The Obama-Needs-A-Teleprompter Meme and Why It's So Awesome

by: tremayne

Wed Mar 25, 2009 at 13:45


Right wing media has tried a lot of smears against Barack Obama, in almost every case complete fabrications. For example:

Obama is a Muslim

Obama was not born in the U.S.

Obama pals around with terrorists

Obama is a communist

These are just a few they've tried. But my favorite smear is the now popular: "Obama can't speak without a teleprompter." The AP's Ron Fornier continued his Obama-bashing habit by focusing his write-up of last night's press conference on the President's use of a prompter for his opening remarks. This meme is fantastic and I'll explain why inside.

tremayne :: The Obama-Needs-A-Teleprompter Meme and Why It's So Awesome

For a nice write-up of the media's non-performance at the press conference see AnonymousLiberal. This part is particularly good:

Well, the hactacular Ron Fournier is at it again. His write-up of the Obama press conference is headlined "Analysis: Teleprompter Telegraphs Obama's Caution." Here are some of his key bits of "analysis":

What kind of politician brings a teleprompter to a news conference?

A careful one.

President Barack Obama took no chances in his second prime-time news conference, reading a prepared statement in which he took both sides of the AIG bonus brouhaha and asked an anxious nation for its patience. . . . .

It was a carefully modulated statement, and Obama — relying on a familiar crutch — read it off a flat-screen monitor perched at the back of the East Room.

The teleprompter was no help during the question-and-answer session (reporters don't signal their intentions), but Obama was no less careful during that give and take. . . .

One of the few times he summoned raw emotion came after a reporter demanded to know why it took him so long to express outrage over the AIG executive bonuses.

"It took a couple of days because I like to know what I'm talking about before I speak."

Even better, he likes to have it up on the teleprompter.

So this is what passes for "analysis" now at the A.P.?  No wonder the newspaper industry is dying. It's apparently hugely significant that Obama used a teleprompter to deliver his opening remarks (which were several minutes long). I'm not sure what Fournier thinks is so unusual about that. Do presidents typically memorize speeches? Read them off cue cards? If so, can he cite a single example of this? And given that Obama gave an hour long press conference in which he gave long substantive answers to questions that were not pre-screened, how is it even remotely relevant that he delivered his opening remarks with the assistance of a teleprompter? How big a "crutch" can it really be?

The truth is, Fournier is a hack. The only reason to use the word "teleprompter" five times in a 100 word write-up of a presidential press conference is in order to push a meme, a meme that just happens to be popular right now on right wing blogs. As usual, Fournier's agenda is transparent.

This meme doesn't bother me at all. In fact, I think it's the best, most productive smear yet. Their previous smears had some effect. Hard to believe but some less-informed voters were influenced, at least temporarily, by the muslim-non-citizen-terrorist-communist smears of 2008. That meant Team Obama had to spend considerable time refuting these fictions. And it's hard to disprove a lie. You can say "I'm a Christian" but then they say you're a secret Muslim.You can say "Here's my birth certificate" and then they say "it's a forgery."

The beauty of the teleprompter smear is that it's 1) not much a smear to begin with and 2) refutable by anyone with either eyes or ears.

First, in today's media world people are used to teleprompters. David Letterman periodically shows the cue cards or prompter he uses. Does the audience then believe he's too dumb to appear without it? No, they've seen his quick wit during interviews. Saying Obama uses a teleprompter for prepared remarks isn't much a smear. Most people don't care.

Second, Obama's ability to speak thoughtfully in unscripted situations is right there for viewers to see or hear. Over the last 2 years he's been in dozens of debates without knowing what the questions would be. He's appeared on countless television shows to be interviewed.

Last night, after making short introductory remarks, he answered an hour's worth of questions without the aid of a prompter. Anyone watching knows he's smart and quite capable of speaking without a script. The teleprompter smear only smears those who spread it.  It does not have the ability to damage the President because the refutation of it is right there before your eyes and ears. In fact, it may serve to lower expectations of the conservative audience who hear the meme. They watch Obama without a script and expect him to sputter and dodge and keep repeating one memorized line over and over (sound familiar?). When he exceeds that low bar they might come away with a more positive view of him than before.

So, keep it up with the teleprompter smear. It's awesome.


Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

I never quite (0.00 / 0)
understood how this was a smear in the first place.

And now I'm all, "this is how far the smear merchants have fallen?".  Wow, there is desperate and then there is what happened when you've shot off all your ammo and you're reduced to spitting at tanks.


I never quite understood... (0.00 / 0)
Many racists dog whistles can be opaque if you view the object of the smear as a regular old human being.

For people who view the target group as subhuman, the subject 'imitating' what real people do is a subject for derision. See, for instance, owning a Cadillac.


[ Parent ]
Um, (4.00 / 2)
I hope you and all the others in the liberal blogosphere were as much deploring the smear of George Bush that he was using a earphone and a wire during one of his Presidential debates. (The Bulge! The Bulge!).

But I keep forgetting. A smear against Eeeevil is no vice.

Of course, while you're fighting your Shirts vs Skins game, convinced that your side is only good, and the other side is only evil, you neglect to pay attention to the fact that both sides are now screwing you.


how is that the same? (0.00 / 0)
If it was an earphone, it was cheating as it would be an advantage Kerry didn't have.  

