Presidential Forecast, 8/18: Obama's Lead Almost Gone

by: Chris Bowers

Mon Aug 18, 2008 at 13:38


Electoral College: Obama 264, McCain 183, Toss-up 91 (270 to win)
National popular vote: Obama 45.2%-43.0% McCain


(Dark Blue (215): Obama +7.6% or more
Lean Blue (49): Obama +2.6%-+7.5%
White / Toss-up (91): Obama +2.5% to McCain +2.5%
Lean Red (87): McCain +2.6%-+7.5%
Dark Red (96): McCain +7.6% or more
)

New polls from Colorado (2), Maine, Minnesota, North Carolina, and Ohio since the last front-page update. While there are no category changes, as you can see from the swing state chart below, Obama's lead is now virtually non-existent:

Swing State Overview (270 to win, 269 to tie)
State EV's Obama % McCain % Margin Obama Total
Obama Base 243 243
Michigan 17 46.0% 42.8% +3.2% 260
New Hampshire 4 45.5% 42.5% +3.0% 264
Colorado 9 45.2% 44.8% +0.4% 273
Ohio 20 45.3% 45.3% Even 293
Virginia 13 45.8% 45.8% Even 306
Nevada 5 43.0% 44.0% -1.0% 311
North Dakota 3 42.3% 43.5% -1.2% 314
Indiana 11 43.3% 45.3% -2.0% 325
Montana 3 44.3% 46.5% -2.2% 328
Florida 27 44.6% 46.9% -2.3% 355
Missouri 11 45.3% 48.0% -2.7% 366
Alaska 3 43.0% 46.5% -3.5% 384
North Carolina 15 44.0% 48.3% -4.3% 381

For a long time, Colorado, Ohio and Virginia have been the three key swing states in this campaign (Nevada is a close fourth). In order to win, Obama has always needed either only one of those three, or Nevada plus a victory in the House of Representatives. Right now, Obama's position is as precarious in those three states as it has been in at least three months, and probably five months. His lead in Colorado is only 0.4%. Both Ohio and Virginia are dead heats. Also, McCain leads by 1.0% in Nevada.

The good news for Obama is that McCain still doesn't lead in any of those three states, even though he would have to sweep them all in order to win. Also, a backdoor path to victory exists by winning two of three in Alaska, Montana and North Dakota. While I show McCain narrowly ahead in Alaska and Montana, Pollster.com actually shows Obama narrowly ahead in both. So, throw on a few more swing states that McCain has to sweep in order to eek out the narrowest of victories.

With the conventions and the VP nominations, the biggest opportunity for movement in this campaign--for both sides--comes over the next three weeks. As big as the debates are, they won't quite compare to eight nights of prime time coverage, plus two veep selections. It is bitterly disappointing that Obama is not ahead by more entering this crucial three week stretch, but I guess we will see where things stand one month from now. The campaign begins full force now.

State by state details in the extended entry.  

Chris Bowers :: Presidential Forecast, 8/18: Obama's Lead Almost Gone
Solid Obama: 215 Electoral Votes
State EV's Obama % McCain % Margin # Polls
California 55 52.8% 36.3% +15.5% 4
Connecticut 7 54.5% 36.3% +18.2% 4
Delaware 3 50.0% 41.0% +9.0% 1
D.C. 3 -- -- +80.0% 0
Hawaii 4 61.0% 31.0% +30.0% 1
Illinois 21 55.5% 35.3% +20.2% 4
Maine-AL* 2 49.8% 35.8% +14.0% 4
Maine-01* 1 -- -- +17.2% 0
Maine-02* 1 -- -- +10.8% 0
Maryland 10 51.5% 37.3% +14.2% 4
Massachusetts 12 51.6% 35.2% +16.4% 5
Minnesota 10 49.8% 40.5% +9.3% 4
New Mexico 5 48.5% 40.3% +8.2% 4
New Jersey 15 50.0% 39.3% +10.7% 4
New York 31 51.5% 33.8% +17.7% 4
Oregon 7 49.5% 40.0% +9.5% 4
Rhode Island 4 50.8% 31.0% +19.8% 4
Vermont 3 60.0% 32.5% +27.5% 2
Washington 11 50.0% 39.5% +10.5% 4
Wisconsin 10 48.5% 40.8% +7.7% 4

Lean Obama: 49 Electoral Votes
State EV's Obama % McCain % Margin # Polls
Iowa 7 47.0% 41.3% +5.7% 4
Michigan 17 46.0% 42.8% +3.2% 4
New Hampshire 4 45.5% 42.5% +3.0% 4
Pennsylvania 21 48.8% 42.0% +6.8% 4

Toss-up: 91 Electoral Votes
State EV's Obama % McCain % Margin # Polls
Colorado 9 45.2% 44.8% +0.4% 5
Florida 27 44.6% 46.9% -2.3% 7
Indiana 11 43.3% 45.3% -2.0% 4
Montana 3 44.3% 46.5% -2.2% 4
Nevada 5 43.0% 44.0% -1.0% 4
North Dakota 3 42.3% 43.5% -1.2% 4
Ohio 20 45.3% 45.3% Even 4
Virginia 13 45.8% 45.8% Even 4

Lean McCain: 87 Electoral Votes
State EV's Obama % McCain % Margin # Polls
Alaska 3 43.0% 46.5% -3.0% 4
Georgia 15 41.8% 48.5% -6.7% 4
Missouri 11 45.3% 48.0% -2.7% 4
Nebraska-02** 1 -- -- -7.0% 0
North Carolina 15 44.0% 48.3% -4.3% 4
South Carolina 8 40.0% 46.8% -6.8% 4
Texas 34 39.3% 45.8% -6.5% 4

Solid McCain: 96 Electoral Votes
State EV's Obama % McCain % Margin # Polls
Alabama 9 36.0% 50.8% -14.3% 4
Arizona 10 37.0% 46.5% -9.5% 4
Arkansas 6 38.0% 49.0% -11.0% 4
Idaho 4 38.0% 52.5% -14.5% 2
Kansas 6 37.8% 53.0% -15.2% 4
Kentucky 8 38.5% 51.8% -13.3% 4
Louisiana 9 38.5% 51.3% -12.8% 4
Mississippi 6 43.0% 51.3% -8.3% 4
Nebraska-AL** 2 35.3% 53.3% -18.0% 4
Nebraska-01** 1 -- -- -12.0% 0
Nebraska-03** 1 -- -- -36.0% 0
Oklahoma 7 30.0% 53.0% -23.0% 4
South Dakota 3 38.8% 47.5% -8.7% 3
Tennessee 11 34.8% 50.8% -16.0% 4
Utah 5 32.0% 55.3% -23.3% 4
West Virginia 5 36.0% 49.0% -13.0% 2
Wyoming 3 37.5% 53.5% -16.0% 2

* Maine four electoral votes are awarded as follows: two for the statewide winner, and one for the winner of each congressional district. ME-01 is about 3.5% more Democratic than the state as a whole, while ME-02 is about 3.5% less Democratic than the state as a whole.

** Nebraska's five electoral votes are awarded as follows: two for the statewide winner, and one for the winner of each congressional district. NE-01 is about 6.0% more Democratic than the state as a whole, NE-02 is about 11.0% more Democratic than the state as a whole, and NE-03 is about 18.0% less Democratic than the state as a whole.

Methodology
I will update at least once every day between now and November 4th. The methodology is simple and straightforward.

  1. For each state, take the last four polls conducted for the state, and average them.
  2. If more than four polls were conducted in the state over the previous thirty days, all polls conducted during that time period are included in the averages.
  3. If polling dates overlap, and make it difficult to determine which polls were the four most recent, include all of the overlapping polls.
  4. No polling firm discrimination whatsoever. Polls are never excluded because the organization has a bad or partisan reputation. Also, if a polling firm has conducted more than one of the most recent four polls, all of the polls from that organization are included.

As we move closer to the election and more data becomes available, the time frames for polls included in the averages will decrease.  


Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
He needs 6 out of 91 tossup EVs (0.00 / 0)
I think his lead has dropped from substantial to still significant. I think it's highly unlikely that McCain sweeps the tossups even if he is leading in most of them.

Chris and Matt are losers (0.00 / 0)
They like to lose.  They fantasize about it.  They secretly do everything they can to make sure it happens.

Depressing enthusiasm before the convention is now their best bet.....look for more this week.


[ Parent ]
I see the beginnings of a narrative here (0.00 / 0)
If and when McCain defeats Obama, the blame will go to ... the bloggers! For not picking up their pom-poms and cheer leading Barack to the White House!

[ Parent ]
The blame will go to the bloggers (0.00 / 0)
for advocating and ultimately being front and center in picking a candidate who blew it.

Why did we all throw our support behind Obama in the primary again?  


[ Parent ]
I'm sure many will blame Hillary... (0.00 / 0)
and theorize she somehow secretly sabotaged his campaign so she could run in 2010.

If this happens we're all fucked anyway and I'm getting the hell out of this country.

End this war. Stop John McCain. Cindy McCain is filthy rich.


[ Parent ]
Your quote:"The campaign begins full force now." clearly shows that the Republicans (4.00 / 1)
got at least a 3-4 week head start on this campaigncause they managed to chip away at Obama's lead and by us 'starting now' we are playing catch-up.

They sure did unveil a strategy that just went drip,drip drip about Obama himself trying to create doubt and turn the 'perceived strength he has - inspiring millions - into a negative.

I hope to God that whoever came up with that stupid advice 4years ago to stay positive about Kerry with nary a word against Bush at the Convention no longer has a high ranking job in any Dem Presidential campaign.

We really do need to take the opportunity that is being handed to us( Convention alomost upon us) and hit McSame and the Republicans hard.


It's a close race. (0.00 / 0)
You're assuming that Obama hasn't done anything that's effective recently, under the radar or otherwise, and that McCains recent tactics and strategy have been entirely effective.  Therefore, full blame on Obama.

It's quite possible any shift going on is just segments settling into an inevitable choice...i.e., some I's and conservative D's who might seem to be avail to Obama really never were going to be available.  They toy with supporting a liberal black guy but really never would.  

This is just a close race, that's all.  The GOP has decades of branding work to leverage.  We have 2 or 3.  We also don't have double digit inflation or unemployment.


[ Parent ]
Yea, I am assuming that the Obama campaign has done very little to define McSame (0.00 / 0)
the best line to me in the last 3-4 weeks was Obama's "it's like these guys take some kind of pride in being ignorant"

But I haven't seen that develop into anything.

My fervent wish would be that McSame comes out this Convention cycle negatively defined so that the conversation can shift back to issues where we can win hands down.


[ Parent ]
he's on the air (0.00 / 0)
check out obama's state ads.  he has been attacking for about 2 weeks now.  see ohio DHL

[ Parent ]
The four (0.00 / 0)
real swing states are still CO, OH, NV, and VA.  I can't see see any of the others actually "swinging" the election.  Obama only needs one of them, whereas McCain needs to sweep.

John McCain: Health insurance for low income children represents an "unfunded liability."

Colorado (0.00 / 0)
I'll be interested to see the polling in Colorado since McCain's water rights gaffe; hopefully team Obama has the sense to hit him over the head with it as he has with DHL in Ohio and nuclear waste in Nevada.  

But we were told that (0.00 / 0)
Obama would turn the South blue and Obamaicans would lead to a great victory.  

The real problem is the Rs have not yet started getting tough.  Remember Rev. Wright?  Obama's positions in the 90s in the Illinois senate.  It's all coming.

Once again, we have a very close election.  Obama can win, but it will be close.  


Is it possible to avoid the conclusion that Obama is a terrible candidate? (0.00 / 0)
Look at it like this: it is conventional wisdom that Kerry was a terrible candidate who ran a terrible campaign. Yet Obama, despite facing much, much more favorable terrain, is not doing much better than Kerry.

And what's worse is he is fucking up the race in much the same way Kerry did - by moving to the "center" and blurring the distinctions between himself and the other candidate.

Just wait! Any minute now, Obama's gonna turn up the heat on old Johnny boy!

I suspect we will be hearing that through October.

None of this is to say we had any better candidates in the wings. This election is really driving home the importance of supporting good candidates at the entry-level.

Sherrod Brown in 2012!


yes (0.00 / 0)
It is not easy for a Democrat.  This is not an easy race.  Read the thread by Tremayne today.    It is not a gimme for a D for a number of reasons, none of which have anything to do with Obama.   You'll see comprehensive answers in that trhead from experienced posters.

[ Parent ]
Yes, it is possible. (0.00 / 0)
Given that he is clearly leading (Chris' lamentations notwithstanding) and is very competitive in several states where Dems never, ever are (Alaska, Montana, ND, SD, NC).

[ Parent ]
It's not (0.00 / 0)
that he moved to the "center." Clinton did that, hell Bush did that too. Hell, McCain is doing that.

It's that he has all but disappeared for the past month and led McCain run the show. Why the hell did he take a vacation in the middle of a campaign. Take one in November like Claire McCaskill did.

Yes Obama is turning into a terrible candidate and I'm certain we'll never hear the end of it from Clinton folk if he doesn't win, but it isn't because he ran to the center. It's because he isn't campaigning hard enough. He just isn't trying. He thinks it's in the bag, or is projecting the image that he is.

A lot of people don't know who Obama is and McCain is the one telling them, not Obama. He isn't going to change until he falls behind badly and at this point, it might be too late.  


[ Parent ]
Why aren't OH and VA bold? (0.00 / 0)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the previous installments, you bolded the "tipping point" states that are sufficient to determine the election... CO, OH, and VA all still meet this criteria. (If Obama wins New Hampshire and everything above the bold line, any one of these three states has enough EVs to win the election without the other two.) Why did you remove the bold?

Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search