WA-08: The First Vote Between Reichert and Burner Is On Tuesday

by: Matt Stoller

Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 16:14


Darcy Burner and Dave Reichert are going to face the voters on Tuesday.  Most elections happen only once, but in Washington state, elections are actully a two round affair.  That's why I'm in Seattle, to cover the 'blanket primary' between Dave Reichert and Darcy Burner.  Washington state has no party IDs for voters, and the primary is what's known as 'blanket', in that the top two vote-getters move forward to the general election, regardless of party.  What this in effect means is that there's a test general election in August, and then a real general election in November.  On August 19th, we'll in effect see massive test of which candidate has more support, similar to the Iowa Ames straw poll.
Matt Stoller :: WA-08: The First Vote Between Reichert and Burner Is On Tuesday
Operationally speaking, Darcy is destroying Reichert, having outraised him for six quarters in a row.  For an incumbent, that is quite possibly a historical record, and Reichert is compensating by using a lot of free franked government mail.  Darcy's up on the air with her first ad, and Reichert hasn't responded.  He's in desperate straights because he just doesn't have the capital to respond, and the NRCC isn't bailing him out like they did in 2006.

Energy on the Republican side is incredibly low.  Reichert was an early endorser of Giuliani, and Giuliani is repaying him with a low dollar fundraiser later this month.  Giuliani is drawing people at $250 a pop, versus $10,000 for Bush in 2007 and $30,000 for McCain earlier this year.  But it's not just the energy level among Republican activists and elites that finds itself hampering their electoral efforts, Reichert himself is just out of his element.  As a response to Darcy's unbelievably innovative campaign, Reichert is releasing a series of web video ads targeted at the press.  Here's how his campaign describes them.

"The Eighth District is the perfect demographic for this sort of innovative web-ad campaign," said Amanda Halligan on behalf of the Reichert campaign. "This is arguably the most wired district in the country. Voters here are connected, progressive and tech savvy - so we're leaning forward with this new technology to spread Dave's message. On the web, anytime can be primetime to reach a voter."

What's remarkable is not that Reichert is suggesting that his voters are progressive, but that he's obviously copying Darcy in a manner that perfectly illustrates his clumsiness with technology.  Reichert is out of touch with the district.  He's a law and order Republican, previously a sheriff, and though he's personally well-liked there's a sense of entitlement that has crept up into his persona.  In 2006, he held off Darcy with an ad that portrayed her as an inexperienced and ditzy young woman reaching above her pay grade.

This year, it's going to be tough for him to reproduce that frame because such overt sexism will put him in a strategically difficult box with the swing voters in the district: women.  Obama is really popular in this district, and he's created an environment in which youth and change are desirable qualities in an elected official.  Darcy's also overcome the experience charge simply by running again, and her ads are targeted at women.

Reichert has been struggling to keep his head above water this year.  He's no longer in the majority, which means his PAC-driven fundraising is just not that strong.  He lost an intra-party contest for an appropriations seat, which was his shot to raise enough to run a strong race through pay-to-play representation.  There's just not enough 'honest graft' to go around in the Republican Party, and that's hurting Reichert pretty badly because he's not a particularly bright or entrepreneurial guy.  Reichert is not overtly corrupt and he is not a particularly good politician, so the current environment is bewildering.  He reminds me of a lot of the Northeastern Republicans that lost in 2006 to people like John Hall and Chris Murphy, who had a strong sense that they deserved their seats and how dare anyone, especially some upstart, challenge them.

At this point, though, Reichert is just trying to stay above water.  He's not only affronted by a young innovative woman embarrassing him by outperforming on every possible metric, he doesn't know what to do.  His name recognition and respect in the district, and the incredibly nasty and conservative media in Seattle, are significant advantages, so it's not a walk for Darcy.  But she's in a good position considering the dynamics of modern American identity politics.


Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
WA-08 polls (0.00 / 0)
Well, Darcy's not leading (yet) in every metric. Pollster.com only shows two polls on this race, both apparently before Darcy's latest round of ads. Reichert was leading 51-45 in the first (SUSA 6/16-17) and 50-44 in the second (SUSA 7/27-29).  How much will Darcy's ad blitz pay off? 10-point swing? Five? 25?

I wrote up... (0.00 / 0)
a profile of Darcy for the Bruin Democrats blog (in trying to educate them about who these other candidates are outside of our Los Angeles world and why they should care).  In it, I point out exactly who Darcy needs to go after.

And the polls have this raise being quite competitive. As I noted in the comments there, Reichert's still getting 37% support from those who are pro-choice, even though he's consistently voted against a woman's right to choose, getting an 82% rating from the National Right to Life Committee. The good thing she now most definitely will have the money to inform the voters of what Reichert's actual positions are when it comes to women's rights. Push those pro-choice numbers just a tiny bit more in her direction, and she wins this thing going away. Re-doing the numbers show that if she can just hold Reichert to 33% of the pro-choice vote, she already wins this thing. Hold him to 30% of the pro-choice vote, and she wins by a larger margin than what Reichert won by in his previous election wins.

The biggest thing IMO is simply educating the voters of her district (which SurveyUSA said was 64% pro-choice) about what Reichert really feels about a woman's right to choose.  I should note, though, that she was getting 19% of the vote from those who are pro-life, and I have no idea if or how much she would drop with them the more she highlights Reichert's pro-life stances.


[ Parent ]
Incredibly nasty and conservative media in Seattle? (4.00 / 3)
God, this country depresses me sometimes.  I was just in a more local conversation about how disgustingly conservative the SF Chronicle is (vis a vis local politics), and then here's the same thing in Seattle.

The millions-of-dollars monopolistic newspaper is an institution that can't die quickly enough, in my book.  Yes, newspapers do some valid journalistic work that there's not yet any obvious way to replicate in a new more distributed era, but, they do so much criminal damage to their hometowns as well.  It's like a doctor who makes house calls, and steals stuff.  Yes, you need someone to heal your leg, but can't there be somebody who will do that and not rob you blind at the same time?

Can't there be a structure that makes news-gathering-and-dissemination happen, without entrenching wealthy conservative control of our politics at the same time?

May the gods of Web 2.0 save our republic.


Will Bunch has written some on that .. (0.00 / 0)
it's coming in vogue to Philly since a right winger bought the two Philly papers .. it really is disgusting ... they hired Man-on-Dog Santorum for a once a week column .. and make sure most of the other columnists are the Kraphammer and George Will .. and Thomas Sowell variety  

[ Parent ]
Indiana Conservative Media (0.00 / 0)
The story is the same in Indiana. The most widely read newspaper in the state, The Indianapolis Star, serves as an organ of the Republican Party. Although it's been bought away from Dan Quayle's family by Gannett it still has the same editorial slant. The local TV news channels aren't much better. This hostile media will be a huge headwind for Obama that will work against him winning Indiana.

[ Parent ]
I never understood why newspapers .. (0.00 / 0)
wanted to spit in the face of their readers so much .. look at the Chicago papers as well

[ Parent ]
That's not it. (4.00 / 1)
You control the media narrative, you then control how people think.  And the big corporations that have bought out much of our media in the last couple years have a specific vision in mind for this country that's at odds with what the vast majority of Americans actually want.  So the only way to get what they want is to distract enough of us from what's really important to focus on trivial things like lapel pins.

[ Parent ]
Wow (0.00 / 0)
BWAHAHAHAHA.

The Seattle media is conservative?  Maybe if you're a Marxist, I guess.  They endorse Democrats FAR more often than Republicans, they push almost every Democratic agenda item, they prop up the Democratic government ...

I live near Seattle, I used to live near SF.  There's nothing "conservative" about the media in either place.


[ Parent ]
Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search