Friday Election Round-up

by: Chris Bowers

Fri Aug 17, 2007 at 12:43


Here are some quick hits on elections for Friday afternoon / morning (it depends on where you are reading this from, I guess):
  • New Nevada Poll
    A new poll out of Nevada shows Clinton maintaining her strong lead in the state (Research 2000, Aug. 14-16, 2007, 400 Likely caucus goers, MoE 5, March results in parenthesis):

    Clinton: 33 (32)
    Obama: 19 (20)
    Edwards: 15 (11)
    Richardson: 11 (2)
    Gore: 8 (11)
    Biden: 2 (1)
    Dodd: 1 (1)
    Kucinich: 1 (1)
    Gravel: 1 (1)
    Unsure: 9 (18)

    Once again, just like Iowa and New Hampshire, not much movement at the top, except for Richardson moving up. Oddly enough, even though he is still ahead of Richardson in Nevada, Edwards is cutting back on staff in the state, while Richardson is expanding. This shows that no matter what the national numbers say, he really is a tier above the rest of the field. In the first three states, the campaign is clearly a four-way race between Clinton, Edwards, Obama and Richardson. Also, Romney leads on the Republican side, but to my knowledge they have yet to move up the Nevada caucus to early state status.

  • Progressive Dem Reverses Retirement Plans
    Turns out IL-04 won't be an open seat after all, as Luis Gutierrez has reversed his retirement announcement. My bet, an this is purely conjecture, is that this reversal is some combination of really liking being in the majority, not being too thrilled with his potential replacements, and not finding his retirement possibilities very exciting. No matter the cause, it is fun to see Republican retirements starting to flow-Pryce in OH-15, Hastert in IL-14, and Pickering MS-03 this week alone-while Democrats are moving in the opposite direction.  Guitierrez is a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

  • A History Lesson on Drafts
    I have to agree with Jonathan Singer when it comes to the perplexing Politico article this morning on Fred Thompson supposedly being "the closest thing to a successful draft of a presidential candidate in more than a half-century." Huh? I was not part of the Draft Clark movement, but I saw it in full-force online back in 2003. Matt, and at least a dozen other people I know, worked on that movement. Further, when Clark dropped out of the race the day after the February 10th primaries, I watched an interview with him the next morning where he specifically stated that he was "obligated" to run because of the draft movement behind him. I'm going out on a limb here and stating that is a little closer to an actual draft movement than Fred Thompson's "campaign."

  • Giuliani Spent 3% of Average Worker Time At Ground Zero
    It turns out Rudy Giuliani only spent 29 hours at ground zero, compared to a median of 962 hours for rescue, recovery and debris removal workers. But hey, whose counting? 29 is about the same as 962, right? I think his campaign might start to need some sort of justification besides 9/11.

  • Clinton Loved In Arkansas
    According to new polling from Rasmussen, it looks like Clinton would move Arkansas from a solid red state, to a solid blue state in the general election. She leads every Republican in the state by at least 18%. It should also be noted that Arkansas is the state where Clinton holds her largest primary lead. It appears that Arkansas voters really, really like Hillary Clinton.

  • National, California Connection In Clinton Polls?
    Here is another possible, simpler explanation for Clinton's improvement in national polls: she is opening up a huge lead in California. Recent Survey USA and Field Poll surveys confirm this, showing Clinton hovering around 50% in the Golden State, although a recent ARG poll shows no significant increase. With something crazy like one in every eight national Democrats in California, half of Clinton's 4% national increase could have come entirely from California. I don't know what she is doing out there, but it seems to be working.

  • Primary Calendar Super Brat Strikes Again
    New Hampshire Secretary of State, and primary season super-brat, Bill Gardner is now threatening to screw Iowa too, and hold the New Hampshire caucus on January 8th. This would force Iowa to either hold their cause within just a couple days of New Hampshire, hold it after New Hampshire, or hold it in December. I'm starting to think that every single problem with the calendar rests with Gardner. It would be really funny if Iowa and New Hampshire end up at each others throats. If their alliance breaks down, and Gardner puts New Hampshire on the 8th, then I bet Michigan goes on the 12th, and all hell breaks loose. Two privileged brats who can't figure out how to divide up the spoils because one of them, New Hampshire, is brattier than the other. Hysterical.

This is a thread for election news.

Chris Bowers :: Friday Election Round-up

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
So in the most recent (0.00 / 0)
polls from the first three states, Edwards is well ahead of Obama in Iowa, and tied with him (within the MOE) in both New Hamsphire and Nevada.

Tanking, indeed.


Any explanations? (0.00 / 0)
Why is his pulling resources out of Nevada?

[ Parent ]
As for New Hampshire (0.00 / 0)
I'd like to see another state pass a law requiring its primaries to be held at least a week before any other state holds a "similar contest." Perhaps then it would become clear just how stupid the New Hampshire law is.

Obama (0.00 / 0)
Obama has to starting giving people an idea of what he stands for, and demonstrate that he's willing to fight for what he believes in. Otherwise, his poll numbers will continue to lag Clinton's and Edwards' in key states.

I wonder if (0.00 / 0)
it would make sense to air some ads in California, Philadelphia, and the like.  Candidates like Obama have more than enough money, surely it would make sense to try to shift the national numbers and overall campaign coverage a bit.  Surely you can't spend all the money in Iowa and NH, there must be diminishing returns after a point.

Or is that just foolish?  Maybe the number of ads required to make an impression would run to over $10 million, and that would be too much.

New Jersey politics at Blue Jersey.


Not a good idea (0.00 / 0)
too much money for something that will be scrambled after New Hampshire. But, given new developments, it might be time to run ads in Michigan.

[ Parent ]
Clinton In California (0.00 / 0)
I don't know what she is doing out there, but it seems to be working.

Well, one thing is she's getting endorsements--three of the four most high-visibility Dems in the state: LA Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, SF Mayor Gavin Newsom, and Senator Diane Feinstein. Boxer has already said she won't endorse:

California's other senator, liberal Democrat Barbara Boxer, does not plan to make an endorsement in the presidential primary because she is close to all of her Senate colleagues who are running, her political consultant Rose Kapolczynski said Wednesday

It's not just these endorsements in themselves, but also what they're indicative of, I think.  Part of which is pretty much that she's the only candidate people here are really familiar with.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


That's what I was going to say (0.00 / 0)
But it's organization as much as endorsements (she's also gotten practically every major state legislator to endorse, including Speaker Fabian Nunez and uber-progressive and single-payer healthcare proposal author Sheila Kuehl).  Obama just hired his main guy out here; Clinton's had her organization in place in the state for months.  She also somehow got elite Hollywood to flip from Obama and move into her camp.

Political news in California is nonexistent, so I think Paul's point about name ID is correct.  But she's also got more boots on the ground than anyone. I haven't seen an ad yet, but I don't watch a lot of TV.

Insert shameless blog promotion here.


[ Parent ]
Agreed (0.00 / 0)
I thought about mentioning the legislative support, particularly Shiela Kuhl, who, in spite of such a multi-faceted progressive record is now most strongly identified with single-payer health care, which certainly doesn't jibe with Clinton.

But that's not really germane to Clinton's strengthening in the polls, IMHO.  Like you say, "Political news in California is nonexistent."

The big endorsement announcements are the exceptions that prove the rule--but even they are just one-cycle news stories easily bumped by anything burning or exploding, or any number of different animals for that matter (whales in the Sacramento River delta, Reggie the Alligator, some celebrity's pet snake or whatever).

The sense I have is that these stories--if they are the explanation--simply serve to reinforce people's previous familiarity with Clinton, while underscoring the lack of a similar familiarity with anyone else.  And this is precisely the sort of influence that takes place below the level of conscious reflection, or even just paying attention.  It's like elevator music.  Which is how you win elections in California.  "Purple Haze" for strings.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
Old & Successful Draft (0.00 / 0)
The New Hampshire draft effort for Ike, led by the later discredited Sherman Adams,in 1952 was a very successful draft campaign.  Thanks for remembering the Draft Clark effort, of which I was a part, that pioneered online campaigning almost as much as Howard Dean.

New Hampshire perspective (0.00 / 0)
The perspective here is that Michigan has been pushing for years to move up, and is willing to blow the calendar up in 2008, no matter what the harm to the nominating process.  If NH goes on the 8th, it is because Michigan jumped to the 15th. Michigan is acting in violation of the rules of both the DNC and the RNC. 
Back in 2005, I tried to get the DNC to look at a comprimise calendar that would put Iowa first, then DC, then NH, then South Carolina, spread out over the month of January. It would have taken care of the need to address diversity, as well as frontloading (we had already suggested capping the number of delegates who could be selected each week, to spread the primaries out over three months, which would have made every state important).  I couldn't get anyone to take a serious look at that idea.
 

Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search