McCain Campaign Running On Borrowed Time

by: Chris Bowers

Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 15:55


I have to agree with Matt when he characterizes the primary campaign as "pretty irritating." It is a once in a lifetime fight in terms of its length and the need to count delegates. However, there are no great ideological issues at stake, the outcome is more than 95% certain, and now it is basically a long electability argument punctured every other week  But the real reason I find it irritating is that the general election is so highly winnable, that I just want to get on with it and finish McCain off already.

How can I be so confident when current general election polling shows Obama and McCain in a dead heat? Simply put, it is because McCain's support is extremely soft, and once we can sink out teeth into him in a general election, he has no where to go but down. Consider the following favorable / unfavorable polling on McCain and Obama from polling report:

CBS News/New York Times Poll. March 28-April 2, 2008. N=1,196 registered voters nationwide.

Obama: Favorable 43%--24% Unfavorable
McCain: Favorable 35%--29% Unfavorable

Diageo/Hotline Poll conducted by Financial Dynamics. March 28-31, 2008. N=799 registered voters nationwide. MoE ± 3.5.
Obama: Favorable 56%--37% Unfavorable
McCain: Favorable 58%--32% Unfavorable

The key here is to note the difference in the number of undecided between the CBS poll and the Diageo poll. While the CBS poll included an option for "undecided" in its question, the Diageo poll did not. This means that while McCain was slightly ahead of Obama when everyone was forced to register an opinion in the Diageo poll, he was well behind Obama in favorable rating when people had the option of saying they were undecided. In other words, most of McCain's positive favorable ration actually comes from people who do not have not formed a real opinion about McCain, and simply lean toward a favorable opinion when forced to choose. This view is supported by other recent favorable polls that dig deeper into the question:

NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll conducted by the polling organizations of Peter Hart (D) and Bill McInturff (R). March 24-25, 2008. N=700 registered voters nationwide. MoE ± 3.7
"Now I'm going to read you the names of several public figures and organizations, and I'd like you to rate your feelings toward each one as either very positive, somewhat positive, neutral, somewhat negative, or very negative. If you don't know the name, please just say so.

Obama---McCain
Very Positive: 24%--14%
Somewhat Positive: 25%--31%
Neutral: 18%--26%

Pew Research Center for the People & the Press survey conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates International. March 19-22, 2008. N=1,503 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3.
". . . Would you say your overall opinion of John McCain is very favorable, mostly favorable, mostly unfavorable, or very unfavorable?"

Obama---McCain
Very Positive: 21%--8%
Somewhat Positive: 35%--37%

In these two polls, McCain trails Obama by a small, but significant margin. However, McCain is thoroughly walloped in the "very positive" category. McCain's support comes overwhelmingly from the soft, "somewhat positive" category, that lines up with the above finding of many of the people who view him favorably actually being undecided.

McCain is staying afloat through supporters who are actually undecided and / or soft supporters who only hold a "somewhat" favorable opinion of him. He remains vague and undetermined to the electorate, largely because the focus of coverage remains on the Democratic primary. Once the general election starts, which means the media will actually start scrutinizing McCain and all progressive money is directed toward attacking him, it is extremely unlikely that he will hold all of those soft supporters. Invariably, a candidate's favorable rating drops during a presidential general election, and there is no reason to think it will be any different this time around.

Considering that right now McCain is only managing to draw even with Obama through the aid of a wave of soft and / or actually undecided voters, he really seems like a relatively easy target in the general election. As such, with a large trifecta in D.C. now clearly within our reach, yes, the primary campaign has indeed become pretty irritating. McCain is running on borrowed time, and that loan is coming entirely from the extended Democratic primary.  

Chris Bowers :: McCain Campaign Running On Borrowed Time

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I think Chuck Todd said something similar a few days ago... (0.00 / 0)
Basically saying that John McCain has a "faux" lead right now in the matchups, and that as soon as Democrats have a nominee (which will likely be Obama), that Obama will almost inevitably receive a massive bump in the polling.  Todd thought it could be as much as 15 points, which while likely temporary, could show how big of a problem McCain will have in the general election. If Obama gets less than a 5-10 point bump, he thinks McCain could be in a better position.

Nice thought, but (0.00 / 0)
I wouldn't underestimate the lovefest between McCain and the press. I guess this can't go on forever....

McCain's problem ... (0.00 / 0)
can he get any better known than he does now? ... he's at his highest point now ... and if this is the best he can do .. he's in trouble

[ Parent ]
Interesting physics not election logic: (4.00 / 1)
 What is up must come down. And what is down must go up.
Please check out the favorability numbers in Rasmussen.
It scares me that Chris is so confident and picks the polls that support his conclusions. Reminds me of 2004 election for President Kerry. We sure put our teeth into Bush and brought him down. How about this time around we spend less time speculating between ourselves and more time talking to our neighbors.

Clinton in '08. Or give Carter a 2nd term. Vote for Obama!

Running On Borrowed Time (0.00 / 0)
What a dangerous attitude. The same one we had in 2004. Kerry was a lock for the WH remember? Breezed through the primaries. Had military standing. LOST!

When will we ever learn?

And irritating? I suppose if the tables were turned and Obama was slightly down but within striking distance and was trying to win through the remaining states and through Super Delegates that his supporters would be saying for him to quit the race? NOT.

And oh yeah - he is trying to win through Super Delegates!