[ Parent ]
Except for the obvious problem (4.00 / 1)
that there was nothing even resembling a convincing case that Bush wore such a device. It was a fabrication essentially built out of nothing. It was a classic conspiracy theory propounded by those who had an interest in spreading a smear.

How many liberal bloggers weighed in against the smear, examining it on its merits, and how many did everything they could to extend its life?

At least it can be said of this "smear" against Obama -- his unusual dependence on teleprompters -- that it appears to be based on something true and establishable, even if it exaggerates its importance. Smears, pretty much by definition, should be false.

Is Fournier's treatment of the issue unfair, because it exaggerates the importance of Obama's use of teleprompters? You can make an argument that it is. But I see nothing that he says that could be said to be outright false.


[ Parent ]
not false, just idiotic (0.00 / 0)
more faux outrage from the pout-o-crats who have nothing better to do than pass around beavis and butthead level cracks. And remember all this teleprompter crap is being pushed by the most "respectable" and "mainstream" media outlets, not a bunch of conspiracy minded bloggers.

[ Parent ]
Half-truths and less-than-half truths from left and right... (0.00 / 0)
Obama actually uses teleprompters more extensively than most other Presidents in the "teleprompter era," and most of the White House press corps has noticed it at one time or another. The New York Times says...

Presidents have been using teleprompters for more than half a century, but none have relied on them as extensively as Obama has so far.

The rest of the "meme," that Obama can't talk without a teleprompter, is either totally false, for charisma-intoxicated Obamoids, or less-than-half-true, because Mr. Obama occasionally puts his shoe directly in his mouth (Special Olympics), or Gospel Truth for a certain far right TV network that probably can't even sell its far-right readers such a whopper.

But it's silly to compare the discussion of Obama's teleprompters to claims that Obama is a closet muslim, or similar nonsense, because that noise has no basis in fact whatsoever, while it really seems to be the case that Obama uses teleprompters more extensively than any other President, even though he can obviously talk more fluently than most of us without them.


[ Parent ]
And what about the reporters themselves? (0.00 / 0)
Check out Stars and Stripes reporter Kevin Baron at Obama's press conference! That boob couldn't even ask a question without reading it all directly off his notes!

And then he mumbled the question so incomprehensibly that nobody could understand him!

Compared to the White House press corps, Obama is obviously fluent enough.


[ Parent ]
it wasn't (4.00 / 1)
based on nothing there was clearly something under his coat.  He also said "let me finish" at one point when neither Kerry nor the moderator had interrupted him, which was certainly odd.

It was certainly an unproven logical leap that it was an RF receiver, but not a complete fabrication.  It fit the available evidence.

To answer your question, I haven't done a complete survey, but my links are two liberal blogs, and we can throw in salon and digby who all took the "I don't know what it is, but it's something" position on it.

The liberal blogs did not run screaming with this "smear" they asked reasonable questions based on the evidence, and noted the White House's evasive denials, and lack of explanation of what was actually under Bush's coat.


[ Parent ]
Desperate undertone (0.00 / 0)
The smear seems obvious to me.  Much of the Obama movement centers around continued statements about how smart the man is.  Well, if he needs to read his text, the undertone, goes, he is not so smart.  (But smart enough to use his advantages, his smarts. Define smart.)

Of course, that is a huge crock.  Jefferson read his innaugural speeches.  The man was brilliant and the speeches (which he wrote) were badly delivered although brilliantly written.  Lincoln wrote the Gettysburg Address and read the speech.

Obama does far better in a set piece environment.  That is a strength that is so evident that his opponents feel the need to come up with excuses.  What's next?  Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant score a lot of points because they make/made a lot of free throws?  Yeah and Shaq could have scored more if he'd done as well as they do from the charity stripe.  It is a strength and Obama is benefitting from it.


trying to attack his strength (0.00 / 0)
Bingo.

This is an attempt to attack his strength. Obama's greatest strength is being seen as a great communicator. The smear is he's not a great communicator, just a great reader from a teleprompter. The related smear is it's all just words, words, words.

I think it's a lame one, but, yes, it is like saying MJ and KB are just average shooters 'cause they scored so many points from the charity stripes or with dunks.

They call me Clem, Clem Guttata. Come visit wild, wonderful West Virginia Blue


[ Parent ]
Speaking of smear merchants - How 'bout that Norah O'Donnell on MSNBC (4.00 / 1)
Sorry to go a bit off topic, but we need all the clear voices
we can get
Norah, as well as the ever dim bulb contessa Brewer always has someone's talking points to push, but I've had it with O'Donnells outright bitchy rudeness.

MSNBC in in it's infinite wisdom has hired Gov. Dean as a contributor.  In battling with the Governor just now over some internal Democratic disputes over Obamas' budget Norah constantly misinterpreted the facts and cut her new colleague off.  
After not getting her way and wasting the time airtime herself she or her handlers just cut the piece off.  No thank you's to Dean  -nothing.

Senator Boxer came on later to confirm everything Dean just said. -

If some at MSNBC thinks Dean is their new punching bag for idiots like her,  I hope The great Gov. tells them to take that job and shove it.

 

Nationalism is not the same thing as terrorism, and an adversary is not the same thing as an enemy.


O'Donnell vs. Dean? (0.00 / 0)

 OMG that's a GROSS mismatch. I almost feel sorry for Norah. Almost.  

"We judge ourselves by our ideals; others by their actions. It is a great convenience." -- Howard Zinn

[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox