Presidential Forecast, June 11th

by: Chris Bowers

Tue Jun 10, 2008 at 11:15


Electoral College: Obama 242, McCain 206, Toss-up 90
National popular vote: Obama 46.6%-44.7% McCain


(Dark Blue (184): Obama +10.0% or more
Lean Blue (58): Obama +4.1%-+9.9%
White / Toss-up (90): Obama +4.0% to McCain +4.0%
Lean Red (62): McCain +4.1%-+9.9%
Dark Red (144): McCain +10.0% or more
)

For the first time this election season, the entire 50-state map actually makes intuitive sense (at least to me). Given the results of past elections, the national polls between Obama and McCain, the demographic shifts nationally, the results of the nomination campaigns, and the differences between the two major candidates and the major candidates of the past two elections, this is pretty much exactly where I would imagine the Electoral College to be right now even without the polls to back it up. Given all of these factors, I can't think of a single state that is more than 5% away from where I would imagine it to be,

North Dakota? Well, Obama campaigned hard there, while McCain has ignored it, and in such a small state that can shift the electorate quite a bit quickly. The same can be said for Nebraska-02, where Obama only trails by 4%.

Massachusetts? Obama obviously won't do as well as Kerry, and Deval Patrick can be viewed, in many ways, as the 2006 preview of Barack Obama. As such, in a state where Democrats control everything, at a time when the national mood is so foul, Massachusetts might not be quite so pro-Democratic as it once was.

Virginia? Demographic shifts in that state have been pushing it toward Democrats for a long time, and we have been winning a bunch of elections in Virginia lately. Almost inevitably, Virginia was poised to become a swing state.

Indiana? Well, Obama campaigned extremely hard in the state, while McCain has basically ignored it. Of course it is going to be more pro-Obama than would be otherwise expected.

Florida and Michigan? In contrast to North Dakota and Indiana, this time McCain is the one who has heavily out-campaigned Obama in these states. This was the real problem with the primary calendar. It isn't that Michigan and Florida resented Democrats, but rather that Michigan and Florida were the two biggest states for Republicans in their nomination campaign, while Democrats ignored both states. Simply put, they have a head start on us in both states.

Colorado and Montana have been moving toward Democrats for at least the past four years In fact, in 2004, both states were bright spots in an otherwise dismal year for Democrats. No surprise at all that Obama is doing better than Kerry and Gore in those two states.

In South Carolina, Obama's efforts in the state back in 2007 and in January of 2008 have probably upped African-American registration to the point where the state isn't much different than North Carolina in terms of partisan voting index. The Palmetto state will remain a bit more Republican than it's northern neighbor, but probably not much.

Overall, very few states are currently showing massive blowouts of more than 16%. Only Alabama, Arkansas, D.C., Illinois, Hawaii, Kentucky, NE-03, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Utah, and Vermont have reached the true blowout stage. The swing, "battleground" states might be extremely numerous this time around, making Obama and Dean's decisions to staff up in every state very smart. Run everywhere for a couple of months, and see what shakes out. If necessary, we can tighten our battleground focus in September, but until that time we should try to win everywhere.

More state by state details in the extended entry.  

Chris Bowers :: Presidential Forecast, June 11th
Solid Obama: 184 Electoral Votes
State EV's Obama % McCain % Margin # Polls
California 55 51.3% 37.5% +13.8% 4
Connecticut 7 49.5% 39.5% +10.0% 2
D.C. 3 -- -- +80.0% 0
Hawaii 4 61.0% 31.0% +30.0% 1
Illinois 21 59.0% 34.0% +25.0% 2
Maine-AL* 2 50.0% 38.5% +11.5% 2
Maine-01* 1 -- -- +15.0% 0
Maryland 10 52.0% 38.5% +13.5% 2
Minnesota 10 50.3% 39.3% +11.0% 2
New Jersey 15 51.0% 37.0% +14.0% 3
New York 31 49.8% 36.3% +13.5% 4
Oregon 7 50.5% 38.5% +12.0% 2
Rhode Island 4 47.5% 34.0% +13.5% 2
Vermont 3 60.0% 32.5% +27.5% 2
Washington 11 49.0% 38.0% +11.0% 3

Lean Obama: 58 Electoral Votes
State EV's Obama % McCain % Margin # Polls
Colorado 9 48.5% 41.5% +7.0% 2
Delaware 3 50.0% 41.0% +9.0% 1
Iowa 7 45.5% 40.0% +5.5% 2
Massachusetts 12 48.5% 39.5% +9.0% 2
Maine-02* 1 -- -- +8.0% 0
New Mexico 5 47.0% 42.5% +4.5% 2
Pennsylvania 21 46.3% 40.5% +5.8% 4

Toss-up: 90 Electoral Votes
State EV's Obama % McCain % Margin # Polls
Indiana 11 45.5% 49.0% -3.5% 2
Michigan 17 40.7% 42.3% -1.6% 3
Missouri 11 44.3% 44.3% Even 3
Nebraska-02** 1 -- -- -4.0% 0
New Hampshire 4 43.3% 44.7% -1.4% 3
North Dakota 3 42.0% 43.0% -1.0% 2
Ohio 20 44.0% 42.7% +1.3% 3
Virginia 13 44.0% 45.3% -1.3% 3
Wisconsin 10 46.5% 42.5% +4.0% 2

Lean McCain: 54 Electoral Votes
State EV's Obama % McCain % Margin # Polls
Alaska 3 41.5% 49.5% -8.0% 2
Florida 27 40.5% 47.5% -7.0% 2
Montana 3 41.0% 47.5% -6.5% 2
Nebraska-01** 1 -- -- -9.0% 0
Nevada 5 41.5% 47.5% -6.0% 2
North Carolina 15 41.8% 46.5% -4.7% 4
South Carolina 8 42.0% 48.0% -6.0% 2

Solid McCain: 144 Electoral Votes
State EV's Obama % McCain % Margin # Polls
Alabama 9 34.0% 57.5% -23.5% 2
Arizona 10 38.5% 48.5% -10.0% 2
Arkansas 6 31.5% 58.0% -26.5% 2
Georgia 15 38.0% 48.0% -10.0% 2
Idaho 4 39.0% 52.0% -13.0% 1
Kansas 6 36.5% 52.0% -15.5% 2
Kentucky 8 32.3% 57.0% -24.7% 3
Louisiana 9 38.0% 50.5% -12.5% 2
Mississippi 6 41.5% 52.0% -10.5% 2
Nebraska-AL** 2 37.0% 52.0% -15.0% 3
Nebraska-03** 1 -- -- -33.0% 2
Oklahoma 7 27.5% 59.5% -32.0% 2
South Dakota 3 36.0% 49.5% -13.5% 2
Tennessee 11 33.5% 55.5% -22.0% 2
Texas 34 37.5% 52.0% -14.5% 2
Utah 5 33.0% 56.0% -23.0% 2
West Virginia 5 36.0% 49.0% -13.0% 2
Wyoming 3 37.5% 53.5% -16.0% 2

* Maine four electoral votes are awarded as follows: two for the statewide winner, and one for the winner of each congressional district. ME-01 is about 3.5% more Democratic than the state as a whole, while ME-02 is about 3.5% less Democratic than the state as a whole.

** Nebraska's five electoral votes are awarded as follows: two for the statewide winner, and one for the winner of each congressional district. NE-01 is about 6.0% more Democratic than the state as a whole, NE-02 is about 11.0% more Democratic than the state as a whole, and NE-03 is about 18.0% less Democratic than the state as a whole.

Methodology
I will update at least once every day between now and November 4th. The methodology is simple and straightforward.

  1. For each state, take all polls conducted for the state over the previous thirty days, and average them.
  2. If one polling firm has more than one poll in a state over the last thirty days, take only the most recent poll.
  3. Every state has at least two polls. If two polls were not conducted in a state over the last thirty days, use the two most recent polls from any polling firm.
  4. If only one poll has been conducted in a state, then only use that poll.
  5. No polling firm discrimination whatsoever. Polls are never excluded because the organization has a bad or partisan reputation.

As we move closer to the election and more data becomes available, the time frames for polls included in the averages will decrease. Also, when the amount of data increases, I will be able to start projecting the swing, "toss-up" states. Right now, however, there just isn't enough data to push those states into one camp or the other.


Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Chris .. (0.00 / 0)
I don't know how much you know about what I am going to ask .. but i'll ask anyway  .. and see what opinions I get .. what happens if gas goes up to $5.50 or $6/gallon? ... if that happens .. is there anyway McCain doesn't suffer a Goldwater type blowout? .. does anyone think that gas prices will come down substantially in Oct & Nov.(like 2006)? ... I know it sounds nutty saying that .. but the worse the economy does ... the worse McCain will do(especially if McCain can be branded as Bush's 3rd term)

probably right, but i wouldn't be too loud about it (0.00 / 0)
there are things Bush can do to manipulate the price of gas in the short term, after all

[ Parent ]
What can Bush do in the short term? .. (0.00 / 0)
he's hamstrung himself .. you do understand that rising global demand .. and global instability aren't the only reasons for the high prices .. right? ... and that there is a question about whether Saudi Arabia can pump much more than it is presently

[ Parent ]
You could not be more wrong (0.00 / 0)
The reasons you give for high prices -- rising demand, global instability -- show no correlation to the current situation.  Current prices are being driven by speculation on the U.S. market, and nothing else.  I've seen analysis that proves it, and if I can find the links again, I'll provide them.

