homesteading" campaign, calling for volunteers that they will train to help people keep (and in some instances reoccupy) their homes using civil disobedience.  They are also partnering with Brave New Foundation to unveil an interactive website that enables homeowners to tell their foreclosure stories in their own words, thereby putting a face on a broad critical situation to underscore its urgency.

ACORN is taking action at the local and national level, doing everything they can to help people hang onto their homes and renegotiate the terms of predatory loans.  By contrast, all the GOP and their media mouthpiece seem to be doing is standing in their way.


Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
ACORN serves power/exploits the poor (0.00 / 0)
It's corrupt and a fraud. What is more, Obama looking to funnel taxpayer dollars to fund what is an arm of his campaign is in violation to the US Constitution, and it's an impeachable offense. His advocating the usage of the people's money for his own re-election shows that he is above the laws that govern him and all of us, that is a sign that he doesn't respect us or the principles of democracy.

This is becoming ridiculous! (4.00 / 1)
Seriously, Mary, is there any left wing group that you like? Or are they all just part of the huge capitalist conspiracy???

[ Parent ]
Sry, I just noticed that you voted for John Edwards.. (4.00 / 1)
...so there's at least one liberal that passes your smell test:
http://www.openleft.com/showCo...

Well, this may explain your opposition to everything Obama. However, what has ACORN done to become a hate object for you? I thought they were sympathetic towards Edwards:
http://acorn.org/index.php?id=...

And, sry for being so curious, but what have you done between January 2008 and today? Too busy preparing the revolution to comment here?
:D


[ Parent ]
I supported Edwards, then Obama after Edwards endorsed him (0.00 / 0)
But then again, as you live in Germany and do NOT pay attention or care about the US, it's constitution or it's people, you don't pay attention to anything that you can't steal, Gray.


[ Parent ]
grumble, grumle... (0.00 / 0)
grumble...

[ Parent ]
I respect neither the far left or the far right wings, they are the same under the skin. (0.00 / 1)
Gray, as a German corporate mole, you have zero relevance to the discussion.

ACORN was involved in demanding the failed mortgage programs that served the corporate interests at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Deutsche Bank, Citibank, BoA, and the rest. They were activist demanding that poor people who would never be able to afford mortgages be given them. Those same people are now homeless and have lost everything. It was a waste of resources, diverted from programs that could have created opportunities, invested in job creation, alleviated the health care crisis, and so much more. ACORN is a front group for pro-corporate, anti-populist power grabs. It has not done one thing that has lifted poor people out of poverty, only exploited that suffering to further their own agenda.

ACORN is under federal investigation and has no credibility or viability, nor is it entitled to divert more money from helping those who are truly suffering. Interestingly enough, Obama's plan for ACORN involves placing Valerie Jarrett, one of his failed appointments, because of her corruption, involvement with Tony Rezko and his fraud, ripping off the taxpayer and the poor, by getting contracts to build public housing that was faulty and dangerous, on toxin contaminated land, as the head of operations in the organization.

As a woman who has been involved with social justice and civil rights activist for nearly 30 years, I know what I'm talking about.


[ Parent ]
Mary is screeching madd! (4.00 / 2)
...fund what is an arm of his campaign

What, exactly, is that supposed to mean? In a real world, legal sense? How was or is ACORN 'an arm of his campaign' any more so than every Jack and Jill who sent in 50 bucks?  


[ Parent ]
Obama's campaign paid ACORN 850,000. to work for his campaign (0.00 / 0)
He is a former employee of ACORN, has long term ties to the organization and ACORN worked on his campaign. No elected official can use his time, or taxpayer dollars to campaign, raise funds or pay an organization that he or she has ties to. It's under FEC laws, is that inconvenient to you?

[ Parent ]
to be precise... (4.00 / 3)
he did organizing for Project Vote and paid Citizens Services Inc. for their help. These are offshoots of ACORN.

The problem with all of this was he failed to report the $800k as "get out the vote" efforts. Originally, they had reported it as polling work.

Fishy? Maybe, but it was the Obama team that corrected the report. Furthermore, even the head of the FEC stated that these errors occur, regardless of dollar amount.


[ Parent ]
Earth to Mary, come in Mary... (0.00 / 0)
You know, I expect to see these kinds of talking points coming out of GOP talking heads like John Boehner. Where, in fact they do.

But from people on a progressive site I expect a discussion based in reality, as opposed to what ZP notes Bertha Lewis called "overheated partisan fever dreams".

I can see the arguements about ACORN and Obama being tight because of past tangential associations (I can see them, but they are so very exaggerated). But this meme about ACORN forcing multi-billion dollar global corporations to make bad loans is just laughable on its face. And once you realize that for a decade ACORN was one of the very few organizations actually fighting predatory lending in the mortgage industry, the very practices that led to the financial meltdown, it becomes an absurdist piece of kabuki theater.

For decades ACORN has been working to help poor people become first time homebuyers, but always in A loans with fixed 30 year terms. Its sister org the ACORN Housing Corporation has partnership with over 40 institutions for such loans and in the 25 years it has operated its loans have performed with a foreclosure rate of under 1%, which is unheard of in the banking industry.

Since 1998 ACORN has been fighting predatory lending, first forcing Ameriquest to modify its practices, then forcing Houssehold/Beneficial into the largest consumer legal settlement ever with 48 Attorneys General (almost %500 million) for its predatory practices, hammering the companies stock prices and credit rating, forcing it to sell itself to HSBC. In that time it issued at leat 42 reports calling for action on subprime loans culminating with a report in 2005 called The Imprending Rate Shock, which foretold of the foreclosure crisis that hit in 2007.

