"Party Of Ideas"? Not So Much...

by: Paul Rosenberg

Sat Feb 07, 2009 at 09:00


So you remember Michael Steele?  The new RNC chairman who earlier in the week said:

And first off the government doesn't create jobs. Let's get this notion out of our heads that the government creates jobs. Not in the history of mankind has the government ever created a job.

even though he, like, had a government job himself?  And his job now is to get Republicans as many government jobs as possible?  Well, his first big move at the RNC is to shut down their new think tank for new ideas!  Greg Sargent reports from his new digs:

The Republican National Committee, under new chairman Michael Steele, has quietly killed an ambitious plan to create the Center for Republican Renewal, a big in-house RNC think tank intended to develop new policies and ideas in order to take the party in a new direction, a Republican official who was directly informed of the decision by RNC staff tells me.

The Center's goal was to help the GOP reclaim the mantle of the "party of ideas," as RNC officials glowingly announced in December, and the decision to scrap it has some Republicans, including allies of former RNC chair Mike Duncan, its creator, wondering how precisely the RNC intends to generate the new ideas necessary to change course and renew itself.

Well, here's the thing: The GOP never was the "Party of Ideas."  At least not since the 1870s or so.  That was just a branding thing, as a whole constellation of recent developments has shown.

Paul Rosenberg :: "Party Of Ideas"? Not So Much...
I wrote about the GOP think tank ploy in my late December diary, "The Party of Ideas As Weapons vs. The Party Of Ideas As, Well, IDEAS!", in which I wrote:

TPM is reporting on a new memo from Republican National Committee chief Mike Duncan, saying that the GOP has lost its reputation as a "party of ideas," and needs to do some serious work to change that.  Only two problems-one for them, one for us:

(1) (For them): It never was the party of ideas in the first place.

(2) (For us): It didn't matter in the past, so why should it matter now?

Put simply, the GOP has basically had TWO ideas since 1932:  (1) Kill the New Deal and anything related to it. (2) Promote Republicans as heroic saviors and attack Democrats as depraved traitors who hate America and are trying to destroy it.  (See, for example, Glenn Greenwald's book, Great American Hypocrites: Toppling the Myths of Republican Politics, and/or my diary "Patriotism Smackdown: Barack Obama Vs. Hitler's Ghost? (Hegemony Is The Enemy Special Report--Pt5)".)  All the other ideas Republicans have had since then have simply been tactical or strategic weaponry to advance those two basic ideas, split the Democratic base, shift blame, or otherwise gain political advantage, regardless of any real-world policy consequences.  In short, Republican ideas revolve around the long-term struggle for political power, based on controlling political and quasi-political institutions, and thus controlling the political discourse.

The GOP's utter lack of ideas--indeed their utter contempt for them has been visible everywhere you look of late. Their attacks on the stimulus have been utterly nonsensical.   Steele's ludicrous claim that government has never created a job is not an outlier here.  It reflects the underlying logic of the DeMint/Heritage Foundation all-tax-cut "stimulus" plan, about which Ezra Klein wrote:

The amendment was beaten back, but all but five Republicans voted for it. It reminds me of something John Cole wrote earlier today. "I really don't understand how bipartisanship is ever going to work when one of the parties is insane," he said.

Precisely.  Certain types of insane people spout ideas by bucketful.  But they don't have ideas.  The ideas have them. Ideas about aliens spying on their every move, for example, which, once you start to think about it dispassionately, is not any more crazy than  saying that government never created a job in the history of the world, when you yourself once had such a job.

Indeed, the way in which Republicans/conservatives think about tax cuts as the quasi-magical solution to everything, with no downside whatsoever, is typical of several different sorts of mental disorder.

As I argued in my diary series, "The Political Duality Of Rep and Dem":

(A) Democrats are reality-based when it comes to policies, and totally out to lunch when it comes to winning elections, and politicking in general.

(B) But Republicans are totally out to lunch when it comes to policies, and as reality-based as it gets when it comes to winning elections, and politicking in general.

The Democrats' success in the last two electoral cycles would seem to negate the second half of "A", and I'm hoping to be proven wrong sometime soon, but given how badly the GOP screwed things up it's hard to see how Democratic leadership can claim any sort of extraordinary credit for their success in these elections.  More to the point right now, they've been strikingly inept at capitalizing on the transparent howling-at-the-moon insanity of the GOP.  The GOP is holding a totally garbage hand, the Dems are holding four aces, and the GOP has still been controlling the play.

That's because, no matter how discredited their ideas may be, they still work as weapons so long as the Democrats are afraid of them.

That's the only idea that the so-called "party of ideas" has left.  And the Democrats?  Can they think their way past that one?


Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Goverment Jobs (4.00 / 1)
I have heard reports that the only net job creation in the Bush era was in the government sector.  These guys don't let facts get in the way, do they?

That Was True Of His First Term (4.00 / 1)
From the BLS

Total Employment:

    2000: 131,785
    2003: 129,999
    2004: 131,435

Gov't Employment:

    2000: 20,790
    2003: 21,583
    2004: 21,621

but eventually employment grew in the private sector, too.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
it looks like the GOP is left with the two-part (4.00 / 2)
strategy of 1) hoping a terrorist attack occurs in the US (and then blaming Obama) and 2) hoping that the US goes into an economic depression (and then blaming Obama).

That's The Dick Cheney Strategy (4.00 / 2)
Then there's the Terrible Twos strategy, which simply involves kicking, screaming and whining, until they get everything they want.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3

[ Parent ]
"Party of Ideas" was a Rovism, no? (4.00 / 1)
As someone who used to work in advertising, I'm still convinced Rove is an unparalleled political salesman. He would never have let the stimulus package be called something as uncompelling as "stimulus package." The branding stuff matters, and we need some of it on our side. Naming is fundamental and reiterative message control, it should be self-evident.

   


No, It's Been Around Much Longer Than Rove (4.00 / 2)
It dates back even before Gingrich, in fact.  But your underlying point is sound.  The GOP knows all about the sizzle, because the only steak they've got is mistake.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3

[ Parent ]
I agree with Yglesias (0.00 / 0)
The time for Republicans to implement new, effective ideas was when they were in power.

http://www.bleedingheartland.c...

At this point they have to hope Democrats fail, which will make the pendulum swing back toward the GOP. If Democratic leadership succeeds, no think-tank generated "new Republican ideas" will prevent a realignment in our favor.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.


Well, From My Realignment-Obsessed Perspective (4.00 / 1)
Realignment is already a done deal.  The question remains, "realignment to what?"  And that's a mighty important question.

The fear is that it's an 1896-style realignment, which was from one contested terrain to another, rather than more like 1932, which was from one dominated terrain to another.

An 1896-style realignment could be perfectly compatible with the GOP staging some sort of comeback, or with the Dems continuing to muddle on as they have the last few weeks.

A 1932-style realignment means the GOP continues off the cliff, and the moderate Dems lose almost all their leverage for the downright traitorous/obstructionist stuff.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
Two parties, six ideas (0.00 / 0)
Although it's probably true that the Republican Party has incorporated very few ideas or even consistent tendencies in the last 30 years, at least three are easy to identify:

1. Low taxes
2. Big budgets for the Pentagon
3. "Pro-life"

Meanwhile, the only thematic tendencies that I can really identify with all factions of the Democratic Party in the same period are...

1. Free trade
2. Welfare Reform
3. "Pro-choice"

Maybe some of the local Democrats can fill in the blanks for me, and suggest a few more ideas that are characteristic of the Democratic Party as a whole in the same way that it's hard to imagine a Republican who doesn't subscribe to low taxes, "pro-life" posturing, and big Pentagon budgets.

In general, if anyone tried to throw a "party of ideas" on Saturday night in the District of Columbia, it would probably be a very small party, and everyone would home in bed before 10 PM.



Typo (0.00 / 0)
"...everyone would be home in bed by 10 PM."

[ Parent ]
Ideas versus Philosophy (4.00 / 1)
I think you are confusing ideas with philosophy.  The Republican philosophy is very straight forward, but it doesn't lead to new ideas.

The liberal philosophy is less straight forward because it incorporates the concept that there will always be new ideas.  It goes back to that whole Enlightenment thing that so many people still don't get, despite growing up in a society built on the concept.


[ Parent ]
Recommended? (0.00 / 0)
The most interesting thing about your comment is that Paul Rosenberg recommended it.

This is very peculiar, but it's pointless to explain why, because anyone who would understand the explanation already understands the peculiarity of Paul Rosenberg's recommendation.  


[ Parent ]
Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search