Nomination At A Glance, August 1st Update

by: Chris Bowers

Wed Aug 01, 2007 at 19:00


Pollster.com, which truly rocks, has a new chart that is worth a look. It shows how closely people are paying attention to this presidential election compared with previous cycles. According to the chart, national interest in the presidential campaign is much higher at this point in the 2008 campaign than it was in any other campaign over the past twenty years.

Why is this? Certainly, part of that is because the primaries will be starting early. Also, I imagine the heavier news coverage of the campaign has also played a role. No doubt, the national desire to get beyond Bush is another factor. Personally, however, my favorite explanation is the rise of grassroots progressive activism, and even of progressive culture, which have led to more people paying attention to elections, especially elections of Democrats and progressives. Just wanted to throw that out there to combat the inevitable complaints that appear in comments about how “its way too early for all of this.” More people than ever diagree with that sentimnet.

And now, onto the averages…

Last update: August 1, 4:00 pm eastern
State polls taken from June 13th through July 30th

Democratic Nomination, At a Glance
State Est. Date # Polls Clinton Obama Edwards Richardson
Net Avail Cash Jun 30 Q2 $29.6M $33.6M $11.8M $6.9M
Iowa December 6 25.0% 16.7% 26.2% 9.8%
New Hampshire December 6 34.8% 24.0% 10.3% 8.2%
Nevada Jan 19 2 39.5% 16.5% 14.0% 6.5%
South Carolina Jan 22 5 34.6% 28.0% 16.0% 2.2%
Florida Jan 29 7 39.3% 17.8% 11.8% 3.2%
National Feb 05 NA 36.0% 23.7% 11.2% 2.5%

Republican Nomination, At a Glance
State Est. Date # Polls Giuliani Romney Thompson McCain
Net Avail Cash June 30 Q2 $14.7M $12.1M $3M (?) $0.1M
Iowa December 5 16.4% 23.8% 15.0% 11.2%
New Hampshire December 6 20.7% 27.2% 12.8% 14.8%
Nevada Jan 19 2 19.0% 21.5% 20.5% 12.0%
South Carolina Jan 22 4 24.8% 7.5% 22.0% 15.0%
Florida Jan 29 6 27.2% 8.7% 21.5% 10.8%
National Feb 05 NA 24.4% 9.7% 19.3% 15.2%

In case you were wondering, my averages are different from those at Pollster.com, because I use a simple mean while they use a trendline system. Mystery Pollster writes about that here.

Methodological notes can be found in the extended entry.
Chris Bowers :: Nomination At A Glance, August 1st Update
Poll and Money Notes
  • Only announced candidates with 5% or more in most polling averages are shown.
  • National polling averages taken from Pollster.com. All early state polls can also be found at Pollster.com.
  • “Net Available Cash” equals cash on hand minus debts minus amount raised for general election. More information can be found at Open Secrets. Current numbers are not precise, as all data is not yet available.
  • For Democrats, early state polls that only include Clinton, Edwards and Obama in the questions were not included.
  • For Democrats, early state polls that include Gore in the question were only included when Gore-less results were unavailable. One Florida poll included Gore.
  • February 5th is not actually a national primary, but due to the large number of states holding nomination events on that date, national polls are used as a placeholder.
Calendar notes
  • I am currently projecting both Iowa and New Hampshire to take place in December of 2007. Currently, the two states are working together, behind the scenes, in order to secure that they are first. Given that Iowa wants to take place eight days before New Hampshire, given that New Hampshire wants to take place seven days before any other non-Iowa state, and given that Nevada is scheduled to take place on January 19, 2008, that means the latest Iowa could be held is Friday, January 4th, 2008. Since Iowa is obviously not going to hold their caucuses either that close to New Year's, much less on a Friday, at this point December seems practically a foregone conclusion. Basically, we are now five months from the Iowa caucus, so anyone who was still doing so can stop saying it is way too early to talk about this stuff.

  • Interestingly, Michigan is currently looking at five possible dates: February 9th, January 12th, January 5th, December 15th, and December 8th. They could very well move up after Iowa and New Hampshire announce the December move. I bet they move up to January 12th, but given the wide range of possibilities (not to mention the lack of recent Michigan polls), it is best to wait for more info before including Michigan in this table. Still, no matter if, where and when Michigan moves, Iowa and New Hampshire will be first. They are willing to hold events in November, or even October, if that is what it takes to stay first.

  • South Carolina, currently scheduled for January 29th on the Democratic side and February 2nd on the Republican side, has also threatened to move ahead of Florida, which is scheduled for January 29th. It would be a real shock if South Carolina did not move up.

  • Ohio might move its primary to January 29th.

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Pollsters (0.00 / 0)
What was interesting to me is that pollsters was polling earlier than past presidential primary races.  The number of people that are showing interest in the race is about 20-25%.  Mystery pollster says there is still a lot of room to move on interested voters.  The interest could be higher now because the media is interested earlier than in the past.  I don't think interest translates to voters completely making up their minds yet.  I still say voters don't totally make up their minds until right before the primaries which would be November of this year.

Can Romney really pull this off? (0.00 / 0)
It's remarkable that he's dominating the three earliest primary states with such a terrible showing nationally.  Edwards is comparable on the Democratic side, but he's only competitive in one of the first three right now

Odd downturn just before 2000 election (0.00 / 0)
The oddest thing I saw was the downturn just before the 2000 election.  Considering that was such an extremely close election I'm wondering what happened a month or two before the election that caused people to lose interest.  I might be wrong, but I don't recall either Bush or Gore leading strongly in opinion polls at the time.  Curious.

Primary schedule (0.00 / 0)
When does it have to be set? At this pace, we might have our nominees before the new year.

And I concur, it is clearly time to get serious about this campaign. IT IS ON!


MI as early as 12/8, who knew (0.00 / 0)
and regularly read and post at MI liberal, says alot or something.

anyhow, Edwards is going to win the nomination, just look at the numbers.  Ok, don't look at the numbers.  Wes Clark on Young Turks was dead wrong this morning about Hillary being unstoppable, ok, maybe he sounded spot on. 
Well, I still see Edwards out maneuvering Clinton and Obama in a tight fiercly competitive nomination fight that may go all the way to the convention floor.

and Romney will be the GOP nominee, and he will be more formidable than the polls indicate.  We hopefully will beat him but we certainly will not crush him.  You just need to listen to him during the GOP debates to get that.


Paying Attention To The Presidential Race (0.00 / 0)
The higher level of early interest in the Presidential race may be one explaination as to why the Democratic race is so stable.  Further, it seems to undermine the argument that Clinton is leading only because of her name-recognition.

Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search