Paul Wellstone Was His Brother's and Sister's Keeper

by: Chris Bowers

Thu Oct 25, 2007 at 15:04


On the five-year anniversary of his death, via Harold Meyerson I want to recount something about Paul Wellstone that really stands out to me right now:

So they flocked to him -- gays, lesbians, union members, hard-scrabble farmers, environmentalists, peace activists, Native Americans, blacks, Latinos, Scandinavians, Lutherans, seniors, students, students and students . . . The volunteers were swamping this campaign from the start. On an August weekday morning, Wellstone's state headquarters in St. Paul had more people bustling purposefully around than you'd find in a normal senate candidate's headquarters on an October weekend. By early October, the campaign had a coordinator on every dorm floor at the University of Minnesota and the state's next two largest college campuses. Campaign organizers were confidently predicting well over 10,000 volunteers getting out the vote on election day, not counting the thousands of union activists turning out union members in their own parallel GOTV campaign. Unions and environmental groups were sending operatives to the swing states all around the country, of course, but more were going into Minnesota than anywhere else, for the simple reason that qualitatively, one Wellstone was worth several of his Democratic colleagues. Students were pouring over the border from Wisconsin. A number of my own acquaintances were flying in on their own dimes to help out in the closing weeks; on the Friday Wellstone was killed, I lunched with a friend whose wife was to go up there the following day.

Wellstone had generated the energy of what many, myself included, often call the contemporary progressive movement before it had really coalesced on a national level or in many different localities. And he earned this energy, this support for his campaign, because he stood with his allies. He didn't throw the netroots, liberals, immigrants, the LGBT community, unions or other progressive constituencies under the bus in order to win. He stood with them. He kept his promises to them. He didn't use them as foils or strawmen to highlight his own centrist or difference with the American left. He stood with his allies. He was his brother's and his sister's keeper.

Compare this to other Democratic leaders:

"The bloggers and online donors represent an important resource for the party, but they are not representative of the majority you need to win elections," said Steve Elmendorf, a Democratic lobbyist who advised Kerry's 2004 presidential campaign. "The trick will be to harness their energy and their money without looking like you are a captive of the activist left."

And

And, predictably, the lowpoint of the weekend was provided by Emanuel who-- in much the same way he told Democrats last year to play down the anti-war message, causing several who listened to him to lose their races-- demanded candidates inoculate themselves against expected GOP attacks by moving to the right on immigration.

Also:

In this election, both the Religious Right and the secular Left were defeated, and the voice of the moral center was heard.

Or even:

"I think there's tremendous agreement and awareness that getting the majority and running over the left cliff is what our Republican opponents would dearly love," Ms. Tauscher said, adding that this was something "we've got to fight."

It isn't even so much the ideological disputes, or even an angry response that I feel when seeing these quotes. Even beyond any of that, I simply feel like Democrats who are willing to throw their own allies under the bus, while simultaneously attempting to exploit those allies for personal gain, are just being assholes. I mean, who treats people like this and still expects to be friends with them afterward? Who acts like that? It is just straight up betrayal for personal gain. There is nowhere on Earth where that sort of behavior is considered a virtue, except for perhaps the Democratic Party, where we all need Sistah Souljah moments in order to appear credible, or something. Unless you betray your friends, you are not worthy of holding public office. That is the ultimate disfunction in the Democratic Party right now, well beyond anything else. It is also one of the main reasons I miss Paul Wellstone. He knew that we were all in this together, and he served as his brother and his sister's keeper, right until the end.

Chris Bowers :: Paul Wellstone Was His Brother's and Sister's Keeper

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Not friends (4.00 / 1)
I mean, who treats people like this and still expects to be friends with them afterward?

There's nothing even metaphorically approaching friendship here. As a byproduct of the elite and cloistered structure of our national government, most of these people don't even see "the left" as people, and virtually every conversation I've taken part in w/professionals and/or "insiders" the attitude towards citizens and voters was at best that of a salesperson an ad-man trying to sell a product -- the language of markets and consumers -- if not one of downright demeaning manipulation. "How can we get these ignorant fucks to do what we want?"

They don't want to be friends. They don't even conceive of this as a possibility. Their primary point of contact is via their staffers, who continually deal with an unrepresentative sample of people, and do so purely as a barometer for support.

The only folks who potentially rise to the level of "friends" are those one can see as peers. We're nowhere near that.

Me | My Work | Future Majority


Wow (0.00 / 0)
That is pretty harsh, but probably true.

[ Parent ]
And sadly so (0.00 / 0)
I might add

[ Parent ]
Well (0.00 / 0)
I didn't mean it to be harsh. It just seems more and more obvious that the problems in politics are driven as much by  small-scale social dynamics as they are outright corruption or a well-organized opposition.

People in positions of power don't know any of us, and they don't have a lot of time to get to know new people. Their small world is pretty full, and regardless of what polls and other aggregate groups may tell them, it's normal human behavior to believe the people you know and stick with your internalized social norms.

Candidate show up at yKos (and tens of other forums), but do they really ever relate to anyone there as a peer? And why should they? From their perspective, they already have all the peers/friends they need.

They may interface on a peer level with the head of some issue group or constituency organization or wealthy progressive donor, but unless there's real power-parity or longstanding operational partnership, that's going to be a lot more like a supplicant/audience kind of relationship than a real peer-to-peer one. And anyway, in many cases, the heads of those organizations (to say nothing of donors) are just as insulated from the Progressive Movement as candidates and representatives.

To a certain extent, this isn't really their fault. It will take the work of a few courageous individuals to break this mold. Someone needs to work differently, and to win doing it to prove the model. It seems like there are ample opportunities, but ironically the general confidence among Democrats about the home stretch of 2008 has rendered the frontrunners timid and risk-averse. They all see a good shot for whoever wins the primary, and nobody wants to risk that.

Also, there have been no serious gadfly/outsider contenders who might really follow the Dean mold. There have been fits and flashes. Lately Dodd looks good, and a lot of what his campaign has done recently is meaningfully participatory, but it's just one data-point, and possibly too late to really matter.

Me | My Work | Future Majority


[ Parent ]
Have you stopped beating your wife yet ...? (0.00 / 1)
- (Pronoun 'you' used colloquially here, not personally ) -

My point, in that headline, is that the thrust of accusation puts you, (the accused), on the defensive for an instant (or longer, directly proportional to the extent of the Guilt Complex you're packing), and, for one example, it is words making a statement you canNOT ignore.  So, uh, have you stopped beating your wife yet ? ? ? ? What will people think? when they hear what you did!

That's the technique, in general. Applied in specific to say:

Why are __Democrats__ PROTECTING WHO MURDERED PAUL WELLSTONE?

Or, if you (personally) speak directly to a Democrat in Congress, imagine the power of the words in a news conference witnessed by reporters with microphones, simply filling in the blank with the individual's name and asking Why are _you,Congressperson So-and-so_ (say, Coleman or Franken, either one) PROTECTING WHO MURDERED PAUL WELLSTONE ? ? ?

Because yes, I agree there's a serious problem, as stated, "People in positions of power don't know any of us, and they don't have a lot of time to get to know new people. [They are] ... regardless (of what polls and other aggregate groups may tell them) ...."

Behind a blank-staring pokerface shield that no polite words can ruffle, serious strong words must gut-punch and face-slap: WHY are YOU helping Wellstone's MURDERER ? ?

[Possible continuing dialogue:
[A: "I didn't know Wellstone was murdered."
[Q: "Evidence looks that way -- WHY do YOU LOOK AWAY from possible MURDER?  Is it a COVER-UP in Congress?"
[A: "... we can look into getting staff of a committee to look into it ... next question?"
[Q: "If Congress has internal rumors Wellstone WAS MURDERED, is that a blackmailing threat to explain WHY DEMOCRATS ROLL-OVER and VIOLATE OATH of Office, the way the ANTHRAX ATTACK on Congress was EXTORTION ? ? ?"
[ ... and so on ...

It just bothers me that investigation was tamped down and suppressed. Not: 'quietly swept under the rug,' no; But: powerfully SUPPRESSED.  That perfectly reasonable speculation on the appearance of guilty behavior, (Democrats hiding from constituents, and violating sworn oath to uphold IMPEACHment and Law), is dismissed, as if too crude and too rude and too screwball to voice and to ask.  The hell! it is screwball --- murder in the pursuit of power's ends, is human nature, is frequent, since time immemorial and completely valid to ask and consider; and DECENT in RESPECT for the dead.  So, WHY do _Democrats_ PROTECT WHO MURDERED Paul WELLSTONE ? ? ?

Other comments here unsettle me the same way, about this, speaking in terms of 'Paul resting in peace,' or 'since Paul left us,' or 'Paul having passed on,' as if it was all quite ordinary, when it was the most EXTRAordinary suspicious plane crash and part of a pattern of plane crashes yielding fascist rightwing political 'gain,' ever since Dag Hammarskjold's plane crash, (or see HERE ), and Wellstone's murder-death inflicted singular damage to progressive Populist Movement, as Chris's thread here makes note.

This memorial date, Oct. 25, this year, has been weighing on my mind and I've been touchy about it, this week.  So I brought it into the Open Thread recently, with LINKS to the most informative investigative results I know of, and accusatory that Democrats, and Congress, and all the insiders 'hear-no-evil, see-no-evil, speak-no-evil;' accusing the 'players' sitting silent in paralyzed personal bodily fear and mute disrespect sacrificing Paul.

And nobody here said an Open Thread peep.


[ Parent ]
Amen (0.00 / 0)
Well said, Chris.

You hit the nail (0.00 / 0)

I simply feel like Democrats who are willing to throw their own allies under the bus, while simultaneously attempting to exploit those allies for personal gain, are just being assholes. I mean, who treats people like this and still expects to be friends with them afterward? Who acts like that?

You're not their friends - and if they expect you to be theirs, then they're delusional.

And throwing under a bus is an essential part of Politics 101: sacrificing the interests of one group for some supposed higher interest of a bigger group.

Thus, for instance, JFK as prez sat on his hands on civil rights for two years to give him a chance of passing his program through Congress.

Couple of years later, the Dems decided to dump the South and go forward on civil rights (and a lot of other stuff).

All dictated by politics - with which friendship has very little to do.

(How many times today has an American pol told someone (words to the effect that) I know that's the right thing to do, but we can't do it because it would hurt us politically?)

Now, of course, that doesn't mean that throwing under the bus is a good in itself. Quite possibly, a measure like the DREAM Act is good politics for the Dems (the Pew poll from June (PDF) shows majorities in favor of offering illegals ways to citizenship).

There may well be a problem with consultants with Sister-Souljah-ing on their must-do lists for candidates. regardless of the political merits.

But - to take the example of the netroots - it's hardly surprising that the regulars want to throw us under the bus! At least so far as taking our money and otherwise doing their best to keep us out of the process. That Iron Law of Organizations thing you write about absolutely applies.

There are some things which are artifacts of the particular history of the actors concerned - in the case of the Dems, the long period of Congressional dominance as the Solid South unraveled, for instance - but I'm pretty sure that under-bus-throwing is common to all societies and eras!


We miss you, Paul (0.00 / 0)
Wellstone was a giant.  I can hardly imagine a more authentic and courageous progressive.

It's such a shame in so many ways that Wellstone didn't live to see the growth of the online progressive community.  As Meyerson describes, Wellstone inspired a kind of grassroots passion, activism, and progressive unity in MN that is almost unfathomable.  Imagine what that could've translated into in terms of national reach with all of the online tools that have developed in the past 5 years.


There are so many of us (4.00 / 1)
who were first inspired to get active in politics here in MN because of Paul Wellstone.  The first political campaign I volunteered for was his, and even though it was very basic tasks I took on, I met an amazing community that is still thriving today in MN.

Paul stood on principle, even when challenged with unpopular votes.  While the country and many Dems were rushing to war, Paul voted against it.  His opponent, and current Senator Norm Coleman attacked him endlessly for his vote.  Paul was proven right in the end.

The progressive movement owes Paul a great deal, and at least here in MN, there is no way we'll ever forget him.

-jason The UpTake


He Helped Me (0.00 / 0)
although never had the chance to meet him.

When I switched from working for non-profits to the political arena I went through the introductory training run by Wellstone Action.  Between campaigns I have gone to advanced ones, and have now had the opportunity to help teach at them.

At work, I have my AP style guide, then right next to it my politics the wellstone way.

It is a tremendous resource that he has left for us and I am honored and humbled to have been a small part of it.


How about just business partners? (0.00 / 0)
It's nice to have true friends. How about defining success as being a true business partner?

I mean, you can do business with some one whos isn't exactly a friend: find mutually acceptable deals or win-win solutions, agree not to step on their toes if they don't mess with you.

I think our problem is not that they aren't our friends, but that they are cutting us off. Now, this may have worked in 1992 or 2004, but I think that we are more important than they realize going forward to 2008 and 2010.

But, we do have to do our job better.


Paul Wellstone Made You Proud To Be A Democrat, These Other Folks Make You Ashamed (4.00 / 2)
The difference really is just as simple as that.

But it goes even deeper:

Paul Wellstone made you proud to be an American, he made you proud be a human being, and these other folks....

"Senate passes expanded GI bill despite Bush, McCain opposition"


RIP Paul (4.00 / 1)
...you done us proud.

Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search