TAKE ACTION: Demand Senate Pass the Sanders Millionaire Tax Amendment TODAY

by: David Sirota

Wed Oct 01, 2008 at 12:48


According to a press release just off the wire, the U.S. Senate will allow a vote on only one amendment to the Wall Street bailout bill - an amendment by Bernie Sanders to impose a surtax on millionaires to finance the bailout. I wrote about Sanders' proposal in my last newspaper column. There's talk that Senate leaders are trying to force Sanders into only asking for a voice vote, not an on-the-record Roll Call vote, for fear that a public vote where Senators have to each take a position might pass, while an anonymous voice vote might fail. Here's the excerpt of the press release from Sanders:

WASHINGTON, October 1 - The Senate today will debate an amendment by Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) to impose a surtax on the wealthiest Americans to pay for a $700 billion emergency bailout of Wall Street.

"Having mismanaged the economy for eight years while continually insisting that the 'fundamentals of our economy are strong,' the Bush administration now wants the middle class of this country to bail out Wall Street," Sanders said. "Meanwhile the wealthiest people, those who have benefited most from Bush's policies and are in the best position to pay, are being asked for no sacrifice at all. This is absurd."

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) set aside one hour to consider the Sanders Amendment to raise $300 billion from a five-year, 10 percent surtax on couples with incomes of more than $1 million and individuals earning $500,000. It is the only amendment being offered to the bill.

"Vermonters and people across America are saying very clearly that this bailout is a bad idea and that the struggling middle class should not have to pay for the greed and excesses of Wall Street.  I have received hundreds of calls and more than 2,000 e-mails from Vermonters, almost all of them against this plan.  Some 48,000 people all over the country have joined me in signing a letter to Treasury Secretary Paulson opposing any bailout paid for by the middle class," Sanders said.

Read Sanders full amendment here, and then contact your Senators demanding they support it. If we're going to bailout Wall Street, we have to make sure the bailout is - at the absolute minimum - paid for so as to not exacerbate the national debt, drive up interest rates and increase inflation.

David Sirota :: TAKE ACTION: Demand Senate Pass the Sanders Millionaire Tax Amendment TODAY

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
is there a clickthrough somewhere? (0.00 / 0)
I assume this will require a 60 vote minimum to pass? (0.00 / 0)


Someone last night said no .. (0.00 / 0)
just voice vote .. and it depends on who is chairing the session tonight

[ Parent ]
I mean for the roll call vote (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
Worse than the House bill (0.00 / 0)
As far as I can see, the Senate bill came out even worse than the House bill, adding on a 2-year extension of Bush's tax cuts. The alternative energy funding is a good thing, but small compared to the ridiculous tax cut.

The Senate Dems blew their chance to lead on a fair and rational economic bill, opting instead to essentially load up the Paulson plan with trinkets for the GOP and its own favored lobbyists. I have to think putting the Senate vote before further House action was designed to create momentum for an inferior bill.

I had come around to supporting the House version, but the Senate version looks too toxic to bear. I'll be calling my senators but don't have much hope for the Sanders amendment going anywhere. Without it, this Senate piece of trash must be stopped. I wonder if the House might be the place to put the pressure: the Senate seems too chickenshit and stupid to bother with.


How popular would the bailout be (0.00 / 0)
if PAY-GO was in effect?

$700 billion in new taxation, or spending cuts?

It would spark an insurrection, rather than merely historic phone and email traffic to Congress.

But, if Americans (like Krugman and Friedman etc.) don't have to pay for it, then it is OK.

Any one else see a pattern here?

Any one else see a problem?

I know you do.

When the problem is profligacy, further profligacy only makes things worse.


Heh (0.00 / 0)
None of the California senators are answering their phones today.

We should pass Sanders's bill early NEXT year (0.00 / 0)
when we could actually have the votes to do it.

Howard Dean in 2016

ok (0.00 / 0)
any one hear if this amendment passed?

Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search