David Brooks: Lobbyists Are Best Equipped to Fix the Economy

by: David Sirota

Tue Feb 24, 2009 at 07:35


The New York Times' David Brooks uses his column today to tell the country that K Street lobbyists are the most qualified people in America to fix the economy. I'm not making this up:

I fear that in trying to do everything at once, [the Obama administration] will do nothing well. I fear that we have a group of people who haven't even learned to use their new phone system trying to redesign half the U.S. economy. I fear they are going to try to undertake the biggest administrative challenge in American history while refusing to hire the people who can help the most: agency veterans who are registered lobbyists.

That's Establishment opinion distilled into pure form. Indeed, only in Washington, D.C. could someone argue that following the Bush/Abramoff era, lobbyists are the most equipped to fix our country.

David Sirota :: David Brooks: Lobbyists Are Best Equipped to Fix the Economy

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
It All Depends On What The Meaning Of "Fix" Is (4.00 / 5)
"Fix" is one of the relatively few words in the English language that is its own antonym.

One meaning of "fix" is to make something work: you fix a broken machine by repairing it, so that it works properly again.

But another meaning of "fix" is just the opposite: you fix a fight or a horse race precisely so that it doesn't work properly.

And it's in this second sense that lobbyists have been fixing the American economy for many decades now.  And Brooksie is completely right: no one knows how to fix the economy better than they do.  They are the Mafiosi of American law and economy.  The fixers of everything not yet utterly broken.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


You've got it! (0.00 / 0)
Perfect explanation of what he means.  Love it!!!

[ Parent ]
But .. but ... but ... (0.00 / 0)
David!!  How dare you!!  just this morning .. Joke Line is telling us that Brooks makes his "usual intelligent case" for Burkean conservatism .. so if Joke Line says Brooks is right .. then who are you to disagree?

/snark

(while my reply is snark, Joke Line actually said such a thing today)


Brooks also posits a return to Burkean conservatism (0.00 / 0)
without the caveat that the current "conservative" political party has nothing in common with Burkean philosophy whatsoever.

He obviously hasn't been reading the discussion here about Obama as a conservative. If Brooks were to suddenly realize that Obama embodies much of what he claims to value in philosophical conservatism, switch to the democratic party, and quit feeling the necessity of being an apologist for Republican policies that have little if anything to do with real conservatism, could he actually become a useful pundit?


wtf (0.00 / 0)
you didnt ask for it but your getting one from me

WTF?

whatever you think people owe you, that is what you owe people


Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search