Palin Satisfies Conservative Persecution Lust

by: Chris Bowers

Thu Sep 04, 2008 at 18:15


Palin has grown popular among the conservative base primarily because she has been able to satisfy the conservative persecution lust that is at the core of the American conservative system of belief. Without an evil, stereotyped, identity group out to attack them, there is nothing holding together the conservative system of belief. So, as First Read notes, in order to raise money from conservatives, Palin has simply invented a generalized Other that is engaged in unfair and immoral attacks her:

This afternoon, the McCain campaign issued a Palin fundraising solicitation for the joint McCain-Palin-RNC fund. (After this week, McCain no longer can raise money after accepting $84.1 million in public funds, but the Republican National Committee and state parties can.)

"I cannot tell you how special last night was for me and how enthused I am to be John McCain's running mate," Palin said in the email solicitation, adding: "Unfortunately, as you've seen this week, the Obama/Biden Democrats have been vicious in their attacks directed toward me, my family and John McCain. The misinformation and flat-out lies must be corrected."

Unless we're mistaken, neither Obama nor Biden nor the campaign has attacked Palin's family.

It is true that neither Obama nor Biden, nor their surrogates, have attacked Palin's family. That fact, however, is irrelevant to the conservative worldview. That anyone even mentioned Palin's family is enough to indict several groups of people on grounds of immoral attacks against Palin, and indeed against all conservatives in general. Obama, Biden, Democrats, the media, liberals, non-Christirans, homosexuals, immigrants, judges, academia, communists, city dwellers, DFHs--they are all rolled up into a single, dangerous Other identity by Palin and her supporters. If anyone from any of those groups even said anything remotely negative about Palin, then all of them were attacking Palin and her family.

Lacking these attacks, the conservative worldview collapses. Without an immoral Other engaged in hateful attacks against the idealized, hard-working, white Christian, small town American conservative, then there is no good reason why their preferred identity is superior to others, and no good reason why the world is such a dangerous place for that identity. It is only because the idealized conservative identity is being attacked by this evil, immoral other that makes anything in conservatism make any sense at all. The attacks on the Ideal Identity from the Other Identity make the Other Identity evil and the world dangerous for the Ideal Identity.

Now, because a hard-working, small town, white Christian mom is being attacked by this vast, generalized, evil Other, conservatives are really, really excited. It doesn't matter who actually made the attacks, because stereotyping and group blame are the order of the day. Because someone they don't like is somehow attacking Palin, conservatives have their persecution lust, which for so long has gone unsatisfied, scratched, and scratched good. Without moments like these, their entire worldview doesn't make any sense.  

Chris Bowers :: Palin Satisfies Conservative Persecution Lust

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Well they raise a cool $1m from it so says Jonathan Martin (0.00 / 0)
http://www.politico.com/blogs/...

So they are $7m down on the day and rising!


I always wondered why they're so angry (4.00 / 5)

 Right-wingers have had the government of their dreams over the last eight years. An avalanche of tax cuts, endless wars, authoritarianism, persecution of immigrants... they should all be in nirvana.

 And yet they're so pissed off.

 What miserable lives they must lead. I'm glad I'm not one of them.  

"We judge ourselves by our ideals; others by their actions. It is a great convenience." -- Howard Zinn


Did anyone point that out .. (4.00 / 3)
at the Democratic convention?

[ Parent ]
asdf (4.00 / 1)
When you've always had power, taking away even a tiny bit of that power makes you feel victimized. On top of that, you can't possibly ever have complete power, so even with their eight years in power they still couldn't accomplish everything they wanted to.  But maybe if they didn't face such unreasonable opposition, if only their opponents would just trust them and work with them, then maybe  things could have turned into a perfect conservative America.

At the absolute bottom line, though, I think a lot of them are just terrified that the country is going to change so quickly that not only will they (or their side, at least) not have complete power, but they won't even recognize it anymore.  In another fifty years, white people will be a minority and the rest of the country will be some shade of brown.  It's loss of power, it's a loss of identity, and even a loss of home that terrifies them.


[ Parent ]
They like being hateful (0.00 / 0)
Its fun.

The liberal wiki
Send an email to terra@liberalwiki.com


[ Parent ]
Additional on persecution (4.00 / 4)
This is a very on-target point, but it would help fill out this picture with two others:

1. Perhaps obviously, the people who are "really in charge" of the Republican party in fact use this agenda to gain this bloc of votes, so in a sense the real "enemy" here to be criticized is the establishment that creates the other.

2. Much more importantly, these folks are (in many cases) actually suffering. The tragedy is that the real blame for their suffering is their own faith in economic, educational, and energy policies that are the REAL causes of their suffering and marginalization. I hope Obama puts Barney Smith out there in ads, because the one thing that would put progressives over the top for a long time is if these folks would come to see the anti-government, anti-tax, anti-education, pro-corporate ideology that is the true source of their persecution.


Yes, well said (4.00 / 1)
The real power brokers in the GOP and their corporate backers know how silly the persecution fantasy is, but they exploit it for obvious reasons--by redirecting legitimate anger toward imaginary causes.

If only the Democrats would dare to do a comprehensive job (on par with the GOP's faux-populism) of directing the anger of working people toward the actual causes of their pain.

Which goes back to narrative: the GOP is telling a story that provides an explanation (albeit bogus) for the pain of Americans. The Dems? Not so much, they're not even trying to explain why people are hurting beyond "Bush is bad."


[ Parent ]
The Sarah Palins of America (4.00 / 5)
Those of us who have served our communities at the local level - on city councils, commissions, and other volunteer positions - as well as those who pay attention to what goes on in those forums, will recognize Sarah Palin as a type of person commonly seen there.

I don't have a name for that type of person readily at hand, but characteristics include employing juvenile sarcasm and mocking in making arguments, using tortured logic and giant leaps of faith, perceiving conspiracies as the basis of all problems, making sweeping generalizations with little or no evidence to support them, and above all, playing to the galley in trying to cast the members of the council or commission as bad or stupid. Somehow the mechanism of Democracy churns on for our local bodies and it survives despite their officious intermeddling.

My guess is that many of the "undecideds" will quickly recognize and be repelled by Sarah Palin as fitting this profile, and question why John McCain would bring this level of discourse to the national arena instead of rising above it to forge solutions to real national problems.

Normally, this type remains a problem at the local level more or less, ultimately being weeded out from higher levels of government by exposure to the natural vetting process of local politics where their earned reputation halts their advancement, and they are not often seen at the national level.  

In this case, however, McCain short circuited that natural vetting process and cast Palin into the national spotlight like a stink bomb.  My view is that she will have a political "expiration date" once Americans get wise to her, and this can explain McCain's attempts to keep her out of news conferences or anything other than the most tractable Fox interview room so the election is held before that expiration date.


One Word - Narcissistic (4.00 / 1)
Republicans are only out for, by, and about themselves.  

Where does the sense of persecution and anger come from?  In reality, they hate themselves.


They set us up.... (4.00 / 1)
....all the news stories about Palin?  It was a massive dump, and I bet most of hit was form the GOP to lower expectations and claim media bias and unfairness towards Palin...  It worked like a charm...

At the moment, McCain's thugs are in Alaska bullying, bribing, or threatening anyone who may have damaging info on the Palins and that's the end of that...

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


So what (4.00 / 2)
Obama versus McCain. Obama versus McCain. The rest is a sideshow.

[ Parent ]
These people aim (4.00 / 2)
to remake the world. The legend of persecution has served the Christian Church well for 2000 years, and they're not going to give it up. So, whatever happens, they're being persecuted for their beliefs. And, when a Christian feels persecuted, the first thing that they do as soon as they acquire a little power is start looking around for a Jewish ghetto or a college or university to start getting pay back.

It's persecution to teach evolution. Their beliefs are given by God, not figured out by scientists, HOW DARE we insinuate their ignorance when they're following God's word! It's a persecution to tolerate homosexuality! God says kill em! HOW DARE we accuse them of intolerance when they're following God's word! It's persecution to allow multicultural groups to be protected by government in the name of religious tolerance. GOD SAYS you will have no other God but him, and God's name ain't Allah! It's persecution not to allow them to impose their ideas about contraception and abortion on everyone. GOD SAYS be fruitful and multiply! HOW DARE we liberals require them to tolerate behavior that goes against GOD'S WORD!

