Nomination At A Glance: Wave of New Polls Give Edwards, Romney New Life

by: Chris Bowers

Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 12:43


Tons of new polls this morning (most links to polls are embedded in state names):
  • Michigan (Jan 15): Seven polls taken over the weekend show a dead heat between Romney, who averages 27.0%, and McCain, who averages 26.3%. The only tracking poll, from Mitchell research, shows Romney rising from a 5% deficit to a 2% advantage over the course of the week. Do I dare to hope that Romney will actually pull this off? Painfully, if McCain wins, it will be because Obama and Edwards pulled off the ballot. Otherwise, McCain’s Democratic and Independent support would dry up, and Romney would take the state. Talk about digging our own grave in the general election. Michigan Democrats for Mitt becomes more important.

  • Nevada (Jan 19): Three way tie in the Democratic race, with Obama at 32%, Clinton at 30%, and Edwards at 27%. Reports of Edwards’s demise have been greatly exaggerated, but he really needs a win. The Republican campaign is equally close, with McCain at 22%, Giuliani at 18%, Huckabee at 16%, and Romney at 15%.

  • South Carolina (Jan 19R / 26D): Yet another new poll shows Obama maintaining a double-digit lead, 44%--31%--16%. On the Republican side, McCain is again shown edging in front of Huckabee, 28%--21%, with Romney (17%) and Thompson (14%) a little further back.

  • Florida (Jan 29): Two new polls from Quinnipiac and Rasmussen also show identical results. On the Democratic side, Clinton holds commanding leads of 21% and 24%. On the Republican side, both polls show four-way ties. Quinnipiac pegs the campaign at McCain 22%, Giuliani 20%, Huckabee 19%, Romney 19%. Rasmussen shows McCain 19%, Giuliani 18%, Romney 18%, Huckabee 17%. Can’t get any closer than that!

  • National (Feb 5): These don't matter as much as the state polls, but they are still a useful way to gauge the state of play on February 5th. New polls from Rasmussen and ABC- WaPo show a close campaign on the Democratic side, with Clinton leading Obama by 4 and 5 respectively. Two other polls, from CBS and ARG, show Clinton well out in front by 15% and 20% respectively. All four polls show McCain ahead, but once again by greatly varying amounts of 3%, 6%, 8% and 15%.
Exciting stuff. However, keeping it exciting will require McCain to lose in Michigan and in either Nevada or South Carolina. On the Democratic side, an Edwards Nevada win would be a shocker that would really shake the campaign up. An Obama Nevada win would probably lead to a comfortable South Carolina win, making the national campaign a dead heat entering Super Tuesday. Basically, keeping the campaigns close requires the next four states to each take the frontrunners, Clinton and McCain, down a couple of pegs. Right now, the possible outcomes appear to be increasing in number, not decreasing.

I have put today’s nomination charts in the extended entry.
Chris Bowers :: Nomination At A Glance: Wave of New Polls Give Edwards, Romney New Life
Democratic Nomination, At A Glance
Contest Date Delegates # of Polls Clinton Obama Edwards Kucinich
P. Delegates Aug 25 2,209 2 24 25 18 0
U. Delegates Aug 25 2,209 NA 183 74 30 2
Michigan Jan 15 0 / 128 4 54.3% 0.0% 0.0% 2.8%
Nevada Jan 19 25 1 30.0% 32.0% 27.0% ??
South Carolina Jan 26 45 4 31.0% 44.0% 15.5% 2.3%
Florida Jan 29 0 / 185 5 45.2% 29.6% 12.4% 1.7%
National Feb 05 1,688 5 43.6% 32.2% 12.0% 2.2%

Republican Nomination, At A Glance
Contest Date Delegates # of Polls McCain Huckabee Romney Giuliani Thompson Paul
Delegates Sep 01 1,259 3 10 21 30 1 6 2
Michigan Jan 15 30 / 60 7 26.3% 15.9% 27.0% 5.7% 5.4% 6.6%
Nevada Jan 19 34 1 22.0% 16.0% 15.0% 19.0% 11.0% 6.0%
South Carolina Jan 19 24 / 47 5 23.6% 26.4% 16.6% 6.6% 10.2% 5.0%
Louisiana Jan 22 21 / 47 0 ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??
Florida Jan 29 57 / 114 5 21.0% 19.2% 17.4% 19.4% 8.6% 5.0%
Maine Feb 01 21 0 ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??
National Feb 05 1,081 5 28.6% 19.6% 14.4% 14.4% 7.4% 4.2%

Polls can be found here, and Super Delegate totals can be found here. All polls are post-Iowa. Except for two South Carolina polls, and one Florida poll, all polls are also post-New Hampshire.

2008 Democratic Nomination wiki
2008 Republican Nomination wiki

Tags: , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Wouldn't You Know It! (0.00 / 0)
The first time in forever that we get two real horseraces, with no incumbent on either side (well, since 1952, really, but who's counting?) and the press has devolved to the point where they can't even do half-decent horse-race coverage anymore.

Good thing we're not a meritocracy, or all these guys would all be out of a job.

"Senate passes expanded GI bill despite Bush, McCain opposition"


I'll be a monkey's uncle if John Edwards's real number is anything above (0.00 / 1)
fifteen.

27%? 

Haha.  No way.

For some reason, it seems that Obama has some pathological and deep-seated psychological need for Republicans to like him.  Seriously.  It's weird.


What does you wife say about.... (4.00 / 1)

.........all that grooming she's gotta do. Keeping that fur in shape must be a hell of a job!

Peace, Health and Prosperity for Everyone.

[ Parent ]
questions (0.00 / 0)
As one of the very best progressive bloggers, you can really help focus grassroots attention on matters of procedure that affect the direction of the party.

You seem angry at the DNC and the Edwards and Obama campaigns over the Michigan primary.  Why no blame for Michigan Democrats for supporting the pre Feb 5 date?  Do you believe that every state should have complete control over when it chooses its delegation?  If so, why?  A long post on that issue would be great for us all to consider tomorrow.

Thanks!


Michigan Democrats are also at fault (4.00 / 1)
but in retrospect, it would have been much better for Edwards to leave his name on the ballot, even if he hadn't campaigned there.

No one in Iowa cared whose name was on which ballot.

Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.


[ Parent ]
Edwards was trying to lead... (0.00 / 0)
...when this happened and not be a follower.  He had alrady made his stand against FauxNews and was trying to lead the way in Michigan by appeasing NH and Iowa.  There is no doubt one can see this as pandering to the voters in the respective early states.  I also understand Chris' disapproval of this but Edwards was already fighting an Obama surge and he was trying to do what he could to stay in the hunt.  Its just like the Michigan gambit by voting for Romney to keep him viable to muss the hair of the other GOP candidates.  Strategic voting and inserting yourself on the ballot are perogatives withing the rules.  That sword cuts both ways.

TrumanDem

Truman's Conscience


[ Parent ]
so what happens if this keeps going on (0.00 / 0)
That is, if the returns continue to be proportionally, 25/24/ or there abouts.  What if John Edwards continues to pull in 25% of the votes and gets to the convention with that showing ?  Superdelegates aside, this would keep the others from getting to 50% assuming they continue to split fairly evenly.

Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search