The Race Card Thing

by: Mike Lux

Fri Aug 01, 2008 at 16:30


There has already been mountains of material written about the politics of race in this campaign, and there will be mountains more before it is through (and, for that matter, in the months after no matter what the result), but the latest back and forth has stirred me to weigh in. Having grown up in a working class neighborhood in the Midwest, and spent years talking politics in the labor halls and bars of Iowa, I have lots of thoughts about the working class white folks of middle America that McCain is targeting with this bullshit.
Mike Lux :: The Race Card Thing
A general observation I have is of the insidious nature of racism in this country. Outside of the very small minority of KKK, neo-Nazi types, very few whites think of themselves as racist, (the KKK types we are proud to be called that). When most Americans tell a joke that has a racist aspect, or when they are condescending to people of color, or when they think they are complimenting a black person when they remark about how clean they are, they don't think they are being racist. And when people (whether they are black, brown or white liberals, or whoever) get mad at them for this kind of behavior, they get defensive and are convinced that those criticizing them are overreacting.

That's why the race card thing McCain is doing, the gambit so well-described by Trippi here, is so dangerous. Working class whites who haven't understood why people criticize them for things they think are funny, or even just "being nice," relate positively to the race card frame.

I am convinced that the genius of the infamous Harold Ford "call me" ad wasn't the subliminal white women/black man stuff, but that it got such a negative reaction from civil rights leaders and white liberals to an ad that just seemed to working class TN voters as just a funny ad. The initial run of the ad for a few days did nothing bad to Ford's poll numbers, but the reactions to the ad in the week following the initial run did.

This is what makes the strategy for McCain so good, and the reaction from our side so tricky. I don't think the answer is the response from Obama manager David Plouffe, which was just to say "No, we're not" when McCain and Rick Davis accused Obama of playing the race card. I think the reaction has to be both less defensive and more aggressive. My suggestion would be something like:

"Barack Obama has never asked anyone to vote for him because of his race, and never will. Why John McCain is raising straw men right now leads us to wonder: why isn't he talking about real issues that actually matter to the American public. We want this campaign to be about reviving this economy, about making America safer and stronger in a challenging world, about lowering energy prices and dealing with the health care crisis. John McCain wants to talk about fictitious race cards and Britney Spears. Let's have a real debate."

One final story related to the over-reacting thing, about one of the greatest labor organizers I ever knew, an Iowa Machinist named Bill Fenton. Many, many years ago I was drinking in a labor bar with Bill and a bunch of other guys, and somebody at the table told a racist joke with the word nigger in it. I was getting ready to blast the guy, but I was also curious to see how Bill- who had been one of the leaders in the fight for civil rights in Iowa in the '50s and '60s- would handle it. To my surprise, Bill laughed at the joke and slapped the guy on the back and said, "that's a funny joke, Jim." But then he paused and said, "you know, Jim, even though it was pretty funny, in our labor movement, we can't afford to be using words like that and telling jokes like that. We have black guys in our union, and we fight for them just as hard as we do for you, because if we don't stick together and have each other's backs, the boss is going to pick us apart and mow us down." Well, Jim turned bright red- he was mortified, and he apologized profusely to Bill and everybody at the table. I never heard him nor anybody else in that group of guys ever tell a racist joke again (although they may well have in other settings). By not overreacting but still responding directly to the issue, Fenton made his point with those guys far more effectively than he would have done by preaching at them.

Obviously, a story like this is difficult to translate to a national dialogue or campaign, but my point in telling it is to say this: it is essential that we respond to all the racial issues being raised, but it is equally important that we not overreact. The Obama campaign has done this pretty well through much of this campaign, but they need to be very clear about not getting into a "no, we're not using the race card" spat, because white working class voters will side with the McCain frame in that kind of back and forth. If Obama is very clear that he is not asking for any favors, or overreacting to people trying to provoke, but instead is focused on debating the real issues that are important, I think that's a frame we win with.


Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
The Race Card Thing | 11 comments
uh, you might want to edit paragraph one (0.00 / 0)
same sentence is repeated twice.

sTiVo's rule: Just because YOU "wouldn't put it past 'em" doesn't prove that THEY did it.

And now that I've read the whole thing (4.00 / 4)
good on you.

Calling folks racist or implying they are ain't gonna cut it.

I liked Obama's quote the other day when he said, in essence, "That's all you got?"

sTiVo's rule: Just because YOU "wouldn't put it past 'em" doesn't prove that THEY did it.


Weak hit from McCain, except with those already in the bag (4.00 / 1)
The Iowa story you told is great.  I suspect Obama 'gets' this approach and won't flip out, and neither should we.  

I don't think McCain can play this very well for two reasons: he has no personal rapport with black voters, and Obama is likeable.

Now, if McCain could somehow come out with, say, a series of black POW/Army buddies of his generation who endorse him and denounce Obama, THIS would be something.  Maybe.  

But Obama is just not a figure like that.  He's not polarizing, and he's not even scary.  He's charismatic.  This is the hurdle for McCain.


delete the word 'even' (0.00 / 0)
typo on my part

[ Parent ]
I agree with this (0.00 / 0)
The campaign seemed to be falling into the trap somewhat -- or at least that's the impression I'm getting -- but outside of a few slipups Obama is taking the high road without failing to cudgel McCain for his lack of seriousness.

But I very much agree with your point that these ads would have a better chance of working if they didn't miss the mark so much -- Obama's both more affable and more serious than McCain. And he's certainly not shy about counterpunching.

