Final Push To Defeat A Bush Dog

by: Chris Bowers

Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 17:13


Donate to Mark Pera on Blue Majority

The Presidential campaign is exiting and important, and will have a major impact on the national party. However, underneath the national radar, another, equally important effort to change the Democratic Party is taking place: primary campaigns against Bush Dog Democrats. One of those primaries will take place in just twenty-two days on February 5th, as Mark Pera challenges Dan Lipinski. The 3rd congressional district of Illinois is the battleground, and it also happens to be the bluest district in the nation held by a Bush Dog. The simple, blunt truth is that if we can't win here, we are going to have a difficult time winning anywhere. This primary is a key test of progressive strength in the party, and as such will have a major impact on Democratic behavior in Congress. The case against

To defeat a Bush Dog and change Democratic behavior, we have to open our wallets and donate to Mark Pera. The case against Lipinski is clear:

  1. Deep Blue District: Lipinski represents an overwhelmingly Democratic district, with a partisan voting index of Democrat +10.3, and where Kerry won 59% of the vote in 2004. This is a blue district in absolutely no danger of falling into Republican hands. It should be represented by a strong progressive.

  2. Nepotism Lipinski never had to campaign for the seat, not even in a primary. When he first won back in 2002, his father actually was the Democratic nominee. However, after his father won the primary, he stepped aside and had the junior Lipinski placed on the ballot in his stead. In other words, Lipinski has no real campaign experience, and only scored his seat in Congress through pure nepotism.

  3. Corruption, Machine Politics and Voter Fraud: Lipinski has regularly engaged in voter fraud:

    Until his dad crowned him a congressman, he spent 15 years out of town working at universities in North Carolina, Indiana and Tennessee. Somehow, while being a resident of other states, he managed to vote here, not by absentee ballot but in person. Election judges in his father's 23rd Ward marked him present in every Chicago election since at least 1990, according to official records.

    Oddly, Lipinski, can't recall casting those votes. "I'm trying to think back to that time," he told me. "I honestly cannot remember."

    Now the voter records are missing. This is clear voter fraud perpetrated by a local machine. Lipinski probably did not vote for over 15 years.

  4. Bush Dog: Lipinski is a Bush Dog who voted with Bush on the war and on FISA. In fact, the IL-03 is by far the bluest district represented by a Bush Dog. We will never have a progressive governing majority if Bush Dogs occupy seats like this.

  5. Hard Right Anti-Choice: In addition to being a Bush Dog, Lipinski is staunchly anti-choice. He has a zero rating from NARAL and Planned Parenthood. He doesn't believe in family planning at all, in fact.

  6. Not Progressive On Much Of Anything: In addition to his records on Iraq, FISA and choice, he also is below average for a Democrat on immigration, gets a big fat zero from Progressive Punch on GLBT issues, and only a 50% score from the Drum major institute on progressive family issues. Basically, he sucks at just about everything.

  7. Already has a primary opponent: Recruiting a primary challenger against Lipinski isn't even necessary. Mark Pera has already signed on to run against him. You can compare some of their views here.. The simplest way to put it is this: Dan Lipinski is one of the worst examples of Democrats out of step with their districts. Mark Pera is a real progressive who has a good chance to defeat him. If we want to change the behavior of the Democratic Congress, this will be one of our very best chances to do so.

None of this will change unless we work to make it change. We didn't flip four of the six the ultimate-Bush Dogs on SChip, or Lipinksi and Boswell on Iraq just by complaining about them. In the form of paid advertisements and / or actual primary challengers, we had to run campaigns against these Democrats in order to change their behavior. This case is no different. To defeat a Bush Dog and change Democratic behavior, we have to open our wallets and donate to Mark Pera.

This is designed to be a blogosphere-wide push to help bring victory in IL-03. We are targeting 5,000 donors for Mark Pera on Act Blue, and we started today at about 2,300. Already, nearly 200 new donors have participated. Even thought I had already participated, I've chipped in, too. This is how we can make a better Democratic Party, but it won't happen unless we donate to all of the campaigns that campaigns that can change the party. The Presidential primary isn't the only way to make change, and through the IL-03 we can have a huge impact even before November rolls around.

