Project Vote & ACORN Complete Historic 1.3 Million Card Voter Registration Drive

by: project vote

Wed Oct 08, 2008 at 13:05


(There's NOTHING conservatives hate more than poor people voting.  Except, of course, poor people of color voting.  No wonder they hate ACORN and Project Vote. - promoted by Paul Rosenberg)

Over 1.3 million new low-income, minority, and young Americans registered nationwide!

Yesterday, as voter registration deadlines passed in most states, Project Vote, the nation's leading nonpartisan voter participation organization, and the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), the country's largest community organization, held a news conference to announce the completion of a joint nonpartisan voter registration drive, which has succeeded in helping over 1.3 million Americans register to vote. To listen to the conference in its entirety, please click here

project vote :: Project Vote & ACORN Complete Historic 1.3 Million Card Voter Registration Drive

The joint effort, which Project Vote Executive Director Michael Slater described as "the largest and most comprehensive drive in the history of our two organizations", was conducted in a total of 21 states, with the largest efforts focusing on 16 states, including AZ, CA, CO, CT, Fl, KY, LA, MI, MN, MO, NV, NM, OH, PA, TX, and WI. While final numbers were still being tallied, Slater said that the largest state-by state successes included:


--over 148,000 in Pennsylvania,

--152,000 registrations in Florida,

--over 217,000 in Michigan, and

--over 238,000 in Ohio.


The goal of the nonpartisan voter registration drive--estimated to cost $18 million--was to help close the existing gaps in the American electorate, particularly among low-income Americans, minorities, and youth, all of whom have historically been underrepresented at the polls.


According to Bertha Lewis, Interim Chief Organizer of ACORN, the majority of the 1.3 million registrants are low- to-moderate income people, 60-70 percent are African American or Latino, and over half are under the age of 30. Lewis said the ultimate goal was to change the face of the electorate and permanently empower the Americans who are most affected by policy decisions.


"We think it is important that the voices in our community get heard," said Lewis. "This isn't just about going into the voting booth, but it's actually about strengthening democracy and instilling an ongoing commitment to effect real change."


This Election Day is expected to see record turnout at the polls, and ACORN board member Carmen Arias, a longtime voting rights advocate, confirmed that the energy and enthusiasm this year is at an all-time high.


"In 2004 we were met with apathy," Arias said. "We had to convince people to register to vote. This year we were met with excitement: people are excited to have an opportunity to have a say in solving the foreclosure crisis, and the healthcare crisis. They're eager to have politicians listen to them."


Slater and Lewis both agreed that empowering voters to have their voices heard by their political leaders is what it's all about. "Our belief, fundamentally, is that by expanding the electorate, by changing its profile, we will get candidates who will start to appeal to those new voters," said Slater. "The idea isn't to assist, whether overtly or covertly, the election of any single candidate, but to force candidates to take into account the interests of Americans who have not historically participated in as high rates as others and to start pursuing policies and programs that are more responsive to their needs."


Responding to questions, Lewis rejected the suggestion that the nonpartisan voter registration drive had a hidden partisan agenda, and emphasized the importance of empowering low-income communities and working families that have too long been ignored or taken for granted by both political parties.


"All of these politicians, I don't care who they are--republicans, democrats, all of them--they need to compete for our vote and they need to be accountable," Lewis said. "Because after the election, whoever gets in there has to deal with us."


Project Vote also announced that they are conducting efforts to make sure that everyone who attempted to register actually gets on the rolls. Project Vote lead counsel Brian Mellor explained that the organization took a random sampling of ACORN registrations in nine states, covering 14 counties, and checked to make sure the applicants had in fact been added to the voter lists.


"We were happy to find that it appears that most applicants that ACORN submitted and verified appeared to be getting on the rolls," said Mellor. "However, we do still see systematic problems," particularly with state database matching requirements. "There is lots of evidence out there that database matching produces a lot of false negatives, with people who are legitimate voters not getting matched."


"There are still thousands of Americans who believe they have completed a voter registration application and are registered to vote, but in fact are not," said Mellor, who explained that many registrations are rejected due to incomplete information, confusing application forms, or address problems. Many would-be voters, in fact, may not discover they have been rejected until they arrive at the voting booth.


To give applicants an opportunity to repair their registrations in time to cast a ballot on November 4, Project Vote is conducting a program to acquire lists of rejected applications from boards of election and then to contact the voters by mail or by phone to inform them of their need to re-register.


To assist in this effort, Project Vote has launched a website, www.projectvote2008.org, which provides lists of voters in several states for people to check and see if they or their friends and neighbors have been left off the voter rolls due to common registration problems.


In his opening remarks Slater pointed out that the American system of voter registration--with few federal standards, and in which the burden of registration is placed on individuals--has often been used to disenfranchise voters.


"It wasn't until the civil rights era that restrictive voter registration laws, challenged by protestors risking physical violence and even death, began to fall," said Slater. "Today, the attacks on voter registration drives are more rhetorical than physical, but the point of contention is the same: the ability of Americans of color to cast a ballot.


"The work of Project Vote and ACORN continues a tradition of ensuring that all Americans can vote," Slater said.


For more information on this and on the various Election Protection and voting rights work going on in the run-up to the election please contact:


Lacy MacAuley, lacy@massey-media.com, for Project Vote

Charles Jackson, communications@acorn.org, for ACORN


Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
"Don't Underestimate The McCain Campaign!" (0.00 / 0)
This is all part of a carefully planned Republican smear campaign, designed to plant the idea that "Democrats are resorting to massive fraud" so that when Republican lawyers start challenging voters on election day, they will be able to point to all these "scandals" as "support" for their vote suppression tactics.

They've got their "caging lists" now anybody registered by some "suspect" organization is going to be challenged. The bonus is that this will create massive confusion and voting delays. Perhaps millions of voters will be forced to take "Provisional ballots" which will never be counted, but they won't be told that these ballots won't be counted.

Others discouraged by the hours long waits will give up and go home. Mission Accomplished!

redstate.com is already ALL OVER IT! They are pushing this theme constantly!

The October Surprise Is No Surprise At All
posted by: Erick Erickson
Wednesday, October 8, 2008 at 09:44AM

Don't underestimate the McCain campaign!
For more than two months the Republicans have pushed the ACORN story - a corrupt, radical organization that operates through voter fraud to disrupt American democracy, destabilize our financial system, agitate against business, etc. Just this week the State Attorney General raided ACORN in Nevada and discovered how prevalent their voter fraud operation is. The FBI is expected to get involved.

Separately, the GOP started painting a picture of Obama's campaign donations. He's been extremely secretive. In a bit of marxist doublespeak, the Obama campaign is saying it is the most transparent campaign ever, but won't provide a list of its donors, destroyed Obama's Illinois legislative files, won't provide his health records, etc. The more we learn about his small donors, the more questions we have about foreigners trying to sway the American democratic system.

And then there is the McCain campaign. It has gone zealously after Bill Ayers's connection to Obama. Ayers hired Obama to run the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, after launching Obama's political career in his living room.

Bill Ayers, in applying for the Annenberg Challenge grant, said the purpose of the money would be to radicalize students to agitate for change. Who did he put in charge of the program? Barack Obama.

Who did Obama give the money to?

ACORN.

And the separate plots begin to connect. The ACORN narrative, the Ayers narrative, the foreign donor narrative - they intersect, combine, tangle, and paint a very ugly picture of Barack Obama

What Obama did on the board with the Annenberg money and what he'd do with your money come in to the narrative.

But I'm told there will be a surprise twist in this plot that will make it even neater to watch unfold.

The next month is going to be tumultuous and fun.

The October Surprise is that there is no "surprise." It's been in front of us all along. Only now the various story lines are getting connected.

Republicans know they can't win through any legitimate means, so they're prepared to go off the charts with MASSIVE fraud in a desperate attempt to prevent millions of voters in Democratic states and counties from voting, especially minorities who they KNOW will be voting by at least 70-30 for Obama.

For every 10 black, brown, Asian voters you prevent from voting, you cost Obama 7 votes.


What Evidence Do You Have Of A Massive Organized Disruption Effort? (0.00 / 0)
I'm sure they'd love to mount one, and this piece you quote is just what you'd expect to rev up the troops.

But there's no there there in their accusations--as serious news reporting has revealed.

What evidence do you have that there's more than just hot air being blown?

I'm not saying there won't be problems.  I'm working on a story about voter suppression, and I know there will be plenty of them.  But a massive coordinated effort that wins the election for McCain???

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.  Or at least some proof, to get things started.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
This is all over the News! (0.00 / 0)
Apparently, you haven't been paying attention:

CBS NEWS ON NATIONWIDE VOTE PURGING: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

From the Brennan Center: "We don't know all the problems, but we do know there is a huge potential for partisan mischief [with voter purge lists].

After the 2000 election, Republicans used the public desire for "reform" to institutionalize the Florida problems nationwide; vote caging lists, voter purges, electronic voting with no paper trail: all Republican attempts to prevent Democrats from voting and to steal elections.

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=647...


Cynthia Tucker: GOP Pinning Hopes on Keeping Democrats Away from the Polls
The Tactic, We'll Unabashedly Add, Seems to Come Straight Out of the Venerable KKK Playbook...

   "The GOP's brand is in tatters...So the party seems to be pinning its hopes on keeping likely Democrats - people of color, the poor, college students - away from the polls."

Cynthia Tucker of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution slams the anti-democracy forces of evil that have become the GOP's (almost) last hope...
The base of the Republican Party - a dwindling but still significant group - clings to a handful of pseudo-facts that don't hold up to serious scrutiny but that still occupy a central place in GOP ideology. Those include the assertion that Saddam Hussein represented a threat to the United States, that affirmative action in lending led to the mortgage crisis and that voter fraud is a serious problem in modern elections.

In campaign seasons such as this, when victory may turn on a handful of votes, none of those claims is more important to Republican activists than overhyped allegations of voter fraud.

She goes on to note the insidious and shameless GOP New Mexico operative, Patrick Rogers (yes, of the voter-suppresion front group "American Center for Voting Rights" and, yes, at the heart of the U.S. Attorney Purge in the state and, yes, a man willing to lie to fend off charges of vote-buying by his comrade, the disgraced, outgoing Rep. Heather Wilson), who was discovered in "a recently unearthed e-mail" to have spoken quite directly to the cynical and despicable issue of using phony claims of "voter fraud" to help keep bad voters (Dems) away from the polls, and encourage good voters (Repubs) to turn out if only to counter all those dirty, filthy, illegal aliens who are showing up (after giving their names and addresses to the federales, in order to register, presumably) to vote...

A recently unearthed e-mail from a Republican strategist in New Mexico shows the unbridled cynicism that underlies claims about fraudulent voting. Patrick Rogers, former lawyer for the New Mexico Republican Party, was among the party hacks pushing for criminal investigations into alleged voter fraud. He clearly was hoping that the threat of legal sanctions would intimidate Democrats and aid Republicans, including U.S. Rep. Heather Wilson (R-N.M.), who was in a tight race for re-election. According to a new report from the U.S. Justice Department's inspector general, Rogers wrote in September 2004:

"I believe the [voter] ID issue should be used at all levels - federal, state legislative races and Heather's race. ... You are not going to find a better wedge issue. ... This is the single best wedge issue, ever in [New Mexico]."

. . . .
Tucker closes...
The GOP's brand is in tatters, dragged down by an incompetent president, an unpopular war and a sickly economy. So the party seems to be pinning its hopes on keeping likely Democrats - people of color, the poor, college students - away from the polls.
...
The stench of corruption and cynicism emanating from the effort to disenfranchise voters is finally too heavy to ignore. The GOP is just ensuring that the tarnish on its brand becomes permanent.

We'd expect no less from a party who is still proud to publicly revere, rather than revile, men such as this one.

All it takes is a list of "purged voters" -- it doesn't matter if the list is remotely accurate, or even if the challenged voters wind up voting.

The point is to create delays, tie up voting in Democratic leaning precincts, discourage people from voting, intimidate students and the elderly, create confusion and havoc, and finally lay the groundwork for claiming "massive fraud" on the part of Obama and Democrats.

It's racism pure and simple -- a blatant attempt to prevent the "Blacks from taking over."  


[ Parent ]
I Have The Brenan Center Report (0.00 / 0)
Along with another one they just released on disenfranchisement.  Both are primarily focused on systemic chaos, disorganzation, and indifference, rather than organized malice.

They are very disturbing to anyone who cares about democracy as a matter of principle.  But they do not support your wild-eyed claims about threatening the outcome of this election.  Perhaps it would be better if they did, as the Obama campaign seems to be purposely ignoring the issue, because they feel they can.  But the simple fact is that they do not.  The existence of various low-level efforts--such as cited by Bradblog--is well-known, long-standing, and reprehensible, but does not rise to the level of national coordination that your original comment proclaimed.

Of course the problems that are out there could very well impact other elections that may be a great deal closer, and every voter deserves to have their vote counted, regardless of outcome.  But over-hyping an unsubstantiated claim will only further muddy the waters, rather than help bringing clear-headed attention, which is what is needed most.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
Speaking soley for myself (0.00 / 0)
Paul's question here is pretty right-on. I think we are seeing the organization right here: move massive stories in the press discrediting the biggest players, create a lot of fear and chaos, and where they are still able, use the machinery of government (the US Attorney's office is involved in the NV voter fraud taskforce) to do things like what happened in NV yesterday to do two things.

First, spread fear and intimidation among the populations that are being brought into the electorate. Enough stories in the papers and on TV and people just think the whole thing is a mess and their vote won't get counted anyway.

Second, create enough sound and fury to cover for new laws and policies that are aimed at disenfranchising voters from these newly activated groups: voter ID, proof of citizenship, faulty purging practices, "no match no vote" policies, etc. All these are justified by the need to "protect the integrity of the elections" even though so-called voter registration fraud results in almost no-one illegally casting a ballot. But the implementation of these policies can disenfranchise literally million of voters across the country.

We're already seeing that with calls in WI and NV for voter ID laws in the wake of these attacks.

Third, these attacks distract from conservative election tactics like voter caging, which is already being exposed in MT, MI, and OH.

I don't see a massive, coordinated effort to "win the campaign for McCain" through nefarious means, but all this other stuff is aimed at shrinking the electorate, which genearlly benefits more conservative candidates.


[ Parent ]
Right--It's A Long-Term War Against "Those People" Voting (0.00 / 0)
And, as Alexander Keyssar demonstrated in The Right To Vote, there was a something very similar lasting for a couple of generations that peaked in the late 19th Century.

It wasn't about just one election then, and it's not about just one election now.  If we want to turn it around decisively, we've got to fight their hysteria with level-headedness, not with hysteria of our own.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
The best way to encourage voting, imo (0.00 / 0)
is to make voting more private.  Week long mail in voting across the country.  If they don't show up, they can't get intimated.    Registering to vote is important but not more important that actually voting.  

They're asking for another four years -- in a just world, they'd get 10 to 20. ~~ Dennis Kucinich  

[ Parent ]
Congrats to Project Vote and ACORN (4.00 / 2)
a million voters here, a million voters there ... pretty soon it adds up to a big difference :-)


A bad pattern (0.00 / 0)
ACORN has done a wonderful job registering voters.  And they have responded responsibly to registration concerns.

Using the levers of government to hinder progressive movements is becoming more prevalent.  The confiscation of computers for "fire code" violations before major marches is another attempt at using govenment for supression. I truly hope that this election is the start of stopping that bullshit.

McCain on the minimum wage


Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search