American Federation of Teachers Endorses Clinton

by: Chris Bowers

Wed Oct 03, 2007 at 15:28


Personally, this is the biggest endorsement of the campaign for me so far:

Ex-Sen. John Edwards was late for Winnacunnet elementary school this morning and he didn't even get a hall pass. Cosmic justice: on the day that Edwards was set to speak to the National Education Associations"School to White House" team here, the American Federation of Teachers voted to endorse Sen. HIllary Clinton, a fact that will almost certainly appear in every newspaper account of the first half of the day.

(A union source says the vote for Hillary was "overwhelming" -- even though Illinois and New Mexico are well represented on the AFT's board. Now -- since the largest AFT affiliate is New York City's United Federation of Teachers, the fact of the endorsement is not too surprising.)

The AFT has played a very large role in both my life, and the life of my family. When I started my Ph.D. program at Temple University in 2000, I became heavily involved in the effort to unionize graduate employees. That effort, spanning over several years, was backed by the AFT, and eventually resulted in a new AFT local for Temple graduate employees. A couple of years later, when I was looking to change my life from academia to politics, my first job was as a union organizer for the Illinois Federation of Teachers in the Chicago Area. Growing up, many of my aunts were teachers and members of the AFT. My mother still is a member. When she was only 23 years old, she was fired from her job as a middle school English teacher for being pregnant with my older brother and when my parents were looking to buy a house--not exactly the best time to lose a job. It was the AFT, of which she was a local, state and national member, that allowed her to sue the school district. Everything turned out OK, and after that point it became illegal to fire public employees in Monroe County, New York (Rochester and suburbs) simply because they were pregnant. And, to top it all off, I am actually wearing one of my three AFT tee-shirts today.

So, yeah, this endorsement means a lot to me. The AFT has played a major, positive role in my life from before I was born. In fact, I can't think of any other political organization that has played such a positive role. Few things anger me more than right-wing attacks on teacher's unions, because it is hard for me to imagine a group of people who are harder working and more dedicated to making a positive difference in people's lives while simultaneously passing up major monetary and career opportunities that their extensive educations would otherwise grant them. I know AFT people, both the teachers and the organizers. They are friends, family and colleagues. They are smart, extremely hard working, and also very progressive. I trust the decisions they make. If they decide to endorse Hillary Clinton, that means a lot to me, just as it meant a lot to me when they endorsed Barack Obama in the 2004 Illinois Senate primary before pretty much any other unions did so. The AFT endorsement of Hillary Clinton improves my image of Hillary Clinton, just as my parents endorsement of Clinton has done so in the past. I still don't think I will vote for her in the primaries, but it is yet another reason why I am definitely not anti-Clinton.

I am wondering, out of curiosity, what endorsements really matter to other people here.  Is there an organization, public figure, or personal relation whose endorsement would make a big impact in your view of the campaign? Beyond the horserace, beyond policy positions, and beyond even actual campaigning, sometimes there is something very personal that drives politics for many people. This is one of those things for me, and I am interested to see what some of these things are for others.

Chris Bowers :: American Federation of Teachers Endorses Clinton

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Shows that endorsements (4.00 / 1)
are going to be largely personal and regional.  Hillary won this endorsement on the back of UFT in New York and her past reputation with the teachers.  If anything, I think labor is more interested in who's been with them in the past (on both the regional and national level) then who's talking the labor rhetoric.

In other words, this trend is bad news for Edwards (and just to note, I'm an Edwards supporter).

"Never be afraid to stand with the minority when the minority is right, for the minority which is right will one day be the majority." -William Jennings Bryan


Is that a surprise? (0.00 / 0)
I think most endorsements are based on record as well as rhetoric, with record carrying a lot of weight. And Hillary Clinton has been there for teachers.

[ Parent ]
The endorsements that matter (0.00 / 0)
most to me would come from bloggers, actually. Digby's endorsement would matter to me most. She's probably the only person who could actually change my mind. Then Josh Marshall's, Glenn Greenwald's, Kevin Drum's, and a few others a little closer to home, here.

