James Dobson

Republican Gommorrah: Max Blumenthal & The GOP's Heart of Darkness

by: Paul Rosenberg

Sun Sep 06, 2009 at 16:30

On Friday, Max Blumenthal was on Democracy Now! to talk about his new book, Republican Gomorrah: Inside the Movement that Shattered the Party.  I haven't seen a copy, much less read his book, but at first listen, it sounds like he has done an excellent job of hitting the bulls-eye of target that others--in books that were already excellent in their own rights--have only clipped before, without quite realizing that the bull's-eye even existed.

This passage from the publisher's description (link above) describes that bull's-eye:

more that just an expose, Republican Gomorrah shows that many of the movement's leading figures have more in common than just the power they command within conservative ranks. Their personal lives have been stained by crisis and scandal: depression, mental illness, extra-marital affairs, struggles with homosexual urges, heavy medication, addiction to pornography, serial domestic abuse, and even murder. Inspired by the work of psychologists Erich Fromm, who asserted that the fear of freedom propels anxiety-ridden people into authoritarian settings, Blumenthal explains in a compelling narrative how a culture of personal crisis has defined the radical right, transforming the nature of the Republican Party for the next generation and setting the stage for the future of American politics.

Numerous other writers have noted how frequently religious right figures get into trouble with sex scandals.  I mean, you've got to work pretty damn hard not to notice it.  And in Great American Hypocrites, Glenn Greenwald went one step further, describing how conservative political heroes, not specifically religious figures, have repeatedly turned out to be the polar opposite of the images of the rectitude that they project, but here, Blumenthal is examining this phenomena not simply as hypocrisy on a grand scale, or a grand deception, but as the inexorable workings of natural laws, taking Fromm's insights and applying them systematically to a history that has been staring us in the face now for decades.

What's more, when Blumenthal includes James Dobson in this pattern, he (perhaps inadvertently) outflanks George Lakoff as well.  In Moral Politics, Lakoff discussed Dobson's work in Dare To Discipline as exemplifying what he called the "Strict Father" model of childrearing on which American conservatism is based.  However, in retrospect Blumenthal's approach reveals how Lakoff seemingly downplayed the more disturbing implications of what he had uncovered.

Some excerpts from the interview, and further explanation of what I mean on the flip.

There's More... :: (17 Comments, 3908 words in story)

Dobson Caves to Evangelicals Who Call Glenn Beck a Cultist

by: Chino Blanco

Fri Dec 26, 2008 at 06:39

x-posted from Stop The Mormons

Admittedly, I got busy with the holidays and fell behind in my reading at some of my favorite websites.  I figured I could bookmark, spend a couple days getting reacquainted with the wife and kids, and then catch up later.  

Later was apparently too late:

No longer available?  Now that's disappointing.

What happened?  

There's More... :: (0 Comments, 963 words in story)

Colorado's Personhood Amendment

by: David Kowalski

Sat May 31, 2008 at 16:24

The people of Colorado will be voting on an amendment to the state's constitution on November 4 that could radically alter the nature of abortion and even in vitro fertilization within the state.  Amendment 48 would change the definition of "person" to include "any human being   from the moment of fertilization."  The new definition would apply to three different sections of the state constitution covering the right to due process and the right to sue.  

The Denver Post reports that the amendment has 103,000 valid signatures, well more than enough to make it on the ballot.  The proposed amendment has already been cleared of a court challenge that it was invalid because it covered more than one subject.  Not so, said the jurists.  It also has the support of Colorado Springs based Focus on the Family, the Catholic Church and appears to be the new issue du jour for the right wingers.

Wording on the Amendment is quite interesting.  The new definition is not, well definitive.  A person would include what the article referred to as the "pre-born" but would not be restricted to that definition.  Thus the eminently non-human corporate persons would retain their right to sue and be sued.  

There's More... :: (0 Comments, 313 words in story)

Storm Clouds for Giuliani in Missouri

by: clarkent

Fri Oct 05, 2007 at 11:55

Crossposted from Show Me Progress

Right now, Rudy Giuliani is riding high in the saddle. He leads the Republican field in national polling, he just raised the most cash of any Republican in the third quarter (he was just in Clayton, MO for a $1,000/plate shindig), and he does best among his rivals in head-to-head matchups with Democratic candidates. But all is not well in Rudyland.

For starters, Christian conservatives on a national level are threatening to split with the Republican Party if the GOP nominates a candidate insufficiently committed to "family values." Focus on the Family head James Dobson explicitly stated this in a New York Times op-ed piece:

Reports have surfaced in the press about a meeting that occurred last Saturday in Salt Lake City involving more than 50 pro-family leaders. The purpose of the gathering was to discuss our response if both the Democratic and Republican Parties nominate standard-bearers who are supportive of abortion[...]After two hours of deliberation, we voted on a resolution that can be summarized as follows: If neither of the two major political parties nominates an individual who pledges himself or herself to the sanctity of human life, we will join others in voting for a minor-party candidate. Those agreeing with the proposition were invited to stand. The result was almost unanimous. [emphasis mine]

Dobson also rejected electability arguments for candidates like Rudy:

The other approach, which I find problematic, is to choose a candidate according to the likelihood of electoral success or failure. Polls don't measure right and wrong; voting according to the possibility of winning or losing can lead directly to the compromise of one's principles.

On a local level, St. Louis' Archbishop Raymond Burke is reprising his role from 2004. Instead of pointing his finger at the Democrats, this time he's aiming at Giuliani. Asked whether he would deny Communion to Giuliani if the former NY mayor attended Mass in the Basilica, Burke replied, "If the question is about a Catholic who is publicly espousing positions contrary to the moral law and I know that person knows it, yes I would." (DHinMI has a fascinating look at this topic on Daily Kos.)
 

So what does all of this mean for Missouri?

There's More... :: (0 Comments, 283 words in story)
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox