Darcy Speaks on Friedman Units

by: Matt Stoller

Mon Sep 10, 2007 at 20:02


This is from Darcy Burner.

"I have one question for President Bush, General Petraeus, Congressman Reichert, and our other leaders in Washington, D.C.: when will it end?

"Publicly, yet again, they are asking for six more months. Six months ago they asked for six more months. Six months before that they wanted six more months. We are now learning that Bush administration plans to not even end the surge until August of next year, and will keep some 130,000 troops in Iraq indefinitely. Privately, the Bush administration is telling allies like Congressman Reichert that with their support they expect to keep the war going for another decade.

"That is outrageous and unacceptable. The deaths in Iraq of nine more of our brave men and women in uniform was announced today. We have already squandered $450 billion for this misguided war. So I ask again: when will it end?

"I suspect that is really a trick question, because the American people are realizing that President Bush and Congressman Reichert have no intention to bringing this war to a responsible close. If we let them, President Bush, Congressman Reichert and those who think like they do will keep this war going forever.

"Unfortunately, taking full advantage of a credulous inside-the-Beltway media establishment, they have succeeded for now - yet again - in turning the D.C. debate into how long the surge should continue.

"That is not what ordinary Americans want. For them, it is not about the surge, it is about the war. This is the only real question: do we want to end the war, or do want to continue it for another five or ten years?

Sign up at Stop the DC Establishment.

Matt Stoller :: Darcy Speaks on Friedman Units

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
It will not go on for another five or ten years (0.00 / 0)
It will either wind down or it will escalate.

If we attack Iran, the entire region will go up in flames. Have no doubt of it.

As horrible as this war is, my greater fear is that, if we don't end the Iraq occupation, the international tensions and violence will increase. The violence could easily follow a path that would end with a nuclear conflagration in the Middle East.

It is already well on its way, thanks to US.


A better question... (0.00 / 0)
I have a better question:

Mr. Bush, General Petraeus, could you please define "win"?  Over the past five years I have heard so many different reasons and justifications that I have to admit I am confused. 

Are we fighting to overthrow an evil dictator?  If so, we're done!  Let's come home!

Are we fighting to establish a democratic government?  Again, we're done!  Let's come home!

Are we fighting to defeat Al Quaeda?  The we are in the wrong effing country!  Let's come home!  Or at least move to the Afghan/Pakistani border where Al Quaeda's leadership is located.

Or are we fighting for your Oedipus complex, Mr. Bush?  Is that what we are really there for?  You psychological problems?  In that case, we're going home...  YOU fight on if you have the guts!


Darcy on Friedman Units (0.00 / 0)
The real neo-con vision for this war all goes back to their "starve the beast" theory.  They intend to break the bank to end the capability to fund programs like Social Security, Medicare, etc.  The only way to end this war is to provide no further funding without taxes to pay as you go and ALSO amortize the already built up war debt.  The taxes, furthermore, must be targeted at the upper income levels.  Only then will the war come to a swift end!

It's All An Educational Exercise About Zeno's Paradox (0.00 / 0)
Bush & Cheney are actually highly educated, deeply introspective students of philosophy.  They hold dearly to the truthfulness of Zeno's paradoxes, and since most people are unaware that their common sense understanding of classical motion must be false (as the Bush-Cheney-Zenocons believe) Our Leaders have realized that Americans would never truly appreciate the brilliance of Zeno's paradoxes without a powerful example of one in the real world.

In the arrow paradox, Zeno asks us to imagine an arrow in flight. He then asks us to divide up time into a series of indivisible nows or moments. At any given moment if we look at the arrow it has an exact location so it is not moving. Yet movement has to happen in the present; it can't be that there's no movement in the present yet movement in the past or future. So throughout all time, the arrow is at rest. Thus motion cannot happen.

Thus, each time we believe that the Iraq occupation has moved further towards its completion, we find that it has yet another six months to travel, at which it can never arrive, because even after 1 month has passed, another 6 month period has just begun.

Someday, however, someone will teach Bush & Cheney about Leibnitz' and Newton's "calculus", and they will realize how to use it to close upon apparently infinitely unreachable goals.


6 more months, 6 more months (4.00 / 1)
Publicly, yet again, they are asking for six more months. Six months ago they asked for six more months. Six months before that they wanted six more months.

This is like the old Bugs Bunny and Yosemite Sam cartoon where Bugs Bunny says, "if you cross this line, you're in big trouble doc" and draws a line in the sand which Yosemite Sam proceeds to cross. The process continues on and on, with no consequences and just more lines in the sand.

Memo to Congress: Just drop the damn anvil on the President already.


Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search