Will the Obama Campaign Raise $100 Million Dollars this Month?

by: tremayne

Wed Sep 10, 2008 at 00:24


The cost of running for President keeps going up but now we're getting into some truly huge figures. The Obama campaign hasn't released how much it raised in August but even without it they were in the neighborhood of $400 million going back to the beginning of 2007. It seems certain the campaign will break a half billion dollars before this is over.

With the polls tightening the money is again an issue. The McCain campaign appears flush with $200 million to spend over the final 2 months of the campaign. A majority of McCain's money will come from the supporting RNC while $84 million comes from federal matching funds.

Because the Obama campaign opted out of public funds and the DNC has only a fraction of what the RNC has, the Obama campaign has its work cut out. The good news is they are reporting that August will be a record month, topping the previous mark of $55 million.

But I think the bigger news will concern the September report which could exceed $100 million dollars. Crazy? The projection follows.

tremayne :: Will the Obama Campaign Raise $100 Million Dollars this Month?

So the Obama campaign set a record in August. They don't have to report the numbers for another ten days so we can only guess at the amount. Let's say, for arguments sake, it's about $60 million or an average of roughly $2 million a day.

Let's assume, coming out of the Democratic convention, that the average for the first few days of September was a little better, say $2.5 million a day:

Sept. 1: $2.5 million

Sept. 2: $2.5 million

Sept. 3: $2.5 million

Then on the night of September 3rd Sarah Palin gives her powerful and snarky speech at the Republican National Convention. The Obama campaign reportedly raised about $10 million in the next 24 hours.We'll record that money on the 4th:

Sept. 4: $10 million

John McCain gives his speech the night of the 4th and you can bet, between Democrats still angry about Palin's speech and with McCain's speech (and all the "zero, zero, zero" chanting) that the money continued to roll in at well above average. Let's taper it down like this:

Sept. 5: $8 million

Sept. 6: $6 million

Sept. 7: $4 million

At this point we're in the period where the polls are looking bad for Obama which is when, during the primaries anyway, people tended to give more. So I'm going to guess we get a few more days at this level:

Sept. 8: $4 million

Sept. 9: $4 million

Sept. 10: $3.5 million

So that's $47 million right there in the first 10 days of this month. To hit $100 million the Obama campaign would need to average about $2.65 million a day over the last 20 days of September, up from our August estimate of $2 million a day. I think, with the polls close, and with the first Presidential debate on Sept. 26 that it could well happen. If so, and if they can do anything similar in October, the Obama campaign should still be able to outspend the McCain campaign, just as they projected when they decided to opt out of public financing.

What's your take?

 

 


Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Are the big donors that maxed for the primaries (4.00 / 1)
and then maxed again for the general already counted in the fundraising numbers, or do they get counted as September donations?

Good question (4.00 / 1)
either way though, most of Obama's big donors were not 4,600 dollar donors, unlike Hillary in the primary. So he's supposed to be hitting up a lot of them now.

[ Parent ]
I like to set the expectations low for the media... (4.00 / 4)
...Obama will raise twelve dollars and thirty-eight cents in September.  And he will be overjoyed with those riches.  Which his field organizer in Santa Fe, NM will blow on printer paper and red bull.


Obama Broke His Record in August (0.00 / 0)
According to the Washington Post, "Obama broke his monthly fundraising record of $55 million in August, sources said today, but the campaign remains tight lipped about its total haul."

I get paid this Friday and I'm cutting some checks (4.00 / 1)
Not just to Obama, but to some others, Darcy Burner in particular.

Does the DNC need donations, or is money best sent elsewhere now?

Any other good places to throw some money at that can make a difference? I'm not exactly rolling in dough, but can spare a little change.

It's crunch time. Time to literally put some money where one's mouth is.

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton


DNC desperately needs money.... (4.00 / 1)
...they need it more than even Obama!

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


[ Parent ]
DNC needs donations maybe even more then Obama. (4.00 / 3)
Really I love Darcy and other congressional candidates. As Chris has said, we are screwed if McCain wins. The party will move to the right, all chances for progress will be blocked, our 2012 nominee is likely to be a establishment conservative type. We will lose the window for progressive change. Darcy is great, congressional candidates are great. But if we don't win this we are screwed. So we really, really need to be donating to the DNC and the Obama campaign. Both are vitally important, both need more money to keep up with McCain and the RNC.

As for congressional candidates. If you do donate I'd of course donate some to Darcy but also donate to congressional campaigns in areas that will swing the presidential election. So Betsy Markey in CO-04 (Colorado will be the single most important state this election). Jill Derby and Dina Titus in Nevada. Judy Feder, Tom Perriello and Glen Nye in Virgina. Martin Heinrich and Harry Teague in New Mexico. Mark Schauer and Gary Peters in Michigan. Vic Wulsin, Mary Joe Kilroy,  Steve Driehaus and John Boccieri in Ohio. Joe Garcia, Annette Taddeo, Alan Grayson, Suzanne Kosmas and Raul Martinez in Florida.

Out of those I'd recomend Taddeo, Grayson, Wulsin, Perriello and Markey beacuse they are all progressive and need our help.

But again. DNC and Obama first. DNC and Obama till you bleed.  

John McCain: Beacuse lobbyists should have more power


[ Parent ]
Yes, and give to who is most likely to win from this list (4.00 / 1)
And that would be (after Obama and the DNC and Darcy Burner):

Betsy Markey in CO-04, Dina Titus in NV-03, Judy Feder in VA-10 (she is VERY GOOD and an expert on health care), Mark Schauer in MI-07, Martin Heinrich in NM-01, Vic Wulsin in OH-02, Mary Jo Kilroy in OH-15, and Garcia, Martinez and Kosmas in FL.  

At this point I think it is important to support the most progressive people who can win, not just the most progressive people.  We need a Congress who will stand up to the next President whoever he is.

John McCain--He's not who you think he is.


[ Parent ]
Thanks! This is REALLY helpful! (0.00 / 0)
And actually, if you or Chris or Matt or someone else who knows a lot about such things can put together some sort of daily or weekly list of top priority donation targets, with some numbers on their and their counterpart's cash on hand, how much they've been raising, and how much they need, that would be EXTREMELY helpful to those of us who'd like to help but could benefit from some specifics. Plus, it would be a regular reminder to all to donate.

And I realize that this could get kind of thorny since you'll inevitably have some campaigns and their supporters complaining that they weren't put up high enough on such a list, but phooey, politics is politics and contention for money and attention is part of the game.

If such a list is already available, my apologies for being redundant and not noticing, and please send me the links.

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton


[ Parent ]
my take is (0.00 / 0)
It's sick.

I suppose we're meant to cheer for Obama to get more cash, or whatever, but that Obama might spend a half a billion dollars on his campaign is so unbelievably shocking and fucked up that it's hard to cheer. Once you factor in all the "issue ads" and advocacy run by all the various groups, it will probably top into the billions.

Hard to see what that has to do with "change", or "I want my country back", or "Democracy for America", or whatever the message is these days.

Sorry to be such a downer, but it's just sickening, I didn't know the numbers would get that high.


Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search