No, I Don't Need To Release A Fifteen-Point Banking Bailout Plan

by: Chris Bowers

Wed Mar 25, 2009 at 00:15


Given the discussion in the previous bailout thread, and really all over the blogosphere, what I am about to say might sound strange to you. However, that doesn't make it any less accurate:

No, I don't need to release a comprehensive bailout strategy for the financial sector. And neither do you. After the last two days, it just isn't relevant anymore.

More in the extended entry.

Chris Bowers :: No, I Don't Need To Release A Fifteen-Point Banking Bailout Plan
Here is the current situation we face:
  1. No more bailout funds will ever be approved through Congress. With the latest announcement that bailout funding is out of the budget, the last route for Congress to approve more bailout money is now closed. At this point, we might as well talk about how to manage the sale of marijuana after it is legalized during the Obama administration. More congressional-approved bailout funds and legalized weed have about the same chance of happening.

  2. The bailout strategy is out the door. While it is fun to sit around and play a game of "Senior Obama Economic Advisor," the truth is that the bailout plan was announced yesterday, already sold to Wall Street, and is now out the door. The plan is a done deal. It ain't gonna be undone until the money is spent.

  3. There is no back-up bailout plan for the Obama administration. Today, when asked what he would do if his current bailout strategy failed, Geithner replied that there is no backup plan. Que no hay plan de copia de seguridad! And that makes sense, too. Since they ain't gonna get any more money from Congress, and since they are going to spend what they have on this plan, then there can't be a backup plan. This is it.
Given that I am a blogger living in West Philly, and that the people reading this post are probably something similar, it was always tenuous, at best, to claim that we should be sitting around debating the finer points of our individual proposals for the bailout of the financial sector. The people who make the specific policies simply are not listening to us. The best we could always hope for was getting some broad message across, like "make sure some of that money goes to homeowners," "don't pass the bill," "stop the bonuses" or "nationalize it." The bonus tax fight last week was the final, rear-guard action that had any chance of improving the bailout. However, the Senate stalled the bonus tax, and so now the bailout is a done deal.

I'm not saying the policy discussions were useless. However, after the events of the last couple of days, they have been downgraded from a longshot attempt to influence policy, and have now become pure intellectual masturbation. At this point, we are not going to stop, or change, the bailout plan. And there won't be another congressionally approved bailout, either. Those wads have been shot.

The time when wonky discussions of bailout plans have any utility to the broader debate is over. Geithner's continued role in the administration was seriously questioned. Nationalization got a lot of talk. These ideas got into the mainstream, even if they didn't happen. If the current bailout plan works, then great, we are all saved. If it doesn't work, we made it clear that there was an alternative.

At this point, we need to refocus the discussion toward the future. We need to keep the anger at Wall Street high. We need to keep demanding more transparency and regulations. And we need to help pass President Obama's budget, now that it doesn't include anymore bailout funds. That is what is relevant now. My opinion on the fifteen steps needed to improve the bailout simply is not.


Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Superb post. (4.00 / 4)
Next topics:

Foreign policy, budgetary priorities, rolling back the police state.


. (0.00 / 0)
No more bailout funds will ever be approved through Congress.

And this is based on what? Congress's backbone? Good luck with that.


Congress is afraid of its own shadow.... (4.00 / 1)
Even if Obama had approval numbers in the 90's, they is no way they will sign on such a bill...

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


[ Parent ]
I'm glad we can move on from this stuff... (4.00 / 1)
The debate was becoming self-immolating and pointless, as you mentioned... we're not going to change anything at the moment.

The next stop is the budget and it is crucial!

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


Relevance (4.00 / 3)

If the current bailout plan works, then great, we are all saved. If it doesn't work, we made it clear that there was an alternative.

Before this is over, I believe a great deal more will be required of us. Tactically speaking, I can't disagree with your desire to hurry the troops past the scene of the crime. Strategically, I think it's a big mistake. I even think you'll come to regret this post.

All of which is not to stand in anybody's way, you understand. I'd just like to be on record that I think the stakes are higher, and the context broader, than you seem to have decided.


it ain't about how high the stakes are (4.00 / 1)
it is about the deed being done. it's frakking over. you didn't even offer a counter to that argument. you just said that you wanted to go on the record opposing the plan.

great. i've gone on the record opposing the plan several dozen times. i fail to see how anything will be accomplished by going on the record opposing it several dozen more times.


[ Parent ]
But, will you absorb the information? (4.00 / 1)
I always saw Obama as being to the right of Bill Clinton.  However, I am dismayed by his timidity.  He lacks vision and fortitude.

All the passion in the primaries directed against Hillary, the DLC, the blue dogs, etc., seems at an end.  There's no pushing or prodding the administration.  If he isn't going to listen to the dire warnings of Nobel Prize winning economists or address the anger over the AIG bonuses, he isn't going to ever listen to bloggers or embrace any progressive politics.


[ Parent ]
Fair enough. (4.00 / 2)
It was late, and I thought that since I wasn't the only one who's been making the underlying arguments, you would understand what they were. At the risk of beating a dead horse, let me try again:

1, It ain't over till its over, frakkin' or otherwise. The bailout policy which you call a done deal is exactly that, but I'm persuaded by folks like Krugman and Galbraith that it won't be the end of the battle, because, as they and others have pointed out, it's unlikely to work. Extremely unlikely.

2. Geithner's plan isn't just a tactical battle which we've lost; it's a strategic battle which, in the long run, we have to keep fighting, because it's absolutely central to establishing the difference between a progressive agenda and the one which Obama is pleased to back with the full faith and credit of his administration. His agenda is, briefly put, an attempt to preserve neo-liberalism, including its stranglehold on the corporate/government monstrosity which has traditionally devoted so many of our resources to serving so few of us.

Obama thinks he can fix this system. I think it must be radically restructured. Conceding defeat on this issue and moving on deprives us for a good deal of the intellectual basis for distinguishing his agenda from ours. (Or rather from mine. I'll give you that much.)

3. The best reason for continuing to criticize this plan, as we move forward to engage on other parts of the Obama agenda -- the budget, health care, labor and foreign policy issues, etc. -- is that those parts of his agenda already show some of the same conceptual flaws as the bailout plan does; i.e. wherever the administration sees a conflict between a restored status quo ante and the people's interest, the status quo is served first. What do you think single-payer is off the table means, if it doesn't mean that?

4. If we go quietly on this issue, we court an outcome more damaging than a mere tactical defeat; we'll be forced to watch Washington sell the bailout as a success when it isn't any such thing, much as the surge in Iraq was sold as a success. Violence is going down; we have a government, Petraeus was right. Do you really want to accept an outcome like that?

5. To sum up, even if you wind up lobbying Congress to pass Obama's budget, or not to water down EFCA, or to accept in principle Obama's plan for universal health care, flawed though it is, it is, as I said, a strategic mistake to act as though these are all disconnected pieces. If we're right, that this is a major inflection point in our recent history, when the left for the first time in my lifetime has a chance to advance a detailed critique of established conventional wisdom about our country's present direction and actually be listened to, why on earth would we restrict ourselves to ward-healing for the best we can get right now?


[ Parent ]
I don't think Chris was conceding defeat... (0.00 / 0)
I think that's his whole point - there is nothing to concede when it's over. The horse has left the barn and there ain't no bringing him back for more training and grooming.

[ Parent ]
April 3 and 4 (4.00 / 3)
there will be a demonstration on Wall Street, I'll be interested to see how it goes.

You are not facing an important reality (4.00 / 4)
The plan, with high probability, will fail.

You're certainly right it's not going to be changed at this point -- which, given its defects, is exactly why it is so likely to fail.

And the other prong of a solution to the economic crisis is, of course, the stimulus -- also well inadequate for its job.

Put them together, how likely is it that Obama's economic solution is going to pull us out of our slump? Not very.

What will be the arc of Obama's Presidency in the face of such a failure to bring to an end our economic crisis -- really the primary reason most people voted for him? Not a soaring one, I shouldn't think.

One wonders how much enthusiasm one might gin up for other progressive policy while laboring under the Sword of Damocles.  


Probably not safe for work (4.00 / 1)
due to frequent use of the word "shit".  

From Breakroom Live with Sam Seder and Marc Maron.


No, you don't (4.00 / 3)
But it would be foolish to think the economy is going to vanish from the front page. Neither the stimulus nor this latest Geithner plan are adequate to their challenges. Unemployment is likely to continue to expand. The second and third waves of defaults, consumer credit and commercial real estate, have yet to hit the banks. And the global effects are not yet clear.

There will be plenty more outrage to come.


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox