24

Bush Speech Writer Makes Jack Bauer Look Reasonable

by: David Danzig

Thu Jan 21, 2010 at 19:52

A new book from a former political speech writer for President George Bush makes a number of wild claims in an effort to "correct the record" about the CIA enhanced interrogation program that featured the use of such "techniques" as waterboarding and slamming detainees heads into walls. The book, Courting Disaster: How the CIA Kept America Safe and How Barack Obama Is Inviting the Next Attack, by Mark Thiessen, hit book stores today. An excerpt which ran on The National Review web site calls the CIA interrogators who used these abusive techniques the "real Jack Bauers" but explains that their work was nowhere near as violent as the interrogation scenes depicted on the hit FOX TV program.
There's More... :: (0 Comments, 661 words in story)

Which TV Show Is A Better Guide To Fighting Terrorism: "24" Or "Criminal Minds"?

by: Paul Rosenberg

Sat Jul 18, 2009 at 12:00

It's an article of faith on the right--not just the fanboys, but the ones who actually ran the Bush "War on Terror"--that way to fight to terrorism is to be learned from the TV show 24, as Dahlia Lithwick writes at Newsweek.  Only problem is, experts are virtually unanimous: they're utterly wrong.  Torture doesn't work to extract information quickly.  In fact, it doesn't work to extract reliable information at all. Dahlia gets into all that in her Newsweek piece, as well as the rather pointed observation that Bauer knows what he's doing is illegal, and expects to pay a price for it:

that is the real source of his heroism-to the extent one finds torture heroic. He makes a moral choice at odds with the prevailing system, and accepts the consequences of the system's judgment.

All in all, she does a very good job of hitting the high notes in the crazy world of taking "24" as blue-print for fighting terror.

But there is another TV show that actually does provide some valuable insight into combating terrorism, the CBS show about FBI profilers, Criminal Minds.  The premise of profiling is quite simple:  to catch a criminal, you have to know how to think like a criminal.  And not just any criminal, but the particular criminal that committed the particular crime you're trying to solve.  Profilers are most famous for their work with serial killers, but profiling can be applied to a much wider range of crimes, including those that are political.  A key insight is that no matter how "crazy" the criminal's thinking may seem, it all makes sense to them, and if you can understand what that sense is, then you are well more than halfway there to solving the crime.

There's a deep irony here: On the one hand, conservatives are utterly horrified at the very thought of trying to understand the terrorists who attacked us.  So horrified, they can't even focus on what it means.  At one point, Karl Rove mocked liberals, saying, "liberals saw the savagery of the 9/11 attacks and wanted to prepare indictments and offer therapy and understanding for our attackers," On the other hand, conservatives are actually very close to the terrorists how they think--brothers under the skin, one might say: tribalist, ethnocentric, religious, fundamentalist, self-righteous, prone to violence and scornful of compromise or even dialogue.  They are peas in a pod.  No wonder conservatives don't want to understand the terrorists--they'd have to admit they're one and the same!

There's More... :: (12 Comments, 628 words in story)

Jack Bauer Shows Up in Senate

by: David Danzig

Tue Feb 17, 2009 at 16:44

Too bad Senator Jay Rockefeller did not get a casting call for the 7th season of "24" (which is going on right now).

There's More... :: (1 Comments, 1052 words in story)

War on Terror? Torture? Prosecute Us?

by: bobhiggins

Tue Jan 27, 2009 at 13:56

There is an ongoing debate over the closing of America's most notorious detainment/torture center at Guantanamo and the legality and efficacy of using torture to extract "information" from detainees in that and other facilities.

In a piece in this morning's Washington Post titled Torture? Prosecute Us, Too Richard Cohen leads with this:

"The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there." So goes an aphorism that needs to be applied to the current debate over whether those who authorized and used torture should be prosecuted. In the very different country called Sept. 11, 2001, the answer would be a resounding no.

Contrary to what has become the accepted noise, "the world" did not "change" on 9/11. Our laws, our treaties and international agreements as well as our values remained. We did not become a "very different country" on September 12, 2001 despite Mr. Cohen's (and others) claim.

There's More... :: (0 Comments, 1692 words in story)
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox