IA-03: Obama Movement Candidate Ed Fallon Can Win - Should We Help Him?

by: Matt Stoller

Tue May 27, 2008 at 11:03


In his endorsement interview, Boswell talks about how we liberated Iraq from Saddam Hussein and how the Iraqis have had elections.

Last week, I blogged about Ed Fallon and his race against Bush Dog Democrat Leonard Boswell.  Fallon faces a tough race, but got a key boost this weekend.  Here's what I noted on Saturday.

The hope for Fallon is that the media continues to report on the race in a substantive manner, and that Boswell's ducking of debates continues to annoy the voting public.

Today, the Des Moines Register endorsed Ed Fallon.  Here's what it said about Boswell:

But currently holding the job of congressman doesn't mean a candidate automatically deserves to be re-elected. After interviewing both candidates and reviewing their records, the editorial board can no longer embrace the congressman as the best person to represent Iowa in Congress. Fallon is running under the slogan "new energy for Iowa." On June 3, Democrats in the 3rd District should give Fallon a chance to unleash some of his ideas and energy in Washington.

Why Boswell falls short

Boswell's own record of accomplishment in a dozen years in Congress is relatively light, and, in a recent meeting with the editorial board, he seemed out of touch about some serious issues facing the country.

One example: Boswell expressed skepticism about the financial problems facing Medicare, asking what economists the Register had consulted to conclude the health-care program was in fiscal trouble. It's hardly an issue for debate. The Medicare Board of Trustees has issued numerous reports outlining the trust fund's looming deficits. David Walker, former comptroller general, has expressed concerns about projected Medicare spending. Yet Boswell talked about further studying the issue rather than proposing how to address it.

On immigration, he suggested that undocumented immigrants should go back to their home countries and "get in line" for a chance to come here. That's hardly realistic considering there are an estimated 12 million undocumented immigrants in the United States.

When asked about Republican presidential candidate John McCain's prediction the previous day that most American troops could be home from Iraq by 2013, Boswell seemed unaware of McCain's statement. When asked about education in Iowa, Boswell said the state does "pretty good." And when asked what he based that on, he said Iowa's history and his own experience. But Iowa's educational system - not to mention the world economy - looks nothing like it did in Boswell's childhood.

Fallon has endorsed Obama, whereas Boswell is a Clinton superdelegate.  There couldn't be a more stark difference.  Here's Fallon's letter on May 10th to Boswell on his vote in the Intelligence Committee offering retroactive immunity to telecom companies.

May 10, 2008

The Hon. Leonard Boswell
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, D.C.  

Dear Congressman Boswell:

I am writing today to ask you to disclose to the people of our district how you voted last week in the House Intelligence Committee on Rep. Heather Wilson's measure to add the Senate-approved FISA bill to the fiscal year 2009 intelligence authorization bill.  

Published reports indicate that one of the Democratic members of the committee voted in support of Rep. Wilson's measure, thus supporting the Bush Administration's agenda of giving retroactive immunity to the telecom companies for assisting in the Administration's program of eavesdropping on Americans. You were also one of the 21 Democrats who signed a letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi on January 28, 2008, asking the House to grant such retroactive immunity to the telecom companies.  

Your original and continued support of the so-called "Protect America Act" and of the PATRIOT Act is an issue to be addressed in public debates. As one of your constituents, I want to know why you supported these bills, and whether you continue to support them. In particular, I want to know whether you continue to support granting retroactive immunity to telecom companies.  

On a related matter, I am disappointed that you have refused to debate me, and I encourage you to reconsider. You and I both know that, as candidates for public office, we have a responsibility to voters to let them see us, face-to-face, discussing the key issues facing our district, state, and nation. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Ed Fallon

Candidate for Congress

We are thinking of doing a special OpenLeft fundraiser for Fallon.

What do you think?

Matt Stoller :: IA-03: Obama Movement Candidate Ed Fallon Can Win - Should We Help Him?

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Good idea (4.00 / 7)
I might remind readers that Fallon was a John Edwards Democrat first, but switched to Obama after Edwards suspended his campaign.  

Fallon takes no money from lobbyists whereas Boswell gets most of his contributions via corporate types.

Fallon has a good chance to win.  He did a great liveblog at EENR Blog last week and was endorsed by EENR early on.  


Why wouldn't we? (4.00 / 7)
I mean, what are we here for?

An OpenLeft fundraiser for Fallon is obviously a good idea.


Agree (4.00 / 1)
I'm in for a few bucks if it happens. Have been meaning to pay more attention to this race, but sort of thought it was a longshot. Maybe not.

[ Parent ]
HELL YES!! (4.00 / 2)
Even Democrats have to be held accountable; that's what the primary process is for.

Yes, do it (and do it quick!) (4.00 / 4)
He's a great candidate who has a decent chance at winning.  

No brainer (4.00 / 3)
What is there to think about! Do it! And thanks!

I agree (4.00 / 2)
If there is a chance we can make a difference, we should do it.


Check out this diary at DKos on Fallon (4.00 / 4)
and other great Better Dem challengers that Howie Klein put up a few minutes ago.  http://www.dailykos.com/story/...

It would be a shame to see not get the exposure that Fallon needs.  hint hint.


I'm thinking of a word.... (4.00 / 4)
...YES!

Rochester Turning - turning the tide upstate

I think yes. (4.00 / 1)
I had some hesitation. I've worried that Fallon was more Mark Pera than Donna Edwards, and by that I don't just mean less likely to win. We need to avoid candidates who are not doing the real work themselves, and are looking to the net to basically bail them out. Fallon's really anemic fundraising does still worry me.

But, looking at all the work DemoinesDem has done bringing attention to the race though, I think Fallon is a more serious candidate than that. He has name recognition, has run for tough offices before, and has a history as a committed (if sometimes idealistic) lefty. I think he'd probably be a real ally. I just threw a couple of bucks your way, so I'm not sure I'd give to Fallon as well, but I think a fundraiser sounds like a pretty good idea.

Do you know of any recent polling at all on this race? Has either campaign commissioned polls, even if they haven't released the results?

I support John McCain because children are too healthy anyway.


Anaemic fundraising (4.00 / 1)
Democratic primary challengers are always likely to be weak. Donna Edwards only managed to break the mould due to organisational connections and Al Wynn making some stupid votes, whereas Boswell is normally bad in more subtle ways, undermining the caucus by his actions and comments at least as much as by his votes.

Forgotten Countries - a foreign policy-focused blog

[ Parent ]
Let me just add (4.00 / 1)
That there are also some primaries that we should really be focusing on, even if they aren't challenging sitting Democrats.

The other day you brought up Adam Cote in Maine 1st district, who is a pretty Right Wing Democrat, although backed by VoteVets. The frontrunner in that race is Chellie Pingree, who is backed by Emily's List and endorsed the Responsible Plan.

I know you guys have pushed Leslie Byrne, but there are probably a number of other primaries in winnable seats where getting a progressive candidate in there would be hugely valuable.

2008 is probably a unique opportunity to promote progressives, even in reasonable conservative districts. I think that should be a top priority.

I support John McCain because children are too healthy anyway.


Worthwhile (4.00 / 1)
I've been peripherally following Fallon's run against Boswell and, with the endorsement, I think it would definitely be worth a shot.  I don't know the race well enough to know just how much of a chance Fallon has, but that endorsement suggests he could get some real traction.  And I think taking out Boswell would be another big wake up call to the establishment, much as Donna Edwards's victory was.

I say go for it.  I don't have much money to spare, but I would throw in a few bucks.  I think the impact a victory would have is well worth the shot.


Do it quick (4.00 / 4)
If it's going to be done at all.  Last minute contributions aren't as effective as earlier ones, but they can still help.  But the sooner the better, especially if it goes through Act Blue, which oirdinarily takes a few days to get there.  

My suggestion in general is earlier, earlier.  Less emphasis on the pres and more on the Congressional/Senate races.

I'd say yes, based on the Des Moines Register.  I too have gotten leery of another Pera, but he looks in stronger shape.  I'm in if it happens today; no later though.

John McCain--He's not who you think he is.


I would also (4.00 / 1)
like to see some opportunities for people to phonebank into the district so those who can't give money can give some time making calls for Fallon.

Faith and Politics from a Liberal Perspective - Faithfully Liberal.

[ Parent ]
Night and Day (4.00 / 3)
Sounds like there's nothing to wonder about as far as who deserves to be elected on principles and issues. Assuming Fallon's chances of winning are really as good as advertised, supporting him looks like a no=brainer -- but ONLY if he has a good shot, which I don't see the evidence for in the post.

Anyone got any data on how close the race is? n/t (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
Do it today, (4.00 / 1)
If we are going to make this a real race, we need to get serious resources to Fallon ASAP. With a week or so left, time's a wasting. I've already given a fair amount to this race, and I'll give more if OpenLeft run's a fundraiser while it can still make a difference.

As long as we make it close we will have made out point to those who would capitulate to greed and silly Republican bullying, even if we lose, and if we win, the Bush Dogs will be peeing themselves.


Late comment, but it's true. (0.00 / 0)
The thought of making the Bush dogs pee themselves is enough to make me reach for my wallet.

[ Parent ]
ha! (0.00 / 0)
i thought that it would turn out that the reason you were asking that question would be to avoid giving him "the Open Left taint"...

not everything worth doing is profitable. not everything profitable is worth doing.

Fallon Supported Nader in 2000 Election (0.00 / 0)
I'm irritated that Ed Fallon supported Ralph Nader in the 2000 election.  Fallon is a progressive leader and Iowa was a swing state in 2000.  I guess because Gore narrowly won Iowa in 2000, Fallon is off the hook.  Also, he appears to have learned a lesson in that he is not supporting Nader in this election.  

Because the rest of the community is in support of this, I will kick in something.  I'm just not as enthusiastic as I otherwise would be.  

Saxby Chambliss, worse than disgraceful; he's reprehensible.  


Supporting Progessive Candidates (4.00 / 1)
I agree that we need to support Tallon.  Obama as President will be limited by Demopublicans.  We need to make blue dogs understand that there will be consequences for selling out to the lobbyists.  

um. HELL YES! (0.00 / 0)
Boswell is a very bad Democrat. If we lose this race people will think Donna was a fluke. I thought the DMR would endorse Boswell as there newsroom has attacked Fallon in the past but this is a huge boost. Boswell's campaign commissioned a poll that showed him 20 points up but that was a month ago and had messed up methodology.

If we do it starting tomorow and push hard we could make a real difference. Imagine if Fallon loses 51-49. How will we feel then?

Let's do it. Let's get started NOW.

John McCain: Beacuse lobbyists should have more power


Weak Republican candidate (4.00 / 3)
IA-03 is not a particularly Democratic district, but the Republican candidate is little more than a placeholder. Every time we get an essentially uncontested district we should be trying to elect a more progressive representative, who then has two years to cement his or her position.

Forgotten Countries - a foreign policy-focused blog

There's no downside (4.00 / 1)
At least, none that I can think of.  It's not like we need Boswell for anything.  

Short answer, yes (4.00 / 3)
But there's one other primary that you shouldn't overlook: Regina Thomas vs. John Barrow in GA-12. It's a race that be a bigger leftward leap than would Fallon over Boswell (Barrow ranks as the most conservative to 5th most conservative member of the Democratic caucus, depending on who's doing the classifying). It's a district that's slightly more Democratic leaning (at D+2), and it might be a likelier victory, based on demographics (at least 2/3s of the Democratic voters in GA-12 are African-American).

Amen to that! (0.00 / 0)
Also Thomas has been a representative in the area for longer and is widely respected in the area. We also have more time for that race.

Let's do a Fallonraiser. Then one for Leslie Bryne so she beats the war profiteer she is facing and then one for Thomas. Or maybe just one big Better Democrats fundraiser.

John McCain: Beacuse lobbyists should have more power


[ Parent ]
By my count (0.00 / 0)
the vote is 22-0 in favor of Fallon and quite a few people volunteering contributions.

Let's do it!

John McCain: Beacuse lobbyists should have more power


Hell Yes (4.00 / 1)
Ed Fallon is a movement progressive, doing progressive movement electoral work against a Bush Dog.  Why the hell wouldn't OpenLeft (and all other netroots outlets) try to organize and fundraise for Ed?  

The key here, of course, was the "Ed Fallon can win" part. (0.00 / 0)
Once that's established, then yes of course we should be helping.

I'm shocked that the DMR went for him.  That's a big fucking deal, undermined only by the fact that there's just a week left for Fallon to capitalize on it.

He needs a money bomb tomorrow, if he's going to pay for anything at all over the weekend.  If you hit this, you should hit it HARD.

I watched the videos over at the DMR endorsement page, and Fallon really does sound like one of us.  Talking about global climate change as your number one issue means you get it.  Boswell does not sound evil, but he does sound like generic Blue Dog Congressman, which is not what the world needs from us right now.

I'm glad I contributed to this race already, and I'll contribute again as soon as the fundraiser goes up.  Which should be ASAP.


Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search