Restating What We Already Know, But It's Still Worth Restating

by: David Sirota

Tue Sep 23, 2008 at 22:36


I'm in Cleveland preparing for a speech tomorrow morning, and still recovering from a 2 hour public debate with Dennis Prager in front of 1,500 people in Denver last night. I just wanted to stop and take a moment to reiterate to everyone what most of us probably already know, but is nonetheless worth repeating - the debate this week over the bailout truly is the most important economic debate we've seen in the last decade, if not the entire last generation. What happens this week will be written about in history books for the rest of our lives. In terms of its size, scope, reach and constitutional implications, the Bush proposal probably surpasses any single measure - good or bad - for the last 30 or 40 years, except, perhaps, for the bill authorizing the Iraq War, and even compared to that, it's very close.
David Sirota :: Restating What We Already Know, But It's Still Worth Restating
I say this as someone who worked on the Hill for 5 years during the passage of the Bush tax cuts, the Patriot Act and the Iraq War authorization: I have never seen a bill as monarchic as the bill Henry Paulson submitted to the Congress, I have never heard as absurd an explanation as Paulson gave for his proposal, and if we let it pass in even vaguely the same shape as it is in, we will watch a tectonic shift in how the fundamentals (to use a McCain term) of our democracy work, and do not work. During a recession and a foreclosure crisis, if the U.S. Congress cannot stop a lame-duck president with a 19 percent approval rating from using an economic crisis Wall Street speculators manufactured to give away almost a trillion dollars of taxpayer cash to those same speculators, then we no longer live in anything even close to a democracy.

Again, I know most OpenLeft readers know this - and I also know I can be prone to passion in my writing. But spending the day in Cleveland and seeing some of the economic devastation firsthand and thinking about what Bush actually proposed on the flight over here, I felt it was just worth repeating. So whether you sign Sen. Bernie Sanders' letter, or make an angry call to your legislator, put aside the presidential election for a second, and do what you can do, right now, to stop this. This is way more important than any election. I don't care if John McCain or House Republicans are opposing it for bad reasons, or as a political trap - this is way more important than that petty B.S. We're talking about $700 billion to Wall Street millionaires - more than it would cost to provide health care to everyone for the next five to ten years, and more than enough to destroy whatever small chance we have to enact a progressive agenda for the next generation. So this is about taking action right now, and getting anyone we can - Republican or Democrat - to oppose this.

We cannot let this stand.


Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Hey! (0.00 / 0)
What brings you to town? Is it that Spectrum(sp) event w/ Brazile?

Stillborn (4.00 / 2)
Two of the biggest proposals of the last 20 years never made it to the starting gate: Bill Clinton's health care proposal and George W. Bush's plan to privatize Social Security.

Two whoppers that got passed made it with fake "concessions" much lauded by the media.  Bush's tax cuts were passed when he agreed to a large cut in the cut, for 10 years.  That cut was paid for by eliminating the plan for year 10.  One of those who pushed this deal was Mike DeWine who got cut by the voters in 2006.  The other was the AUMF for Iraq.  The talking point at the time was that Bush did not really intend to go to war, he just needed pre-authorization of military force so he could negotiate from a position of strength.  I actually had people tell me that with a straight face.

If this gets passed, it will have some "concession" in it, probably meaningless.


terrifying opportunity (4.00 / 1)
The bailout is terrifying but what an opportunity too.  

Stopping Social Security privatization re-energized the Democratic Party.  

Stopping the bailout could be the moment when America finally deep-sixes its class-blind infatuation with the rich and super-rich and rediscovers (oh no! how un-American!) that a little class-consciousness might benefit you and your family.

Since the Reagan era especially, our culture has a habit of demonizing the underclass and lionizing the upper class.  Let's turn that around a little.  

I think this pair of anti-McCain spots is a great example of how to do this.  

I linked them in a diary too... because they make me laugh every time.


The FISA bill was the real watershed (4.00 / 2)
in the destruction of our republic.

That was the moment we crossed the Rubicon, when it became clear that the Congress was deeply in thrall to will of the corporations and the unitary executive, and that the Constitution was, if not completely dead, barely alive.

After they got the Congress to retroactively legalize Bush's criminal and unconstitutional actions and grant full immunity to the telecoms, the door was opened for even more audacious and radical power grabs--like this one.

Be prepared for even worse to come--the retroactive legalization of torture, for instance, or a unilateral declaration of war by the executive against Iran without Congressional authorization. Whenever they want a new authority--to cover their asses or to profit their friends or just out of sheer lust for power--they'll demand it, and they'll get it. Until they get tired of pretending we're still a democracy, and decide to pass an Enabling Act to get rid of Congress altogether and start ruling by executive decree.

I called one of my senators (the other senator and my congressman have already come out in opposition) and voiced my displeasure. I agree with you--economically this will be a bombshell that will destroy our economy and make recovery nearly impossible. It must not be allowed to pass.


Questions I Didn't Hear Asked - Answers I Didn't Get (0.00 / 0)
It's 3am, I'm listening to the Senate hearings.  Paulson sounds like Alan Greenspan on ten-packs a day.  The Q&A is making nervous, edgy, and sick to my stomach.  I can't take it any more.

All I can hear are the questions that aren't being asked...

...how much impact did the Fed raising interest rates after all those people were sold those predatory loans contribute to this problem?

...what guarantee do we have that after they burn through the $700b they won't be back for more?

...why can't there be oversight or court review, do you know you are doing something wrong?

...after we bail them out whose to say that the banks will lend the money and/or not charge exorbitant interest rates and/or only loan to their friends?

I'm sure some of these were answered or not.  And, Paulson was less believable then the missing Florida Tot's mom, Casey Anthony.

I can think of one word that explains why Czar Paulson won't tolerate oversight, this is extortion of the worse kind.


Extortion (4.00 / 2)
Give us $700 billion, no questions asked, or we will destroy the economy. And by the way, do you remember all those campaign donations we gave you? If you ever want to see anything like that again, you better cough up the dough right now.

Why aren't we calling this a $700billion TAX? (4.00 / 1)
I can't remember where I'd read this yesterday, but some analyst calculated that this bailout plan equates to a 55% sales tax on all of us.

Another person calculated it as a $7,000 per taxpayer tax.

The scary thing is that the language in the bills being thrown around makes it clear that the $700 billion is just an ESTIMATE (Barney Frank called it an educated guess), and it allows the SecTreas to start with that amount of money, and request more at any time.

These major companies took on enormous risk with piles of global money looking for investment. Why are we stuck with this unbelievably high TAX INCREASE to bail them out for their poor decisions?

(Just thinking about the language that makes the Republicans get fired up. The Bush administration is trying to increase your taxes dramatically in order to pay for bad investments by these firms.)


I actually think the energy debate (0.00 / 0)
is more important than this one - though it may very well be that the bailout bill decides the '08 election.

The issue at stake in the bailout bill is its cause.  The right is absurdly arguing that it was the government that was to blame.  Thus far people aren't buying the argument.  


Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search