Chris Bowers :: Final Push To Defeat A Bush Dog

Tags: , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Pera is an active blogger at Prairie State Blue (0.00 / 0)
You can read his posts here.

Also, this anecdote is from Yoda's post on her cavassing for Pera this weekend:

One of the first things we did when we got there was deliver window signs. At the first address the owner of the house was standing out on the front steps with her young child chatting with a neighbor. When we handed her the sign the child asked, "Mom, who's Mark Pera?" and she replied, "He's the one that's going to get rid of that lisping fool."

Read all the anecdotes here.

Prairie State Blue Covering Illinois Democratic politics.


Is there a plan to promote Donna Edwards at a Later Date? (0.00 / 0)
Okay.  I donated to Mark Pera via Blue Majority.  Last time it was through the DFA.

Is there a plan to do a Blue Majority push for Donna Edwards at a later date? 

Saxby Chambliss, worse than disgraceful; he's reprehensible.  


MoveOn (0.00 / 0)
Recently collected for Donna Edwards.
I donated through them.

We won the Battle. Now the Real Fight for Change Begins. Join MoveOn.org and fight for progressive change.  

[ Parent ]
Donna Edwards is also on the page (0.00 / 0)
and MoveOn is working for Edwards now. Also, this is actually something we did for Edwards a couple months ago--we are getting around to doing it for Pera now.

[ Parent ]
Congress vs. President (0.00 / 0)
Chris,

I fully agree and will donate.

Question: which do you think would have a greater impact on progressive policy... A DemSuperMajority and Republican President, or A Dem President with a Republican (regular) majority?

I wonder because I fear we- Dems/Progressive-- will get so caught up in the presidential race this year that we will neglect congress.

We won the Battle. Now the Real Fight for Change Begins. Join MoveOn.org and fight for progressive change.  


Dem Super Majority (0.00 / 0)
Simply because a large advantage like that in Congress lasts a long time, while Presidents are always temporary.

[ Parent ]
Congress (0.00 / 0)
Look at what happened under Nixon with a strong Democratic Congress and a powerful progressive movement: Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, opening to China, etc.

The best is to have an actual progressive President with a strong progressive Congress (with a super-majority), a strong progressive media, and a very strong progressive movement holding all their feet to the fire. As much as possible we need to focus on achieving all of these. And Congress and the progressive movement are the two areas that the grassroots probably have the best chance at changing.


[ Parent ]
We have more influence in House races (4.00 / 1)
Than in the presidential race.  Think about it--the Dem candidates will raise and spend over $100 million each.  Anything we send is a drop in that bucket.  But in the Pera and Donna Edwards races, we can make a real statement.  The more progressive Congress is, the better any Dem President can do.  Plus it sends a message to Pelosi, Hoyer and Emmanuel.  These are important races, as important as some of the contested races will be down the road.  I sent each of them $500 over the last few months.  Do whatever you can.  Put your money where your mouth is.

John McCain--He's not who you think he is.

We gotta get on board with these challenges (0.00 / 0)
Nothing we can possibly do in the Presidential has a much effect as replacing Democrats who don't act like Democrats.

If the people lead, eventually our leaders will follow...well, certainly worth trying.

Can it happen here?


just saw Mark Pera (0.00 / 0)
Hey, I just got back about an hour or so ago from helping Mark Pera pass out lit at Union Station in Chicago.  The trains that run there are communter trains that take people from downtown Chicago out to the 'burbs, and they are totally packed, so I bet we easily passed out over a thousand pieces of lit in the hour I was there -- maybe more. Mark himself was there shaking hands with folks -- he has such a great rapport with people and is just so relaxed and comfortable out in public.  Plus he is just so nice, maybe too nice -- he kept stopping what he was doing to give people directions or help them find their train.  It was a fun experience and easy for me since I work right by the train station.

Anyway, it is a bit off topic but since the blog was about Mark I thought I would share.


There's more (0.00 / 0)
You could also add in William Lipinski's lobbying business and its corrupt contacts with his son. It's not just that Lipinski isn't progressive, he isn't even ethically qualified to sit in congress. And there's nothing worse for the Democratic brand than corrupt Democrats.

Forgotten Countries - a foreign policy-focused blog

Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search