Like many people, I wish his campaign would go on the attack a little bit -- McCain's ads don't even mention McCain until the boilerplate at the end. Obama needs to remind voters there's another candidate out there and that that other candidate sucks.

Still -- he's a strong candidate and the republicans are going to have a hard time finding a vulnerability that Obama can't overcome with prudent campaigning.  


[ Parent ]
I think this is very well written (4.00 / 1)


John McCain doesn't care about Vets.



I Agree With Your Point, And I Loved Your Story (0.00 / 0)
But I do think that Obama could hit back hard, precisely because a national campaign isn't a labor bar

The reason I say this is that McCain is just flat-out disrespecting Obama, and he's disrespecting the voters.  (He's disrespecting the media, too, but they're depraved, and they enjoy it, for the most part.)  So, I haven't given this enough thought yet, but my point is simply that I think there's a way here to respond that isn't anywhere near being about race.

The suggestion you made--which I like in terms of message--is simply too reality-based, and pedestrian.  These are high-voltage attacks, and they need a high-voltage response.  This is the Swiftboat meta-message.  Obama needs a zinger response.  Then he can follow up with what you wrote.

As I said, I'm not sure what that should be, yet.  But that's what I think we should be looking for.

Wait, the vague outlines of something are starting to form, something along the lines, of "This wouldn't be happening if John McCain were still alive."

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


obama in person vs ads (0.00 / 0)
From the clips I've seen of Obama in town hall meetings he captures the right tone of response there. (Most recently, the lengthy video clip on CNN of him handling "hecklers" comes to mind.)

The campaign hasn't figured out how to translate that effective response in its ads or in the rapid response to the talking heads.

Maybe the heavy ground game and online organizing with saavy investmenting in key districts is turning Obama's campaign into more one of a retail politics than any other modern Presidential race... still, I'll feel more comfortable once his ad team figures out how to bottle the essence of Obama in person into their ads.

They call me Clem, Clem Guttata. Come visit wild, wonderful West Virginia Blue


This is what I feared in the primary....what worked there hurts here. (0.00 / 0)
The Republicans were going to be aggressive about the race issues...and unlike Democrats they are unabashed about it.

They won't retreat or apologize...see Rick Davis's interview with Andrea Mitchell.

They will just keep on going and it could work becasue the general election voter is different than the Democratic primary voter.  Dems feel abashed if they think race is an issue agasinst someone. They will go out of their way to make it not an issue and will support the candidate being attacked.

However Mike is right.  Calling the rest of the electorate racist for thinking these things is counterproductive.  Dems will try to make up for it.  the rest will get offended and vote against the persons and the candidate who are trying to guilt trip them.  Unlike in the primary you can't make them feel guilty nor can you make them angry at the one who is supposedly making these racial charges....becasue then you are trashing them.  

It can't work for Obama in the general the way it worked in the primary....it works agaisnt him not for him.  He used it effectively against Hillary Clinton (even though most of the time it wasn't true...the MLK and LBJ stories being the most egregious distortion..and the press is now ore chary of promoting it)but I think he's going to have to do some very interesting jiujitsu.  And he ain't doing it too well at the moment.

"Incrementalism isn't a different path to the same place, it could be a different path to a different place"
Stoller


Obama's not going to win this election on race (0.00 / 0)
and it's in fact, probably his achille's heel.  So he better find a way to effectively combat it - whether it's through self-righteousness or pop ed or organizing strategies or swift-boating or whatever else works.  Otherwise he's going to face a very difficult choice between having a national conversation about race and winning the election.

I'm Going Emphatic Now (0.00 / 0)
What I proposed as just a suggestion above has grown on me.

I'm ripping myself off.  My original--"None of this would have happened if Colin Powell was still alive"--was a comment on the Iraq War, from Colin Powell's UN speech onward, and a reference to the vaunted "Powell Doctrine."

The idea here is less carved in stone, but much more carved into media narratives--John McCain as an honorable man, accentuated by his pledge to run a "respectful" campaign.

And my thought about this now is that Obama should do a major speech about this.  He should talk about John McCain's reputation, and his pledge.  He should talk about covert racism and dogwhistle politics, and how a lot of people don't really understand the game that's being played, because it's not a dogwhistle for them.  He should talk about the difficulty in not responding to such things.  He should talk about how the McCain campaign has gone all in on this.  He should explain it in terms like:

"This is what the ad said, this is the dog-whistle in it, that most of you probably didn't notice, this is the history that it recalls, and this is why Senator McCain is AWOL in his own campaign if he wants to live up to his pledge."

And then he should step back and talk about his accomplishments:

"Yes, he should say, I haven't been in Washington long.  The upside of that is that I can still see quite clearly what's wrong with it in terms most Americans can understand.  The downside is that I don't have a long list of accomplishements.  But that doesn't mean I have none, it doesn't mean I haven't plunged into some difficult work."

He should keep it brief, but he should definitely talk about working with Lugar, to revive the Nunn-Lugar partnership, as a significant example of taking on a vital foreign policy concern that has languished.

And then he should say:

"Now Senator McCain has been here a lot longer than me, and he's had much more time to build a list of accomplishments.  But this election is not about the past, it's about the future.  My past accomplishments show that I may be young, and relatively new on the national scene, but I'm certainly not just a pretty face.  And it's time for Senator McCain to start acting like a principled leader again, cut his substantless attack ads, fire those responsible for them, and get back to debating the issues that are so important for our nation's future.  The American people deserve nothing less"

In short, he needs to step up and be the grownup, and cast McCain in the role of the immature teeenager who's been acting out, and now needs to start acting like an adult.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


The Race Card Thing | 11 comments
Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search