Obama's New Hampshire Bump

by: Chris Bowers

Sat Jan 05, 2008 at 16:37


Adding on to the earlier post on post-Iowa New Hampshire polls from today, ARG now has their first post-Iowa data up (pre-Iowa numbers in parenthesis):

January 4-5, 600 LVs, MoE 4
Obama: 38 (31)
Clinton: 26 (35)
Edwards: 20 (15)
Richardson: 3 (5)
Kucinich: 1 (2)
Other / Unsure: 11 (12)

Also according to the poll, which was conducted entirely post-Iowa, McCain is walking away with it on the Republican side, leading 39%-25%. ARG stunk terribly in Iowa, predicting Clinton by nine over Obama, and thirteen over Edwards. However, their 2004 New Hampshire polling was pretty good, so this might be accurate, or at least worthy of consideration.

This poll shows a 16-point net bump for Obama in New Hampshire. Rasmussen showed a net bump of 13 points. Zogby, in the one day after Iowa, supposedly showed an 11-12 point bump. Suffolk shows a net bump of around 10 points. That makes for an average of around 12-13% net for Obama so far, which is actually very close to the momentum projected by fladem six months ago.

I feel as though, in order to have any chance, Edwards needs to finish in second in Iowa, too. Obama doesn't need to win anymore, but it sure would put him close to the nomination if he did. Clinton will probably still be competitive after New Hampshire, but unless she wins Obama will take the national lead. And right now, things look pretty good for Obama.

Only three days before New Hampshire, and Obama is going up. Tonight's debate should be big, since it is one of the final chances for Clinton and Edwards to change the media narrative before Tuesday. At this rate, Obama is already ahead in New Hampshire, and looks well positioned to win.
Chris Bowers :: Obama's New Hampshire Bump

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Edwards needs to get 2nd in NH to stay in this (4.00 / 2)
and this poll shows he is within 6 points of doing just that.  Seems to me the wise Edwards strategy would be to ignore Obama and go hard after Hillary to peel away her supporters.  It might just make it an Edwards-Obama race going into Nevada and SC which are more favorable for him than NH...

2nd makes him (0.00 / 0)
If Edwards can get second in NH, it'll be much harder to ignore him. Beating Clinton twice is significant and the 'lived in Iowa' line won't work for NH.

He'd then have to broaden his message slightly to compete with Obama, but he'd have a shot. Whereas if he can't progress beyond third then it's hard to see where he gets the oxygen to maintain a challenge for long.

Forgotten Countries - a foreign policy-focused blog


[ Parent ]
Concord Monitor poll (0.00 / 0)
Here:

Among likely Democratic primary voters, Barack Obama was the choice of 34 percent of those surveyed and Hillary Clinton was the choice of 33 percent, suggesting the race is a virtual dead heat. John Edwards was next at 23 percent, followed by Bill Richardson at 4 percent and Dennis Kucinich at 3 percent.

No internals yet. I'm going to guess they polled fewer independents.


CNN/WMUR poll taken Jan. 4 and 5 (4.00 / 1)
Clinton 33 percent

Obama 33 percent

Edwards 20 percent


[ Parent ]
Thank you (0.00 / 0)
Thanks for keeping track of all this, Chris.

Obama is no longer a sideshow (0.00 / 0)
  I think that Barack Obama's Iowa JJ Dinner speech got a few bemused observers who might have leaned Hillary out of habit to pay closer attention to him. And his performance in the caucuses has now fully legitimized him as a "real" candidate -- which has freed a lot of Dem primary voters to support him in their minds.

  I've noticed that in my own local circles. People LIKED Obama, but part of them resisted thinking he was a "legit" presidential candidate.

  That resistance appears to have dissipated. I think that's what's happening.

"We judge ourselves by our ideals; others by their actions. It is a great convenience." -- Howard Zinn


Exactly... (0.00 / 0)
that has been my experience in NH canvassing for Obama, exactly Master Jack.

[ Parent ]
Edwards got a bump, too (0.00 / 0)
  In 1977 the Sex Pistols released their revolutionary anti-royalist single "God Save The Queen", one of the most ferocious slices of rock'n'roll ever recorded by anybody. The vicious lyrics earned the Pistols a ban from the BBC, but the single was a commercial blockbuster anyway, shooting up into the Top Ten. Which greatly mortified the authorities.

  Some of the UK national charts left the "God Save The Queen" slot blank in their publications, showing white space where the song was supposed to be listed. Given that the single was a between-the-eyes slam at the British class system, it's no wonder they tried so hard to suppress it.

  That's what the US media is doing to John Edwards. Hillary Clinton finished third in Iowa behind Barack Obama and a blank space.

"We judge ourselves by our ideals; others by their actions. It is a great convenience." -- Howard Zinn


2nd in NH (0.00 / 0)
I feel as though, in order to have any chance, Edwards needs to finish in second in Iowa, too.

Chris, I believe you mean New Hampshire . . .


This Just In from NH! (0.00 / 0)
Well, from America really....

Baaaaa.........Baaaaaaaaa....Baa....Baaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

Of course ex-Senator 'White Space' is facing a truly impossible task as since he doesn't exist!

From OrangeLand we get this very well done and researched diary which proves Master Jack's contention:

http://www.dailykos....

Too ways to the same vile conclustion: Intuition and analysis.

Our nation is in deep, deep shit when the guy who cam in second is reported to have lost while placing third.

Peace, Health and Prosperity for Everyone.


Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search