More Journalistic Double Standards On Financial Policy

by: Chris Bowers

Tue Oct 07, 2008 at 17:11


The Dow continues to plunge, closing below 10,000 for the first time in four years. Yesterday, in regards to the bailout, Matt noted the double standard in journalism on the subject:

Last Monday's Headlines:

House Rejects Bailout Package, 228-205; Stocks Plunge, New York Times

Bailout bill slapped aside; record stock plunge, AP

Markets plunge after House rejects financial rescue bill, LA Times

Stocks plunge as House votes down bailout plan; Dow drops 778, USA Today

Today.

Credit Crisis Drives Stocks Down Sharply, New York Times

Dow plunges 800 points amid global sell-off , AP

Stocks plunge as credit crisis goes global
, LA Times

Credit crisis pushes Dow below 10,000, USA Today

It's almost as if there's a double standard at work.

Here is another one from today (emphasis mine):

Stocks plunged on Tuesday afternoon - shedding 200 points in the final hour of trading alone - despite reassurances from the chairman of the Federal Reserve, Ben S. Bernanke, that the central bank was prepared to lower interest rates, words that many investors had said they were waiting to hear.

Seriously, it is almost as if a double standard is at work here. I mean, the Dow plunging couldn't possibly be because of the policies pursued by Bernanke, could they? Those were clearly the words that investors wanted to hear. So, there is no way that is the cause.

The temporary defeat of the bailout, however, was to cause for the Dow plunging last Monday. If you don't believe the media, just go to their source: Henry Paulson. Bush administration officials are always right.

Chris Bowers :: More Journalistic Double Standards On Financial Policy

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I see Suze Orman on CNN (0.00 / 0)
just denounced banks as being responsible for this mess, and being unwilling to negotiate.


New Jersey politics at Blue Jersey.

Finanical news sources quite different (0.00 / 0)
If you read CNBC ( i cant watch it, no cable :( ) or listen to Bloomberg Radio, the Paulson plan is getting slammed half the time. Which is pretty remarkable.

The mainstream press, Cokie Roberts, NYTimes are however a lot more clueless / baised as you suggest.

Michael Bloomberg, prince of corporate welfare


CNBC(which includes Cramer) .. (0.00 / 0)
are a clueless .. vehemently anti-Obama bunch ... the only redeeming feature CNBC has .. is Rick Santelli .. otherwise it is a worthless channel ..  

[ Parent ]
Basically the world markets are messed up (0.00 / 0)
It is plain fear and the fact the people holding the bad debt just want it gone without strings attached.

This mess is worldwide now thanks to boneheads like AIG and the FED.


"Getting Things Done" (4.00 / 2)
How many times have we heard this quotation:

"I want to work across the aisle in the spirit of bi-partisanship to get things done"

or some variation on it?

This bailout clusterfuck is a fine example of putting "getting things done" and "bipartisanship" ahead of getting the right things done the right way.

Had we seen real economic stimulus legislation passed, the credit markets wouldn't still be so tight, instead of this Wall Street bailout baloney.  

Passing the right kind of legislation and getting a good bill --> affecting the problem

Passing crap legislation to get something passed, with the spirit of bipartisanship in high Broder --> clusterfuck


Also... (4.00 / 1)
There's nothing virtuous about something midway between two points.  There's no virtue in a relative center between a "liberal" and "conservative" position.  There's a right thing to do - and those right things to do on economics happen to be progressive.  This is a variation on what I wrote above.  

Charting the "centrist" course --> at best, doing nothing; at worst, making things worse


[ Parent ]
Opposition was bipartisan too (4.00 / 1)
The vote was basically bought representatives for vs. unbought ones against. A big determination of who went where was how much money they got from financial lobbyists. Hmmm.

[ Parent ]
As someone who has a lot of money in (0.00 / 0)
the markets and real estate, I can tell you how delighted I am that they are letting the clusterfuckers fix the clusterfuck.  I squarely hold Democrats responsible for this.  

They're asking for another four years -- in a just world, they'd get 10 to 20. ~~ Dennis Kucinich  

Good Chris, (0.00 / 0)
it's time to build the Progressive case for the end of the Fed and the current financial aristocracy.

Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search