Every time they are forced to witness or hear about something that goes against their idea of Biblical inerrancy that constitutes persecution! AND THIS COUNTRY WAS FOUNDED ON CHRIST! HOW DARE we make them forgo dispensing punishment against infidels! Christians ARE PERSECUTED!

The really amazing thing is that so many otherwise educated people buy into it. I honestly wonder what would happen to Scalia, Thomas, the whole mad Roman Catholic crew if they went ahead with their plans to empower the fundies? It's so hard to believe that Scalia doesn't realize that after they burn all us infidels, they'll start on the Romans with great zeal.

Fundie paranoia is really epic, and they've got a LOT of anger stored up. So far, we've been protected by one vote on the Court. God help us all if we lose that vote.


Thank you Chris (0.00 / 0)
For the most perceptive diary of this repub convention cycle. The extreme right has been lost, adrift even without the Commies and the Soviet Union. They first turned on Clinton and liberals, and then Islamofacists stepped in to fill the void. An uppity semi-African-American democratic presidential candidate will do the job as well, in their warped world view.

Just now on MSNBC, a repub delegate (who is a veteran) told reporter Ann Curry that the most important job of the next president is to protect his (the delegate's) children. I thought that was the job of the parents, but what do I know.

But that confirms your thesis. McPalin needs to protect these repubs from the frightening "Others".


There was a Reaganesque feel to Palin last night (0.00 / 0)
that had me worried. She seemed to rally up the base like no Repub has since him (except, perhaps, Bush right after 9/11, and Gingrich in '94). I wasn't so much worried that she could swing the election to McCain this year--I doubt that she will. But I was worried that we might have been watching the next Reagan, i.e. the next big GOP star.

But after further reflection, and taking in what others have written and said about her, and some initial poll and focus group results, I'm not so worried. Reagan's gift was to be able to rally the base AND center around him. And he was able to do this by using soothing language intended to reassure the center, while throwing in dog whistle terms to satisfy the base.

Palin, though, was more in the Rove 50% + 1 mold, i.e. rally the base by throwing them red meat, and scare (not soothe) the center into voting Repub one election at a time, on cultural wedge issues and and character-based attacks. Except that one, that 50% base is now down to 40%-45% (at most), and two, the center just isn't open to these cultural wedge issues and and character-based attacks this year.

She used 2004 Rovian tactics in a 1984 sort of year (historically, not Orwellian, although her speech was Orwellian). The center wants "Morning in America" this year, and she gave it "Death to the evil big city librul infidels!". That WILL NOT WORK.

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton


Get over yourself. (0.00 / 0)
Oddly, surveys find that Republicans self-identify as happier than Democrats, by considerable margins:

http://pewresearch.org/pubs/30...

Angry people aren't happy.  Perhaps wealthy people, and people who don't ask hard questions are happier than those who are poor or maintain self awareness.  Republican platitudes are numbing, perhaps, inducing an unenviable bliss.  

All groups use fear of The Other to maintain cohesion.  The political base of every party, the passionately engaged lower level partisans, are by nature unhappy people, kept angry and fearful of their opponents.  If you doubt that, look at the old kos threads during the primaries, when vitriol against Clinton was at its zenith.  Look at your own post, here.  Despite the fact that you have no evidence for the idea that the average conservative (as opposed to the freeper/delegate base) is meaner, angrier, or more unhappy than the rest of the population, you decide that hate is fundamental to the "conservative worldview."  

To take an easy counter-example: Rev. Wright appears to me to be an angry man, full of ideas that are every bit as disassociated from reality as Palin's.  I could name a number of other people on the left who are similarly so full of anger at real or imagined wrongs that they have lost any analytical capacity and simply lash out at the Other(they are, of course, less well known or accepted than the angry radicals of the right).  All political bases function on hate and fear.  

The people who actually run the political parties get along with one another.  Feingold and Clinton have no problem praising McCain.  Pelosi can film an ad where she jokes around with Newt Gingrich.  Partisans complain that this is "corrupt."  In fact, it's sanity.  


That poll was taken in 2006 (0.00 / 0)
Don't you think that might have something to do with why Republicans were happier than Democrats?

[ Parent ]
Consistent data (0.00 / 0)
The happiness gap has favored Republicans since 1974 (see graph):

http://freakonomics.blogs.nyti...


[ Parent ]
Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search