TARP II: Trumka's label for Bush's millionaires tax cut

by: Paul Rosenberg

Tue Nov 16, 2010 at 15:00


Mark Matson in Quick Hits is right:

TARP Two (Mark Matson)

"It's absolutely insane that in these tough economic times, some people want to continue the George Bush tax giveaway for millionaires," Trumka continued. "It doesn't create jobs. It's bad policy and it's bad for the economy."

Trumka, in a formulation that just might stick, labeled an extension of the high-end cuts "Tarp Two."

"Instead of bailing out the banks, we're bailing out the people at the helm," Trumka said.

I do love me a good meme.  I thought this one was worth passing around.  Let's all call the extension of the high-end Bush tax cuts TARP Two.

This is the perfect meme, and it needs to be spread around as much and as fast as possible.

This is particularly true, given how poorly the high-end tax cuts are understood.  Conservatives routinely tout them as promoting growth.  Tea Partier's are encouraged to support them, because "If my boss gets a tax cut, maybe I'll get a raise."  Of course your boss has had that tax cut for years, so how's that working out for you?

More to the point, tax cuts for the rich actually work exactly the opposite of that, as I've heard David Cay Johnson explain on a couple of local Pacifica shows over the past week or so:  business owners benefit from these tax cuts when they take money out of their companies--out of productive use--and buy luxury goods, such as paintings or whatever.

Using the "TARP II" meme would help push a totally different way of viewing the tax cuts, one that's already got a lot of emotion and attitude connected to it. Not to mention one that's a lot more accurate than the BS conservatives are pushing.

TARP II: Pass It On!
Paul Rosenberg :: TARP II: Trumka's label for Bush's millionaires tax cut

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

TARP (II) stands for (4.00 / 6)
The Republican belief that:

Taxes
Ain't for
Rich
People.

Things You Don't Talk About in Polite Company: Religion, Politics, the Occasional Intersection of Both


Okay, now this is fighting fire with fire. (4.00 / 1)
Even a dumb hillbilly can identify with turning a good phrase.    The fight isn't going to be won by the best thesis.  We're fighting a battle of one-liners.  And they don't have to be true, just catchy.  The one way to stop Obama from going along with this is to brand him with the "going along with rich label."  

"Oh. My. God. .... We're doomed." -- Paul Krugman
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...">http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...">http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...


Sorry to be a wet blanket but there's (0.00 / 0)
already something called TARP II.

http://www.truth-out.org/011909A

What's wrong with calling them "Tax Cuts for Rich" ?


Well, some politically correct nerd (4.00 / 1)
Is going to point out that you're engaging in Class warfare.  As if the other side hasn't already.  As far as TARP II, that was 18 months ago and who would you suspect even remembers that.  Remember, we're talking impact not factual worthiness.  You can't fight a fight the other side isn't participating in.

"Oh. My. God. .... We're doomed." -- Paul Krugman
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...">http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...">http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...


[ Parent ]
That TARP II never actually happened (4.00 / 1)
Since Obama never spent his TARP money (other than a small percentage to bail out the auto industry and the poorly designed HAMP program), the term is still available for use.  Not that it matters anyway, neither term is/was official.

[ Parent ]
That's true (0.00 / 0)
TARP II only means something to political nerds like me.

Still, I think straight-up populism still works.  


[ Parent ]
Just another little indication (4.00 / 3)
of what I've expressed here before:

Rich Trumka is the best President the AFL-CIO has ever had.  (For those whose labor history doesn't go back that far, that's only to 1955 - that doesn't include all those good CIO folk from the previous generation).

We need to think of him as at least a potential ally, not as a member of the so-called "veal pen".  Netroots have to begin to overcome some of their labor-unfriendly roots.

sTiVo's rule: Just because YOU "wouldn't put it past 'em" doesn't prove that THEY did it.


I like to see him as a (4.00 / 1)
a potential presidential candidate.  

[ Parent ]
. (0.00 / 0)
I would like that too, in a Christine O'Donnell sort of way, can you guys work to get him nominated?

[ Parent ]
Many pro-labor people (0.00 / 0)
are making similar criticisms to those coming from Firedoglake.  They do so in large part because they hope the action of the AFL-CIO will meet the rhetoric.  It has nothing do with being anti-labor. We shouldn't confuse constructive (if sometimes overheated) criticism with being anti-labor which is in fact a serious problem. The veal pen label is designed to get people out of the pen so that they can be effective allies - that is the point.

More important is to realize that the president of the federation operates largely through suasion rather than control (despite the fevered imaginations of some on the right).  We've had multiple waves of progressive reform candidates taking the top spots who said good things, and made important reforms without making fundamental changes. Change can only come from the bottom up.  When the LA County Federation was reformed, it changed the face of labor and progressive politics in CA.  There are unions out there who are doing good work.  If you have examples - share them.  We could use more of that here.

Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.


[ Parent ]
. (0.00 / 0)
Two notes:

It will not stick because it doesn't apply.

Irony in that the original TARP was used to bailout out Automaker unions.


re raise (0.00 / 0)
Tea Partier's are encouraged to support them, because "If my boss gets a tax cut, maybe I'll get a raise."  Of course your boss has had that tax cut for years, so how's that working out for you?

exactly!


TARP? (0.00 / 0)
Didn't Tarp more then pay for itself? And wouldn't it also be a tax increase if the tax cuts expire?

Democrats and Republicans need to quit trying to call it "The Bush Tax Cuts for the Rich" or "The Obama Tax Increase" and come up with a middle ground or face another massive sweeping election for both parties next election.


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox