Precinct Captains are the Key

by: Mike Lux

Thu Aug 02, 2007 at 12:00


When caucus results don't wind up very much like pre-Iowa caucus polls, a lot of non-Iowans get confused about that. There's an easy two-word answer: precinct captains.

The final results in Iowa are influenced more by precinct captains than by the quality of TV ads, the amount of mail caucus attendees receive, the number of turnout calls caucus attendees receive from paid phone banks in D.C. or even volunteer phone bankers in the campaigns central HQ in Des Moines. Precinct captains are the heart and soul of the Iowa precinct caucuses.

The reason why these captains are so important is the nature of those caucus meetings themselves. The participants don't drop by a polling place whenever it's convenient throughout the day to do a quick secret ballot that lasts a few short minutes. Caucuses are a two-hour long, highly social, highly interactive process, one that gets played out in public in front of your neighbors. Taking two hours out of your day at an exact-assigned time takes a pre-arranged juggling of your normal schedule, dealing with your kids and other family members, maybe taking time off from work or leaving early. Once you get there at all, it's a process where you have to make decisions as to where to stand, where to move to if your first choice doesn't get 15%, whether to run for delegate, and who else to support for the other delegate slots your candidate has allocated to his campaign.

Without strong precinct captains, a campaign in this environment is screwed. The precinct captain's job responsibilities include:

-Getting all known supporters in the precinct to show up on the night of the caucus

-Getting there early and making sure your supporters are greeted and accounted for when they first come in

-Making sure that when the time comes to caucus for candidates, that your people aren't being talked into going to another camp because a friend is over there, or that you aren't missing people who are going to the bathroom or out smoking

-Once your viability is determined (you have to get 15%), you have to start working all the unviable candidates' groups, and all the folks who went to the undecided corner in round one. (That process, by the way, is very political, because everybody in those not-viable groups is being courted by all the viable campaigns. You have to be good, and agile, at cutting deals with the people who want to be elected as a delegate to county convention, and you have to be really persuasive, more persuasive than every other campaign's precinct captains).

In a race with 8 candidates, plus the undecided option, there are going to be a lot of folks who will have to make a second choice, so your precinct captain has to be good at wheeling and dealing, cutting deals and persuasion. If that captain is inexperienced, or just not very good, the other campaigns will pick up a lot of votes.

Everybody talks about the surge that Kerry and Edwards had at the end in January 2004, and it's true that they both got hot at the end while Dean was taking on a little water. But both the Kerry and Edwards campaigns had brilliant Iowa organizers (Michael Whouley and John Norris for Kerry, and John Lapp for Edwards) whose leaders understood the importance of precinct captains, and their network of captains was just deeper, stronger and more experienced than Dean's. It made a huge difference at the end.

I'm not sure yet who the precinct captain factor will benefit the most this time around. Edwards has a built-in network from last time, and that's a big advantage, but both Clinton and Obama have deep, smart teams who understand how the caucuses work extremely well, and are building strong cadres of precinct captains.

One final note: one thing I do know is that the Iowa caucus system is great for both the state Democratic Party, and for making the party more progressive. Having well-trained, savvy precinct captains in 2,500 Iowa precincts has made the Iowa party consistently one of the strongest (much of the time the strongest) in the country for at least a quarter century. And it helps progressive because it's hard to recruit good precinct captains if you aren't pretty damned progressive on the issues as a candidate. The Iowa caucuses have done-in a ton of conservative Democrats since 1984, including John Glenn, Ernest Hollings, Reuben Askew, Bruce Babbitt, Al Gore (circa 1988, when he was the most conservative candidate in the race) and Joe Lieberman.

I'd love to know what the Iowans, and those with Iowa caucus experience, who are reading this think is going on in terms of precinct captain recruitment. And I'd love to know in general how people think the dynamics of this race will affect the recruitment of these captains. Post in the comments below, and if you're on the ground in Iowa, send me an e-mail at openleft at gmail dot com.

Mike Lux :: Precinct Captains are the Key

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
At this point (0.00 / 0)
who has the best ground game in Iowa?

Particpatory Democracy (0.00 / 0)
You've presented a picture of the Iowa Caucuses as an uber-Democratic phenomenon, rather than the picture of exclusivity and a highly limited number of people making decisions for a much larger group that you often get from the media about Iowa.

I guess my question is, should other states consider caucuses instead of primaries as a way to build the party up.  You noted that precinct captains have a much greater impact than ads in this environment, and I wonder whether it wouldn't be beneficial for other states to adopt caucuses as a way to build up  the party. 

I come from Indiana, and we've got something like 6,000 precincts in the state.  The idea of having 6,000 (or more if it's contested) activists on the ground is amazing, and I imagine makes the state more cometitive in November. And I'm interested to hear whether Iowa uses caucuses beyond the presidential race.

It really seems to me that one of the great tragedies of the 20th century has been that the weakening of party structures has made candidates less dependent on mass participation than before.  That's to say that where in the past the support of  mass base party structures was vital, now a candidate can fight almost exclusively on television, and needn't have any contact with the people who actually live in the district.

Are caucuses better than primaries for the democratic process?


They hold off-year caucuses (0.00 / 0)
Iowa does have off-year caucuses to elect party officials and write the party platform, among other things. They aren't that well-attended, from what I've heard from people in the state.

[ Parent ]
I still wonder if (0.00 / 0)
it wouldn't be a good idea for more states to move to caucuses.

I think that the weakness of the party system in the United States has allowed money to be far more corrosive to the process than if there were more powerful party organizations that were organized around grassroots activities instead of selling candidates like toothpaste.


[ Parent ]
they are poorly attended (0.00 / 0)
but it's still a good chance for the very engaged activists to network and submit resolutions for the party platform.

In 2004 we had about 175 voters attend our precinct caucus.

At the next off-year caucus we had something like 22 people show up in my precinct. The neighboring precinct had only 6 people show up for the off-year caucus.

Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.


[ Parent ]
Wow. Thanks, Mike, (0.00 / 0)
for this post.  I was completely unaware as to how this comes together.  It now makes sense to me why John and Elizabeth Edwards, when asked about how they feel about their election prospects in Iowa, always got what seemed to me to be a funny sort of understated smile as they said they felt confident, as they were able to retain a very large number of their 2004 precinct captains.

Kicking it in the NY-25.

does Clinton really have a lot of precinct captains? (4.00 / 1)
Because I know a lot of people who volunteered for either Kerry , Edwards, Dean or Kucinich in 2004, and none of them are for Clinton.

Neither are the people I know who door-knocked on election day 2004, or the people who volunteered for MoveON or America Coming Together.

I don't see Clinton attracting the kind of volunteers who will do the grunt work in their neighborhoods, frankly. But maybe I am just missing it.

No doubt Teresa Vilmain and others on the Clinton campaign understand how the system works and why precinct captains are important. But if I had to guess right now, I would guess that even if they are getting a bunch of Hillary supporters to call themselves "precinct captain," those people are just not going to put in the time and effort of making calls and knocking on doors.

I was a Kerry precinct captain in 2004. All of the Kerry precinct captains I know of are either for Edwards, Obama or undecided. I'm sure there must be some for Clinton, but I haven't run across them yet this year.

I agree with you about the advantages of having precinct captains, although in my experience not much real persuasion goes on during the caucus. Most of the people supporting non-viable candidates have already decided on a second choice.

Precinct captains are most helpful in persuading neighbors, getting them to show up, greeting them and getting the candidate's sticker on them right away, and making sure nothing goes wrong in the room (like you miss the viability threshold by one person because a couple of your supporters went to the bathroom just as they were dividing into preference groups).

Also precinct captains can sometimes take advantage of screwy caucus math to deprive someone else of a delegate if they know what they are doing. In 1988 the Dukakis and Babbitt supporters in my precinct figured out that if a few Dukakis people transferred to the Babbitt group, Paul Simon would lose a delegate from my precinct and Babbitt would gain one. That's what happened, even though no one in the Simon group defected.

But to be effective, the precinct captain has to actually do something. In my area last time, the Dean precinct captain did virtually nothing to work the neighborhood before the caucus. He was shocked by the number of Kerry and Edwards supporters there, but he wouldn't have been if he had been doing his voter contacts in the weeks before the caucus.

I think Edwards has retained most of his precinct captains from 2004, but it's important to remember that he didn't have as many as Kerry. If he had recruited more precinct captains around the state in the summer and fall, he probably would have won Iowa.

Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.


Does Iowa have 2,500 precincts? (0.00 / 0)
I thought it was a little less than 2,000 precincts. I'm not sure, though.

I am not a fan of the caucus system. I would much prefer a primary. However, I agree that it's an asset for the party to have this precinct-level network of volunteers.

I have heard that the organizing before the 1984 Iowa caucuses helped Tom Harkin defeat an incumbent and get elected to the Senate later that year.

Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.


Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search