Ruffini: Top-Down Right Wing Blogosphere Is Stagnating

by: Chris Bowers

Tue Aug 14, 2007 at 12:08



Andrew Rasiej and Micah L. Sifry have a new piece sizing up the Republican and Democratic fields in the 2008 presidential campaign. The short version is that Democrats are clearly ahead, as measured by the following metrics:
  • Democratic candidates have twice as much traffic on their websites as do Republican candidates
  • Democratic candidates have raised three times as much money online as have Republican candidates
  • Democratic candidates have 50% more small donors than Republican candidates
  • Democratic candidates have three times as many friends on MySpace as Republican candidates
  • Democratic candidates have 25% more views of their videos on YouTube than Republican candidates, and more than twice as many views of the non-Ron Paul Republican candidates.
Generally speaking, what we are seeing here are online Democrats taking more action on behalf of Democratic candidates than online Republicans taking action on behalf of Republican candidates. To put it another way, even though studies show that Republicans use the Internet at rates equal to Democrats, Republicans are less politically active online than Democrats. This basically confirms what I predicted more than two years ago in an article titled Aristocratic Right-Wing Blogosphere Stagnating:
Chris Bowers :: Ruffini: Top-Down Right Wing Blogosphere Is Stagnating
Last September, I wrote an article entitled Top Down Right-Wing Blogosphere Growing Powerful, that argued the anti-community nature of right-wing blogs was allowing them relatively greater message discipline than left wing blogs and a superior ability to influence the content of the national media. In January, I wrote a follow-up piece entitled Partisan Democratic Blogs Growing Far More Influential Than "Independent" Right-Wing Blogs, where I argued that progressive blogs, due to their affiliation with the Democratic Party, were growing influential in ways that the largely media focused right-wing blogosphere was not. In my latest irregular installment that compares the national liberal blogosphere to the national conservative blogosphere, I would like to discuss a new phenomenon I see emerging. The left-wing blogosphere is beginning to decidedly pull away from the right wing blogosphere in terms of traffic. This is largely a result of the open embrace of community blogging on the left and the stagnant, anti-meritorious nature of the right-wing blogosphere that pushes new, emerging voices to the margins.(…)

Unless right-wing blogs decide to open up and allow their readers to have a greater voice, I expect that the liberal and progressive blogosphere will continue its unborken twenty-month rise in relative traffic. Conservative bloggers continue to act as though they are simply a supplement to the existing pundit class, without any need to converse with those operating outside of a small social bubble or any need to engage people within the new structure of the public sphere. In the formulation of Stirling Newberry, they view themselves existing on top of a pyramid rather than in the middle of a sphere. At least when it comes to the national blogosphere, liberals are leaving conservatives in the dust. By comparison, conservatives seem all too happy to continue to cogitate from atop their lofty and increasingly irrelevant perch.

At the time, the post was widely linked by right-wing bloggers who largely dismissed my argument, including Patrick Ruffini. Last week, however, Patrick Ruffini posted an article basically agreeing with my assessment, noting that the top-down structure of much right-wing online is not conducive toward building a new generation of activists:
But Free Republic simply could not succeed in the world of the blogosphere, social media, and Web 2.0. The founders made the decision that they were going to hoard as much traffic on their servers as possible, by posting full-text articles (that eventually got them slapped with high-profile lawsuits from WaPo and the LAT). Early on, links to blogs were verboten. If you expressed your own opinion when starting a thread, that was a “vanity” and it was frowned upon. And fundraising for candidates was strictly forbidden, except for those pet causes approved by Jim Robinson. Their culture was very anti-blog and anti-original content.(…)

And the media focus also fits the frame of conservative bloggers as pundits rather than activists. If we act as pseudo-journalists and commentators, it stands to reason that we’d think actually getting involved on a campaign is dirty business.(…)

My concern with some of the sites I discussed above is that for ten long years, they haven’t been giving our people Web experiences that teach them how to be more than simple readers.

Thank you for making my point more than two years later. It is also true that my prediction turned out to be correct, both in terms of activism and traffic. Just after I wrote the piece, both the Huffington Post and Dailykos surpassed Free Republic and Townhall in terms of traffic, and have never looked back since. Whatever the questionable value of Alexa may be as a traffic tool, it is a useful way to compare larger websites according to a single metric. Looking at that metric, one can see that, starting in June 2005, Townhall was first passed by Dailykos, and then by the Huffington Post. By the middle of 2006, both sites also passed Free Republic, and have never looked back. It is worth noting that Democratic Underground, while it caught up to Free Republican in page views, appears has suffered from many of the same Web 1.0 problems as Free Republic. As such, it has been passed by not only Dailykos and the Huffington Post, but the more interactive Townhall is now also virtually its equal.

Perhaps most importantly of all, it is worth noting that none of these five major websites have improved on their position from August 2005. Every single one of them is either long-term stagnant, or in what appears to be long-term decline. This is despite the greater level of political news at this point in the election cycle compared to two years ago. Now, we are less than six months away from selecting new presidential nominees, but back then, major elections of any sort were over a year away. Traffic should be better now, but it isn’t. This might point to the overall lower level of interactivity offered by blogs compared to the broader world of Web 2.0. Right now, web traffic growth appears to come from enormous sites that allow users to micro-search for their interests, such as YouTube and MySpace. By contrast, individual blogs, even large blogs, are much more focused and topic specific. Even if the possibility I suggest above is wrong, and the blogosphere is able to continue to grow as a whole, this may spell difficulty in terms of growth for individual blogs. After all, it is the overall blogosphere that is more like YouTube or MySpace, and no individual blog can ever hope to match. This is bad news for bloggers struggling to find a means of independent support for their endeavors. We may quickly discover that the “short head” of Web 2.0 is even more exclusive, and has even higher entry costs, than previously envisioned. In the new online political frontier, both Dailykos and Free Republic might both be competing with sites like MySpace, rather than with each other. In terms of pure capital, that is a struggle that neither can ever win.

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Alexa (0.00 / 0)
Just a note: Alexa's data would never in a million years pass any kind of peer review. It's a shame there isn't a better source, but their method for collecting statistics amounts to being as accurate as an unscientific poll.

Not that it's meaningless, but just a word of caution when using their numbers. It can skew pretty heavily, because only end-users who have elected to sign up for their toolbar will have their pageviews counted.

Me | My Work | Future Majority


Durr (0.00 / 0)
Sorry; you noted this in yr article. My bad.

Me | My Work | Future Majority

[ Parent ]
accurate web traffic (0.00 / 0)
is hard to come by. You are right that it is unfortunate that Alexa is the only larger comparison tool available with regular updates.

[ Parent ]
Attitude (4.00 / 2)
I've mentioned it before, but it's worth repeating. The right and left have different ideas about how society should be organized. The left is more focused on the individual while the right prefers a top-down, autocratic, hierarchical structure.

See the (free, online) book by Robert Altemeyer for the data to back this up:
The Authoritarians

I was rapidly removed from redstate when I questioned their dogma. Presently I'm being vilified at several libertarian economic sites for disagreeing with their "fearless leaders". These people find questioning of their beliefs threatening. The response by some "why can't we have an honest debate over ideas" is met with blank stares.

So the right by its nature is not compatible with the blog culture.

As to the decline in traffic, I think there are several trends. First its the dull season. The election is far away, the war is a steady drone, but not on the front page, the economy is stable (except for housing) so there isn't much to spark interest. People who focus on the electoral race have lost their perspective, most people just don't care yet.

Second as the number of outlets grows the audience gets more divided. This site, itself, is a good example of the effect. How much traffic has it pulled from existing sites?

Third, I think that the rise of video and podcasting is also shifting viewing patterns. How many people are really interested in a static written word experience? People born in the last 40 years are part of the multi-media generation. Type, on paper or on line, is just not their thing.

Policies not Politics


I think that is right (0.00 / 0)
Conservatism is just more top down than progressivism. Thus, as long as Net Neutrality remains in place, a medium like the Internet might naturally shift in our direction.

[ Parent ]
You Can Only Type "Megadittos" So Many Times Before It Gets Old (0.00 / 0)
If they weren't so friggen stupid, they would all be bored to tears by now.

As it is, maybe only half of them are.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
The top-down lefty blogosphere (0.00 / 0)
This attempt to read back an inconsistency into my analysis is amusing. Of course, the problem I identify with some sites on the right is that they AREN'T blogs. Their infrastructure predates the blogosphere. So to conflate this with an earlier analysis of the interlinking tendencies of conservative *blogs* wholly misses the point.

If you look at the updated traffic stats today, you'll see the same pattern applies. Kos is way out front, followed by three conservative blogs in the 100,000+ range.

http://tinyurl.com/3...

There is no clear "leadership" of the conservative blogosphere in the same way there is on the left. Markos may abjure the role of "leader," but it was called "Yearly Kos" before the name change.

If you broaden the analysis to include the online activist space, it becomes fairly clear that Daily Kos is actually the lefty reaction to Free Republic. The formats are different, but activists' desire to have a space to communicate is essentially the same, and DU wasn't doing the job. And just like Free Republic, there can only be one mega-site like that of its kind. Once that develops, that site, either collectively or through the founder, plays a leadership role in the movement. And Free Republic is failing to provide this leadership.

As to how the top-down critique applies, one could easily argue that the right's problems, such as they are, stem from an inability to be top-down enough. Most people do not naturally get involved campaigns on their own. There needs to be an external push, and hats off to Markos, Jerome, et al. for providing it. Whatever collaborative activity happens after, there needs to be that initial focus in the beginning. Comparatively, conservatives' desire to be pundits, to hang out on individual blogs, and a reluctance to push their readers to action shows an admirable individualistic streak but does not evince a similar top-down/organizer mentality.

As an aside, for more reliable open source traffic stats, I'd suggest taking a look at Compete and Quantcast. Their absolute numbers are off -- I think it's because they conflate global audience with U.S. audience -- but the trends seem pretty accurate.


Couple of points (0.00 / 0)
"If you broaden the analysis to include the online activist space, it becomes fairly clear that Daily Kos is actually the lefty reaction to Free Republic."

No, it isn't. Democratic Underground is, and has been for a long time, the left's reaction to Free Republic. That much should have been obvious for a long time. I don't know where the new argument about Dailykos being the equal to Free Republic came from. Maybe it because Dailykos has left Instapundit so far in the dust that it is obvious that comparison is no longer relevant.

"If you look at the updated traffic stats today, you'll see the same pattern applies. Kos is way out front, followed by three conservative blogs in the 100,000+ range."

Again, no. Crooks and Liars and Raw Story are ahead of all but Instapundit, and that is when one only measures visits on Site Meter. Both surpass Instapundit in terms of page views. Further, neither Think Progress nor the Huffington Post are listed in those rankings, further complicating any argument that the conservative blogopshere leads when Dailykos is removed from the equation. Not to mention that The Huffingotn Post easily exceeds. Dailykos in terms of traffci, making it strange to argue that Dailykos is the leader. the Talking Points network of sites also equals any conservative blog, when they are combined (which they are, at least in terms of advertising).

As for the argument about what is and isn't a blog, I'm not going down that road. It could easily be argued, for example, that any website with multiple writers is not actually a blog. Thanks for the traffic links, though.

[ Parent ]
A bit of rightosphere history (0.00 / 0)
I do think Daily Kos is to the left what Free Republic is/was to the right: the pre-eminent community in which the voices at the edges have grown to matter more than the voices at the center. It doesn't matter if it's a blog or a forum. Forums were what were hot when FreeRepublic emerged, and blogs were what were hot when Kos emerged.

DU may be the most direct counterpart, but it never had the eyeballs that Free Republic had. I think a comparison can be made to all the groups on the right that try to the "conservative Daily Kos" or the "conservative MoveOn" and fail to catch on. DU tried to be the "liberal Free Republic." The shoe is essentially on the other foot from where it was in 1999-2000.

I wonder where if we wouldn't be back where we started should Hillary Clinton manage to get elected.


[ Parent ]
I don't think you have that right, Patrick (0.00 / 0)
I'm a case study in what you are talking about -- someone who was inspired by the blogs to directly volunteer locally.  And I can tell you it wasn't Markos or Jerome who persuaded me.  I think Rick Warren's model of creating a church community is the best way to describe it.  DailyKos may be the megachurch that we all "pray" together in.  But the only way to get people out of their chairs to volunteer is through the smaller "bible groups".  That being smaller blogs and forums for like minded subgroups, ending in my case with a visit to a local blog to find out what was going on with my local Democratic party.  When I finally took that step and went to a local meeting I ended up running into the writer of that local blog, which immediately made me feel more comfortable being there.  Then every week, I read on the local blog what was going on in my community and started showing up to these events.

I attended YKos, and although I had a lot of fun, it was almost too big.  It is, in fact, when the blogs break down even further to smaller groups that activism is more likely.  I think we on the liberal side of the blogosphere have done that, whereas the right side is still relying on the old formulas of getting their foot soldiers.  As society changes, the Right will, too, just to keep up.


[ Parent ]
On blog readership expansion (0.00 / 0)
  I'm one of the "blog enthusiasts" in my little neck of the woods, and I'm actively involved in my local Democratic Party (I'm on the Central Committee). So I'm acquainted with a lot of local Dems and my name is fairly well known in local political circles. And one of my pet projects, so to speak, is to get people to read the blogosphere more and rely on CNN less.

  What I do is send choice pieces out to the community on the local listserv (Glenn Greenwald being someone I cite almost daily), hoping not just to pass on the information, but also to try to get people in the habit of checking out the blogs for themselves. The results have been a mixed bag -- I get a lot of feedback complimenting the piece I pass along, but it doesn't seem to translate into them actually making reading Glenn Greenwald (or Kos, or Bowers, or Stoller, or Sirota, etc.) part of their daily routine. despite my constant entreaties to get them to do so. This is to a putatively receptive crowd. Kind of the way you play this riveting Buzzcocks CD at a party and having everyone rave about it, after which they all go back home and retreat to the safety of their Billy Joel. (OK, I just dated myself.)

  Granting that this is purely anecdotal, what does this mean? My own humble proposition is that the initial explosion in blog readership came from those of us who were already predisposed to subscribe to "alternative" media, and stampeded to the tubes when they finally gave us an outlet for REAL progressive viewpoints. We ALREADY didn't trust CNN, we ALREADY knew that Bush was a criminal, we ALREADY knew what a canard the "liberal media" talking point was (and has always been). And once that initial wave was tapped-out, we're now getting into the harder-to-extract audience, the audience that's mildly progressive but essentially still trusts our major media institutions. And the rate of growth of blog-reading slows down accordingly.

  But I haven't quit...

"We judge ourselves by our ideals; others by their actions. It is a great convenience." -- Howard Zinn


Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search