The Telling Absence of Abramoff In McCain Messaging

by: Chris Bowers

Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 13:15


One of the less talked about reasons as to why many movement conservatives, such as Tom DeLay, hate John McCain, is that, as chairman of the Indian Affairs Committee, McCain actually played an important role in exposing the Jack Abramoff scandal. The damage that this scandal did to both the Republican Party and the conservative movement, including its leaders like Tom DeLay, was pretty severe. Because of this, no matter how much McCain backtracks and tries to suck up to the right-wing, many movement conservatives will never forgive him for his role in the Abramoff scandal.

All of this makes the absence of Abramoff in McCain's messaging extremely interesting. On the surface, it would seem like the perfect issue for McCain to run on. It would emphasize his image as a reformer in an election where people are seeking change. It would emphasize his willingness to stand up to his own party, in an election where people hate Republicans. It would also make him look tough and principled, in that he is willing to throw high-ranking members of his own party into jail if they break the law. Combined with the selection of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, who defeated a corrupt Republican governor in the 2006 primary, it strikes me that McCain would have a winning message reinforced by two object lessons. With a paid media campaign centered on Abramoff, a McCain-Palin ticket could argue that it is willing and able to throw Republicans in jail and out of office if they are corrupt. That is a pretty solid message this year, and it could erode, or even erase, Obama's lead pretty quickly.

And yet, Abramoff has almost never come up in McCain's message in this campaign. A Google search on McCain's website shows only 19 results for Abramoff, which is only one more time than Dennis Kucinich is mentioned. Further, about half of the Abramoff results on the website are from old pages that are now obsolete. In short, there is virtually no mention of Abramoff by the McCain campaign.

The most obvious conclusion to draw from the absence of Abramoff in McCain messaging, even though McCain is running as a capable reformer who will stand up to his own party, is that McCain isn't actually willing to stand up to his own party anymore. That McCain is not messaging on Abramoff is a clear sign that he is too afraid of angering his big-money donors, too afraid of angering conservative media, and too afraid of angering Republican Party higher-ups to run on his role in the Abramoff scandal. Abramoff is just about the perfect way to reinforce McCain's campaign message, and yet he isn't using it. As such, this is the perfect demonstration that McCain isn't actually a crusading reformer willing to stand up to his own party. At this point, he can't even stand up to his own party in terms of messaging, much less anything substantive.  

Chris Bowers :: The Telling Absence of Abramoff In McCain Messaging

Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
John McCain & Abramoff (0.00 / 0)
John McCain's role in the Abramoff scandal as chair of the Indian Affairs Committee was to shift blame onto Ralph Reed and Abramoff and away from Charlie Black and others who are associated with the McCain campaign.  He walled some stuff off, selectively released documents etc to protect some and ensure others took the fall (noit that it was undeserved).  I'll look for the link, but someone explored this in depth--maybe Emptywheel.  It's pretty interesting and one can see why some of those guys hate McCain.

John McCain--He's not who you think he is.

Here's the link (4.00 / 2)
To the very extensive exploration of the connections between Jack Abramoff and Charlie Black, McCain's campaign manager.  The post suggests (towards the end) that Black may have been one of the sources of leaks against Abramoff.  It's pretty interesting stuff.

John McCain--He's not who you think he is.

[ Parent ]
that's the impression I got from reading dengre's work (0.00 / 0)
over the years at Daily Kos.

McCain made sure not to take the Abramoff investigation in certain directions.

try this:

http://dengre.dailykos.com


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.


[ Parent ]
Democrats Should Also Focus on Corruption (0.00 / 0)
Why haven't Democrats continued to talk about the Republican "culture of corruption" in Washington? Top Bush administration people still won't testify about all the shenanigans they've been involved in. It still looks like stonewalling to hide the corruption. To me, this is an excellent issue to run on and one that appeals to liberals, conservatives, and everyone in between. If Obama wants to prove that his campaign is all about change and running Washington in a different way, then this issue seems perfect.

The problem with your analysis is that... (0.00 / 0)
... it assumes the worst for anything done by McCain.  

There may be alternate reasons why McCain isn't highlighting the role of Abramoff... right now, McCain's biggest problem is that he has an "R" after his name, and Abramoff was a GOP (as opposed to "Bush") scandal, and it doesn't go McCain any good to bring up Abramoff.  (not to mention that McCain would prefer that the Keating Five scandal remain in the background)


You seem to be stretching (0.00 / 0)
In the GOP primary debates McCain, on more than one occasion, explicitly named Abramoff as evidence of what had gone wrong with the Republican brand. This at a time when he needed the right wing more than he does now. He "stood up to" the DeLay wing then.

Counter-hypotheses:
1) Iraq, economy, energy, etc. all are bigger issues than Abramoff.
2) His campaign is too poorly run to figure out that Abramoff might be a good message to pound.

Visit DebateScoop for political candidate debate news and analysis.


Or, (0.00 / 0)
follow the links in my post above.

John McCain--He's not who you think he is.

[ Parent ]
He didn't need the right wing then (0.00 / 0)
McCain almost never got more than 50% of the vote while the contest was still going, and some of his biggest victories were in more moderate states like New York or states with open primaries. When he won conservative states, it was generally because the hard-right vote was divided (South Carolina being the best example).

He was essentially running a general election campaign in the primaries. Giuliani was the only other man with any interest in the centre and he ran a terrible campaign then dropped out so that McCain could take the big states, so McCain managed to obtain pluralities without cosying up to the right wing.

When the primaries ended, he needed to consolidate his base and hence moved right. Hence mentioning Abramoff no longer achieved much. It's possible he could bring the messaging back if things look really bad in October and the GOP is willing to throw everybody else under the bus, but right now he's protecting the party and just relying on sleaze to weaken Obama.

Forgotten Countries - a foreign policy-focused blog


[ Parent ]
Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search