Free widgets -- for voter registration

by: aaklaus

Tue Jul 31, 2007 at 07:30


In 2006, Matt Stoller presented Working Assets with a detailed critique of online voter registration system we had developed for the 2006 election. A year later, we are ready to roll out what we expect to be a game-changing web tool for the 2008 election as a direct response to the challenge Stoller laid out.

This new generation voter registration tool is being developed by Working Assets and deployed in partnership with Rock the Vote.

Working Assets, Rock the Vote, and other groups have been using the web to help people complete voter registration forms for several years.  But our methods were centralized, top-down and to a large part didn't harness the power of the netroots or bottom up campaigns. Our new tool is an advancement over previous versions for several reasons - thanks to Stoller for helping us conceive of these improvements and to Zack Exley for helping us understand how to execute them. In a nutshell, we're making it as easy to register voters on your blog or web site as it is to post a YouTube video. And we're providing easy-to-use tools to measure your progress and get in touch with your newly registered voters.

Over the next month or so, we'll be rolling out the full functionality of our voter registration widget - a portable application that anyone can embed in virtually any webpage, allowing users to complete a voter registration application for their state that they can open as a PDF, print, sign, and mail in.  (Check out a live version at rockthevote.com; just click `Register to Vote' on the splash page.)  Folks hosting the widget on their sites have administrative rights for their campaign, meaning they can view and display counts of their registrations and even download the data for people they've registered.

The advances are significant. First, users never have to go to a foreign site to complete the registration process.  The application lives fully inside the site it's embedded in.  Second, allowing users to make their counts public will let different individuals and groups take credit for their work and even encourage some healthy competition.  Finally, giving widget hosts full control over their data is a powerful incentive to use the tool for list building.

If you care about what happens on November 4, 2008 (or November 6, 2007 for that matter), you're probably wondering where to get the code.  The full administrative interface where you can sign up and grab the widget on your own will be up by September 1.  If you want to be updated on the status of the program, or have an urgent need to be signed up before then, drop me an email at aklaus@workingassets.com.

If you're curious about more of the back story, read on after the jump.

aaklaus :: Free widgets -- for voter registration
You may know Working Assets as your mobile phone, long distance, or credit card provider.  You may also know us as a funder of many progressive organizations ($50 million and counting in donations over the last 20 years).  In addition to that, we've become increasingly operationally involved in the civic engagement sector in the last few years.

In 2003, we set a goal of registering a million new voters by the 2004 election.  To reach the goal, it became apparent that we were going to have to find a very high-volume channel, and the most obvious place to turn was the internet.

In conjunction with Rock the Vote, we developed a web application that streamlined the Election Assistance Commission's National Voter Registration Application (a 25-page packet) into a series of webforms that delivered the correct state-specific instructions to and collected the appropriate information from users.  It created a completed PDF of the registration application, which the user could sign and submit to their state using a pre-addressed mailer sheet.

We met the goal in 2004, and between Working Assets and Rock the Vote, we've generated over 2.1 million online registration applications to date.  Matching those data to voter files shows that over 70% of the applicants who complete the online process end up on the rolls - huge, considering the unavoidable process hurdles imposed by the postal mail-based system.  Additionally, over 80% of the registrants end up voting.  The numbers vary based on age, among other factors, but we know that anywhere from 54-63% of the online list actually turn out.  Clearly, registering folks online is a great way to build a list of high-turnout propensity voters.

Our improvements in 2007 are poised to carry us into the largest voter registration campaign ever, possibly by a factor of two or three, leading up to 2008.  Stoller's idea for widgetization will help to make this a truly distributed campaign that aggregates the efforts of hundreds or thousands of smaller, personalized campaigns driven by the netroots.  It turns the tables on older, top-down, centralized models of organizing.  And we're ok with that.

Add to the mix Zack Exley's idea to build the underlying engine with an open API - thereby enabling folks with some development resources to creatively integrate voter registration into other applications - and we've got a very Web 2.0 approach to this aspect of online organizing.

The end result looks like this:  a central engine capable of processing huge volumes of registration applications; an API that opens up access to the necessary functions of voter registration; and a widget application that anyone can grab, host, and have access to an administrative site where they can get counts and even download the data for the list of registrants they build.

Online voter registration is not meant to replace field registration programs, an area in which Working Assets is also involved.  But it does give us a much cheaper alternative for the people we can reach on the web:  historically, we've been able to collect applications online for about $1 a piece, compared for about $13 for an efficient and scalable field program.  The more people we can register online, the more we can spend on even more impactful work, like issue education and GOTV.

