Paulson Opposes Any Help for Foreclosed Families; Obama & Mcain Trumpet Support from the "Serious"

by: David Sirota

Sun Sep 21, 2008 at 10:42


Just adding to Matt and Paul's earlier posts, the Associated Press's big headline this morning is "Paulson: Don't Add Households to Financial Bailout Bill." The story reports that Paulson is opposing efforts to add any aid for foreclosed families to the $700 billion bailout for his Wall Street cronies. The one thing Paulson has changed is the scope of the bailout - while opposing help for American homeowners, the Politico reports he now wants to give American taxpayer cash not just to domestic banks, but foreign ones too.

In other news, the Washington Post takes a look at how both Obama and McCain have largely surrounded themselves with the same kinds of people who created the environment for the meltdown. The story mentions that Obama specifically did not invite his only labor-affiliated economic adviser, Jared Bernstein, to his emergency meeting. The most telling passage is this:

"Winning the hearts of serious economic policy guys is not necessarily the path to electoral votes," one adviser fretted, "but I'm not sure. When things are serious enough, people want their leaders to be serious."

That's right, when things are Serious, America supposedly wants its leaders to only take advice from Serious People - that is, the people who got us into the crisis, not those who had been warning about it for years. When it comes to Iraq, the only Serious People are those who supported the war, not those who opposed it. And now, when it comes to the economic meltdown, the Serious People who need to be "won" are the Wall Streeters and Washington insiders who drove us off the cliff.

Oh, and in case anyone is still claiming that the Republican Congress passed bad deregulatory laws that the supposed saints in the Clinton administration (who are now advising Obama) supposedly opposed, think again:

Former Clinton Treasury Secretaries Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers, both Obama advisers, supported and helped negotiate the bill [repealing Depression-era financial safeguards]. At the November 1999 signing of the legislation, Summers praised it as "a major step forward to the 21st century."

Indeed, the foxes in the henhouse are the ones who we are expected to believe will "save" America...after having destroyed it. Fantastic.

David Sirota :: Paulson Opposes Any Help for Foreclosed Families; Obama & Mcain Trumpet Support from the "Serious"

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
KIlljoys? Yes. Serious? Not So Much. (4.00 / 5)
Serious, I suppose in the "bit a lemon and the lemon bit him back" sense.  No one's laughing when these guys come around, that's for sure.

But what astonishes me is how so many commentators in your diary yesterday didn't quite grasp the fact that the progressive economists they pointed to--such as Galbraith and Bernstein--were not invited to advise him in the midst of the crisis.  That alone spoke volumes.

It's not who's on the team that counts so much as who's on the field.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


The Problem Is... (0.00 / 0)
...the patient is bleeding to death.  If you stop to discuss which technique is best the patient will die and YOU will be held responsible.  Rather than debate what kind of tourniquet to use how can the bailout plan be structured, now so that it HAS to be revisited in the very near future.  

If you employ the wrong technique, (4.00 / 5)
the patient will die and YOU will be held responsible.  Look, I want Obama to be a progressive and a reformer as much as anybody else; but I don't see any evidence for that.   This is as stupid as letting Rumsfeld fix the war.   People on blogs will vote for Obama no matter what. But people who are pissed at the economy will stay home in droves if Obama supports the Republicans on this bailout.  Why bother voting if the choice is frick and frack.

They're asking for another four years -- in a just world, they'd get 10 to 20. ~~ Dennis Kucinich  

[ Parent ]
If you don't stop to discuss what we're doing... (4.00 / 2)
...then you can be damn sure than it won't be done in such a way that it can ever be revisited. The lack of discussion, tight control over who is involved in the decision, and the marginalization of any other voices, discussed above, are all designed to prevent the next step you propose.  

Support a Pennsylvania Progressive for Governor - Joe Hoeffel

[ Parent ]
right (4.00 / 1)
because rich people and finance capitalists have always proved so willing to give the money back to taxpayers and the government afterwards ;)

also, comparing this to personal death is a bit extreme.  it's more like how severe and how deep a recession (which no one, including big ben, really knows i think - at least if the amy goodman piece is to be relied upon, and i see no reason not to).


[ Parent ]
first off (4.00 / 2)
the $700B would help people who spent to much on a home by propping up the housing market. So this is bullshit from Frank and HRClinton that they want to layer on more taxpayer handouts.

second the $700B plan is complete bullshit under the current proposal because there are no systemic reforms in it and no accountability for banks - its just a raw get out of jail free card.

all this is crap. they shouldn't let the money market just freeze up, but this is not at all a healthy way to stop that. tax payers are about to be fucked. fixing this proposal should not be defined by giving even more handouts. it should be about accountability from top to bottom.

oh, i know, i'm heartless. bs! where is the hand out for responsible citizens?

Michael Bloomberg, prince of corporate welfare


yes clearly it's all about moral responsibility and "handouts" ;) (0.00 / 0)
were you trained in the Newt Gingrich wing of the Democratic Party?  Unbelievable.

[ Parent ]
Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search