This meme is just stupid and is being pushed by people with no grasp of either banking or economics and certainly not with any understanding of ACORN.

This idea that ACORN is a corporate puppet is also stupid. Show me any other organization that routinely sits-in at corporate offices or targets corporate officers for actions like papering their neighborhood with Wanted posters. In terms of lifting people out of poverty, ACORN was instrumental in passing over 100 local living wage ordiances from 1995 to the present, passing the SF minimum wage ballot inititative in 2003, passing the Florida min wage ballot initiative in 2004, ones in Ohio, Missouri, Colorado, and Arizona in 2006, and instrumental in the coalition that forced Congress and Bush to raise it nationally in 2007. If that isn't putting money in the pockets of people who desperately need it I don't know what is.

As for ACORN being under Federal investigation, that's not true. Some former ACORN hourly employees who worked on the VR drives and defrauded ACORN by getting paid for work they didn't do, which resulted in ACORN catching, flagging, and turning in (as required by law) bad VR applications, are under investigation. The organization as an organization is not. That is a key distinction and one that is purposefully obscured by people with agendas rooted in ideology, not fact.

Mary, you are entertaining for sure, but you are completely and totally off base with your verbatim recitations of GOP talking points. You remind me of how conservatives used Al Sharpton in 2004.

Oh and all that Obama-ACORN stuff is total garbage too. Obama never worked for ACORN. He ran a Project Vote registration drive before PV and ACORN had any formal relationship (though ACORN did contribute about 5000 cards to that drive). After that he did one unpaid leadership training for ACORN leaders. Then he was part of a team of lawyers that sued the staet of IL for failure to implement the National Voter Registration Act, with ACORN as a plaintiff. And he was joined in that suit by the radical lawyers of the US Department of Justice.

The CSI-ACORN connection is also just a bunch of innuendo and supposition. CSI is a political consulting firm started by ACORN folks using ACORN's orgnaizing tecniques and principles. But it is not ACORN. In fact, the contract between CSI and Obama For America went almost entirely to CSI and was spent on GOTV activites, which is what political campaigns do all the time. How nefarious! ACORN got a small sub-contract for about $20K in one of the cities covered by the OFA contract. Hardly a huge funnel of cash. If I were running a front group, you can bet I'd be getting way more than 3% of the total expenditure into my core operation. Then again, maybe that's why ACORN is so broke all the time: they just don't know how to run good front groups.

I know this lengthy response isn't going to have much impact on the continued circulation of teh stupid, but I'm hoping it will help others over here in the reality-based community get their responses together.


[ Parent ]
Comebacks (4.00 / 2)
1) The description needed to be a lot clearer.  Republicans will read a bad interpretation into this legislation if at all possible.  

2) We need to constantly call the man John Boner not "Bayner."  It is playground but exactly the sort of thing Republicans do effectively.

3) Dominance and Diaper Dave needs lots of attention.  His glorification of Bush (and failure to advocate for LA) during and in the aftermath of Katrina is incredibly shameful.  His personal behavior was a lot kinkier than Spitzer's.  A whole lot kinkier.  It went beyond prostitution to stuff that is truly disgusting.  Admitting to a sin may work spiritually but given the treatment of Spitzer and Larry Craig, he's gotten off very lightly.

4) The actual record is that it is Republicans who are the ones guilty of massive fraud at the same time they use "fraud" for voter intimidation and vote suppression.  Some of these people who think democracy is a game (or optional, or should be limited to the rich) need to get and serve at least a little hard time.


Neighborhood Stabilization Program (4.00 / 3)
Ughhh...stop the stupid.  The Neighborhood Stabilization Program originally resulted from emergency Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program funding provided under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008.  The funding in that bill was distributed to 308 states and local governments according to a formula crafted by HUD.  States and those localities that received funding are allowed to program the money for only five approved uses:

*Establish financing mechanisms for the purchase and redevelopment of foreclosed upon homes, and residential properties, including such mechanisms as soft-seconds, loan loss reserves, and shred-equity loans for low- and moderate-income homebuyers;
*Purchase and rehabilitate homes and residential properties that have been abandoned or foreclosed upon, in order to sell, rent, or redevelop such homes and properties;
*Establish land banks for homes that have been foreclosed upon,
*Demolish blighted structures; and
*Redevelop demolished or vacant properties.

As with the regular CDBG program, grantees are allowed to subcontract with nonprofits, for profit developers, housing authorities, and others to administer NSP-funded programs.  ACORN has not been and will not be a major player in this program.

The second round of NSP funding included in both the House and Senate versions of the stimulus would operate much in the same way as the first.  The major difference is that the funding would be distributed through a HUD-administered competition.  This is probably a good thing, since the formula developed by HUD the last time around was seriously flawed and resulted in very few local governments having direct access to NSP funds.  Additionally, the new format will allow local housing and redevelopment authorities that operate independently of local governments to access the funding directly.

This is not, never has been, and never will be a mechanism to funnel money to ACORN.  This is an important tool for states and local governments to use to stabilize neighborhoods that have been especially hard hit by the foreclosure crisis.  I've been involved in the program's design and have had 3 meetings with Congressional staff on the program in the last week.  I know this program.  If you have any questions, just let me know.


Bingo (0.00 / 0)
Exactly.

But facts really never get in the way of a good political attack.


[ Parent ]
Welcome here. (4.00 / 5)
You're a great addition.

This comment had to be written (0.00 / 0)
The contrast between this video and the Rachel Maddow video is like night and day. Rachel Maddow lets her guest talk without slipping in conservative propaganda phrases such as "a national outcry". This national outcry was from viewers of Fox News alone!!  

Darkness has a hunger that's insatiable, and lightness has a call that's hard to hear.  

Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search