ACORN: Bogus "Voter Fraud Charges" Aim to Camouflage Voter Suppression

by: Paul Rosenberg

Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 11:32


I've been following the issue of voter suppression off and on for virtually my entire life.  I can remember watching live reports from Selma, Alabama, when I was a teenager.  Even before that, I remember the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party and its challenge to the seating of the segregationist "regular Democrat" delegation at the 1964 DNC.  But my appreciation of the issue was boosted dramatically in 2000 by the publication of Alexander Keyssar's comprehensive historical analysis, The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States, swiftly followed by the debacle in Florida, which revealed various different forms of voter suppression all at work simultaneously.

Increasingly, throughout the 2000s, ACORN and Project Vote have been on the forefront of the struggle to push back voter suppression, and give full voice to those routinely sidelined from participation in our democracy.  I'm planning to post a longer diary of my own later this weekend, but to kick things off, I'm posting this diary, primarily composed of a press release from ACORN setting the record straight about just what is going on in the struggle for democracy here at home today.

Paul Rosenberg :: ACORN: Bogus "Voter Fraud Charges" Aim to Camouflage Voter Suppression
ACORN's press release begins:

ACORN  (The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) has just completed the largest, most successful nonpartisan voter registration drive in US history.  We helped 1.3 million low-income, minority and young voters across the country register to vote.

Unfortunately, just as in 2006, that success in bringing people into the democratic process, have been greeted with unfounded accusations to disparage our work and help maintain the status quo of an unbalanced electorate.

After a similar spate of charges against ACORN in 2006, we learned that then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales had fired Republican US Attorneys because they refused to prosecute ACORN and other voter assistance groups on trumped up fraud charges.  This was the heart of the US Attorney-gate scandal that led Karl Rove, Gonzales and other top Department of Justice officials to resign.  Because the press didn't catch on until long after the election, it was part of a successful strategy to create an unfounded specter of voter fraud and to suppress voting.

We're quite accustomed to the M$M failing to connect the dots--or not even being able to see them in the first place.  But comments here, and even diaries at other progressive blogs show that even progressive activists often have no real grasp of the true picture of what's going on.  To inform yourself of the basics, please continue reading on the flip.

Three basic facts you need to keep in mind:

(1) Registration fraud is not the same as voter fraud.  Registration fraud, if not caught, produces phony names on voter roles, nothing more.  Voter fraud produces illegal votes.  Both are and should be illegal, but they are two entirely diffrent things.

(2) The perpetrators of registration fraud are overwhelmingly--if not exclusively--the employees of organizaitons like ACORN.  The primary victims of registration fraud are those same organizations, who are paying for honest work that is not being done.

(3) There is virtually no evidence of any voter fraud in the US in recent years, despite the best efforts of the Bush Administration to dig up such evidence.

Here is how ACORN addresses the issue:

Key Facts:

1. In order to help 1.3 million people register to vote, we hired more than 13,000 registration assistance workers r.  As with any business or agency that operates at this scale, there are always some people who want to get paid without really doing the job, or who aim to defraud their employer.  Any large department store will have some workers who shoplift.  

2. Any large voter registration operation will have a small percentage of workers who turn in bogus registration forms, Their goal clearly is not to cast a fraudulent vote.  It is simply to defraud their employer, ACORN, by getting a paycheck without earning it. ACORN is the victim of this fraud - not the perpetrator.

3. In nearly every case that has been reported, it was ACORN that discovered the bad forms, and called them to the attention of election authorities, putting the forms in a package that identified them in writing as suspicious, encouraging election officials to investigate, and offering to help with prosecutions.  We are required by law to turn in all forms, but instead of just turning them in and figuring that it is the responsibility of the board of elections to figure out which are valid, we spend millions of dollars verifying that forms are valid, and then separate out those that are suspicious.

4.  This has nothing to do with "voter fraud" - nothing at all to do with anyone trying to cast an extra vote.  There has never been a single reported instance in which bogus registration forms have led to anyone voting improperly.  To do that, they would have to show up at the polls, prove their identity as all first-time registrants must, and risk jail. The people who turned in these forms did so not because they wanted an extra vote, but because they didn't care enough to make sure eligible people got to vote at all.

5. When a department store calls the police to report a shoplifting employee, no one says the department store is guilty of consumer fraud.  But for some reason, when ACORN turns voter registration workers over to the authorities for filling out bogus forms, it gets accused of "voter fraud."  This is a classic case of blaming the victim; indeed, these charges are  outrageous, libelous, and often politically motivated.

6.  Similar attacks were launched against ACORN and other voter registration organizations in 2004 and 2006. The bogus charges were at the heart of  the U.S. Attorney-gate scandal that led to the resignations of Karl Rove, Attorney General Ablerto Gonzales and other top Justice Department Officials.  It turned out that it was the charges that were fraudulent, and that they were part of a systematic partisan agenda of voter suppression. Republican US Attorneys David Iglesias (NM), Todd Graves (MO), and John McKay (WA) all were fired primarily because they refused to prosecute similar bogus charges of "voter fraud."  Another US Attorney, Bradley Schlozman, who did politicize prosecutions against former ACORN canvassers, was forced to acknowledge under cross examination by the Senate Judiciary Committee that ACORN was the victim of fraud by its employees and ACORN had caught the employees and had identified them to law enforcement.

7.  The goals of the people orchestrating these attacks are to distract ACORN from helping people vote and to justify massive voter suppression.  That's the real voter fraud; the noise about a small fraction of the forms ACORN has turned in is meant to get the press and public take their eyes off the real threat, while those hurling the charges are stealing people's right to vote in broad daylight.  They have already tried to prevent Ohio from registering voters at its early voting sites.  In Michigan, they planned to use foreclosure notices to challenge thousands of voters. And if this year is like past years, they are preparing to use this so-called voter fraud to justify massive challenges to voters in minority precincts on Election Day.

In its press release, ACORN went on to focus on more specific details of process.  One thing they cannot do, however, is compare their efforts with those of others.  I asked about this in a press teleconference with ACORN yesterday.  There is, to date, no known study that can provide background statistics for comparisoin purposes of what sorts of error and/or fraud rates are normal.  I only know from my own experience that duplicate and outdated registrations are quite commonplace.  Walking precincts in Los Angeles, I never found a single one with an error rate anywhere close to being merely 1%.

ACORN, again:

The Details:

Fact: ACORN has implemented the most sophisticated quality-control system in the voter engagement field but in almost every state we are required to turn in ALL completed applications, even the ones we know to be problematic.

Fact: ACORN flags in writing incomplete, problem, or suspicious cards when we turn them in,. Unfortunately, some of these same officials then come back weeks or months later and accuse us of deliberately turning in phony cards.  In many cases, we can actually prove that these are the same cards we called to their attention.  

Fact: Our canvassers are paid by the hour, not by the card . ACORN has a zero-tolerance policy for deliberately falsifying registrations, and in the cases where our internal quality controls have identified this happening we have fired the workers involved and turned them in to election officials and law-enforcement.

Fact: No criminal charges related to voter registration have ever been brought against ACORN or partner organizations.  Convictions against individual former ACORN workers have been accomplished with our full cooperation, using the evidence obtained through our quality control and verification processes - evidence which in most cases WE called to the attention of authorities

Fact: Most election officials have recognized ACORN's good work and praised our quality control systems. Even in the cities where election officials have complained about ACORN, the applications in question represent less than 1% of the thousands and thousands of registrations ACORN has collected.

Fact: Our accusers not only fail to provide any evidence, they fail to suggest a motive: there is virtually no chance anyone would be able to vote fraudulently, so there is no reason to deliberately submit phony registrations. ACORN is committed to ensuring that the greatest possible numbers of people are registered

ACORN will not be intimidated, we will not be provoked, and in this important moment in history we will not allow anyone to distract us from these vital efforts to empower our constituencies and our communities to speak for themselves.

More to come on this.  But make sure to spread this information to your friends, and other activists who can help spread this information.  This is yet another area in which the hegemonic infrastructure of the right has mattered much, much more than the truth.  Let's not let it stay that way.


Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
What's worse, my idiot of a Rep...Feeney...see my letter to the Orlando Sentinel (4.00 / 4)
To the editor:

I wasn't surprised to see my representative, Tom Feeney, on Fox news yesterday.  He was talking about the ACORN voter registration efforts and said "I believe Acorn has violated more Americans' civil rights to have their vote counted than any group since the KKK. It's an outrage."   In partnership with the nonpartisan organization Project Vote, ACORN helped register over 1.3 million low-income, minority, and young voters in a total of 21 states this year. An estimated 60-70 percent of the applicants are people of color.  At least HALF of all are registrations are from young people between 18-29. In Florida they collected over 151,000 registrations.  So, why would he compare ACORN to the KKK, which has a long and documented history of racial bigotry and racial voter suppression and violence?  I would think that Mr. Feeney would think that registering eligible constituents in his district and throughout the state is not a violation of anyone's civil rights.  While fraudulent voter registrations should not be tolerated by anyone, registering eligible voters is a civil right that the KKK fought against for decades.

This is only one example of the type of "leadership" we get from Mr. Feeney in our district.  From voting against the S-CHIP bill which provides healthcare to children and is a bipartisan program, Mr. Feeney places himself outside the mainstream.  As a Veteran I also am painfully aware that Mr. Feeeney voted 18 times against improving veterans benefits. At the same time voting himself 5 pay raises.   Mr. Feeney's feeble attempts at apologizing for his involvment in the Abramoff corruption scandal and that trip to Scotland, comes late and only after earning the honor of being named one of Congress's 10 most corrupt members.

We have a choice in this year election in District 24 and that choice is not Tom Feeney, it's Susanne Kosmas.  Ms Kosmas is for changing the direction that we are headed in Iraq.  Ms Kosmas also supports our troop and veterans by providing them the care that they earned in defending our nation in this time of peril.  For these and many other reasons, I am supporting Suzanne Kosmas this November.

Sincerely,

Feeney is a MORON...I am ashamed to live in his district and hope that we will defeat him in 24 days...get out and canvass, write letters, get involved...


Two Birds With One Stone, If You Can (0.00 / 0)
One bird with ten stones, if you must.

Whatever it takes!

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
Excellent (4.00 / 1)
Democracy is an underestimated campaign issue, IMHO. More of this please.

Support a Pennsylvania Progressive for Governor - Joe Hoeffel

[ Parent ]
In the longer term there is only one way to deal with this (0.00 / 0)
is to take Republicans and the MSM at their word that they are really concerned about registration fraud, and offer the a real solution (one which also deals with an actual problem - which is the need for groups like ACORN to register people in the first place.)  The government registers everyone. That eliminates the role of ACORN and other groups, taking private organizations out of this business entirely.  Anyone who opposes this solution is obviously motivated by something other than fraud. This can be done while vigorously (and correctly) attacking these bogus "voter fraud charges."

The actual problem is the same one that Keyssar details. Historically, the vote has been denied far more often by seemingly neutral rules like registration that don't actually combat fraud but do increase the costs or difficulties of voting for certain groups, or give authorities the discretion to game the vote at the local level.  The solution must go beyond calling those who would suppress the vote on their abuse of these rules - it's to eliminate the potential in the first place.  Clear simple uniform rules that eliminate the role of discretion make abuse (real or imaginary, leading to too few or too many votes) less possible.  

Support a Pennsylvania Progressive for Governor - Joe Hoeffel


Works For Me! (4.00 / 2)
In fact, the most direct connection ACORN and Project Vote have with Obama goes back to him litigating vs. Illinois for a coalition of groups to force implementation of the Motor Voter Act, which was a significant step in that direction.

Just make such registration automatic, and universal for all eligible voters, and problem solved.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
ACORN as an organization is critically important (4.00 / 1)
They're not just attacking ACORN because of the voting issue, of course.  It is the only truly national community organizing group with a truly central staff that actually works on national issues at the same time as it maintains very strong local organizations as well.  (The other groups are umbrealla organizations that train and advise but do not, as far as I know, act as separate political/social action centers themselves.)  And it is the only major group not based in churches but on knocking on door after door.  

As a result, they are probably the most important community organizing group in the nation.  

Having said that, I have not had much direct contact with ACORN, and have read about them only intermittently.

Interestingly, ACORN is also likely the only major community organizing umbrella group that is not 501(c)3.  Thus, it can integrate political and issue organizing in a way that other groups cannot.  

Heidi Swarts recently published a book that includes work on ACORN.  I haven't read it yet, but her chapter on ACORN in Transforming the City ed. by Marion Orr was very informative.  For those who are interested:  

Organizing Urban America: Secular and Faith-based Progressive Movements  by Heidi J. Swarts: http://www.amazon.com/Organizi...

Transforming the City: http://www.amazon.com/Transfor...

--Aaron Schutz (Core Dilemmas of Community Organizing)


CNN is doing a hatchet job on ACORN (0.00 / 0)
I just watched a rebroadcast of their investigative report on the ACORN controversy. The report is overwhelmingly slanted toward the notion that ACORN is a shady, corrupt organization intent on committing voter fraud. It makes little or no effort to present the other side.

And to make matters worse, following tonight's airing of that piece, they had John Fund and another person who was there to supposedly make the case for ACORN. The trouble was this person was totally inept at explaining the actual situation and due to his inability to articulate the legitimate facts of the matter, he only served to reinforce the suspicion that ACORN's behavior was indefensible and deserving of the condemnation coming from the right.

I will pass this post on to everybody I know. This is about the only place I've seen that is countering the Republican smear job on this issue.

Slacking toward the apocalypse


Good TPM summary (0.00 / 0)
Josh also does a good job covering the history of phony voter fraud claims here

Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search