McCain--A Fighter Who Will Reach Across The Aisle? Record Says, Not So Much

by: Paul Rosenberg

Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 20:03


Two of the themes that John McCain hit on in his acceptance speech were his willingness--nay eagerness to "fight" for the American people, and to work across the aisles.  He used the word "fight" 25 times in his speech.

In one section he sought to personalize his speech:

Paul Rosenberg :: McCain--A Fighter Who Will Reach Across The Aisle? Record Says, Not So Much
I fight for Americans. I fight for you. I fight for Bill and Sue Nebe from Farmington Hills, Mich., who lost their real estate investments in the bad housing market. Bill got a temporary job after he was out of work for seven months. Sue works three jobs to help pay the bills.

I fight for Jake and Toni Wimmer of Franklin County, Pa. Jake works on a loading dock, coaches Little League and raises money for the mentally and physically disabled. Toni is a schoolteacher, working toward her master's degree. They have two sons; the youngest, Luke, has been diagnosed with autism. Their lives should matter to the people they elect to office. They matter to me.

I fight for the family of Matthew Stanley of Wolfboro, N.H., who died serving our country in Iraq. I wear his bracelet and think of him every day. I intend to honor their sacrifice by making sure the country their son loved so well and never returned to remains safe from its enemies.

He also said:

The constant partisan rancor that stops us from solving these problems isn't a cause, it's a symptom. It's what happens when people go to Washington to work for themselves and not you.

Again and again, I've worked with members of both parties to fix problems that need to be fixed. That's how I will govern as president. I will reach out my hand to anyone to help me get this country moving again. I have that record and the scars to prove it. Sen. Obama does not.

Well, he proved that his staff can come up with the names of real Americans, and learn something about them.  (Something in doubt after he chose Sarah Palin.) But he didn't actually say how he would fight for them, what he would try to do for them, or why.

Once you start asking for things like reasons and explanations, it becomes obvious that there are all sorts grounds on which to doubt McCain's claims, but I decided on the nerdiest way I could think of.  I would just do some counting of McCain's record vs. Obama's for the currrent Congress, using the Thomas database.  

So, to the first question, about fighting for people.  Well, a good first numerical test is does he fight at all?  Does he get out there and try to get things done?  Turning to Thomas I found the following:

Bills Sponsored:
(You want to fight for something, you introduce a bill to do it.)
      Obama: 129
      McCain: 38

So, Obama sponsored 3 1/3 bills for every one of McCain's. (3.39473684210526, more precisely, but who's counting?)

Total Co-Sponsors:
(You want your bills to pass, you go out and get co-sponsors.)
      Obama: 547
      McCain: 91

So, Obama got 6 co-sponsors for every one that McCain got. (6.01098901098901, more precisely, but who's counting?)

Average Co-Sponsors:
      Obama: 5.82
      McCain: 3.96

So, for each bill, Obama got about 1 1/2  co-sponsors for every one that McCain got. (1.470773907, more precisely, but who's counting?)

Most Co-Sponsors:
(for the most important fight, presumably)
      Obama: 36
      McCain: 14

So, at his peak, Obama got about 2 1/2  co-sponsors for every one that McCain got at his peak. (2.571428571, more precisely, but who's counting?)

Number of Bills With 10 or More Co-Sponsors:
(for the most important fight, presumably)
      Obama: 14
      McCain: 1

So, Obama got 10 or more co-sponsors 14 times for every one time that McCain did. (14.0000000, more precisely, but who's counting?)

Finally, to test the bipartisanship claim.  Remember that?  No?  Well, here it is again:

The constant partisan rancor that stops us from solving these problems isn't a cause, it's a symptom. It's what happens when people go to Washington to work for themselves and not you.

Again and again, I've worked with members of both parties to fix problems that need to be fixed. That's how I will govern as president. I will reach out my hand to anyone to help me get this country moving again. I have that record and the scars to prove it. Sen. Obama does not.

That's the rhetoric.  Here's the reality:

Number of Co-Sponsors From Opposite Party on 7 Bills With Most Co-Sponsors:
(for the most important fight, presumably)
      Obama: 29
      McCain: 16

So, Obama got a little less that 2 Republican cosponsors for every Democrat that McCain got. (1.8125, more precisely, but who's counting?)

Now, you could say this isn't a fair comparison, since Obama got a lot more Democratic co-sponsors as well.  But who's fault is that?  In fact, this comparison is almost certainly biased in McCain's favor.  His top 7 bills account for over 2/3rds of the total co-sponsors he's secured.  Obama's top 7 bills account for less than half of his.  So if we were to compare the total number of Republican co-signatures Obama had to the total number of Democratic co-signatures McCain had, the ratio would almost certainly be even more favorable to Obama.

So, what do you know?  John McCain, caught lying again on national TV.

I'm shocked! Shocked!


Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Good thing "John" is a respected friend (4.00 / 3)
So, what do you know?  John McCain, caught lying again on national TV.

I'm shocked! Shocked!

Otherwise, they might politely question the Straight Talk brand....

...Adding, the Obama campaign negligence has been so great that McCain/Palin repeat the same lies over and over without a care in the world.

"Don't take much, does it, elected Democrats, to get your balls tucked up." Cf.


Good stats (4.00 / 1)
This is a unique way of approaching it, but it does empirically demonstrate who has been the more effective and active senator.


Especially When You Consider How Long McCain's Been There (4.00 / 1)
He should be able to get co-sponsors as easily as shit get flies.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3

[ Parent ]
More Precisely (0.00 / 0)
I think you mean " Very proud Bush/McCain Republicans at the GOP convention".

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3

[ Parent ]
Duplicitous maverick crosses the aisle with ease. (0.00 / 0)
maverick: an unbranded calf or steer

Maverick: an electro-optically guided U.S. air-to-ground tactical missile for destroying tanks and other hardened targets at ranges up to 15 mi. (24 km)

maverick: a lone dissenter, as an intellectual, an artist, or a politician, who takes an independent stand apart from his or her associates--not so much


Man on the Moon (0.00 / 0)
Interesting set of stats, Paul. Meat and potatoes. I want to see Obama use those stats in a stump speech. Remember the movie, Man on the Moon? Jim Carrey plays Andy Kaufman. Basically a true bio story of Kaufman. In one scene Carrey/Kaufman stands on a stage in front of a college audience. He begins to read into a microphone from a novel. Deadpan, he continues to read until he completes the novel, by which time everyone but one or two people have left the auditorium. Funny stuff.

Less Andy Kaufman, More Joe Isuzu (0.00 / 0)
I'm thinking more like using it as crawl across the screen as McCain is blathering his lies.  Only not an ordinary dull crawl.  Make the letters flashing neon or something.  And have them grow bigger and bigger so that they totally obscure McCain.  And then at the end, the classic Jos Isuzu "He's Lying!"

And Obama sez, "I'm Barack Obama, and I approved this message, because unfortunately, it's all too true. John McCain IS lying.  And it's a lowdown dirty shame."

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
Replay...Replay (0.00 / 0)
That's actually not a bad offering for an ad. It not only shows and displays McCain repeating the same tripe he uses in his own ads, but the 'crawl' will cause people to want to see it again because they're pretty sure that they've missed something the first time, and the second time through. So, each subsequent time that they watch and listen to it, while they are trying to concentrate on picking up the numbers in the crawl, they have McCain's voice lying in the background sounding more and more like the snake oil salesman.  

[ Parent ]
Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search