So, yes, the opportunity for Bush to manipulate prices this fall is quite real.

That a disgusted America will see right through it, though, is entirely a possibility.


[ Parent ]
You could not be more wrong (4.00 / 1)
Krugman explains here why speculation can't be contributing that much to the rising oil prices. Short answer:

If oil isn't building up in inventories, there can't be a bubble in the spot price.

And inventories have been falling.

Also, the falling dollar alone accounts for like a third of the rise in oil prices over the last couple of years. See here.

Finally, this article makes it explicitly clear that net oil exports have been unable to keep up with rising demand - in fact, they've been falling in absolute terms. This is what is most responsible for the rise in oil prices.

But, if you have "proof" that it is all about speculation - proof which makes a convincing case against all of the above - I would like to see it.


[ Parent ]
You are right .. (0.00 / 0)
about the falling dollar ... but speculation also plays a part(see the run up at the end of last week) ... for what ever reason .. Krugman doesn't want to acknowledge that speculation plays a part(not a huge part mind you .. but a part)

[ Parent ]
Many factors cause rise in oil prices (4.00 / 1)
Key drivers are rising demand in the developing world and, until very, very recently, the US as well, combined with static production in areas such as Saudi and failure to find new, large fields.  Plus falling dollar, due to our budget and trade deficits.  But local supply disruptions, the "terror premium" and speculation, especially over the last 6-12 months, also play a part.  That speculation has increased is shown in trading figures, such as they are, but much takes place "off the books".

Bush can do very little to lower prices (release from strategic petroleum reserve--unlikely, as Congress had to mandate him to stop filling it up, or pressure Saudis, but that hasnt been wprking and it seems clear that they have already peaked and no longer have surplus capacity).  But he can do a great deal to increase them--such as attacking Iran and sabre-rattling that increases the "terror premium".

John McCain--He's not who you think he is.


[ Parent ]
There is still the strategic reserve, as well (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
if? (0.00 / 0)
Gas is $4.50 in my neighborhood and it's barely summer.

John McCain opposes the GI Bill.

[ Parent ]
Important Caveat (4.00 / 1)
We're still in the midst of Obama's post-nomination bounce and the full effect of that hasn't fully filtered down into the state-by-state polling yet.

I suspect in another week or two you'll see more state-by-state polling showing a lot of movement toward Obama. I suspect all the Kerry states are coming home, and he could very well move some Bush states like New Mexico into the Safe Obama category.

The real moment of truth is going to be the next round of polling out of Ohio, Missouri, Virginia, Florida, North Carolina, and Nevada, in my opinion. If Obama shows serious movement in, say, four of those states, McCain's in trouble. He can't afford to play a battlefield that large while trying to keep a foothold in the Midwestern Kerry states.


Agree about the Kerry states (0.00 / 0)
except maybe N.H. McCain is popular and Obama seems to under perform in the New England region.

 As for the other states. Lately I have become less confident about Nevada  


[ Parent ]
lay a good ground foundation for us here in Michigan (4.00 / 1)
we'll be OK come October.  I want to see Obama in ND,NV,MO,NC,VA,IN.  Come October when McCain is scrambling for votes, he'll abandon MI like his first wife and head to OH hoping to lock down that difficult state.  Fortunately, Strickland is very poplular and thier corrupt secretary of state is gone.  And I'll give my left foot to see McCain forced to stop in ND to shore up support in that sure thing state all for 3 electoral votes.

I am filled with glee and apprehension. (4.00 / 1)
Everyone has to get this right. Not only the election, the administration, and the tackling of onrushing problems will all demand our best efforts and our best imaginations. Three trillion dollars will have been wasted in the republican war by the time congress can begin fighting their "Iraq war depression." The oil depression will be upon us and we will need to build a new energy creation and distribution system.

Get ready to work.

In honor of this continuing plea for dedication and commitment, I will fight typos and sentence fragments.


Change
"We must break up the banks and never again let them get so big that they distort our politics and take down the economy.


[ Parent ]
typos and sentence fragments, forever!! (4.00 / 1)
Good point about the typos and fragments.  For whatever reason, I keep treating posts like freewheeling thoughts and write poorly on purpose like it's a post-it.  

[ Parent ]
I do it even as I write long diaries. (4.00 / 2)
I wasn't always so careless, I have even been pleased with my writing, but the blog/net/post system calls out the worst in me. I have postulated that it's because I have the immediacy of a conversation, and I attempt to 'say' my side of the conversation before everyones attention is elsewhere.

I am going to have to live with the fact that this is really a term paper sometimes, a funding proposal, and not a txt msg, or an offhand telephone conversation.

Wish me luck metaprogramming my net writing.

Change
"We must break up the banks and never again let them get so big that they distort our politics and take down the economy.


[ Parent ]
Amy Walter (4.00 / 1)
Amy Walter, editor-in-chief of the Hotline (and my favorite poll analyst) said on the News Hour last night that she doesn't like the current state-by-state polls:

JUDY WOODRUFF: . . . [B]efore we look at this map and how you think these states are leaning, we're almost five months away from the election. Tell us what you're basing these estimations on at this point, Amy.

AMY WALTER, Editor-in-Chief, The Hotline: Well, the one thing that we shouldn't base them on today is looking at polling. There are a whole bunch of people who are looking at...

JUDY WOODRUFF: Shouldn't?

AMY WALTER: Should not, because it's still way too early. Most of these polls that have been taken in these states, for example, they were a month or two months old. And they really reflected, I think in many ways, what was going on in the primary election between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, not so much about where voters necessarily sit today. So I'm a little wary about using the polls there.



The truth about Saxby Chambliss

Gut check (4.00 / 1)
My gut tells me that Obama will beat McCain decisively. I had the same feeling about Bush (despite support Kerry) in 2004, and I felt in 2000 things were getting to close even while trying to keep my chin up for Gore. I don't have the charts you've got, but I am convinced Presidential runs are less (despite appearances) about the day to day, and, more about the fundamentals. They all favor Obama heavily. Frankly, I will be blunt and cynical for a moment by saying that the only thing that will keep this even close is race. Outside of that demographic, it won't be even close. And, despite the closeness, the fact is- Obama still wins decisively. Just reading too much about how the GOP hates their own candidate, how our side is fired up, etc. Those are the fundamentals. Everyone should work hard, or in my case donate what I can, but I am becoming more confident.

Once a week is enough (0.00 / 0)
At least for me, at this point.  I enjoy the posts, but I can't see that enough will change daily to warrant it until the conventions.

Now Congress is another story.  I'll update after today's primaries, but no one does charts like you.  Really.  How about one of each, once a week for now?

John McCain--He's not who you think he is.


Sort of on that topic (0.00 / 0)
My brother (something of a math geek) is convinced that Chris' methodology is flawed. By including older polls but weighting newer ones more heavily he could get equally accurate results, but there would be less static, or day-to-day fluctuation.

Now, maybe we all like the day-to-day fluctuation a lot, but there's something to be said for smoother changes, so that trends are a little easier to spot (and harder to imagine.)

Finally, I kind of like that he does it everyday, just because at the end of the summer (or when the election rolls around) I want someone to put them all together into a video where we can see the country making up its mind as the colors change.

I support John McCain because children are too healthy anyway.


[ Parent ]
Obama EV Strategy (0.00 / 0)
I see an Obama victory grouped as follows and my assessment as to where the race will be in October barring a major gaffe/revelation or major economic/war event that fundamentally alters the dynamic of the race:

Pacific Bloc : CA, OR, WA, HI = (73 EV. Safe)

Northeast/MidAtlantic Bloc : ME, VT, MA, NY, CT, RI, NJ, DE, MD, DC : (91 EV. Safe.)

Great Lakes/Midwest Bloc : MN, IA, WI, IL, IN, MI, PA (97 EV. I think that the "tossups' like IA, WI will safely come home. I think that Obama is already up in MI and his superior organization and GOTV operation will keep MI. I think IN is the interesting pickup. I think Obama will seriously challenge Mccain here and make this a very good pickup opportunity. Figure a higher AA turnout out of Indianapolis & the NE combined with a youth vote turnout. I think PA stays blue and all the recent polls say so. 97 EV. EVen if Obama loses IN (11EV) he still walks out with 86 EV.

At this point he arrives at 250 or essentially what Kerry had in 2004 (252).

Now come the two major pickup opportunities :

Southwest : CO, NM, NV : 19 EV's. I feel good about CO & NM and give McCain the edge in NV. Say Obama comes away with 14 EV.

Which brings him to 264 or six short of victory.

Battlegrounds and Obama Reaches : NH, OH, VA, FL, MO, NC : 90 EVs. I put his chances in order as follows : OH>VA>NH>MO>FL,NC. I think that running a Strickland sort of campaign in PH can bring this home. I think VA will be interesting to see. I can see MO and NH breaking for us. I would like to see a fight in NC & FL to force McCain to defend his must-win states. McCain does not have a path to win without those 42 EVs. I see Obama taking OH for sure. I think that NH and VA will be the difference between Obama winning 300+ EVs or winning in the 285-290 range.



Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search