Opening the Day: Karl Rove Throws in the Towel

by: Matt Stoller

Mon Oct 27, 2008 at 08:00


Soon, very soon, very very soon.

  • Eight points in Virginia?  And half of all voters in the state contacted by the campaign?  Wow.

  • Democrats are warning people not to become complacent about Obama's win, but it doesn't help that Karl Rove is publicly throwing in the towel.  Speaking of complacency, who's going to replace Obama in the Senate?  Larry Handlin makes some guesses.

  • Third Way communications director Matt Bennett and Brookings Institution fellow Bill Galston doubt that Obama can follow through on his transparency pledge.

    Matt Bennett, co-founder of Third Way, a progressive policy think tank that leans Democratic, said he sees parallels between Obama's plan and Clinton's pledge in 1992 to cut the White House staff by 25 percent - the symbol of his overall platform to reduce and reorganize government in a year when, like 2008, "change" was a more popular mantra than "experience."

    "His staff will struggle to comply with what will eventually feel to them as arbitrary rules," said Bennett, a former Clinton administration aide. "I go back to the Clinton vow to cut the White House staff by 25 percent. It was arbitrary and capricious. It was very hard to do and caused significant trouble, and he got zero political benefit out of it."

    Norm Ornstein also gets in a few digs.  You know, can't they wait until Obama wins to start telling him why he shouldn't run an open administration?

  • Lots of different companies are now competing for the bailout money.  

    Insurers, automakers and American subsidiaries of foreign banks all want the Treasury Department to cut them a piece of the largest government rescue in U.S. history.

    It's a grab bag!  Can I have some?

  • Democrat Paul Kanjorski in Pennsylvania is just not doing well.  This ad isn't helping, making him look old and out of it.

  • Lobbyist revenue is taking a dip.

  • Do we really need 60 Senators to pass legislation?  Sheldon Whitehouse doesn't think so.

    "If the White House political team can't figure out a way to get two Republican senators to vote with us between Air Force One, tea at the White House, U.S. attorneys and judges and dams and roads and ambassadors and all that other stuff, somebody should take them out to the woodshed. Sixty is less a magic number than a zone."

  • New York's going to lose 40,000 Wall Street jobs.  I don't know how the city's going to deal with that.

  • The GOP in the House is preparing to tear itself apart.

What are you reading?

Matt Stoller :: Opening the Day: Karl Rove Throws in the Towel

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Jinx (4.00 / 1)
Perhaps people don't want to jinx the outcome of the election, but there really should be some online discussion about what the Obama administration should look like.

The was one article in the NY Times about possible cabinet members for each candidate, but that's all I've seen.

Obama and Biden's seats will become vacant and it would be nice to know who is going to fill them. Similarly if Obama is going to pick present office holders to fill positions then who is going to replace these people as well.

For many, like me, who feel that Obama will be too centrist and timid the only time that we might be able to influence the direction of his administration is now when those being selected to work in it are being chosen.

More progressive staff choices could be vital - just look at the harm that industry flacks have done when appointed to key posts in the Bush admin.

So how about starting a discussion of the Obama admin now.

Policies not Politics


60 Senators to Pass Legislation? (4.00 / 2)
Do we really need 60 Senators to pass legislation?  Sheldon Whitehouse doesn't think so.

I don't think so either, but for completely different reasons.  Sure, try rides on AF1 and tea at the White House first, but what you do if that fails is bring your most popular legislation (SCHIP expansion, aid to Iraq vets, whatever) to the floor, and if the Republicans block cloture, you have Reid keep the bill on the floor until they stop talking.  At that point, under the Senate rules, the bill itself is voted on.

Do this two or three times, and I bet they lose their taste for blocking cloture.


Lets face it .... (0.00 / 0)
what  Senators are up for re-election in 2010(besides Specter)? ... those are the ones you lean on .. I know Snowe isn't up till 2012 ... but you lean on her too ... given Obama's donor and voter lists ... you promise to make their life hell .. after all ... what prevents him(or his aides in the WH) ... from emailing his supporters once he takes office?

[ Parent ]
Karl Rove (0.00 / 0)
Please do not listen to Bill Galston.  We don't need to hear anymore of his centrist, Hayekian views.  And that goes for Elaine Kamarck as well.
Besides, the White House staff should be reduced, by 75%.  That would free up the President and enable that person to attend to the affairs of the country.  Also, it would be more difficult to hide away from one's responsibilites and the public, behind a cocoon of aides.  

Handlin's analysis is as good as you can get (0.00 / 0)
on Illinois' next Senator. He knows all the players from way back. He has his contacts and he pays attention.  

Jeff Wegerson

Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search