Appalachia

Analyzing Obama's Weak Spots - Part 3: Appalachia, South Central and the 2010 Midterms

by: Inoljt

Sun Sep 05, 2010 at 21:20

This is the final part of three posts analyzing the congressional  districts President Barack Obama underperformed in. It will focus on the movement in Appalachia and the South Central United States. The previous parts can be found starting here.

The 2010 Midterms

Let's take one last look at those districts in which Mr. Obama did worse than Senator John Kerry:

Photobucket

One sees again, as clear as ever, the diagonal pattern of Republican movement in South Central America and the Appalachians.

These districts differ from the northeastern and Florida-based regions examined in the previous post. Unlike those congressional districts, the districts in South Central and Appalachia vote strongly Republican.

More below.

There's More... :: (0 Comments, 428 words in story)

The Facts Vs. The Earth

by: RevBillyTalen

Tue Jul 13, 2010 at 16:32

We oppose the shopping culture, and so we must deal with the unseeable part of the sale.

With Consumerism the system, there are always levels of secrecy behind the flash.  When Steve Jobs gets up on the stage he is our modern magician, but he conceals a vast sweatshop empire that is kept out of sight - until last month when the 12th suicide this year at one Chinese facility finally stopped his iPad cold.  He was forced to insist that the iPad is not made in sweatshops, and began to define the term absurdly, comparing his factories with California high schools.  OUR FACTORIES ARE NOT SWEATSHOPS, he said, and as weird as his explanation was - his "sweatshop" seemed an objectively defined entity with a panel of experts to absolve him.

"Facts" are Consumerism's best cover-up. A really misleading ad campaign always has, somewhere nearby, its logical apologist:  the Expert.  It's the magician's razzle-dazzle that hides the rabbit under the table.  The facts as processed by corporations have night-vision for our intuition, our common sense, our love of chance and mystery - these old-fashioned practices that leave us purchasing products too slowly, maybe even thoughtfully, maybe not at all.

It is "facts" that tilt and spin and somersault all the way to climate change denial.  We say No!  But we are defenseless if scientific studies are our only defense.  Lobbyists and experts working for CO-2 emitting energy, like Big Coal, insist that the facts are incomplete, more facts are needed.  What?  Something in our indigenous past stirs in us - can this be the time to sit on our hands?  Isn't the Earth speaking directly to us in a language more alive than "facts?"

America has enjoyed for so long what it saw as an obedient Earth. That is, the Earth was made unseeable behind a wall of facts which we manipulate like Steve Jobs' suicide math.  Our "western frontier," our "American freedom" - are spaces curved by facts for our gullible consumption.  Now we are watching the tsunamis and tornadoes and ash clouds and oil spills and rising seas - escaping through the wall of facts.  The Earth is surfacing, the sky and soil touching again.  The Earth is breaking through and taking a deep breath.

Some of us are waiting for a signal that there will be a post-consumption future.  We would like to cooperate with this greater force, the life of the Earth.  We are hearing such a signal from the Appalachian Mountains, the oldest mountains in this hemisphere, some 280 million years old.  About 500 of these mountains have been blown up in the coal-mining process called Mountaintop Removal, or "MTR."

The biggest financier of MTR is currently the Swiss bank UBS, which is a famous practitioner of secrecy and spinning facts.  UBS is the perfect final magician of Consumerism, in a showdown with the oldest mountains. The bank plans to blow up the mountains invisibly.  We won't notice.  The marketers will make MTR a war movie for American's freedom from Arab oil, with experts firing "facts" at the activists.  The Earth, however, has seen Mountaintop Removal.  The Earth sees the whole thing.

Discuss :: (0 Comments)

Analyzing Swing States: Pennsylvania, Part 4

by: Inoljt

Thu Mar 04, 2010 at 14:39

This is the fourth part of an analysis of the swing state Pennsylvania. It focuses on the industrial southwest, a once deep-blue region rapidly trending Republican. Part five can be found here.

Photobucket

Pittsburgh and the Southwest

Pennsylvania's southwest has much in common with West Virginia and Southeast Ohio, the northern end of Appalachia. Electoral change in the region is best understood by grouping these three areas together as a whole.

Socially conservative (the region is famously supportive of the NRA) but economically liberal, the industrial southwest voters typify white working-class Democrats. These voters can be found in unexpected places: Catholics in Rhode Island and Massachusetts, loggers along the Washington coast, rust-belt workers in Duluth, Minnesota and Buffalo, New York.

More below.

There's More... :: (0 Comments, 497 words in story)

2008 Electorate: Appalachia - Surprisingly Democratic

by: dreaminonempty

Thu Nov 12, 2009 at 08:00

What in the heck is wrong with Appalachia?  I keep running into interesting correlations that tells me Appalachia should be giving far less support to Democrats at the presidential level than it actually does.

Here's the example from yesterday:  

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us
Click to enlarge.

If all of Central Appalachia behaved like the rest of the region, we'd expect to see all the points scattered near the line in the graph above.  Instead, the points representing counties in parts of Appalachia go soaring off above 50%.

And Southern Appalachia does its own strange thing too.  More below.

There's More... :: (9 Comments, 2036 words in story)
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox