Blue Dog

Weekly Pulse: What Do GOP Gains Mean for Health Care? Abortion Rights?

by: The Media Consortium

Wed Nov 03, 2010 at 12:53

by Lindsay Beyerstein, Media Consortium blogger

The Republicans gained ground in last night's midterm elections, recapturing the House and gaining seats in the Senate. The future House Majority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) wasted no time in affirming that the GOP will try to repeal health care reform.

A full-scale repeal is unlikely in the next two years because the Democrats have retained control of the White House and the Senate. However, Republicans are already making noises about shutting down the government to force the issue. The House controls the nation's purse strings, which confers significant leverage if the majority is willing to bring the government to a screeching halt to make a point.

Don't assume they'll blink. The GOP shut down government in 1995, albeit to its own political detriment. Rep. Steve King (R-IA) and his allies have sworn a "blood oath" to shut down the government, regardless of the consequences. The Republicans may actually succeed in modifying minor aspects of the Affordable Care Act, such as the controversial 1099 reporting requirement for small business.

The most significant threat to the implementation of health care reform may be at the state level.  Republicans picked up several governorships, and the Affordable Care Act requires the cooperation of states to set up their own insurance exchanges. Hostile governors could seriously impede things.

Mixed results for radical, anti-choice senate candidates

As a group, the eight ultra-radical, anti-choice Republican Senate candidates had mixed results last night. Three wins, two sure losses, and three likely losses that haven't been definitively called. Voters didn't seem thrilled about electing senators who oppose a woman's right to abortion, even in cases of rape and incest.

Two cruised to victory: Rand Paul easily defeated Democrat Jack Conway in Kentucky.  Paul is one of the most extreme the of a radical cohort. As Amie Newman reported in RH Reality Check, Paul doesn't even believe in a woman's right to abort to save her own life. In Florida, anti-choice standard bearer Marco Rubio defeated Independent Charlie Christ.

Another radical anti-choicer, Pat Toomey, who favors jailing abortion providers, narrowly edged out Joe Sestak in Pennsylvania.

Two were soundly defeated. Evangelical code-talker Sharron Angle lost to Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV), and anti-masturbation crusader Christine O'Donnell lost to Chris Coons in Delaware.

The last three radical anti-choice senate candidates were down, but not, out as of this morning. Democrat Sen. Michael Bennett leads Republican Ken Buck by just 15,000 votes out of over 1.5 million ballots cast, according to TPMDC. Planned Parenthood launched an 11th hour offensive against Buck because of his retrograde stances on abortion, sexual assault, and other women's issues, as Joseph Boven reports for the Colorado Independent.

This morning, Tea Party Republican Joe Miller was trailing behind incumbent Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), who challenged him as an Independent, but no winner had been declared. In Washington State, Democrat Sen. Patti Murray maintains a 1% lead over radical anti-choicer Republican Dino Rossi.

Are fertilized eggs people in Colorado?

Coloradans won a decisive victory for reproductive rights last night. Fertilized eggs are still not people in Colorado, as Jodi Jacobson reports for RH Reality Check.

Amendment 62, which would have conferred full person status from the  moment of conception, thereby outlawing abortion and in vitro  fertilization. It also called into question the legality of many forms of  birth control, including an array of medical procedures for pregnant  women that might harm their fetuses. The proposed amendment was  resoundingly defeated: 72% against to 28% in favor. This is the second  time Colorado voters have rejected an egg-as-person amendment.

Blue Dogs and anti-choice Dems feel the pain

Last night was brutal for corporatist Democrats who fought the more progressive options for health care reform and Democrats who put their anti-choice ideology ahead passing health care. In AlterNet, Sarah Seltzer reports only 12 of the 34 Democrats who voted against health care reform hung on to their seats. The Blue Dog caucus was halved overnight from 56 to 24. Nick Baumann of Mother Jones speculated that the midterms would mark the end of the Stupak bloc, the coalition of anti-choice Democrats whose last-minute brinksmanship could have derailed health care reform.

Did foot-dragging on health care hurt Democrats?

Jamelle Bouie suggests at TAPPED that Democrats shot themselves in the foot by passing a health care reform bill that won't provide tangible benefits to most people for years. The exchanges that are supposed to provide affordable insurance for millions of Americans won't be up and running until 2014.

In Summer 2009, Former DNC chair Howard Dean predicted that the Democrats would be penalized at the polls if they failed to deliver tangible benefits from health care reform before the midterm elections. That's why Dean suggested expanding the public health insurance programs we already have, rather than creating insurance exchanges from scratch.

Sink, sunk by Scott

Andy Kroll of Mother Jones profiles Rick Scott, the billionaire health clinic mogul, corporate fraudster, and enemy of health care reform who spent over $50 million of his own money to eke out a very narrow victory over Democrat Alex Sink in the Florida governor's race.

Apparently, many Floridians were willing to overlook the fact that Scott had to pay a $1.7 billion fine for defrauding Medicare, the largest fine of its kind in history. Scott also spent $5 million of his own money to found Conservatives for Patients' Rights, one of the leading independent groups opposing health care reform.

Pot isn't legalized in California

California defeated Proposition 19, which would have legalized marijuana for personal use. David Borden of DRCnet, a pro-legalization group, writes in AlterNet that the fight over Prop 19 brought legalization into the political mainstream, even if the measure didn't prevail at the polls. The initiative won the backing of the California NAACP, SEIU California, the National Black Police Association, and the National Latino Officers Association and other established groups.

So, what's next for health care reform? The question everyone is asking is whether John Boehner will cave to the extremists in his own party and attempt a full-scale government shutdown, or whether the Republicans will content themselves with extracting piecemeal modifications of the health care law.

This post features links to the best independent, progressive   reporting about health care by members of The Media Consortium.  It  is free to reprint. Visit the Pulse for  a complete list of articles on health care reform, or follow us on  Twitter. And for the best   progressive reporting on critical economy, environment, health care  and  immigration issues, check out The Audit,  The Mulch,   and The Diaspora. This is a project of The Media Consortium, a network of  leading independent media outlets.

Discuss :: (0 Comments)

Blue Dog Slams Progressives in NH -- Fight Back!

by: AdamGreen

Fri Sep 10, 2010 at 12:00

Meet Katrina Swett. That’s her on the right. Why are we talking about her?

Well, the Democratic primary for New Hampshire’s open congressional seat is just 4 days away, and it’s neck-and-neck.

The Progressive Change Campaign Committee has endorsed bold progressive candidate Ann McLane Kuster, who is running against Joe Lieberman’s presidential co-chair Katrina Swett. Kuster and Swett met in a big debate Wednesday night, and Swett attacked Kuster for being the "very progressive candidate," saying, "The country is moving away from the more left, progressive point of view."

Seriously? Attacking a Democrat for being progressive in a Democratic primary? Swett’s attack is all you need to know about the type of Blue Dog she’ll be in Congress.

The primary's in 4 days. Can you donate $3 to Ann Kuster’s campaign so she can get her message to voters and defeat Swett in 4 days? Click here to donate.

Ann Kuster is the real deal...

There's More... :: (6 Comments, 193 words in story)

Feeling bored? Helpless? Excited? Energetic, perhaps? Then you should help Marcy Winograd!

by: rossl

Thu Feb 18, 2010 at 15:11

So I was sitting around my house today, putting off doing my Latin homework, when it hit me - instead of just opening the fridge a dozen times and checking my facebook a hundred times, I could be putting this time to good use!  And I did.  I started doing some online phonebanking for Marcy Winograd's campaign for Congress in California's 36th district.