[ Parent ]
Yes (4.00 / 1)
If positions were reversed and Obama had basically no chance to win other than to trash Clinton and try and make her look unelectable, I would absolutely want Obama to quit.  When it looked as though Clinton would definitely win the nomination before Iowa, I was prepared to vote for her even though she wasn't my first choice.  If it happened that she got into a tough fight with another candidate (Obama) but eventually candidate had virtually no chance of winning the primary, I would want them to pull out already so that the general election could start and we could work united towards a Hillary presidency.

[ Parent ]
But Clinton (0.00 / 0)
does have a chance win. Through Supers - which is the same way that Obama has to win. Because without Supers neither can reach the needed number to get the nomination.

So when you and the others keep repeating that she can't win you are just repeating a falsehood.

But I fully expect you to keep preaching to the choir and reinforce the falsehood that you now believe is not a falsehood even if logic says it is.


[ Parent ]
History Teaches us Nothing! (0.00 / 0)
Who would have thought Dems could lose in 2004? Humm?

I think McCain sucks but i just don't see Obama pulling it out in the GE. Too many skeletons in that closet...which if he does get the nom, will be blown wide open. I think once the GE gets rolling it will be an attack ad after attack ad against Obama and ever other bucket of mud they can throw.

So now, maybe it looks good, but god knows what it will look like when we are in the thick of it.

The other factor is the fact that dems are just so divided. Will Obama be able to make amends with the Clinton supporters for all the nastiness he spewed? If not, can he pull enough people to vote for him to compensate for the loss of all the defecting Hillary supporters? I am not so convinced...perhaps i learned the hard way, i never thought Bush would win 2 times.

I say, never count the republicans out, if there is one thing they do know how to do and that is "win/steal" elections. God only knows, dems don't even know how win in their own darn primary.

Sigh...


You think Obama .. (4.00 / 1)
has to make nice with Hillary supporters? .. and what about all the garbage Hillary as thrown at him? .. some Hillary supporters are really too much

[ Parent ]
Well - maybe (0.00 / 0)
because he can't win without Hillary's supporters. But hey, if he really is the great unifier, he should be able to do it. Shouldn't be a problem.  

[ Parent ]
Just because Clinton has been attacking from the right (0.00 / 0)
doesn't mean that they will not attack her in the GE, does it?

This comment applied to both Obama AND Clinton, no?

"Too many skeletons in that closet...which if he does get the nom, will be blown wide open. I think once the GE gets rolling it will be an attack ad after attack ad against Obama and ever other bucket of mud they can throw. "

Now, considering that Obama has managed to weather the attacks so far - while Clinton has gone from the inevitable nominee to the one fighting to stay in the race - kind of speaks against your analysis, no?



"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


[ Parent ]
Regardless of some of the other comments, (4.00 / 1)
I absolutely agree with you, Chris.

McCain is walking on eggshells.  His continued viability rests on, among other things...
1) The economy not getting any worse.
2) The situation in Iraq remaining (relatively) stable
3) Nothing bringing global warming to the fore.
4) People not thinking about Health Care, the value of the dollar etc. etc.

The Republicans are going to lose this year.  It might not be an easy battle, but I am going to work my ass off to make sure Barack Obama is the next President.  I think Hillary Clinton believes that Obama will win in November as well.  Why do you think she's still campaigning so hard for the nomination.  She recognizes a Democratic year when she sees one.

Think about this.  If she REALLY thought Barack would lose the election to McCain, who she says has passed the "commander-in-chief" threshold and admires so much, why would she go with this scorched-earth, kitchen sink policy against him, ensuring that if he did lose she would recieve much of the blame for it, thus making it near impossible to build a winning primary coalition in 2012.

If she just nobly withdrew, and let Obama take a dive, she would COAST to the White House in 2012.  But she knows Obama will probably win this year, making him the nominee in 2012.  She has wanted to be President all of her life, and she sees her window of opportunity rapidly closing.  This is a fight to salvage a lifelong ambition, hence the bitterness and ferocity being brought to the fight.  It is unfortunate that she may not see her chance at the Presidency, but if she doesn't she can only blame her willingness to make decisions based on political expediency rather than her own better judgement.

John McCain.  Wrong for America.


"Pretty Irritating"? (0.00 / 0)
So what you're saying (in a kinder, gentler way) is that Hillary Clinton should just drop out and hand the nomination to Obama.

I have said before that I believe Hillary Clinton is more electable than Barack Obama, in spite of the left's protestations to the contrary. And I won't go into the lengthy dissertation here about why this is so.

However, if "the outcome is more than 95% certain" as you claim, why are 40% of the superdelegates in no hurry to make the dash into Obama's corner?

And why is it that 73% of voters believe Clinton should stay in the race?

And why is it that there is less than 5% separating Obama and Clinton in pledged delegates?

And why is it that Clinton's overall positive ratings have remained relatively stable (50-55%) throughout this campaign, while Obama's have roller-coastered by roughly 18%, depending on the day of the week?

These are no small matters.

Additionally, while Clinton may not have the high positives attributed to Obama, why is it that in a head-to-head matchup with John McCain, particularly in the battleground states of OH, PA, FL, MO, she wins by roughly 8 points?

It might be "pretty irritating" to you and others who want to crown Obama as the Democratic nominee. But "irritating" is not the word I would use to describe a democratic process that is perhaps the most important test of our democracy and our principles in 30 years.


Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search