Smoke, Fire And Gasoline--Alaska GOP Legislators Throw Troopergate Block For Palin

by: Paul Rosenberg

Fri Sep 05, 2008 at 17:48


In the immediate aftermath of the GOP convention, the Troopergate scandal has clearly emerged as VP candidate Sarah Palin's Achilles heel, with a ferocious, Nixonian combination of lies, stonewalling, and, of course, attacks on her "enemies" in the media.

The sheer intensity of Palin's turn from promised cooperation to Nixon/Bush total resistence only seems to makes sense if she's got something very serious to hide.  So now, subtley, belatedly, but most definitely, the Republican state legislators are coming to her assistance, agreeing to subpoena the whole lot of Palin cronies she's convinced not to testify, but not Palin herself.  The announcement comes along with an earlier completion date for the investigation--October 10--which could make it even easier for Palin to run out the clock.

This move will clearly allow Palin's stonewall to continue, without consequence, unless political heat is brought to bear.  This will prove particularly challenging, as the Nancy Pelosi "See No Evil Policy" is having a deeply corrosive trickle-down affect on our political culture, as stonewalling legislative oversight has now become accepted public practice.  Details on the flip.

Paul Rosenberg :: Smoke, Fire And Gasoline--Alaska GOP Legislators Throw Troopergate Block For Palin
The investigating committee has an 8-4 GOP majority.  TPM reports:

The bipartisan committee overseeing the investigation announced today in a press release that they're moving up the date that they release the results of their investigation by three weeks, meaning it should come out in early October. The commitee, led by Sen. Hollis French, an Anchorage Democrat also announced that it would meet on September 12 to issue subpoenas in the case.

But according to the release, Palin herself will not be subpoenaed. The committee still holds out hope that she will talk to indepedendent investigator Steven Branchflower voluntarily.

    "We also discussed and agreed amongst ourselves that no subpoena will be issued for the Governor," said Representative Nancy Dahlstrom, R-Eagle River. "She has told the public that she intends to cooperate with the investigation, indeed, she has told the public that she welcomes the investigation and I have every faith that she means it. If necessary we can send Mr. Branchflower to wherever the Governor is, or she can give her statement to him over the telephone, whatever is most convenient for her. We recognize that her schedule is extremely busy, and we want to accommodate that."

French had initially indicated that subpoenas likely wouldn't be necessary, since Palin had pledged her full cooperation.  But earlier this week, Palin's lawyer warned that unless the case were handed over to the state personnel board -- whose three members are appointed by the governor -- Palin would not be made available to testify. And according to the release: This week, seven key witnesses informed Mr. Branchflower through their attorneys that they would not provide depositions. Their depositions, which had been agreed to and scheduled earlier with Mr. Branchflower, were cancelled within the last 72 hours."

And, just to be perfectly clear, in a follow itemTPM reported:

Even if she refuses to testify voluntarily, Sarah Palin will definitely not be subpoenaed as part of the Trooper-Gate investigation, Rep. Jay Ramras, a Republican on the committee overseeing the probe, just confirmed to TPMmuckraker.

Ramras said that issuing a subpoena for a vice-presidential candidate "would be disrespectful." He called it "inappropriate conduct, given the unique political circumstances," and "bad form."

Adding some detail to this last paragraph of the first item above, as well as the date shift, the Anchorage Daily News [ADN] adds:

The idea of the earlier completion date for Branchflower's report is to avoid the appearance of a last-minute "October surprise," said Rep. Jay Ramras, a Fairbanks Republican and chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.

The Palin administration in recent days has shown resistance to the legitimacy of the legislative investigation.

A press release today from Ramras and Sen. Hollis French, the Anchorage Democrat who is managing the Branchflower investigation, says subpoenas are necessary to compel cooperation with Branchflower.

Says the press release:

"This week, seven key witnesses informed Mr. Branchflower through their attorneys that they would not provide depositions. Their depositions, which had been agreed to and scheduled earlier with Mr. Branchflower, were cancelled within the last 72 hours.

"Additionally, the governor's lawyer has stated that he represents the governor and the governor's office, and has forbidden any contact by Mr. Branchflower with any member of that office.

"Mr. Branchflower wishes to depose some of those employees. The issuance of the subpoenas is intended to get at the truth and to expedite the completion of his report to the public."

ADN is also reporting on GOP push-back against Democrat Hollis French, despite the fact that Branchflower, not French, is conducting the investigation at ground level:

A ranking Republican state representative is calling for Anchorage Democratic Sen. Hollis French to step down as manager of the Legislature's "Troopergate" investigation.

Rep. John Coghill, R-North Pole, today released a letter criticizing statements French purportedly made in media interviews.

Coghill said French remarked that a forthcoming legislative investigation into Gov. Sarah Palin's firing of her former public safety commissioner, Walt Monegan, is "likely to be damaging to the administration" and has twice suggested the governor faces potential impeachment.

"These statements cause me to think that the report is already written even though the investigation is only just begun and the most important witnesses have not even been interviewed," Coghill's letter says. "The investigation appears to be lacking in fairness, neutrality and due process."

Of course, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that the investigation is "likely to be damaging to the administration" since Palin has already been exposed as lying about it.  But, apparently speaking frankly is a sure sign that "the report is already written" according to the GOP spin machine.

Where are the Democrats?  And I don't just mean the Alaska Democrats.  I mean the folks who have pretty much failed to get one scinitilla of cooperation from the Bush Administration these past two years, on the rare occassions where they've actually pressed for it.  Because Dick Cheney in a skirt is clearly waiting in the wings.


Additional Links:


Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
One simple comment.... (4.00 / 3)

 "Sarah Palin must testify. If Sarah Palin hasn't done anything wrong, she has nothing to worry about."

 If the Democrats had a plan, this talking point would be flying out of every Dem mouth for the next three weeks.

 But that would be mean.

 And losing an election isn't as bad as being called mean.

 

"We judge ourselves by our ideals; others by their actions. It is a great convenience." -- Howard Zinn


Let's just hope that Obama (0.00 / 0)
and his crew are working on this overtime. We have a problem. If the American people go for this they will get what they deserve for sure. But I'll get it too. As will all of us here.

[ Parent ]
If the Democrats had a plan.... (0.00 / 0)

You're asking way too much my friend...

...Adding, as Tristero notes, you'd think Obama and the Dems would have some major announcement/event set for today to change the discourse/blunt any GOP convention momentum. But so far, crickets...

Surely the Democrats have some major announcement today to remove the spotlight that's been shining on the viscous mass of white ooze that infested St. Paul. The couldn't be so stupid as not to have planned a major rebuttal to the lies, distortion, and stupidity on display this past week.

We're gonna hear about something big from Barack today. Right? RIGHT????



"Don't take much, does it, elected Democrats, to get your balls tucked up." Cf.

[ Parent ]
Forget A Plan, If The Democrats Had A CLUE... (0.00 / 0)
sigh!

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3

[ Parent ]
Let It Be (0.00 / 0)
The election is Obama v. McCain.  Palin is a sideshow.  

It'll be more fun when at a press conference, President Obama is asked for a reaction to the impeachment of Alaska's Governor, Sarah Palin.


You Don't Get It (4.00 / 3)
This is clear--albeit slightly subtle--evidence that there isn't going to be any impeachment.  There isn't even going to be a semi-thorough investigation.  There is going to be a whitewash, in the classic Bush/Cheney style.

And while Palin was clearly not the place to focus last weekend, that has very clearly changed this week.  Even if Obama wins handily, Palin is poised to be a major player for the GOP, a presidential contender at the very least starting in 2012, if she's not properly dealt with now.

Demanding that she testify in Troopergate is simply holding her to the standard of honesty and transparency that she herself claims.  It is a perfectly reasonable demand, and her resistence to it is frankly more damaging than anything that even I can imagine coming out.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
Don't Get Me Wrong (0.00 / 0)
"I may look skinny but I'm tough," a streetwise kid (albeit old) from Brooklyn.  And, one thing I learned is pick the time and place for your battles.  

Paul, you replied similarly to my position on FISA.  I agreed with you then, and I agree with you agree now.  But, please explain how this issue gets Obama elected.

May I point you to a blog by Arianna Huffington:

Forget worrying about the economy or health care or the housing crisis -- think about how many people live in Wasilla, whether Bristol and Levi will live happily ever after, and if Sarah and her "First Dude" really want Alaska to secede from the union.

This is why the McCain campaign wants Palin front and center -- did you notice how much time McCain spent during the speech praising Palin and how quickly the celebratory post-speech music shifted from "Raisin' McCain" to "Barracuda"?

And it's why Democrats need to ignore Palin, and keep the focus on reminding voters about the stark contrast between an Obama and a McCain administration. It's tempting to prime the Palin attack pump. But Obama and the Democrats do so at their own peril.

McCain is Running on the Amnesia Platform, But It's Democrats Who Need to Forget Sarah Palin

I'm hearing that the Obama administration would consider prosecuting Bush and cronies for their wrong doings.  And, there is too much smoke around Palin, there's a fire somewhere, and it's going to burn her.

As for, "a major player for the GOP," let's see how she plays out, she may very well be an empty pants/skirt suit.  


[ Parent ]
Since I'm The One Who First Used The "Forgetting Sarah Palin" Line (4.00 / 1)
Let me make it simple:  

17. According as circumstances are favorable, one should modify one's plans.
    --Sun Tzu, The Art of War

My full response requires a diary, so I'll just say this much:  ignoring Palin now would be a potentially fatal mistake, just as ignoring the Swiftboaters was for Kerry.  Act quickly and decisively, and you have plenty of time to run the rest of the campaign your way.  Fail to act now, and you may never be in control again.


"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
And while... (4.00 / 2)
...we're crying "Wolves!" and thinking Palin wins the election for us, the focus is deflected off of the presidential candidate McCain, who'll be allowed to continue his false Maverick/Straight Talk themes all the way to November, with nary a peep from the Obama campaign...

If they think "more of the same" and "ZOMG! Palin sucks" are the only themes/attacks required, we are going to lose again...

Just to be clear, Dems should keep the pressure on the Palin scandals to see if something breaks free. However, McCain is the candidate who needs to be disqualified and that's where the focus should be. So far, we've entirely failed to disqualify "Maverick" and "Straight Talk," which continue to be employed with good effect by McCain.

"Don't take much, does it, elected Democrats, to get your balls tucked up." Cf.


[ Parent ]
Campaigns Are Not Static One-Note Affairs (0.00 / 0)
This is yet another example of my thesis in the series, "Open Left:: The Political Duality Of Rep and Dem".  To wit:

The same sophistication that Democrats have about issues, and how complexely they inter-relate is utterly missing when it comes to the political struggle itself, which they approach with the same level of dunderheaded simplicity that Republicans approach global warming or sex education.

Right now is the time to strike at Palin, while her image and identity are very much in flux.  There will be plenty of time after that to focus on McCain, who is already a dead duck without Palin.

But if you only think we can do one thing in the whole campaign, then you might as well just move to Australia or wherever, because politics is never going to be that simple.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
Respectfully, (4.00 / 2)
If I had made a "one-note" argument your response would be compelling. To the contrary, I'm arguing against just such a "one-note" focus on Palin. McCain is the one who needs to be disqualified. To the extent that her record rebuts/refutes a claim of 'reform' and 'change' then focus on Palin is helpful if it's tied to a larger theme of disqualifying McCain's reform/change positioning. IMO, however, excessive focus on trying to stop the coming Troopergate cover-up will likely not be successful.

Secondly, the contention that McCain was already a "dead duck without Palin" is now immaterial. With her they are now trying to leverage the Maverick brand that Obama has failed (really, not even attempted) to degrade/disqualify. Likewise with the Straight Talk brand. He still has both brands fully intact independent of her and she is now just reinforcement. That McCain can still stand in front of a Straight Talk sign, claim to be a Maverick and tell multiple lies without comment or ridicule is a criminal failure of the Obama campaign. Those brands should be in tatters by now (and would be if the roles were reversed and McCain was the Democrat).

Thirdly, there's "plenty of time?" The election is in eight weeks. The general election period is more than half over. If not now, when? Ever? Or are they going to just let those McCain brands stay intact through to election day?

Finally, it's the Obama campaign that's relying on the "one-note" theme of "more of the same." Obama is a truly gifted a speechwriter and orator but his campaign theme development and paid media tactics/execution have been extremely poor.

"Don't take much, does it, elected Democrats, to get your balls tucked up." Cf.


[ Parent ]
II. WAGING WAR (0.00 / 0)
2. When you engage in actual fighting, if victory is long in coming, then men's weapons will grow dull and their ardor will be damped. If you lay siege to a town, you will exhaust your strength.

    --Sun Tzu, The Art of War

 

[ Parent ]
Ain't gonna happen (0.00 / 0)
Alaska is a GOP state and the full weight of the national GOP legal/political infrastructure is being brought to bear to contain and close this off. Absent some piece of hard, physical evidence surfacing, anyone who thinks this can't be stonewalled for a mere eight weeks is sadly mistaken.

It would be more productive if Obama and the Dems would actually attempt to destroy the entirely false Maverick and Straight Talk labels of the actual candidate for president. Right now, incredibly, with just eight weeks until the election both labels are largely untouched and intact ... and as of now McCain has a credible chance of riding them to victory.

How is McCain's lying with impunity every day not a major campaign issue? Why has there not been one advertisement (let alone a developed theme) contrasting the alleged Straight Talk(er) with the truth?

"Don't take much, does it, elected Democrats, to get your balls tucked up." Cf.


We mustn't be "shrill".... (0.00 / 0)
Our drinking buddies in the press don't like it when we're "shrill."

[ Parent ]
Maybe we should... (4.00 / 3)
...take a tip from the GOP and not give a rat's ass what the press thinks. They don't seem to be losing sleep over putting Palin in a bunker and freezing the press out.

...Adding, just for the sake of argument, my guess is if Obama were to make "Straight Talk" a major issue/theme the press would orgasm over the "boldness" of going at McCain's strength. The ads would get tons of free media and drive the chattering class discourse. Chris Matthew's leg would definitely tingle.

It's not like we don't have the facts on our side -- McCain stands in front of a Straight Talk sign lies every day -- and the Obama campaign seems content to just let him do it.

"Don't take much, does it, elected Democrats, to get your balls tucked up." Cf.


[ Parent ]
Yes, Calling For Law & Order Is DEFINITELY "Shrill" (0.00 / 0)
At this point, I'd settle for Desperate Housewives.  If Sarah Palin doesn't remind me of Nora Huntington... or maybe, even, Kayla all growed up.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3

[ Parent ]
we wouldnt want to disrespect a criminal (0.00 / 0)
and Pelosi is god damn pathetic

Michael Bloomberg, prince of corporate welfare

Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search