If you're bored, feeling helpless and alone amidst a sea of political currents fighting against you, excited about the upcoming primaries and election, overcome with energy you need to spend on something, or feeling any other emotion, this is for you!  Marcy has been a member of the Netroots for years and is a firebrand progressive.  Since she's running against a corrupt Blue Dog (Jane Harman), this is one of the best races in the country for progressives to get involved in.

I live in Pennsylvania, yet I'm still able to help Marcy's campaign, because of a neat online phonebanking tool that has been set up.  Follow me below the fold to learn how you can help, too.

There's More... :: (0 Comments, 370 words in story)

Shaming Blue Dog Mike Ross (And You Can Help)

by: AdamGreen

Sun Sep 20, 2009 at 21:13

Change Congress founder Lawrence Lessig -- with whom I work on campaign finance reform issues -- announced a new TV ad on Friday shaming "Blue Dog" leader Mike Ross on the public option.

In the ad, Keith Olbermann calls out Ross for his special-interest contributions -- and then recent poll numbers show that Ross is siding with those interests against his own constituents.

It's caused quite the buzz. Within hours, it was covered by NBC, ABC, Politico, Huffington Post, The Young Turks, Roll Call...and Rachel Maddow.

You can chip in here to keep this ad on TV in Arkansas -- holding Mike Ross accountable back home.

In addition to calling out Ross on the public option, this ad gets to the root of the problem: our corrupt campaign finance system, calling for Mike Ross to support fundamental reform.

Lessig's announcement of the ad -- and Rachel Maddow's clip -- are below the fold.

There's More... :: (5 Comments, 223 words in story)

(VIDEO) Congresswoman Donna Edwards Speaks Out at Progressive Caucus Press Conference

by: Rusty5329

Thu Jul 30, 2009 at 20:41

Originally posted at Sum of Change

A special thanks goes out to shevas01 for giving us the heads up about this press conference.

On Thursday, July 30th, the Progressive Caucus held a press conference to draw a line in the sand when it comes to the inclusion of a strong public option in the health care bill.

There's More... :: (0 Comments, 318 words in story)

Change Congress joining with a Blue Dog?

by: bluethunder

Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 17:15

Yes it is true. From the press release email...

Last week we launched Change-Congress.org. After that event, I made my first call on a Member of Congress, to ask him to join. I knew he was a supporter of at least some of our ideas. I had come to many of my own ideas about how Congress needs to change after long conversations with him.

I am very proud to announce today that Congressman Jim Cooper (TN-5) (Dem) has become the first Member to join the Change Congress movement. (He supports planks 2, 3, and 4). Congressman Cooper is a "blue dog" Democrat.
http://campaign-archive.com/ar...

I am not sure how I feel about this. More below the jump.  

There's More... :: (21 Comments, 482 words in story)

Democrats (Bush) Dogging MoveOn

by: bluethunder

Thu Sep 20, 2007 at 19:50

So I feel like the Dems fell for a distinctly Karl-Rovian tactic today. Rove is well known for his divide and conquer tactics using controversial wedge issues to chip away at the Democratic base while whipping the Republican base into a froth.

I think that is what the MoveOn resolution was about.

Not only did it help the Republicans shift the debate for a day or two off their failed policy, but right now the Democratic base, or at least the progressive base is furious with the Dems for voting against MoveOn and free speech.

So now the question I am torn between is this: do we add a new category to the BushDogs and start watching those Dems very closely who voted against MoveOn and free speech (and possibly fall into the Rovian trap of splitting even further from them), do we let it slide, or what do we do?

I for one think those Dems who voted against MoveOn and free speech need to never hear the end of our anger over this. But I also fear falling into the Rovian trap of abandoning them come election time.


I think MoveOn and the netroots should launch a campaign to unseat the author of the anti-MoveOn bill: Cornyn http://cornyn.senate...
Below is a complete breakdown of the votes as linked here....
http://www.senate.go...

Discuss :: (0 Comments)

Blue Dog Fraud?

by: FreedomDemocrat

Tue Aug 28, 2007 at 14:13

There is overlap between the Bush Dogs and Blue Dogs, but also some examples of outstanding Blue Dogs like Patrick Murphy of Pennsylvania.  Most Blue Dogs claim that the group focuses on fiscal responsibility, controlling spending, and balancing budgets.  But the Wall Street Journal argues otherwise.
There's More... :: (0 Comments, 532 words in story)

Iraq, Budgets and Progressivism

by: BillFoster4Congress

Tue Aug 21, 2007 at 12:05

( - promoted by Chris Bowers)

The Right to Respond in this case relates to a post I made on Saturday evening about the IL-14 primary, IL-14: Differentiating Between Blue Dogs and Bush Dogs. In that post, I openly wondered if Bill Foster was positioning himself to become a Bush Dog by announcing his planned affiliation with the Blue Dogs. This is the campaign's response. Judge for yourself if you feel it is adequate--Chris

First, thanks to Chris for the opportunity to tell folks here at OL a little more about myself and about this campaign and to answer some of the concerns raised.

On the campaign trail, I tell voters most often about my background as a scientist and businessman, but I realize that probably doesn't signal as much about my politics and values as some folks in the netroots would appreciate, so before I talk issues, let me talk about my family.

My mom and dad met on Capitol Hill while my mom was working for Senator Paul Douglas of Illinois and my dad was working for Senator Myers of Pennsylvania.  Mom came from a family of inventors and dad was a chemist before taking up what would be one of his many achievements: his work on the civil rights movement.

More in the extended entry.

There's More... :: (3 Comments, 730 words in story)

DCCC Chair Van Hollen Whines About Bush Dog Campaign

by: Matt Stoller

Thu Aug 16, 2007 at 09:10

Well the idea for going after the Bush Dogs has gotten a bit of pickup in local press, even though we haven't yet gone forward with it.  Here's DCCC Chair Chris Van Hollen.

"Would you put a bit of money and effort to go after these wayward Democrats?" writes blogger Matt Stoller on Open Left. "We can't replace all of them with progressive Democrats, but we can certainly annoy at least a few of them and raise the costs for voting against the Constitution."

That would be liking shooting themselves in the foot, U.S. Rep. Chris Van Hollen, chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, told us recently when asked about such groups upset with lawmakers like Carney.

That's ridiculous.  Just look at these numbers.

Meanwhile, Congress wins just 18% positive approval from Democrats, while 80% of Dems give them negative marks for their performance so far. Republicans watching the performance of the Democratic-controlled Congress are more harsh - just 12% give it good marks, while 86% said they are doing only a "fair" or "poor" job in Washington. Political independents appear to agree with Republicans on this count - just 16% give Congress positive marks, while the balance give it a negative rating.

The public is mad at Democrats for caving to Bush.  Check out these numbers from the approve/disapprove on whether Bush should have the power to wiretap the phone calls and emails of Americans without a search warrant from a judge.  60% of all voters, 77% of Democrats, 66% of Indepedents, and 36% of Republicans strongly disapproval, with another 12% overall giving a softer disapproval.  Those are nearly Terri Schiavo numbers type numbers.

We wouldn't have to do this if Van Hollen, Hoyer, and Rahm could actually impose discipline on the Bush Dog Democrats they just got elected.  Instead, it's pretty obvious that Pelosi has very little control over the House, and had to schedule a vote on FISA or she would face an open revolt.  Worse yet, it's also obvious that Van Hollen doesn't care.  He doesn't recognize we're trying to help him do a better job and work against the alienation most voters feel.  I was pretty explicit that we are not going to try to primary these people, that's up to local Democrats.  We are just offering criticism and a bit of political pressure for voting to shred the Constitution, which, incidentally, is probably a very stupid political move for the Democrats as a whole.

It's a good thing that Van Hollen is getting asked about this by the press.  Next time there's a close vote, he'll have a stronger incentive to whip Bush Dogs more effectively.

More and better Democrats.

Discuss :: (25 Comments)
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox