Survey USA: Darcy Burner Up 50-46 Over Reichert

by: Matt Stoller

Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 21:08


I just saw that King 5 TV reported a new Survey USA poll, Darcy is up 50-46 over Reichert.  The ad which pointed out that he's ineffective really knocked him down, the first time his reputation has been damaged in any serious way.  Reichert's even set up a site, http://www.davereichertdelivers.com, to rebut the claims.

He has $725k of TV on the air right now just this week, in all likelihood thanks to an illegal corporate contribution from Republican media buying firm Media Plus.  

Meanwhile, a former Harvard faculty member responded to the Seattle Times article in the comments of the article:

As someone who has been on faculty at Harvard, I can attest that this is simply twisting words for political opportunism. Harvard doesn't have "majors". They only have concentrations. And they don't have "minors" -- so to gain other credentialed experience, someone gathers coursework in joint, or dual concentrations. However only one department can appear on any transcript. Period. Even if you had major coursework across three departments (say your joint major area was "Molecular Biochemistry", you would Biology, Chemistry and Molecular Biology courses) but you would have to designate ONLY one of those as the primary department and thus folks might think you had only biology OR chemistry OR molecular biology work.

Ms. Burner's description is accurate if you understand the Harvard system (which also until recently had a 14 pt GPA scale -- I don't hear folks calling Ms. Burner a 'liar' about any 12.76 GPA average that she likely had). You just need to understand the Harvard system and its terminology which is quite different from most University systems.

This person is writing under the pseudonym 'JK465', but if they are willing to speak out under your own name, contact me at stoller at gmail.com.

Matt Stoller :: Survey USA: Darcy Burner Up 50-46 Over Reichert

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Wow (0.00 / 0)
That's great news. I think Darcy finally found the right attack.


John McCain: Beacuse lobbyists should have more power

It's finally working (4.00 / 2)
and it's great to have some independent polling that backs up the internals and the D-Trip's findings from earlier this month.

See you in Washington!  And no, I'm not talking about DC.  I'm talking about Tacoma.  I'll be there the weekend before election day.

LET'S ROCK!


Great news! (0.00 / 0)
A credible poll result. And there was a Washington state poll out today giving Christine Gregoire a 12 pt. lead. The Obama wave in Washington state is going to go far and deep.

Link to SUSA poll (4.00 / 1)
Here it is.  

This is a net swing of 14 to Darcy since the last SUSA poll 6 weeks ago.  She's up 5 among indies now, but the biggest swing must have come from increasing her support among Dems.  Reichert leads 90-9 among Repubs, but Darcy is now winning 82-14 among Dems.  The poll shows a partisan breakdown of 40 Dem-31 GOP.  So if she can hold onto the party base (and she even has a bit more room to grow there), she'll be in great shape to win.  Looking good!  


Indeed! (4.00 / 1)
   Most of the undecideds are Democrats and Independents.  I wish I could volunteer for Darcy, but I'm 3000 miles away.  Money will have to suffice.  

John McCain lets lobbyists shape his economic policy

[ Parent ]
Contact the campaign (0.00 / 0)
most campaigns will be able to hook you up with e-phonebanking.

John McCain: Beacuse lobbyists should have more power

[ Parent ]
DCCC pouring money in (4.00 / 1)
just took a look at the SSP IE Tracker. The DCCC just dropped a 250k+ media buy two days ago and must be on the air heavily in the district.

In other great news they've put more then 300k in media buys in already in the VA-05 race to help elect Better Democrat Tom Perriello!

John McCain: Beacuse lobbyists should have more power


Great news. It's almost enough to make me (0.00 / 0)
overlook the fact that the DCCC has given huge amounts of money to the Blue Dogs, too.  Or maybe not.

[ Parent ]
To "the Blue Dogs" (0.00 / 0)
The DCCC spends money in races that that will help the Democrats keep a majority. That has included a few Blue Dogs, yes but it's not like it's a funding tool of Blue Dogs, it is lead by a progressive (Van Hollan) afterall.

John McCain: Beacuse lobbyists should have more power

[ Parent ]
Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search