Augustus Cochrane III

Ignoring the supermajority

by: Paul Rosenberg

Wed Nov 17, 2010 at 12:00

At Campaign for America's Future (CAF), Richard (RJ) Eskow took the CBS poll results about American's issue priorities that I wrote about yesterday and put them into graphic form:

This chart only includes economic issues (health care registers at 14%--more than twice the level of taxes and the deficit combined). As Eskow says:

Only 6% of Americans think Congress should concentrate on reducing the deficit or changing the tax code, according to the latest CBS News poll. Nearly ten times as many people, 56%, want it to focus on creating jobs and fixing the economy. Guess which set of policies is the center of attention in Washington right now?

This is why the Democrats lost the mid-terms.  As HousesofProgress notes in Quick Hits, "POLL: Election was not mandate for GOP (70% - 17%)":

Americans overwhelmingly say that the midterm election results that gave Republicans control of the House represented a rejection of the Democrats and not a mandate for the GOP, according to a CNN/Opinion Research poll conducted Nov. 11-14. (Story; Poll data). Seventy percent of those surveyed said the results were a rejection of Democratic rule in the House while 17 percent called it a mandate for Republicans. Eight percent answered "neither" and 5 percent had no opinion.

The Democrats lost because they didn't address the people's number one concern.  How hard is that to understand?  Of course, they did address it sporadically and inadequately--which only makes matters worse, actually.  It shows that Democrats know the problem exists, they just don't care enough to actually take it seriously.  For all the GOP lies about Democrats "not sharing your values", this truth is far more devastating.

Also at CAF, Dave Johnson, who guests here occassionally picked up on the poll and Eskow's post, ("The DC/Rest-Of-Us Divide And Its Consequences"):

Only 6% of the public is concerned about the deficit. The only thing Washington elites are concerned about is the deficit. The rest of us live on the other side of the planet from the people in DC who make the policies. Maybe the other side of the solar system.

You can see how this divide affects policy. There is a "deficit commission" but no jobs commission. There are millions of people needing jobs and millions of jobs that need doing, but Washington won't "spend," even on badly-needed infrastructure investment. People over 50 (laid off because they were paid more or their health care was expensive) can't find jobs but the DC elite discuss raising the retirement age to 70. The deficit commission proposes cutting back the already-meager "safety net" while cutting tax rates for the really rich even more.

And while all of this goes on the rest of the people in the country are worried about jobs, foreclosures, bills, jobs, wages, jobs, and jobs - the things that matter to regular people. And they are feeling the consequences of the DC/rest-of-us divide.

In 2008, we expected the Democrats to recognize the obvious, side with the vast majority of the American people, and thereby cement long-term majority support.  It was no-brainer.  Unfortunately, the Democrats showed us they have no brains.

There is, of course, an explanation for this: the elite dominance of American politics, as described and explained, for example, by Thomas Ferguson's investment theory of political parties.  In fact, the complete ignoring of the people's overwhelming #1 priority is about the most striking bit of evidence one could ask for proving such elite dominance.  The question is, however, why that elite dominance has turned so short-sighted and self-destructive.

There's More... :: (21 Comments, 972 words in story)

Glenn Greenwald And Jay Rosen On Bill Moyers Journal

by: Paul Rosenberg

Sun Feb 08, 2009 at 16:57

Friday, on Bill Moyers Journal there were a couple of remarkable segments (transcript here).  I doubt I'll have time to discuss the segment with Eric Foner, one of America's top historians, but it was really excellent, a sharp contrast to the almost endless mindless blather one routinely hears about Abraham Lincoln.  Foner comes at Lincoln as an historian who's written extensively about much more ordinary people of that time, and so he carries a perspective that much more in tune with how the blogosphere sees power today.  But I want to focus on the other segment, Glenn Greenwald and Jay Rosen.

What was so good about the segment was not the content per se, which most of us are generally familiar with, but they way they were able to convey it in the tv medium, in a very distilled, but not dumbed-down manner.  And I'd like to use that distilled presentation to link what they were saying to a couple of excellent books from the 1990s that can further illuminate the historical background of what we're living through and fighting against.

They began with a discussion of the Daschle affair....

There's More... :: (36 Comments, 2157 words in story)
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox