Elizabeth Edwards Leads Healthcare for America Now Campaign

by: Benny

Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 15:07


The Politico is reporting that Elizabeth Edwards is leading a $40M campaign called Healthcare for America Now on July 8th at the National Press Club.  
Healthcare for America Now will unveil a $40 million effort, with the first ad buy being a $1.5 million in national print, online and broadcast advertising.

The group's goal is to provide "quality, affordable health care for every American," and it obviously dovetails with the Obama campaign's promise of providing universal health care. The group will spend $25 million in paid media, while also funding 100 organizers involved in events around the country.


More after the jump...

Benny :: Elizabeth Edwards Leads Healthcare for America Now Campaign

Healthcare for America Now coalition includes a who's who list of liberal organizations such as MoveOn.org, the housing group ACORN, Americans United for Change, the Campaign for America's Future, the Center for American Progress Action Fund, the National Education Association, Planned Parenthood, the Service Employees International Union, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, United Food and Commercial Workers, and National Women's Law Center.  Many state organizations are also participants.

Many of these are also participating in John Edwards' Half in Ten Poverty Initiative.

Elizabeth Edwards is a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress (CAP) Action fund, thus it is not totally surprising that she is leading the effort.  Sam Stein at HuffPo reported that Elizabeth Edwards continued her criticisms of McCain's plan with this comment (not certain if it was a conference call or not):



Often Republicans try to skate by the issue of health care without putting out a plan...John McCain didn't do that he completely breaks that mold, nit only does he have a plan he has posed the most radical plan in this race, the most radical plan in my lifetime... It ignores what happens in people's lives, how the insurance industry has worked in the past, and will work in the future, and it ignores other kinds of deregulations.


CAP pointed out that in 2009, McCain's plan would cut a family with $40K in income's taxes by $50, but by 2013, as the value of the credit erodes, this family's taxes would increase more than $1,100. By 2018, they will be paying over $2,800 more.


Will you stand with Elizabeth Edwards to obtain health care for all of us?  If you're ready, click here and sign up.  


Elizabeth Edwards, Health Care Guruess

Cross-posted from MyDD


Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
And a great person to make this initiative happen (4.00 / 3)
Elizabeth Edwards...

Thanks, Benny. This is a good resource for the continuing (4.00 / 3)
campaign for a national health care plan.  I hope that the energy behind the FISA push back will be harnessed for a truly universal health care plan.  To paraphrase John Edwards, "How can you compromise on universal health care.  It's either for everybody or it's not."

"I'm not a fan of "affordable" health care.  The term has been used by every Democrat who has run of office.  But at least the big education push has begun.


Weasal words (4.00 / 1)
"affordable health care"  as Edwards used to say.  

[ Parent ]
Actually his example of a weasal word (4.00 / 2)
was "access" to health care. I think he used affordable in his own description of health care, but I could be wrong there.

[ Parent ]
That's right (4.00 / 1)
"access" was a weasal word.  

[ Parent ]
Cool (4.00 / 2)
40 mill ain't chump change.

Obama needs to own this issue. Word is, he's moving closer to the Edwards-Clinton mandate model.  


I sure hope so. (4.00 / 3)
The thing is, it'd be very easy for him to pivot on this issue if he so chose.

As infuriating as it was during the primary that he would never acknowledge that Edwards and Clinton don't have onerous mandates because they heavily subsidize workers health insurance up to $100,000, it may turn out to be a useful political tactic. Because since he never conceded that point or said that point still made it an onerous mandate, now he can say, "well I don't like onerous government mandates, and we've made sure this is not one. If you don't have a lot of money, we're going to make sure you pay no more than 5% of your income per month for my health care plan."

So it doesn't look like a flip-flop. It really does sound like something like that will have to happen because Kennedy is starting to have health care talks in his office on what the new plan will look like (in today's NY Times). And they've been discussing the MA plan and how that might be extended nationally. Now I HATED the MA plan because it really was onerous mandates and there was no public option. So since Obama has come out against that kind of thing, I'd hope this would force him to take something like the MA plan, but add subsidies on a sliding scales to actually make it affordable (like Edwards did).

It does suck that Kennedy is trying to find "consensus" with republicans. That's what they did in MA and with the medicare drug plan. And that meant no public insurance option if you wanted republicans to go along with it. Very very stupid. Very inefficient. I hope they crack through that and do what Edwards did with a Medicare Plus plan that gives people the option. Maye if we have 57-58 senators we can get something like that through. I sure as hell hope so.



[ Parent ]
The Plank has a good header on this one (4.00 / 2)
Harry and Louise, Meet Elizabeth Edwards.

http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs...


Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search