I like your list (4.00 / 1)
I agree. AFT is a good organization though, even though I disagree with their choice of candidate.

[ Parent ]
Yeah, both my parents (0.00 / 0)
are teachers, so nothing against AFT. But I'm just unable to trust an organization like I trust a person. Take, well, Chris Bowers. I disagree with him, I think, regarding some of his priorities for our nominee, but I trust him personally, and think his agenda is perfectly transparent. Hell, the transparency is what allows disagreement.

There just aren't any organizations--or public figures who don't write -many- thousands of words in direct response to readers--I can know as well as I know bloggers. That's the power of this online conversation. Although Digby hasn't any clue who I am, or that I read her--or even exist--I have forged a personal (albeit one-sided) connection to her. That's pretty powerful.

I'm still a bit in love with Howard Dean--and Al Gore--but even their endorsement would be secondary for me.


[ Parent ]
Most Bloggers (0.00 / 0)
are too opinionated and biased to trust in such a choice. I agree that some of the people you mentioned have interesting thing to say but they are just one person in each of their cases. In a union the collective voices are varied and therefore speak for a larger segment of America.

Josh originally supported the war. Digby was not so high on the idea of impeachment. I can't sat that those were two popular opinions on the Left.


[ Parent ]
If you're looking for the endorsements of unbiased (4.00 / 1)
people without strong opinions, then sure, bloggers aren't the people for you.

[ Parent ]
Well Not Only That (0.00 / 0)
But overall a blogger endorsement is just going to reach a small portion of the population - a large number of which already support the candidate being endorsed.

As opposed to a more mainstream endorsement that reaches a wider and larger audience.

My point is not to put bloggers down but to just point out that a blogger endorsement isn't that big of a deal in the greater scheme of things.


[ Parent ]
I view this as typical institutional stupdity... (0.00 / 0)
The AFT thinks The Hill is gonna be good for them. They must be sucking down the Kool-Aid.

The Hill will want 'more of the same...' which means keep them corporation taxes low, low, low and ship whatever money the government does take in of to Iraq. Won't be any 'left over' for schools and such.

Perhaps she will 'triangulate' on 'No Child Left Untested'?

Historians will someday look back on this period of U.S. history and wonder how so many could be fooled so effectively by so few.

Peace, Health and Prosperity for Everyone.


Al Gore (0.00 / 0)
That would be an endorsement that would at least be somewhat influential to me.  I can't think of any other endorsement, besides Howard Dean (who can't endorse this year as DNC Chair) that would have any meaningful impact on me.

John McCain <3 lobbyists

SEIU (0.00 / 0)
They are involved in every exciting progressive thing around and rebuilding labor.

Hillary and Education (4.00 / 1)
The AFT's overwhelming endorsement of Hillary Clinton is important to me as well.  Hillary's dedication to improving education and her commitment to educators and all the work she has done in this regard beginning in Arkansas, including her years as First Lady and her record in the Senate are my primary reasons for supporting her as I do.  She, more than any other candidate, deserves this endorsement. 

Her promise to make pre-K avaiable to every 4 year old in the nation and her intention to pay for this by cutting half a million federal contractors has been the most important and least publicized of all of her proposals.


As a Californian, I view the AFT as an East Coast union (0.00 / 0)
with 1 million members, compared to the NEA, with over 3.5 million teachers.  The California Teacher's Association (CTA) is closely affiliated with the NEA, and the inside word is Hillary is polling third with that group, behind a Edwards and Richardson.  Richardson's recent visit, dovetailing with the CTA's stand against the Miller-Pelosi proposal for NCLB; with Richardson calling to scrap NCLB in its entirety, perked up the ears of a number of CTA Executive Board members.  His special visit to their headquarters also showed the members of the Board a level of respect not shown by most of the other candidates, although they have "promised" to make the same stop.

If the NEA and the CTA endorse a candidate other than Sen. Clinton, it will certainly mitigate the import of the AFT endorsement.


Interesting (0.00 / 0)
Most people view the UFT as primarily urban and the NEA as primarily suburban.

And that's 1.4 million members ;)


[ Parent ]
Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search