Trade and the Rootsgap

by: David Sirota

Tue Feb 24, 2009 at 09:00


Last week, Gallup reaffirmed what polls have been telling us for a few years now: Americans are sick and tired of rigged trade policies that they know are selling them out:

The most interesting thing about the poll, though, is not its numbers, but Gallup's analysis.

The pollsters note:

As with many policies, there are pluses and minuses to foreign trade. And while many economists and political leaders may hold a more pro- than anti-trade position, the public does not necessarily share that position. In fact, as the Obama administration seeks to preserve or expand current trade relationships, the public is slightly more likely to take a negative than a positive view of foreign trade.

As always, those who want to reform trade are billed as "anti-trade" - not, for instance, "pro-trade-reform." Anyone who thinks our current trade policies are bad must be portrayed as Luddite isolationists by the Establishment - it's standard operating propaganda.

But what's really interesting is Gallup highlighting the rootsgap - ie. the gap between the American public and elite opinion. Yes, Gallup couches it with mealy-mouthed terms like "not necessarily," but it's right there, and the more that rootsgap gets exposed, the better able we will be to narrow it.

David Sirota :: Trade and the Rootsgap

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
47-44 is very close (0.00 / 0)
The popularity of labor and environmental standards is a different question. I would imagine such agreements would be very popular, but whether they would affect the person's view of trade in general is another question again.  

Darkness has a hunger that's insatiable, and lightness has a call that's hard to hear.  

It looks like trade reform (0.00 / 0)
has lost ground a bit this year. I wonder if that has something to do with the popularity of the current administration. One wonders if people's views on this are colored by the perceived policies of whoever is in power at the time.

Neat correlation (0.00 / 0)
When "free trade" is more popular, Republicans won 100% of the House elections (1994-2004).  When "fair trade" is more popular, Democrats won 100% of the time (1992, 2006-2008).  Hint to "free trade Democrats" stfu, you are cutting your own party's throat.

Fair Trade = Death to labor (0.00 / 0)
It's all about huge greedy companies exploiting cheap labor and killing the American middle class. That's what this is all about.

And it's starting to sink in, even for uninformed Americans.


Cheap imports (0.00 / 0)
create downward price pressure. $1 lower cost means something like $1.50 saved when you consider taxes, and of course means time saved when you consider the extra work to make that buck-fifty. This helps the middle and poorer classes. Of course if there are no replacement jobs for them they lose out, and if their wages decrease they lose out. And moving those factory jobs out of LA sure cleaned up the valley. There are lots of positives about exporting grunt manufacturing jobs. The margins on making tons of toys and cheap electronics just aren't very big - the percentages are in the last part of the chain once they get off the boat and pay import duties - 60-70% of the price comes after that point. Now, if you're worried about the labor conditions in China, that's noble, though it's partly a comparison of them living on $30 a month in some village vs. making $180/month in a factory, and partly being concerned about them getting half of that $180 ripped off through exploitive work arrangements.

Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search