'Suspended' McCain Aide Resurfaces Pushing Anti-Obama Messaging

by: Matt Stoller

Mon Apr 14, 2008 at 22:43


( - promoted by Matt Stoller)

While the Presidential primary is pretty irritating, I did find that the elitist charge from Clinton and the racist use of the word 'boy' found a sort of operational unity within the Republican operative class.  I'll put the pieces together so that we can see how this works, since the pattern it suggests about the McCain campaign will be repeated.  Here's the new ad from Clinton hitting Obama on elitism.

So first of all, a Democrat is laying down an attack on the Democratic nominee.  While right now it's Clinton, during the general election, any liberalish person will do, be it Ward Churchill or anyone else.  And here's racist Geoff Davis, KY-04, talking about Obama.

"I'm going to tell you something: That boy's finger does not need to be on the button," Davis said. "He could not make a decision in that simulation that related to a nuclear threat to this country."

And finally, to unify the charges of racism and elitism, check out what Soren Dayton, the McCain operative 'suspended' after circulating a racially charged video about Obama is distributing on Facebook.

Operative

This episode reveals so many aspects of our corroded political system.  For one, while I find the whole 'don't repeat right-wing frames' kind of tired if useful, Hillary Clinton's charges of elitism are explicitly reinforcing right-wing charges.  How do we know this?  Well, because right-wingers are attacking him with her rhetoric.  Two, Soren Dayton is a Republican operative who was apparently 'suspended' from the McCain campaign, but he's out there spreading the same old political arguments about Obama as he did before he was suspended.  The whole disavowal thing for McCain is a neat trick, isn't it?  Three, the use of elitist snob and the use of racist rhetoric is intimately tied together.  As Glenn Greenwald has demonstrated in his important book Great American Hypocrites, male Democratic candidates must always be presented as feminine, elite, aristocratic, savage, and untrustworthy, for fear that substantive arguments will actually present the electorate with a choice on larger questions of national direction.

And no conservative is ever held accountable for their activities, no matter how dishonorable.  It really doesn't matter if it's Ann Coulter calling for the assassination of a New York Times reporter or describing John Edwards as a fag, or Soren Dayton being 'disavowed' by the McCain campaign while explicitly continuing to push out anti-Obama right-wing messaging, the conservative machine marches on without fear of consequence.  

George Bush has openly admitted that he signed off on torture, along with Condi and the whole senior staff, and yet the media is abuzz with silly arguments about elitism and bitterness and bowling scores.  It's just remarkable.  And John McCain can transparently exchange people in his political operation for one another and 'distance' himself from them by swapping his operatives into consulting or marketing shops without fear that he will be unmasked as the deceitful smear artist he clearly is.

Matt Stoller :: 'Suspended' McCain Aide Resurfaces Pushing Anti-Obama Messaging

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
that ad is ridiculous (0.00 / 0)
those people don't even remotely seem natural. who would say any politician has been fighting for them their entire life? its just weird.

Michael Bloomberg, prince of corporate welfare

I wish someone would run ad's asking Hillary how (4.00 / 5)
she would keep WH interns from giving Bill blowjobs if she were elected President.  What?  Can't go there?  Well, you know the Republicans would make an issue out of that in the fall, so it's definitely fair game.  Right?  Besides, we'd actually be doing her a favor.  How is she going to stand up the nasty, right-wing smear machine if she can't take it from Democrats?

You know (0.00 / 0)
I hate to say it, because this is honestly a pretty horrible suggestion, but I kind of agree. Honestly, it is kind of bullshit that Hillary makes these ridiculous attacks on Obama and then uses excuses like that, but when she is attacked, she quotes SNL and calls foul. It is honestly the definition of the word hypocracy. Still, I would never advocate that, as I really don't think stooping to that level would help the discourse at all.

Former Edwards Supporter, Obama Supporter since January 30, 2008

[ Parent ]
How do we turn the tables on them... (0.00 / 0)
...I mean the right wingers and they're framing...

They manage to succeed almost always, even with our "tough guys"....

I know they pretty much run most of the media, yet, still, there has to be a way to turn this stuff around on them...

Any ideas?

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


fund public education /nt (4.00 / 2)


Michael Bloomberg, prince of corporate welfare

[ Parent ]
You have to wonder if the truth matters or (4.00 / 1)
ever did.  Lieberman, Hillary, McCain -- you can't get a genuine sentence out of the one of them. All contrived, all manipulative.

Sad day.

John McCain doesn't care about Vets.



Power is what matters to them (0.00 / 0)
Truth is a tactic.


"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


[ Parent ]
uh (0.00 / 0)
Obama isn't the nominee.  The race is still going on and it is possible for Hillary to win.  

NoSlaves.com  


The Economic Populist


I love your drowl sense of humor (0.00 / 0)


"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


[ Parent ]
me too (0.00 / 0)


Michael Bloomberg, prince of corporate welfare

[ Parent ]
This is great (0.00 / 0)
Even a stupid slip-up by Obama is Clinton's fault? When Obama ran those outrageous healthcare ads, they were termed "Somewhat dishonest", those weren't right-wing attacks,  but these are?

What about Gonzo? (0.00 / 0)
the conservative machine marches on without fear of consequence.

In the excellent book on how the conservative machine marches, Off Center, Hacker and Pierson describe the concept of no-consequences conservatism as "backlash insurance."  

In other words, go ahead and do the most reprehensible right-wing thing you can think of, and the movement will get your back.  Pass tax cuts for the top 1%, and Club for Growth will make sure you don't get primaried.  Pass a horrifically unpopular, corrupt Medicare drug bill, and K Street will make sure you get $2 million a year.  Or in this case, get fired from a campaign for racism, and someone will hire you to be racist on Facebook.

But what about Alberto Gonzales, who hasn't been able to find a job since he quit DOJ?  Top law firms are not infrequently run by mega conservative assholes, and having a former Attorney General as a partner is generally considered quite prestigious.  It would seem like a perfect fit for backlash insurance.  Yet Gonzo's insurance claim has apparently been denied like any terminally ill teenager's.

When I read Off Center, it seemed that in order for backlash insurance to work, all the components of a very complicated machine had to be synchronized.  Clearly the system is still working to some extent, but not to the same extent it used to.  Which pistons have stopped firing in the conservative machine?  My guess is public opinion, electoral domination, and fundraising domination.  Whatever it is, we may be making inroads...

Yes we Kang


Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search