The Bush Dog - Steve Elmendorf Business Model

by: Matt Stoller

Tue Oct 23, 2007 at 15:54


( - promoted by Chris Bowers)

Remember this?

"The bloggers and online donors represent an important resource for the party, but they are not representative of the majority you need to win elections," said Steve Elmendorf, a Democratic lobbyist who advised Kerry's 2004 presidential campaign. "The trick will be to harness their energy and their money without looking like you are a captive of the activist left."

He figured it out.

The best-heeled new blue firm is Elmendorf Strategies LLC, which at present has just three registered lobbyists but has pulled down more than $2 million in business since December 2006. Some of its leading clients are UnitedHealth Group, Verizon Wireless and Coalition for Patent Fairness, a communications industry trade group specializing in intellectual-property issues. Founding partner Steve Elmendorf, a longtime adviser to former Democratic Rep. Dick Gephardt of Missouri, launched the shop after leaving Bryan Cave Strategies in 2006. The other lobbyists had previously worked for Democratic Sen. Paul Sarbanes of Maryland and the centrist New Democrats group.
Matt Stoller :: The Bush Dog - Steve Elmendorf Business Model

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I don't remember that (4.00 / 1)
But those first two quotes are devastating when juxtaposed. My first reaction is is a bit radical: how do we develop a list of Democratic decision makers who feel that way, and get rid of / isolate them?

yeah (0.00 / 0)
That's a good project.

[ Parent ]
The epitome of the revolving door consultant class (0.00 / 0)
I remember when he was pulling the strings at the DCCC in the late 1990's. 

There was nothing the guy wouldn't force the D-trip staff to do or keep progressive House Dems from doing to please the large corporate donors he knew would hire him after he left the House. 

I wish I had an easy answer as to how we can keep senior staff in the House and Senate from forcing our party to pull their punches so as not to offend their future employers. 

Even now, it seems like at least once a month I can read National Journal and see the name of someone I worked on legislation with on the Hill, or played in the Congressional softball league with, moving over to some trade association or lobbying firm.

It's a conveyer belt of influence peddling that I know a lot of staff, who may be able to even triple their pay after leaving the hill, find very hard to resist in an expensive city like D.C.  Sad.


It would seem that 'we' progressives need to... (4.00 / 1)
build our own $$$ infrastructure. Blogpac is a start. But I wonder if there are not lots of folks out there in America, folks with money, who'd be willing to support progressive infrastructure.

Example:

As Sirota has written, and I know from personal experience, there are large industries who rely on existing natural resources in the Rocky Mountain West. They mostly revolve around recreation. Flyfishing, hiking, skiing require that methane and coal extraction be subject to draconian controls so that the local operators can survive. This might appear small potatoes until you factor in the equipment manufacturers.

Not everyone in America works for Big Oil, Gas, Corn etc. and those who do not are, it's my assertion, vastly underrepresented.

Peace, Health and Prosperity for Everyone.


The last part of your statement .. (0.00 / 0)
was exactly JE's point ... when Hillary made her lobbyist comments that got loudly booed

[ Parent ]
Yes, it's about the infrastucture (0.00 / 0)
Not just $$$, because we can only partially compete with the lobbyist firehose. We have to be strategic with our money.

Our bigger opportunity is continuing to build channels of communication, something to rival the right-wing noise machine, and the ability to change the conventional narratives. We are still going through the early phases.

The netroots is still small, but growing fast, and traditional media is losing readership. Elmendorff thought he could write us off in 2004, thinks he could still write us off in 2008, let's see what happens in 2010.

Maybe some of our friends have forgotten the hand we gave them to climb up, but that just means we haven't reached the tipping point.


[ Parent ]
And we are part of a new... (0.00 / 0)
Physical and Social Technology as per Eric Beinhocker's definition in The Origin of Wealth.

Further, as members of a boolean network we've got the processing power far in excess of any other group on the planet.

If we figure out how to make it work; and the best thing?

Should not cost all that much more than 'we' are already spending.

Peace, Health and Prosperity for Everyone.


[ Parent ]
Pretty much sums it up....Use us (0.00 / 0)
as an ATM and a ground operation, then ignore what we want them to do. Do they really think people want to elect a bunch of wimps?

Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search