Are you in?  Again, contact me at aklaus@workingassets.com and we'll keep you posted as we roll this out through the end of the summer.


Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I'm curious (0.00 / 0)
Very interesting.

I'm curious about what the implications are of "a widget application that anyone can grab, host, and have access to".

When I think of hosting from a blogger perspective I think of plugins that fit into one of the standard blogging frameworks... wordpress, moveabletype, scoop, blogger, etc. Is that what you're talking about? Is there any word being done on providing these.

IMHO the simplest design is a javascript widget that anyone can place on their site's template. Then one wouldn't have to host it at all. Is any consideration being done for this sort of design.

Can you also give more details of what you mean by an "open api"? Will it be placed under an open source license? Will the development code be hosted in such as way as to promote community development?

I see a lot of potential in this.


re: I'm curious (0.00 / 0)
Sorry -- I was using 'host' very loosely.  It is indeed a javascript application, and all you have to do to 'host' is to paste it into the markup of any web page.

We're still working out the exact details of how we're going to release the API, and waiting for the widget and admin tool to get out the door before we do that.  But I'm expecting a simple process by which you register and get assigned an API key, which you can then use to access the API functions of initiating a registration, pulling down instructions and fields for a given state, submitting/validating registration data, and generating the PDF.

We'd love for people to use the API to find creative ways to embed the voter registration process across the web.


[ Parent ]
re: GOTV (0.00 / 0)
Right you are in noting that voter registration is only the first step, and that there is not necessarily any correlation between increased registration and turnout rates.  By making each widget partner's list of registrants easily and instantly available to them, we are certainly hoping that individual groups will GOTV their own people.

Besides hope, though, a major value of this project is that almost all online voter registration will write to the same central database.  Obviously, many of these people will end up on actual voter files which most well run efforts use as a basis of their GOTV campaigns. However, because most people register right before an election which means they may get registered too late to appear on the lists that GOTV operations acquire through regular channels.

Rock the Vote will be able to centrally GOTV the list using various online techniques, including some sophisticated testing of friend-to-friend asks that seem promising. That said, we know that online GOTV has not proven successful in the past (if you haven't read Gerber and Green's Get Out the Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout you should order it now). There have been some recent experiments that suggest online peer-to-peer turnout may have some value. Getting all these online registrations in one database is the first step towards making it possible for an offline GOTV operation targeting this universe.

We have some additional ideas for turning out the list that I'm happy to discuss offline.  Suggestions are always welcome also.


[ Parent ]
This does raise a lot of privacy and control issues. (0.00 / 0)
A database like this is worth a lot of money. While you're talking about peer to peer data collecting, you're not talking about peer to peer data sharing.

[ Parent ]
re: GOTV (0.00 / 0)
(see above reply)

[ Parent ]
re: I am impressed (0.00 / 0)
[Comments are being a little buggy, so I hope this shows up in the right place.]

In addition to the above reply about the value of a central database of online voter registrations, I should note that the administrative site will have some resources for widget users, including a community blog and wiki where people can share best practices.  As the campaign grows, it's one of our goals to facilitate a conversation about how to make voter registration most effective.


[ Parent ]
re: I am impressed (0.00 / 0)
(See above reply)

[ Parent ]
Sounds (0.00 / 0)
like you are thinking along the same lines.  The more personal these asks can be the better, which is why having the sites who registered the people messaging the list will probably be more effective than the general Rock the Vote GOTV push.

Wiki will be really helpful, as will the blog.

P.S. to reply to individual posters hit the reply link just below their post.


[ Parent ]
GOTV (0.00 / 0)
What kind of efforts will there be to make sure people are turning out their lists? Or are we just going to hope?

We use the widget already at Forward Montana and we will be actively turning out people we register from it, but I'm wondering if bloggers will do the same (I'm writing this as a blogger).


I am impressed (0.00 / 0)
by the data you have on the effectiveness.  I would have thought that it would be significantly lower.

Let me second that question from Left in the West.  Are you guys going to provide basic email list training for people picking up the widgets.  Proper email strategy and heck even just information on cheap email programs is invaluable.  Pushing people to contact that list, even if it is just a few names could really bump up the percentages.  Ooh, imagine if you went one further and set up a web interface that allowed the less technically inclined folks to message their list.


Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search